Topological Polymorphism of the Two-Start Chromatin Fiber

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1 Superhelical path and base-pair-step parameters for NCP147 DNA. a, Structural alignment of the NCP147 (gold) and best-fit, ideal superhelix (red)
Advertisements

Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Dechang Li, Ming S. Liu, Baohua Ji  Biophysical Journal 
(Un)Folding Mechanisms of the FBP28 WW Domain in Explicit Solvent Revealed by Multiple Rare Event Simulation Methods  Jarek Juraszek, Peter G. Bolhuis 
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Changing Chromatin Fiber Conformation by Nucleosome Repositioning
Membrane-Induced Structural Rearrangement and Identification of a Novel Membrane Anchor in Talin F2F3  Mark J. Arcario, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical.
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Peter J. Mulligan, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips, Andrew J. Spakowitz 
Toshiro Oda, Keiichi Namba, Yuichiro Maéda  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Ching-Hsing Yu, Samuel Cukierman, Régis Pomès  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanism of the Lamellar/Inverse Hexagonal Phase Transition Examined by High Resolution X-Ray Diffraction  Michael Rappolt, Andrea Hickel, Frank Bringezu,
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Effect of Spontaneous Twist on DNA Minicircles
Torsional Behavior of Axonal Microtubule Bundles
Local Geometry and Elasticity in Compact Chromatin Structure
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
DNA Nanomechanics in the Nucleosome
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Liqun Zhang, Susmita Borthakur, Matthias Buck  Biophysical Journal 
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
Filip Lankaš, Richard Lavery, John H. Maddocks  Structure 
Antoni Luque, Gungor Ozer, Tamar Schlick  Biophysical Journal 
A Molecular-Mechanical Model of the Microtubule
Pattern Selection by Dynamical Biochemical Signals
Histone Octamer Helical Tubes Suggest that an Internucleosomal Four-Helix Bundle Stabilizes the Chromatin Fiber  Timothy D. Frouws, Hugh-G. Patterton,
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Azobenzene Photoisomerization-Induced Destabilization of B-DNA
Actin-Regulator Feedback Interactions during Endocytosis
Firdaus Samsudin, Alister Boags, Thomas J. Piggot, Syma Khalid 
Moon K. Kim, Robert L. Jernigan, Gregory S. Chirikjian 
DNA Topology and Global Architecture of Point Centromeres
Comparative Studies of Microtubule Mechanics with Two Competing Models Suggest Functional Roles of Alternative Tubulin Lateral Interactions  Zhanghan.
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
Histone Acetylation Regulates Chromatin Accessibility: Role of H4K16 in Inter- nucleosome Interaction  Ruihan Zhang, Jochen Erler, Jörg Langowski  Biophysical.
Irina V. Dobrovolskaia, Gaurav Arya  Biophysical Journal 
René Stehr, Nick Kepper, Karsten Rippe, Gero Wedemann 
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Grischa R. Meyer, Justin Gullingsrud, Klaus Schulten, Boris Martinac 
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Chi H. Mak, Tyler Matossian, Wen-Yeuan Chung  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Ion-Induced Defect Permeation of Lipid Membranes
Volume 104, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Coupling of S4 Helix Translocation and S6 Gating Analyzed by Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of Mutated Kv Channels  Manami Nishizawa, Kazuhisa Nishizawa 
Coupling of S4 Helix Translocation and S6 Gating Analyzed by Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of Mutated Kv Channels  Manami Nishizawa, Kazuhisa Nishizawa 
Mechanism of Anionic Conduction across ClC
Agnes Noy, Anthony Maxwell, Sarah A. Harris  Biophysical Journal 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Mijo Simunovic, Gregory A. Voth  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Chze Ling Wee, David Gavaghan, Mark S.P. Sansom  Biophysical Journal 
Actin Filament Strain Promotes Severing and Cofilin Dissociation
Amir Marcovitz, Yaakov Levy  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Quantitative Modeling and Optimization of Magnetic Tweezers
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Topological Polymorphism of the Two-Start Chromatin Fiber Davood Norouzi, Victor B. Zhurkin  Biophysical Journal  Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages 2591-2600 (May 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.04.015 Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Definition of the chromatin fiber parameters. (A) Cylindrical parameters h (rise), r (radius), and polar angle φ. This angle determines the superhelical fiber twist: ω = 2φ –360° (the polar angle between the centers of nucleosomes ν1 and ν3). In this particular case, φ = 165° and ω = –30°. The entry points of nucleosomes are shown as red balls, and the exit points as yellow balls. Each nucleosome is associated with a right-handed coordinate frame in which axis Z represents the superhelical axis of the nucleosome (calculated as described in (44)), axis X points toward the nucleosome dyad, and axis Y is perpendicular to X and Z. (B) Inclination angle ρ (defining rotation around the dyad axis X) is related to the angle γ measured by electric dichroism (39–41), which is the angle between the Y axis and the fiber axis. These two angles are related by equation γ = | 90° – | ρ | |. Increasing the inclination angle by Δρ leads to decreasing the total twisting of the linker between nucleosomes ν1 and ν2 by ∼2Δρ. The images were prepared with the VMD software package (45). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 2591-2600DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.04.015) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Two-start chromatin fibers with the linker L = 20 bp, with the inclination angle ρ changing from ±180° to 150°. All conformations correspond to the energetically optimal points (Fig. 3 A). Note that all these structures are different—in particular, the fiber with ρ = –90° differs from the fiber with ρ = 90° (see positions of the DNA entry points shown as red balls). The DNA is presented in alternating blue and orange colors, to emphasize the two stacks of nucleosomes and to clarify the passage of linkers in the middle of the fiber. The histone cores are also shown in two colors: the entry sides of nucleosomes (interacting with the DNA entry points shown as red balls) are colored in yellow, and the exit sides are in white. In this way, it is easier to distinguish the fiber configurations. For example, for ρ = 0 the white sides of the cores face upward, whereas for ρ = 180° they face downward. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 2591-2600DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.04.015) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Energy profiles and DNA twisting for the chromatin fibers with the linkers L = 20 (A, C, and E) and 25 bp (B, D, and F). Each point corresponds to a minimum of the conformation energy in the space of three fiber parameters—radius, rise, and polar angle φ (Fig. 1 A). Energy is very high for ρ < –120° so this region is omitted for clarity. (A and B) Total energy. (C and D) Torsional energy of the linker DNA. (E and F) Changes in the excess twisting, ΔTw, of the linker DNA as a function of the inclination angle ρ. The points shown by asterisks in (C)–(F) correspond to the linker DNA undertwisted or overtwisted by more than 180°. (See the main text for details.) Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 2591-2600DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.04.015) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Abrupt change in the linker DNA excess twisting, ΔTw, caused by increase in the inclination angle ρ. For ρ = 60° (pink ribbon) the linker DNA is undertwisted by ∼180°. For ρ = 70° (black wire) the linker DNA is overtwisted by ∼180°. The nucleosomes on the left are superimposed. The images were prepared with the Chimera software package (46). Inset: the DNA twisting differs by one helical turn (∼360°) in the two linkers. Compare the black wires representing ∼2.5 turns of DNA in the case of ρ = 70° with the pink ribbons corresponding to ∼1.5 helical turns (ρ = 60°). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 2591-2600DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.04.015) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The writhing-induced transition occurring in the chromatin fiber with the linker L = 20 bp. Note the different mutual positioning of linkers in the fibers with ρ = –130°, –120°, and –110° (A, B, and C, respectively). (A) The two bottom linkers shown in blue are positioned above the linker shown in orange (solid blue arrow). (B) Overcrossing (intersection) of the blue and orange DNA linkers (dotted-line blue arrow). (C) The two bottom blue linkers are positioned below the orange linker (dash-and-dot blue arrow). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 2591-2600DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.04.015) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Total energy of the two-start fibers as a function of the inclination angle ρ and the linker length L. Optimization is made in the space of three remaining fiber parameters, i.e., radius, rise, and polar angle φ. Dark blue regions (negative energy) represent stable structures, whereas dark brown areas are those with energies higher than 50 kT. Cross-sections of this 2D map for linkers L = 20 and 25 bp are shown in Fig. 3, A and B. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 2591-2600DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.04.015) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Variation of the three topological parameters as a function of the inclination angle ρ and the linker length L. The contour plots are consistent with the conformation energy map presented in Fig. 6. (A) The excess twisting of the linker DNA, ΔTw (compare with Fig. 3, E and F). The ΔTw values are expressed in the number of DNA helical turns (or degrees/360). (B) The writhing number per nucleosome, Wr. (C) Change in the linking number per nucleosome, ΔLk (relative to the relaxed state of DNA). See Fig. S12 for additional details. (D) Classification of the fiber conformations: three families of topoisomers. The cyan region represents family T2 with the lowest ΔLk values (approximately from –2.2 to –1.5). The yellow region corresponds to the family T1 with intermediate ΔLk (from –1.2 to –0.5). The highest ΔLk values define family T0 (approximately from 0 to 0.5). The ovals denote energetically optimal regions shown in Fig. 6. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 2591-2600DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.04.015) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Topoisomers T2 and T1 for linkers L = 20 bp (A–C) and L = 25 bp (D–F), respectively. The optimal structure for L = 20 bp has inclination angle ρ = –45° and rise h = 27 Å (A and B); the optimal structure for L = 25 bp has ρ = 90° and h = 23 Å (D and E). The difference between the two families is clearly visible in the stretched forms with h = 55 Å (C and F). Note a more extensive folding of DNA in the nucleosomal disks in (C). This is consistent with the DNA writhing: Wr = –1.7 in (C) and Wr = –0.9 in (F). Red balls indicate the DNA entry points. The detailed representations in (B) and (E) show that there are no steric clashes between the stacked nucleosomes ν1 and ν3 (Fig. 1 A). The internucleosome stacking is stabilized by the H4 tail-acidic patch bridges shown by black lines; the distances between Asp24 (H4) and Glu61 (H2A) are 23 Å in (B) and 34 Å in (E) (see Fig. S3 for details). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 2591-2600DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.04.015) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions