Sedition, Seditious Libel, Treason

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Schenck v US Facts of the case Charles Schenck, Secretary of the Socialist party, was charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917 Along with.
Advertisements

Freedom of Speech CHAPTER 19.3.
Attacks on Civil Liberties.
Sedition. Sedition, Seditious Libel, Treason Sedition: advocacy or action with the goal of subverting or overthrowing the government, but falling short.
Gitlow v. New York: Deference and Free Speech Regulations Majority’s Test: When the legislative body has acted reasonably and not arbitrarily in determining.
Chapter 14 Section 3. Freedom of Speech What is speech? –Pure Speech Verbal expression before an audience that has chosen to listen. Opinions/thoughts.
Controls on the Press in Colonial America zlicensing zseditious libel zbreach of privilege (contempt of assembly) zroyal governors zcourts zcolonial assemblies.
When Worlds Collide Protecting National Security & the First Amendment Mark Cohen & Tiffany Middleton, American Bar Association Division for Public Education.
Abrams v. United States Work taken from the United States Reports of the U.S. Supreme Court Argued October 21-22, 1919 Decided November 10, 1919.
How does the First Amendment Protect Free Expression?
Chapter 13 Crimes Against the State Joel Samaha, 9th Ed.
Case Studies: Civil Liberties in World War 1
Essential Question How does the Constitution protect citizen rights?
Free Speech & the Press Government Unit 6. National Security  Treason: act of aiding & comforting an enemy of US in time of war  Sedition: use of language.
Progressing to War World War I as a Progressive Crusade.
The Court’s first line-drawing attempts re dangerous speech: the WWI prosecutions  Espionage Act made it a crime for any person to: (1)make false reports.
Challenges to Liberty: The U.S. Constitution, Supreme Court, & Political Speech Artemus Ward Department of Political Science Northern Illinois University.
Types of Speech Pure Speech –Calm –Passionate –Private –Public Supreme Court has provided the strongest protection.
UNIT 5 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. LESSON 29 PAGES How does the 1 st Amendment protect free expression? Objective: Explain the importance of freedom.
AP U.S. Government Timpanogos High School Unit No.4 Civil Liberties Targets
Opportunities for African-Americans in WW1 “Great Migration.” 1916 – 1919  70,000 War industries work. Enlistment in segregated units.
Com360: Public Safety.
APUSH Review: Schenck v. United States (1919)
Brandenburg & incitement Government can forbid advocacy of the use of force or of law violation only where such advocacy is (1) directed to inciting/producing.
AP Government and Politics Chapter 18: Wilson Homework: Read Wilson, Chapter 18 ( ) for Thursday Does the freedom of speech, of the press, or expression.
How does the Supreme Court decide cases?. Sample Case: Virginia v. Black (2003) The Law: Virginia The Law: Virginia It shall be unlawful.
Civil Liberties during Wartime pg. 27 – Unit 5 Study Packet.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH A look at the First Amendment: Security vs. Liberty.
Freedom of Speech First Amendment Expression, Speech and Symbolic Speech.
By Jake Chesney and Angele Dunne. The idea of Protected Speech  Protected speech is the idea that a citizen of a government is guaranteed the right to.
Freedom of Speech and Press. Freedom of Expression The 1 st amendment has two guarantees on freedom of expression #1 Guarantee to each person a right.
Progressing to War The Great War as a Progressive Crusade.
Supreme Court Case Research Melanie Rosen. PROTECTED SPEECH Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment of the United States.
Did World War strengthen Democracy on the Homefront?
“Hate speech” and incitement Training workshop on media and freedom of expression law.
March 14, 2014 Aim: Did the Sedition Act violate the First Amendment? Do Now: – Are there any factors preventing you from fully exercising your right to.
Interpreting the Constitution Civil Rights & Civil Liberties US Government. US Government. US Government. US Government.
NOTES 2 & TEST REVIEW CIVIL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES.
Objective; describe the kinds of speech the 1st Amendment does and does not protect.
Freedom v. Security during WWI. Debt Reduction Every year the government spends more money than it raises from tax revenue. It is able to do so by borrowing.
The congress passed the sedition act on May 16,1918. It was designed to protect America’s participation in WWI. That Eugene Debs was noted for his oratory.
World War I.
Chapter 13 Constitutional Freedoms Section 5
21 to 30 yrs. and later extended to 40 yrs. of age.
Civil Liberties: The Struggle for Freedom
Freedom of Speech.
Questions of Constitutionalism
Constitution Debated.
“To win, we must endeavour to be the stronger of the two at the point of impact. Our only hope of this lies in making our own choice of operations,
Limiting Speech in War Time
Who was Charles Schenck?
Aim: How did Adams’ presidency effect the US?
Freedom of Speech.
Incorporation of the First Amendment
Speech Clauses I (Clear and Present Danger and Bad Tendency Tests)
Chapter 13.3 Freedom of Speech
The First Amendment.
John Adams John Adams becoming President was the first peaceful transition of power. Why is this important?
How does the 1st amendment protect free expression
1916 Election WW – “He kept us out of the war.”
And how they relate the Judicial Branch
Civil Rights & Liberties
Free Speech and Free Press
Content Specialist, Florida Joint Center for Citizenship
Excerpts from the Sedition Act
Judiciary Act (1789) The supreme court of the United States shall consist of a chief justice and five associate justices… And be it further enacted, That.
Constitution Debated.
Limiting Speech in War Time
Abrams v. United States Russian immigrants convicted under Sedition Act of 1918 for circulating leaflets calling for munitions strike. Charged with publishing.
Freedom of Speech.
Presentation transcript:

Sedition, Seditious Libel, Treason Sedition: advocacy or action with the goal of subverting or overthrowing the government, but falling short of treason; Seditious Libel: publishing or broadcasting any statement that brings the government or its officials into disrepute. Treason: Levying war against one’s country, or giving aid or comfort to its enemies during war.

Seditious Libel "De Scandalis Magnatum" prohibited distribution of "any false News or Tales, whereby discord, or occasion of discord or slander may grow between the King and his People, or the Great Men of the Realm." [3 Edw. 1, ch. 34 (1275)]

Sedition Act of 1798 (1) “if any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States,

Sedition Act of 1798 (2) with intent to defame the said government, or either house of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States, or to stir up sedition within the United States, or to excite any unlawful combinations therein

Schenck v. US (1919) Clear and present danger test: “whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.”

Speech or Act? "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."

Holmes’ dissent in Abrams A classic of Pragmatist thought “the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market ... That at any rate is the theory of our Constitution. It is an experiment, as all life is an experiment.”

Bad Tendency Test Even a tendency to obstruct government justifies prosecution  Government can extinguish spark before it becomes a flame Abrams v. US (1919) Gitlow v. US (1925)

Jackson in Dennis “The statute before us repeats a pattern, originally devised to combat the wave of anarchistic terrorism that plagued this country about the turn of the century, which lags at least two generations behind Communist Party techniques … Anarchism's sporadic and uncoordinated acts of terror were not integrated with an effective revolutionary machine”

Jackson in Dennis “the Communist stratagem outwits the anti-anarchist pattern of statute aimed against "overthrow by force and violence" if qualified by the doctrine that only "clear and present danger" of accomplishing that result will sustain the prosecution.”

Action, not Advocacy Constitution protects advocacy and teaching of revolution, but prohibits advocacy of specific illegal actions Yates v. U.S. (1957) Scales v. U.S. (1961)

Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) Imminent lawless action test: “free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”

Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project It is a federal crime to “knowingly provid[e] material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization.” The authority to designate an entity a “foreign terrorist organization” rests with the Secretary of State, and is subject to judicial review.

Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project “[T]he term ‘material support or resources’ means any property, tangible or intangible, or service, including currency or monetary instruments or financial securities, financial services, lodging, training, expert advice or assistance, safehouses, false documentation or identification, communications equipment, facilities, weapons, lethal substances, explosives, personnel (1 or more individuals who may be or include oneself), and transportation, except medicine or religious materials.”