995 South Fair Oaks Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning & Community Development Department East Green Street Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting November 4, 2013.
Advertisements

Planning & Community Development Department Update on Mansionization and Neighborhood Compatibility Study City Council January 26, 2015.
Vineland Commercial Site Address: 7626 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N ) 7634 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N ) 7630 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N )
El Cajon Courtyard Excel Hotel Group July 1, 2014.
Planning & Community Development Department 55 Fillmore Street Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 15, 2014.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
Planning & Community Development Department Villa Esperanza Services Master Plan September 29, 2014 City Council.
Planning & Community Development Department South Fair Oaks Avenue “Shriners Hospitals For Children” Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting.
PALM COAST COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CENTER – PHASE Application No. SP-MAJ
Planning & Community Development Department Predevelopment Plan Review for Art Center College of Design Master Plan City Council June 8, 2015.
City Council 2642 Second Street Appeal of Landmarks Commission Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness 07CA-009 February 12, 2008.
HRB Meeting June 9, 2015 City Council Remand of AP 14-02/ZC
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Draft Zoning Code Residential Focus Neighborhood Meeting May 8, 2007.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
Planning & Community Development Department Hillsides Residential Care and Educational Center Master Plan City Council July 20, 2015.
JUNE 19, 2012 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , April 5, 2012 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: TONY RAHBANY.
Planning & Community Development Department 277 North El Molino Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting May 5, 2014.
Planning Department Zoning Code Amendment: Change Hearing Body from Hearing Officer to Planning Commission for Major Projects over 75,000 square feet City.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
Subcommittee on Heights, Massing, and Alternate Standards    Third Report – January 20, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission.
Planning & Community Development Department 1336 and 1347 East Colorado Blvd. Pre Development Plan Review City Council Meeting January 28, 2013.
Planning & Community Development Department 2362 East Washington Boulevard “St. Luke Medical Center” Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting December.
Planning & Community Development Department Conditional Use Permit #5029 and Other Land Use Entitlements: Final Environmental Impact Report and Statement.
Community Development Department APPLICATION #2457 GRAND HAVEN PUD AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2411 GRAND HAVEN NORTH: SMALL SCALE FLUM AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment Public Hearing Proposed elimination of the 50% review step from the design review process.
1 Public Planning Meeting Date: June 24, 2015 Application: Draft Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applicant: Highland Gate.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments December 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments October 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Planning & Community Development Department Consideration of a Call for Review Minor Conditional Use Permit #6003 (1528 Whitefield Road) City Council Meeting.
Planning & Community Development Department Board of Zoning Appeals: Hillside Development Permit # Hillcrest Place City Council March 14, 2016.
Prepared by: Alex Fisch Planning Services Division.
NORTH 40 SPECIFIC PLAN Advisory Committee Meeting #6 November 3, 2011.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Historic Landmarks Commission Type II Appeal of Approval LU HDZ –
Planning & Community Development Department 3202 East Foothill Boulevard (Mixed Use Project – Space Bank) City Council May 16, 2016 Predevelopment Plan.
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment: Neighborhood District Overlay Zone City Council April 25, 2016.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission LU DZ Glisan Commons May 17, 2012.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Review Hearing LU DZM AD – Grant.
Planning & Community Development Department 180 South Euclid Avenue Demolition of Existing Structure Consolidated Design Review (Appeal) City Council June.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Design Commission Land Use Review LU DZ Arthouse.
JUNE 18, 2013 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , MAY 2, 2013 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: JAIGOPAUL BISNAUTH.
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
July 4, 2017 AURORA UNITED CHURCH + SOUTHBOUND DEVELOPMENT LTD Yonge Street, 55&57/57A Temperance Street, 12&16 Tyler Street General Committee Meeting.
Zoning Code Amendment: Neighborhood District Overlay Zone
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
City Council Meeting July 17, 2017
253 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review
DISCUSSION OF THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE YWCA BUILDING 78 N
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
CFT Gateway Center ( E. Foothill Blvd
General Plan Adoption Follow-up
Residential Building Height Standards
City Council September 18, 2017
Agenda 15th and Race Project Summary Current Requests
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
83 North Lake Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review
Appeal: Time Extension for Variance # East Walnut Street
City Council Meeting February 26, 2018
Hotel Conversions Background
City Council Meeting July 23, 2018
City Council Meeting April 23, 2018
City Council Meeting September 17, 2018
254 East Union Street Pre Development Plan Review
Establish New Park Space in the Central District & Appropriate Funds to Acquire a Portion of an Existing Parking Lot for Conversion to Park Space March.
City Council Meeting April 29, 2019
115-Unit Mixed-Use Project (711 E
Presentation transcript:

995 South Fair Oaks Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting July 23, 2018 Good evening, honorable Mayor Tornek and Councilmembers. The following presentation summarizes key aspects of the Predevelopment Plan Review application for a residential care facitlity at 995 South Fair Oaks Avenue. The Predevelopment Plan Review process was established to achieve better projects through early consultation between City staff and applicants. The plans are routed to all City Departments for review and comments. Through this process, staff identifies issues that may arise during the application process. A summary of comments regarding this application was presented to the applicant in June 2018.

Predevelopment Plan Review Projects of Communitywide Significance: Projects greater than 50,000 square feet in size with at least one discretionary action Projects with 50 or more housing units Proposed project is a four-story, Residential Care project with 90 senior units in 60,000 square feet of floor area Informational Only – No Action Required PPR Projects of Communitywide Significance are presented to the City Council as an informational item. Projects of communitywide significance include…. The subject project meets this threshold. The applicant is proposing a…. This item is informational only. No action is required.

Discretionary Actions Needed Modification to Conditional Use Permit #4577 Under the current code, the land use is permitted by right but a modification to the Phase 2 CUP (#4577) will be required to allow for the integration of Phase 3 Variance: Height Application for 55 feet instead of 45 feet to match existing buildings. Although the proposed project would match the height of the existing buildings, the findings required for a Variance will have to be met. Subdivision Consolidation of the two parcels through a Certificate of Exception (lot line adjustment) or Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) application There are physical connections between the new building and the existing buildings (above grade pedestrian connections and the subterranean parking).

Subject Site Site Information IG-SP-2 AD-2 (South Fair Oaks Specific Plan, IG area) Residential Care land use is permitted by-right within the Specific Plan area Total Site Size: Approximately 90,000 square feet (2.1 acres) Site currently occupied by: One, 6,700 square-foot, commercial building and surface parking Two Senior Residential Care buildings with 149 units and surface parking (Phases 1 and 2) The subject site is located in the IG-SP-2 AD-2 zoning district, which allows for Residential Care use by-right. The gross lot size is approximately 105,000 square-feet., not 90,000 as noted in the staff report and plans. And it is….

Site Context Huntington Hospital Gold Line Fair Oaks Ave. Hurlbut St. Arlington Dr. The site is located on the west side of South Fair Oaks between Hurlbut Street to the north and Arlington Drive to the south. Huntington Hospital is to the north of the site.

Project Description Prior Phases: Third Phase: Phase 1: 102 units in 88,600 sq.ft.; Approved in 1999 (CUP#3507) Phase 2: 47 units in 47,871 sq.ft.; Approved in 2005 (CUP #4577) Third Phase: Demolition of an existing commercial building and surface parking lot Retention of Phases 1 and 2 Construction of an integrated, four-story structure with 90 Residential Care units in 60,000 sq.ft. of floor area, one-level of subterranean parking, and a reconfigured existing surface parking lot Total Project FAR of 2.18 This is the third phase in a larger Residential Care complex. Phase 1 was approved in 1999 for 102 units in approximately 88,600 square feet; Phase 2 was approved in 2005 for 47 units in approximately 47,800 square feet. Both Phases 1 and 2 were approved prior to the new South Fair Oaks Specific Plan, and both required separate Conditional Use Permits and variances for the use and size. The third phase, however, is subject to the newer Specific Plan which allows for new residential and nonresidential development projects with floor area between 25,000 and 75,000 square feet to be exempt from applying for a new Conditional Use Permit. The proposed third phase includes….. And…

Project Location Hurlbut St. Fair Oaks Ave. Arlington Dr. Phase 1 Not a part Phase 3 Arlington Dr. Aerial of site with phases. Note the portion outlined in blue which is not a part of the proposed application.

Proposed Site Plan Fair Oaks Avenue Arlington Drive Hurlbut Street Phase 1 Phase 2 PROPOSED BUILDING: Residential Care (General) Total Floor Area (All 3 Phases): 196,471 SF Total FAR: 2.18 The project includes the reconfiguration of an existing surface parking lot. Currently, the lot has 62 spaces and has two driveway cuts from Arlington Drive. The proposed reconfiguration has 35 spaces and only one driveway cut on Arlington Drive, with all the surface parking behind the existing and proposed structures. The proposed 60,000 building is located in the southeast corner of the site and has a pedestrian bridge connecting it to Phase 1.

Section – Looking East Phases 1 and 2: 53 – 56 feet tall Phase 3: The north elevation of the project ranges from six to seven stories. This elevation would mainly be visible from the south-facing units at the Green Hotel Apartments.

Not a part of project site Site Context Arlington Drive   Hurlbut St. Fair Oaks Ave. Phase 1: 56 ft. One-story commercial Not a part of project site (2-story office) Phase 2: 53.5 ft. 3-Story Commercial Phase 3: 55 ft. 2-3 Story Multi-Family Single-family

Planning PPR Comments Key development standards that are not consistent with IG-SP-2 zoning district: Additional information will be required in the final project submittal to verify compliance with the setback and open space requirements Standard Proposed Requirement Height 55 feet (to match existing buildings) 45 feet Loading Spaces 8 spaces 9 spaces Height Proposed Required 55 feet 45 feet Loading Spaces 8 spaces (7 – 10’ x 20’ and 1 – 12’ x 30’) 9 spaces (8 – 10’ x 20’ and 1 – 12’ x 30’)

Design Commission Comments Preliminary Consultation: Improve pedestrian and vehicular circulation Better integrate the location and function of indoor communal areas with the outside Shift the building volumes to enclose the proposed courtyard; Create a more prominent design for the main entry to the building on the main street-facing elevation Integrate the proposed development with Phases 1 and 2 The driveway should not be overemphasized or detract from the overall architectural style on the south elevation Study ways to respond more clearly to Pasadena’s architectural legacy Preliminary Consultation with Design Commission: Study the pedestrian and vehicular circulation to, from and within the site; Study ways to modulate the exterior of the building to better integrate the location and function of indoor communal areas with the outside; Further explore shifting the building volumes to enclose the proposed courtyard; Provide a more prominent design for the main entry to the building, which appears to lack prominence from the public realm and is more of an interior-facing component of the structure off of the main street-facing elevation. The project underwent Preliminary Consultation with the Design Commission on October 24, 2017. Comments from the Commission included the following: 1)Further study the massing and scale of the building to ensure that it responds to the sensitive historic context of the adjacent buildings. 2)Further study the project’s connection to central park as well as pedestrian connections to outdoor spaces. 3)Provide articulation of blank wall surfaces along the east and north elevations. 4)Further study the integration of proposed materials (mainly the glass stairway), specifically in terms of compatibility with the adjacent historic buildings. 5)Study the creation of a more iconic and distinct roofline.

Next Steps Next Steps Conduct environmental review per CEQA; Conduct a noticed public hearing before the Hearing Officer for: (1) Modification to CUP No. 4577; Variance for Height; Certificate of Exception or Tentative Parcel Map; and (2) Consideration of adoption of the environmental determination; and Conduct a noticed public hearing before the Design Commission; Return to Design Commission for Concept/Final design approvals. Upon submittal of a code-compliant project, the official entitlement process would commence with concept and final design review by the Design Commission, with the CEQA review being conducted concurrently.

955 South Fair Oaks Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting July 23, 2018 This concludes our presentation. We are available for questions.

Land Use Description Residential Care (General): Is a state licensed facility, family home, group care facility, or similar facility Is maintained and operated to provide 24-hour limited medical and nonmedical residential care for seven or more adults in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or the protection of the individual Considered a ‘Public and Semi- Public Use’ Not a Residential land use No dwelling units are proposed It should be noted that Residential Care Facilities are not considered a Residential land use. The Zoning Code defines Residential Care as a state licensed facility that is maintained and operated to provide 24-hour nonmedical residential care for seven or more adults in need of assistance in daily living or protection. The use does include limited medical assistance, as needed. Further, the Residential Care land use is encompassed within the Public and Semi-Public Uses. As a result, the proposed land use is considered as nonresidential with no dwelling units as it pertains to the residential use.

Subterranean Parking Plan Fair Oaks Avenue Arlington Drive Hurlbut Street The proposed project proposes to reconfigure the existing 62 space surface parking lot and construct a subterranean level of parking to have 35 surface spaces and 72 spaces below-grade. The Staff Report noted that the subterranean level would have 45 spaces and is incorrect. *The current proposal is for 45 spaces in the subterranean garage.

Floor Plan for Proposed 2nd – 4th Levels Fair Oaks Avenue Hurlbut Street Arlington Drive This i

Additional Design Commission comments Preliminary Consultation with Design Commission: Study the pedestrian and vehicular circulation to, from and within the site; Study ways to modulate the exterior of the building to better integrate the location and function of indoor communal areas with the outside; Further explore shifting the building volumes to enclose the proposed courtyard; Provide a more prominent design for the main entry to the building, which appears to lack prominence from the public realm and is more of an interior-facing component of the structure off of the main street-facing elevation. Further study the how to integrate the proposed development with Phases 1 and 2, especially the proposed bridge connections to the existing building; the bridge connections should be seen as fully integrated and architecturally compatible. The driveway to the subterranean parking is at the south elevation. This elevation should be provided with appropriate architectural details so that the driveway is not overemphasized or detract from the overall architectural style. Study ways to respond more clearly to Pasadena’s architectural legacy; The north and east elevations and site features shall be appropriately detailed in anticipation of possible incorporation of the adjacent property into the campus in the future.