© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho. © 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7, 2013 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Copyright © 2011 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 20 Supervising and Evaluating the Work of Others.
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Eli Collins-Brown, Ed.D. Illinois State University July 12, 2006 Aspects of Online Courses That Are More Effective and Successful than Traditional, Face-to-Face.
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Learner-Centered Education Course Redesign Initiative Builds upon work of prior LCE grants Will award grants of $40,000 - $50,000, with the option.
1 The Promotion and Tenure Process Managing the Academic Career for Faculty Women at Undergraduate Computer Science and Engineering Institutions CRA-W.
Supplemental Instruction in Precalculus
Promotion and Tenure Workshop 1. Evaluation Procedure There is only one evaluation procedure leading to recommendations regarding promotion, tenure and.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Dual Credit Policy/Procedures and Data Regional Planning Team Training November 8,
Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.
Integrating Library Resources into the Course Development Process at an Online College ©2009 The Sheridan Libraries of The Johns Hopkins University Inspiration,
Outcomes Assessment- Full Implementation Meeting Fall 2009.
1 FORMULATING PRIORITY & SENIORITY LISTS Los Angeles Southwest College July 2008.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Student Focus Groups UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY 1 Formative Evaluation Using Student Focus Groups Heidi M. Anderson, Ph.D. University of.
The Educational Assistant Classroom Partner
STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOCUSING ON TEAM BUILDING & CONFLICT MANAGEMENT Teresa E. Simpson EDLD: 5345 Human Resource Development – Fall 2008.
Student Learning Outcomes at PCC Adapted from a presentation to the PCC Board of Trustees in 2007.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Student Development The Gateway to … Opportunity Accomplishment Financial Solution Student Success Achievement Student Life.
Proposal for the Process of Faculty Selection to Committees in the School of Undergraduate Studies History As the School of Undergraduate Studies (UGS)
Department of Computer Science Faculty of Science Research Methods Supervision.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
RCR Needs Assessment Survey 02/04/2011. Core areas of RCR Data Management Mentor / Trainee Relationships Publication Practices & Responsible Authorship.
NACEP Accreditation: Advancing Quality College Courses in High School and Improving Credit Transfer Kent Scheffel, President-Elect National Alliance of.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Structured Learning Assistance (SLA) and Training for Success Jim Valkenburg Delta College.
Stephanie Dumont, Counseling Golden West College Academic Senate for California Community Colleges, Academic Academy, March 13-14, 2015 The Coming Together.
Peer-Led Team Learning: A Model for Enhancing Student Learning Claire Berardini & Glenn Miller Third Annual Faculty Institute Pace University.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
Faculty Peer Mentoring Program UCCA PRESENTATION.
Online Course Observation. Objectives: 1.Articulate the steps of an online faculty observation 2.Explain the elements of the GRCC Online Course Observation.
Design and Development Awards Spring 2015 TLOS Networked Learning Design and Strategies (NLDS)
TBA Compliance Training Long Beach City College Developed & Presented by Bob Rapoza LBCCD Internal Audit Manager TBA Compliance Training Long Beach City.
Building an Online MSW Program from the Ground Up Mary Ann Forgey Cathy Berkman.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Teaching College Geology in High School: The Concurrent Challenges and Opportunities of Dual Credit Programs to Departments of Geology Carl N. Drummond.
1 Intro to Dual Credit Programs: Policy and Program Requirements, 2013 May 2013.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Stages of Commitment to Change: Leading Institutional Engagement Lorilee R. Sandmann, University of Georgia Jeri Childers, Virginia Tech National Outreach.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
THE TEACHING & LEARNING CENTER- AN OVERVIEW MOHAMMED EL-AFFENDI AUGUST 2014.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Formative Peer Review at Ocean County College. Guiding Principle “Ideally, the peer review of teaching is a critically reflective and collaborative process.
Lighthouse Junior Our School Metaphor. Governance Curriculum Climate Staffing WE WILL EXAMINE THE FOLLOWING TOPICS:
Ad hoc Committee on Faculty Bylaws Todd Ellis Michelle Hendley Jimmy Johnston Michael Koch Eileen McClafferty John Relethford Renee B. Walker (Chair)
Overview of a Recommended Course Development Process.
Peer Evaluation and the College of Business Effective 3/15/93.
New Employee Induction Program
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
Keeping your Senate Involved, Engaged and On Course Grant Goold Professor & Chair, Emergency Medical Services, American River College Area A, Academic.
Colorado Community Colleges Online
Workload Fulfillment Term Faculty Appointments Patricia Linton
Curriculum and Emotions – Solving Problems and Managing Conflict
June 5, 2017 General Track Meeting.
Curriculum and Accreditation
Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System
Annie Bélanger September 2016
Committee Purpose Roles COR Standards Curriculum Review Process
Online Curricula Where are we? Where might we go?
Training for Faculty Reviewers
Accreditation and curriculum
Faculty Serving on Visiting Teams
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
New Faculty Orientation Non-tenure-track Faculty Appointments
Presentation transcript:

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7,

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho TWO REASONS FOR THIS TRAINING 1: To help Course Leads understand their important roles 2: To explain how you will have the time to fulfill this responsibility 3

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Course Lead Policy 4

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Faculty Guide Course Leads In an effort to keep all modes of delivery aligned and continually improving, department chairs assign course leads for multi-section courses (typically four or more sections). As needed, department chairs ensure that a portion of the course leads load is designated for significant course redevelopment or modification, to allow for class observations, for communicating with other instructors of that course, and to participate in Course Councils. This load allocation may be from 0 to 3 hours per semester. It is anticipated that the amount of load would be reassessed each semester and that it might decrease over time. In situations where many sections of a course exist (such as Foundations courses), a department chair may consult with his or her college dean and the associate academic vice president for instruction about the possibility of appointing an assistant course lead, as well. 5

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Relative Roles and Responsibilities: A Collaborative Approach to Learning Online Campus Faculty Department chairs and faculty are the chief stewards of content. Among other things, they do the following: Help decide which courses get created online. Collaborate with the online team in creating great courses, helping improve them over time, and keep them synchronized with whats being taught on campus. They do this through councils that include online instructors and curriculum designers. Council members listen to each others ideas with open minds and debate proposals respectfully and rigorously. On matters of content such as deciding on the critical learning outcomes for the course, faculty members have the final say. In other words, no substantive changes to the content of a course should ever be made without approval of the responsible on-campus faculty. (The person who plays this role is called the Course Lead.) Screen online instructor applicants to make sure they have sufficient expertise and appropriate credentials to teach courses in the discipline. No online instructor should ever be hired without a department chair or Foundations team lead approving their hire. Help provide, as needed, content and discipline-specific training to online instructors. Provide critical input to the online team if any content-related concerns arise about an instructors performance. Look for opportunities to reach out to online instructors in their discipline or course and invite them to participate, where possible, in content-specific discussions and training, without undermining instructors reporting relationship to the online team. 6

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Course Lead Responsibilities 7 Content Expert for the Course(s) Chair of Course Council Assist other Instructors of the Course(s) Course Development Familiar with all Modes of Delivery Report to Dept. Chair

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Establish and maintain integrated outcomes and assessments for all delivery modes (Learning activities may differ according to the environment, i.e. Face to Face [F2F], Online, Blended [BL], or Competency-based course [CBC], but must lead to the same outcomes and similar assessments) Develop new Online, BL, or CBCs, as needed Works collaboratively with full-time faculty who teach the course to: 8 Content Expert for the Course(s)

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Chair of Course Council Course Lead Online Course Representative (Other individuals may be invited to attend as needed) Course Council composed of: Discuss course modification Implement changes in all modes of delivery Course Council communicates once/semester (or as needed) 9

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Assist Other Instructors of the Course(s) Includes adjunct and Evening School faculty Observes F2F classes once/semester Occasionally view online instruction to understand content-related elements in this environment, and offer suggestions to the Online Course Representative about an instructors performance in content-related concerns. In consultation with OCR Communicate vision, give encouragement, and answer questions Could be in conjunction with class observation Meet w/F2F Instructors and OCR 10

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Appointed by Online Instruction and granted a 10 hr. contract each semester Sits on the Course Council as the online representative for the online course they teach Evaluate aspects of the online course against established criteria Gather curriculum improvement suggestions from peer online instructors. Responsibilities: 11 Online Course Representative Responsibilities

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Course Development Under Department Chair direction Ensure all modes of delivery have same learning outcomes, assessments, and learning activities-adapted to specific modes of delivery Take lead in representing on- campus faculty in development of new and/or existing courses 12

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Familiar With All Modes of Delivery Get a feel for that mode of delivery Once/year As part of load May opt to teach an online and/or BL course If used, oversee CBC modes 13

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Report to Department Chair 14 Report once/semester on status of course(s) under his/her supervision Assigned by the Dept. Chair Varies, but will typically be 1 hr./ semester (approx. 45 hrs.) Load Assignment

© 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho Resources Process Instructions Templates and Forms Design and Development Assistance 15