Open Science: the crucial importance of metadata

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Keith G Jeffery, Anne G S Asserson GL 11 Washington Keith G Jeffery Director, IT & International Strategy, STFC
Advertisements

DRIVER Building a worldwide scientific data repository infrastructure in support of scholarly communication 1 JISC/CNI Conference, Belfast, July.
DRIS/BP Task Group Report, Madrid, Sergey Parinov, TG leader Barbara Ebert, deputy TG leader.
Task Group Cerif/CRIS-IR. TG Cerif/CRIS-IR Ed Simons, Radboud University Nijmegen (NL) Projectleader academic information systems development. -Initiator.
CERIF: Common European Research Information Format An international standard relational data model for storage and interoperability of research information.
CONTI’2008, 5-6 June 2008, TIMISOARA 1 Towards a digital content management system Gheorghe Sebestyen-Pal, Tünde Bálint, Bogdan Moscaliuc, Agnes Sebestyen-Pal.
1 INFRA : INFRA : Scientific Information Repository supporting FP7 “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author.
Integrating aspects of interoperability, policy and governance FRIS: a research information infrastructure in Flanders euroCRIS Strategic Members meeting.
Metadata in a distributed information environment: Interoperability as recombinant potential Lorcan Dempsey OCLC/SCURL pre-IFLA conference, 15/16 Aug 02.
Title of the presentation | Date |1 Nikos Houssos National Documentation Centre (EKT/NHRF) CRIS for research information management.
Metadata Framework for a Statistical Data Warehouse
Data Citation Implementation Pilot Workshop
Open Science (publishing) as-a-Service Paolo Manghi (OpenAIRE infrastructure) Institute of Information Science and Technologies Italian Research Council.
ΕΚΤ Access to Knowledge ΕΚΤ Access to Knowledge R&D Statistics Information System: An Interoperability Tail between CERIF and SDMX Dimitris Karaiskos Dimitrios.
The important role of CRIS’s for registration and archiving of research data Case study: Radboud University (NL) in cooperation with the DANS EASY archive.
Moving away from the fish-eye view Integrating Surveys for the Ecosystem Approach 29 May 2013, Ingeborg de Boois (WGISUR)
CERIF for research evaluation including REF Keith G Jeffery STFC / euroCRIS 20/04/20111Ready 4 Ref End of Project Workshop
BERGEN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Workshop on Embedding of CRIS in a university research information management system CRIS 2002 Conference Kassel, August 28 –
Towards integrating European research information
NRF Open Access Statement
SYNTHESYS3 Parallel Discussions
euroCRIS Business Session Membership Meeting Dublin
Audit of predetermined objectives
DSpace standard Data model and DSpace-CRIS
The assessment of competence to perform research and development by the SK CRIS: Research Organisation as an object of evaluation Danica Zendulková, Slovak.
EOSC MODEL Pasquale Pagano CNR - ISTI
Paolo Budroni, University of Vienna
‘openLandscapes’ The Knowledge Collection of Landscapes Science
Athina Antoniou and Lilian Mitrou
The OpenAIRE infrastructure
An Open Knowledge & Research Information Infrastructure
Say, “S” (as) = semantics – and mean it
INFORMATION & PUBLICITY REQUIREMENTS
European Publication Information Service - a Pilot Project
European Publication Information Service - a Pilot Project
Integrating Data Management Plan functionality in the CRIS
VI-SEEM Data Repository
Vision for Open Science
INPE, São José dos Campos (SP), Brazil
05 April 2016 Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on review of the draft APP - Department of Arts and Culture.
Why the Multistakeholder Approach Works
Data Management: Documentation & Metadata
EOSCpilot Skills Landscape & Framework
Documentation of statistics
Metadata for research outputs management Part 2
Metadata for research outputs management
EOSCpilot All Hands Meeting 8 March 2018 Pisa
NARCIS: linking CRIS’s and OAR’s in the Netherlands
Health Ingenuity Exchange - HingX
An ecosystem of contributions
SISAI STATISTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND INTEGRATION
Towards a national research information infrastructure in the Netherlands based on CERIF: challenges and opportunities Chris Baars, supervisor Electronic.
Quality in administration of higher education
AARC2 JRA1 Update Nicolas Liampotis
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
Welcome!.
Social Research Methodology and Supplementary Documentation John Kallas University of the Aegean, Department of Sociology.
Open Archival Information System
Introduction to the MIABIS SOP Working Group
Jisc Research Data Shared Service (RDSS)
Bird of Feather Session
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Research Data: Infrastructure, Re-use and Dark Knowledge
A Brief Update on the Activity of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group – An action item from WGISS-46 Ge Peng North Carolina State University,
Research data lifecycle²
Kees Zeelenberg, Winfried Ypma, Peter Struijs; Statistics Netherlands
Research Data Dr Aoife Coffey, Research Data Coordinator
Cultivating Semantics for Data in Agriculture and Nutrition
WISE and INSPIRE By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat
Presentation transcript:

Open Science: the crucial importance of metadata To realise an optimal and workable Open Science Framework, a conditio sine qua non is that the information and data are FAIR, meaning: Findable Accessible Interoperable \ Interpretable Reusable For all these aspects the availability of adequate (enough detailed, expressive) metadata is vital. And consequently: so is the availability of an appropriate metadata ecosystem to optimally handle, exchange and expose the metadata.

CRIS: Treasure Chests of metadata A CRIS is an information system that holds (interlinked) metadata about virtually all aspects of research: The researchers (ID, name, title, affiliation, ...) and their role in the research. The projects (ID, title, description, key words, start- and enddate, ...) The organisations (institutes, universities,…) involved and their role (owner, funder, ...) The input invested in the research both in time (f.t.e.) and money. The output from the research (publications, datasets, software, patents, images, etc...) The equipment, services and tools (e.g. which version of whic software) used. The field or subject of the research. The impact of the research, both in- and outside of academia (metrics, impact indicators,…). Semantic classifications of the research on various dimensions (typologies, ...), Rights metadata: who is authorised or which conditions may apply to access (some of the) information in the CRIS Cooperations with other projects, researchers, groups, organisations. Links to other systems (HRM, financial, external: ORCID, WoS, Scopus, ...) Etc…

CRIS, a big switch in time. In the course of time CRIS have made a big switch: from tools for research administration to primary resources of research information. In terms of stakeholders/target groups: from administrators to the research(ers) community. Initially, CRIS: resources for administrative purposes, notably management, monitoring, evaluation and benchmarking of research. Awareness has grown about the big potential of CRIS for profiling and showcasing research. In general: for making research known to the world The information in CRIS constitute what may be called, an interconnected and multiple chain of variables (entries) for searching, finding and interpreting research data, their accessibility and their reusability. Therefore: it makes a world of difference to a user searching for relevant research data when the metadata that directly apply to the datasets are enriched by the additional metadata available in CRIS. about aspects and entities linked to the dataset.   CRIS, a big switch in time.

Resulting Propostions for discussion In order to realize an optimal FAIR and Open data and Science infrastructure the integration of (the information available in) CRIS (infrastructure) is recommendable if not necessary. Resulting from this: The Open Science an FAIR Data communities on the one hand and the CRIS Community on the other should come together and jointly cooperate to work this out.

A European Research Information Infrastructure is possible in the near future. Conclusion of a report of a working group of the European Parliament (April 2014): “We conclude that a European Integrated Research Information Infrastructure is technically feasible thanks to recent technological developments and especially the maturity of the European CERIF standard, which allows seamless interlinking of datasets and/or research information systems, in different formats and including non-CERIF systems”

A European Research Information Infrastructure is possible in the near future. Conclusion of a report of a working group of the European Parliament (April 2014): STOA-Report: Measuring Scientific Performance for Improved Policy Making, p. 14.

European Research Information Infrastructure: an Architecture. Standard use case / profile Standard use case / profile Standard use case / profile Standard use case / profile Standard use case / profile Standard use case / profile NATIONAL and LOCAL CRIS AND REPOSITORIES

publication of results CRIS’s new field of application: Research DATA sets selection final dataset articles data life cycle management analysis temporary storage CRIS: linking publications to dataset + archiving of data. data collection CRIS: registration of (metadata) for dataset publication of results