Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oana Dickinson et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Advertisements

Prakash Harikrishnan et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Noriko Kikuchi et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Marwan Badri et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Waddah Maskoun et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Konstantinos C. Siontis et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Sigfus Gizurarson et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Shadi Al Halabi et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Kenshi Hayashi et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Tom F. Brouwer et al. JACEP 2016;2:89-96
Junjie Zhang et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Ashish Shukla et al. JACEP 2015;1:41-51
Thomas C. Crawford et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Thomas C. Crawford et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Tom F. Brouwer et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Junjie Zhang et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Julien Seitz et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Santiago Rivera et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Pablo B. Nery et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Michael G. Klein et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Songyun Wang et al. JACEP 2016;2:97-106
Wesley T. O’Neal et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Jong Sung Park et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Konstantin Krieger et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Patrick M. Boyle et al. JACEP 2018;4:
Prakash Harikrishnan et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Peter F. Aziz et al. JACEP 2015;1:62-70
Michael G. Klein et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Mohit K. Turagam et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Fu Siong Ng et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Mintu P. Turakhia et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Leonard M. Rademakers et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Prakash Harikrishnan et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Konstantinos C. Siontis et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Mitsunori Maruyama et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Francesco Santoro et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Svend A. Mortensen et al. JCHF 2014;2:
S.M. Afzal Sohaib et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Prabhat Kumar et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Michael G. Klein et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Marwan Badri et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Vittorio Calzolari et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Kenshi Hayashi et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Moussa Mansour et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Vittorio Calzolari et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Patrick M. Boyle et al. JACEP 2018;4:
Mintu P. Turakhia et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Aya Miyazaki et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Bernard Lim et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Hussam Ali et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Miyako Igarashi et al. JACEP 2018;4:
Valeria Calvi et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Dose–response curve for the rate ratio (solid line) and 95% CIs (dashed lines) of pneumonia as a function of inhaled corticosteroid dose in μg (measured.
Christian Madelaire et al. JCHF 2018;6:
Khadijah Breathett et al. JCHF 2017;5:
Jeffrey Senfield et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Treatment response patterns and effect size over time in exclusively placebo-controlled trials. Treatment response patterns and effect size over time in.
Leonard M. Rademakers et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Anneline S.J.M. te Riele et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Table 2. Regression statistics for direction a
Table 3. Regression statistics for direction b
The QT interval responses to different pacing rates in a patient in group I. The pacing rate was decreased from 110 to 50 beats/min and the QT interval.
Nonlinear associations between anxiety-depression and SA of the genetic cluster 6R. Nonlinear associations between anxiety-depression and SA of the genetic.
Presentation transcript:

Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep.2016.12.005 For Men the QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate for Different QTc Formulae Boxplots of the QTc for each formula are plotted, grouped by heart rate in intervals of 5 beats/min. Both the spline QTc and the spline QTc from cross-validation (labeled Spline QTc-CV) are included. The solid line is the fitted regression line from the regression of a linear, quadratic, and cubic trend on QTc for each QTc formulae. The dashed line shows the fitted regression line on the subset of data with heart rates between 40 and 120 beats/min. Plots are annotated with the permutation p value, which compares the F statistic for linear, quadratic, and cubic trends in each comparator formula with the F statistics for the cross-validated spline. The permutation p value from the trimmed analysis, where only data from ECGs with recorded heart rates between 40 and 120 beats/min were used, are also included. ECG = electrocardiography. Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep.2016.12.005 American College of Cardiology Foundation