Group Member Evaluation Form

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bus 411 DAY 21. ETS testing ETS Field Test in Business for Wednesday, April 23, in Nadeau 109. the morning; 9:00 a.m. afternoon 1:00 PM Juniors and Seniors.
Advertisements

Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
Bus 411 DAY 19. Agenda Case Feedback  1 B, 1 C and 1 D  Weakest part is Financials Ratios - Trends and comparisons Cost - EPS/EBIT cost of implementations.
Bus 411 DAY 27. Timeline (tick-tock) May 1  Take home final available  Due May 3PM May 5  Team 2 Case 22 Yellow Roadway Corp.  Round four case.
Bus 411 DAY 20. Agenda Kroger Case Study  PowerPoint Before Class (at least one hour) Grades and feedback are posted  Performance should improve.
Bus 411 DAY 15. Agenda Assignment 5 Corrected  1 A, 4 B’s, 1 C & 2 D’s  Problem with BCG, All data was available in the Google 2004 annual report Mid.
Peer Evaluations. Attendance- Does the team member attend group meetings? Is advance warning of non-attendance given? Is the member late to meetings?
By Mrs. Fisher 12/1/14 Period 0 How To Make a Power Point Presentation Title Page Title Your Presentation Your Name, Date, & Period.
Unrepresented Staff Evaluations Tips for an Effective Review.
WHAT IS BRAIN STORMING?. BrainStorming is a group and individual creativity technique by which efforts are made to find out the conclusion for the specific.
TeamView/ th Street Suite 2 Santa Monica, CA 
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Decision Making Matrix
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
Using Classroom Competitions to Prepare Students for the Competitive Business World Laurel Powell October 2014.
On a scale of 1-5 (5 being the best) rate yourself on your ability to complete all the assignments for class. Why? 4 For the most part I did a good job.
Bus 411 DAY 24. Agenda Jet Blue Airways Student choose Last Case Send of 1 St and 2 nd choice Only received one teams I will choose if I do not.
9 th Annual Performance Report Scorecard AGENDA Welcome Hon. Maurice McTigue Study Results Dr. Jerry Ellig Henry Wray Remarks Hon. Jim Cooper AwardsHon.
Thank you for taking this class. I hope you have fun, learn, and discover your talents.
Lesson Concept: Relationship of Area and PerimeterArea 1 You now have learned a lot about area (the number of square units that are needed to cover.
What is a Rubric? A rubric is a set of scoring criteria for a performance task. A rubric also serves as a blueprint for the student to use in constructing.
Bus 411 DAY 25. Agenda Course Evaluations AirTran Airways Student choice of Last Case  Team 1 Home Depot  Team 2 Harrah's T  Team 3 Liz Claiborne Team.
Student Led Conference By: First and Last Name.
Bus 411 DAY 25. Agenda USA Truck Student choice of Last Case  Team 1 Home Depot  Team 2 Harrah's T  Team 3 Liz Claiborne Team work Send me your presentation.
Bus 411 DAY 18. Agenda A Philosophy of education Grading in this Class Quick way to an A Dell Computer Case study Team work  Send me your presentation.
Bus 411 DAY 27. Agenda Grades for 3 rd case  3 B’s  Feed back on next slide Home Depot Peer Evaluations sent  Due Friday, May 9:30 AM Team work.
2014 – 2015 EVALUATION PERIOD KCTCS ePerformance Training.
FINAL PROJECT. Part 1: Jeopardy - Each unit (1-6) must complete a jeopardy game board - The game boards should be consistent in format - The game board.
PRG 420 Week 2 Learning Team Quality Control Sheet To purchase this material click below link Week-2-Learning-Team-Quality-Control-Sheet.
ACC 544 Week 6 Individual Assignment Controls for Information Technology (IT) and Reporting and Evaluation Imagine you are a company controller. Identify.
Performance Evaluations
Readiness Consultations
Bus 411 Day 23 Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall.
Standards based Grading
Sullivan County 4-H Activities Day
Lesson Concept: Relationship of Area and Perimeter
ITIS 2110 Lab #6 Team Project.
What you need to know now to be promoted later!
Implementing a Professional Learning Community
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
Team Project Showcase Presentation: 15 to 20 minutes Peer evaluation
Standards-Based Grading
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Course Name and Number The Basics Semester: Days/Times: Location:
Problem Solving And visualization.
Bus 411 Day 22 Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall.
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
FSGP Process Step 1: Review of Scientific Merit
A review of two approaches to peer assessment for selected business courses at a tertiary institution in New Zealand Dr Leonie Menzies.
MODULE 2: TEAMWORK.
Standards-Based Grading
Bus 411 DAY 19.
Final Project.
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Color Value >+1SD above the mean >mean <mean
Bus 411 DAY 21.
MODULE 2: TEAMWORK.
Making Tens.
Making Tens.
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Group 4 Project.
IED Product Management Day #2
Bertie Early College High School
Final Project.
Student Led Conference
Group Projects Provide small class perspective
Problem Solving And visualization.
Presentation transcript:

Group Member Evaluation Form Date of Activity: ______________ Printed Name: __________________ 1. Rate each person in your group (including yourself) on the criteria indicated, using a scale of 0-10. (0 = unsatisfactory, 10 = superior) Names of Group Members Criteria Participation, attendance at meetings Quality of work, completeness, carefulness, depth of thinking Completion of assigned work within schedule, dependability Amount of work and effort Leadership in organizing and motivating group members Group maintenance, cooperation, concern for the group Resourcefulness, innovation, imagination, creativity Communication of thoughts, ideas, and concepts Knowledge/understanding of the task/processes, etc. Individual’s overall value and contribution to the group Team Member Rating (sum of above ten scores) 2. Rank all members of your group by placing them in the categories below. You must place at least one person in each of the categories! (Include yourself) Top performers Average performers (This may still be very good performance) Lower performers (This may still be acceptable or good work)

3. Briefly list your own contributions to the project. 4. Provide any other comments which will help in evaluation of the group and its members. Provide specific details regarding what each group member did or did not do to justify your ratings and rankings.