Today we’re going to talk about resources that you definitely know how to find… Websites Have them name some things, make a list on the board of why.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Six Steps to Effective Library Research
Advertisements

How to… Critically Evaluate Information Resources!
SOURCES finding & evaluating them. Evaluating the AUTHORITY of a source – what questions should we ask? Is the author or organization identified? What.
Evaluating Information The CRAAP Test When you search for information, you’ll easily find a lot of it…but is it good information? That’s up to you to.
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
C.R.A.A.P. Website Evaluation Test The
Digital Citizenship Lesson 3 Collective Intelligence.
Evaluating Websites… The truth is out there - but so is the lie..
How is the process of publishing printed material
EVALUATING ONLINE SOURCES. GOAL Identify criteria to evaluate websites. Evaluate websites to determine their usefulness for research & your own personal.
Evaluating Internet Sources Mrs. Karber. Content and Literacy Objectives To become familiar with one tool for evaluating the reliability of websites You.
Tips for Writing Research Papers. Evaluating Websites.
The CRAAP Test Your guide to website evaluation Ms. Mitchell Ms. Mitchell English 9H.
How to Research– Finding RELIABLE Information. Getting Started  Where is the first place you go when you start researching a project?  Google, Wikipedia,
Research Skills Did You Know?. How are you searching now? Google and Ask.com allow you to type natural language search strings, in other words, you type.
How to Research– Finding RELIABLE Information. Getting Started  Where is the first place you go when you start researching a project?  Google, Wikipedia,
Internet Literacy Evaluating Web Sites. Objective The Student will be able to evaluate internet web sites for accuracy and reliability The Student will.
Today we’re going to talk about resources that you definitely know how to find… Websites.
Credible Sources? Do you believe everything you read on the Internet?
La recherche Un guide. Une bonne source? ACCURACY: There are no regulations, standards, or systems in place to ensure that information on the web is correct.
CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico
The CRAAP Way to Evaluate Credibility AP Capstone Research Mr. Linton.
Math in Action 2016 Grand Valley State University Saturday, 27 February Debbie Morrow Liaison Librarian – Math & Statistics University.
6 Criteria for Evaluating a Website! Ms. Fauss ens/Evaluating%20Websites.pdf.
Suzan Skaar, South High School Library Media Specialist.
Research skills (cont.) Source evaluation. By the end of the lesson you will be able to: evaluate sources using relevant criteria evaluate sources using.
Evaluating Sources.
Research skills Source evaluation
Evaluating of Information
6 Criteria for Evaluating a Website!
The Library and Credible Research
CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico
Do Now: January 21, 2015 Sentence Composing Tools: Adjective Clause Take Notes: -What is an adjective clause? Provide multiple examples -What’s the difference.
FATMA ISMED K1-09 Websites in ELT.
Looking for information?
Are my Sources Reliable?
Using Credible Internet Sources
Evaluating Web Resources
Evaluating Sources.
Evaluating Web Sources
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
ABCs of Source Reliability
Evaluating Websites The Good, the Bad, and the Misleading!
Evaluating Information
The CRAAP Test.
Finding and evaluating secondary Sources
Evaluating Websites Using CRAAP 
Internet Literacy Evaluating Web Sites.
Source evaluation criteria
ABCs of Website Evaluation
Web Evaluation The C. R. A. A. P. Test.
Safe and Effective Web searchING
Evaluating Information
Evaluating Internet Resources
The quest to find good information on the internet.
Evaluating Websites Using CRAAP 
Searching for Information Without Losing Your Cool!
SCARAB.
Evaluating Print and Electronic Sources
Created by Karen Christensson Adapted by the SAISD Librarians
The CRAAP Test WORKSHEET
Use the CRAAP Test to Evaluate Information
The CRAAP Test Your guide to web site evaluation
Evaluating Internet Resources
Speech 101 Ms. Lewallen.
Evaluating Websites The CRAAP Test: Don’t Surf the Net Without It! CRAAP Test: Meriam Library  California State University, Chico.
CRAAP.
Evaluating Website Credibility
Presentation transcript:

Today we’re going to talk about resources that you definitely know how to find… Websites Have them name some things, make a list on the board of why they think it’s important to evaluate websites, or what sort of criteria you need to be looking for. The other thing to remember is that once you become skilled at evaluating Internet resources, you will become better at evaluating other types of sources (library resources, etc.)

Take out some paper--write down some notes about the following questions: Why is it important to evaluate websites? What do you look for in a “good” website? What would make you think a website was untrustworthy? Have them name some things, make a list on the board of why they think it’s important to evaluate websites, or what sort of criteria you need to be looking for. The other thing to remember is that once you become skilled at evaluating Internet resources, you will become better at evaluating other types of sources (library resources, etc.)

“Good” Websites “Bad” Websites

How to Evaluate Internet Resources Currency Relevance Authority Accuracy Purpose So now that we all agree that it’s a good idea to evaluate websites, let’s talk about HOW to do this. There are lots of different guides online or cute little acronyms for remembering the different components of evaluating websites, but this is my favorite, mostly because it’s easy to remember and covers the most important areas. CRAAP Test Let’s talk about what each of these means:

Currency: Timeliness of Info When was the information published or posted? Has the information been revised or updated? Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? Are the links functional? Currency: When was the information published or posted? Has the information been revised or updated? Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? Are the links functional?

Relevance: The Importance of the Info to Your Needs Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? Who is the intended audience? Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? Relevance Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? Who is the intended audience? Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use?

Authority: Who is the Source of the Info? Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source? examples: .com .edu .gov .org .net Authority Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source? examples: .com .edu .gov .org .net

Accuracy: How Reliable, Truthful, or Correct is this Info? Where does the information come from? Is the information supported by evidence? Has the information been reviewed or refereed? Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? Are there spelling, grammar, or other typographical errors? Accuracy Where does the information come from? Is the information supported by evidence? Has the information been reviewed or refereed? Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? Are there spelling, grammar, or other typographical errors?

Purpose: Why does the information exist? What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? Purpose What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?

Wikipedia: Why do your instructors say NO? Articles may be heavily biased, incomplete, or vandalized. May contain obvious oversights or omissions. Many contributors do not cite their sources. Bibliographies are frequently incomplete or out-of-date. Credentials of authors vary. Continually edited - >100,000 edits/day. Can propagate misinformation.

Wikipedia: How to use it as a tool Useful for background information. Contains many viable links and references. Excels in topics on current events, popular culture, emerging technology, and obscure subjects. Don’t CITE it! Cite sources it links to, if you find them to be credible, accurate, useful, etc. I usually use the entry for Sesame Street on wikipedia as a really good example of an entry with a lot of good references and external links, etc. If you know of another entry like this off hand, feel free to use that. It really doesn’t matter—the point is just to reinforce that it should be used to find out more info about a topic, but not something you’d want to cite. I usually tell them that the main reason I wouldn’t cite it is that it’s dynamic—so if someone went back to look at what you cited, it might be different when they look at the entry.

Let’s try it out… http://guides.emich.edu/ENGL121 Go to the following research guide: http://guides.emich.edu/ENGL121 Click on “Handouts and Activities” Take a look at the two sites in the box that says “Websites for Evaluation Activity” and fill out the CRAAP test worksheet You DO NOT NEED TO ANSWER EVERY QUESTION on the CRAAP Test guide—use those questions to guide you to notice things in each category and jot down notes.

Group Up!… Currency : Group 1 Authority: Group 2 Accuracy: Group 3 Purpose: Group 4 Once in your group, spend about 5 minutes coming up with a list of the TOP THREE things you noticed in your category for each website and be prepared to report out on these items!