High Efficiency Medium Access via Rosters

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0696r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Slot-based Power Save without PS-Poll Date: Authors: Date: July, 2012.
Advertisements

PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 1 Authors: Transmission Mechanism in MU-MIMO Date:
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0374r0 Mar 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Further Considerations on Legacy Fairness with Enhanced CCA Date:
Multi-STA Block ACK Protection
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r1 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0374r1 Mar 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Further Considerations on Legacy Fairness with Enhanced CCA Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Random RU selection process upon TF-R reception Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0097r0 SubmissionJarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Bandwidth Specific TXOP Limits Date: Authors: January 2011.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Submission doc.: IEEE /0102r0 January 2016 Sean Coffey, RealtekSlide 1 High Efficiency Medium Access via Rosters Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0394r0 March 2016 Sean Coffey, RealtekSlide 1 Achieving High Efficiency in Medium Access via Roster Mode Date:
HE Trigger Frame Format
Doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
High Efficiency in Accessing the Medium
Virtual CS during UL MU Date: Authors: March 2017
Locationing Protocol for 11az
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
High Efficiency in Accessing the Medium
MAC Calibration results
ERP Rates Date: April 2018 doc.: IEEE /1479r1
Power Efficient PS Poll
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 September 2010
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
EDCA and BlockAck Extensions for Reliable Multicast/Broadcast Services
MAC Calibration Results
Regarding UL MU protection
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
EDCA Enhancement to Improve Link Reliability for Multicast Streams
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Duration/ID field in UL-MU
Slot-based Power Save Improvement
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
HT Features in Mesh Network
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
UL MU Random Access Analysis
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
[Multi-RTS Proposal] Date: Authors: September 2010
Mandatory Protection Mechanisms
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
More Simulations on Secondary CCA
November 2007 doc.: IEEE /2752r1 July 2008
Airtime Analysis of EDCA
Duration in L-SIG Date: Authors: May 2010 Month Year
Multiplexing of Acknowledgements for Multicast Transmission
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
HEW Beamforming Enhancements
Coex Simulation and Analysis
Coex Simulation and Analysis
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Utilizing Unused Resources by Allowing Simultaneous Transmissions
Channel Access Design for Synchronized Multi-Links
Presentation transcript:

High Efficiency Medium Access via Rosters Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 High Efficiency Medium Access via Rosters Date: 2016-01-18 Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Abstract Using rosters reduces medium access overhead, by providing 11ax devices with predictable and unique backoff slots [1, 2]. This presentation provides further information on roster operation, including: A—fundamentals of roster operation and contrast with polling methods; B—effect of OBSS hidden nodes and a contrast with OFDMA; and C—ensuring legacy fairness Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Abstract Using rosters reduces medium access overhead, by providing 11ax devices with predictable and unique backoff slots [1, 2]. This presentation provides further information on roster operation, including: A—fundamentals of roster operation and contrast with polling methods; B—effect of OBSS hidden nodes and a contrast with OFDMA; and C—ensuring legacy fairness Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Motivation—I Cf. [1] January 2016 AIFS Backoff CCA +IFS . . . 43 22 133 15 AIFS Backoff CCA +IFS RTS SIFS CTS A-MPDU BA 43 23 20 15 52 44 16 356 68 Sean Coffey, Realtek

Both quantities are usually significant [1] January 2016 Motivation Baseline EDCA medium access overhead = the lower of the two quantities shown Both quantities are usually significant [1] It is possible to achieve much lower medium access overhead than either of these, by re-using well-proven components that are already part of the protocol Sean Coffey, Realtek

Approach Build a roster Use the roster Two phases: Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Approach Arrange matters so that each STA may obtain a unique backoff slot Two phases: Build a roster Use the roster Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Using a roster (A) [2, slide x] AP … … STA January 2016 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Using a roster (A) [2, slide x] ④ AP invokes a roster (now in usage mode): NAV set for legacy devices (say 5 ms) AP … … If the assigned slot is reached within TXOP, STA may transmit Other devices set NAV and freeze countdown as usual Depicted STA will have frozen its own countdown for each preceding transmission by others STA Roster invoked: Roster number Roster length Current NAV Offset within roster length STA / traffic stream uses its assigned slot(s) modulo offset within roster length Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Using a roster (A) Fundamental operation, step 1/3: AP … ? … STA Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Using a roster (A) Fundamental operation, step 1/3: AP … ? … STA On detecting L-STF during 9 ms slot time, other devices freeze backoff decrement and prepare for rest of PPDU At beginning, other devices do not know duration of PPDU Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Using a roster (A) Fundamental operation, step 2/3: AP … … STA Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Using a roster (A) Fundamental operation, step 2/3: AP … … STA Other STAs read further and extract duration from L-SIG, set NAV Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Using a roster (A) Fundamental operation, step 3/3: AP … … STA Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Using a roster (A) Fundamental operation, step 3/3: AP … … STA STA transmits for signaled duration, and other device defer Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Using a roster (A) Corollary 1: No duration scheduling required at AP Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Using a roster (A) Corollary 1: No duration scheduling required at AP AP … ? … STA AP takes care of order only; STA will announce duration later Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Using a roster (A) Corollary 2: No data to transmit causes only  9 ms loss AP Other STAs continue countdown May transmit when their turn arrives, earliest  9 ms later … … STA STA’s turn arrives but CCA is high: OBSS hidden node STA doesn’t start transmitting Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Summary—A A—Fundamentals of roster operation and differences with polling methods: Polling methods require specific duration in advance Polling methods waste airtime (for the full polled duration) if the polled device has no data to transmit Polling methods require extra PPDU(s) when allocated duration is insufficient, wasting airtime from extra preambles & other overhead Rosters have none of these drawbacks Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Abstract Using rosters reduces medium access overhead, by providing 11ax devices with predictable and unique backoff slots [1, 2]. This presentation provides further information on roster operation, including: A—fundamentals of roster operation and contrast with polling methods; B—effect of OBSS hidden nodes and a contrast with OFDMA; and C—ensuring legacy fairness Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Using a roster (B) [2, slide x1] Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Using a roster (B) [2, slide x1] Corollary 2: OBSS hidden nodes cause only 9 ms loss AP Other STAs continue countdown May transmit when their turn arrives, earliest 9 ms later … … STA STA’s turn arrives but CCA is high: OBSS hidden node STA doesn’t start transmitting Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Hidden nodes from OBSS (B) [2, slide x1] AP A-MPDU / Block Ack Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Hidden nodes from OBSS (B) [2, slide x1] AP A-MPDU / Block Ack VIFS + slot time (if AP bitmap signaled 0) Later slot: STA (after a busy slot) VIFS + CTS time + SIFS + slot time (if AP bitmap signaled 1) VIFS = Vestigial IFS, say 4 ms: for CCA, Rx-to-Tx and Tx-to-Rx turnaround times Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Hidden nodes from OBSS (B) AP A-MPDU / Block Ack Later slot: STA Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Hidden nodes from OBSS (B) AP A-MPDU / Block Ack CCA checks for OBSS hidden nodes STA gives up slot if CCA high VIFS + slot time (if AP bitmap signaled 0) Later slot: STA (after a busy slot) VIFS + CTS time + SIFS + slot time (if AP bitmap signaled 1) VIFS = Vestigial IFS, say 4 ms: for CCA, Rx-to-Tx and Tx-to-Rx turnaround times Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Using a roster (B) Corollary 3: OBSS hidden node causes only  9 ms loss AP Other STAs continue countdown May transmit when their turn arrives, earliest  9 ms later (i.e., VIFS + 9 ms later) … … STA STA’s turn arrives but CCA is high: OBSS hidden node STA doesn’t start transmitting Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Summary—B B—Effect of OBSS hidden nodes and a contrast with OFDMA: Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Summary—B B—Effect of OBSS hidden nodes and a contrast with OFDMA: Roster methods automatically reallocate airtime if there is an OBSS hidden node Roster methods lose only a minimum airtime (IFS + slot time) when OBSS hidden node transmits Roster moves on to next roster slot—which may not have CCA high OFDMA loses the allocated duration in the presence of OBSS hidden node Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Abstract Using rosters reduces medium access overhead, by providing 11ax devices with predictable and unique backoff slots [1, 2]. This presentation provides further information on roster operation, including: A—fundamentals of roster operation and contrast with polling methods; B—effect of OBSS hidden nodes and a contrast with OFDMA; and C—ensuring legacy fairness Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 Legacy fairness Previously a method was provided to ensure that devices participating in the roster do not achieve an unfair advantage over legacy devices ―devices defer for an appropriate time after roster use in order to equalize medium access [2, slide x2] Question arose on how the fairness works at AP ―how does the AP judge when to use roster mode? Using roster mode without guidelines would disadvantage legacy devices Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek

(C) [1] September 2015 Microseconds Subtract 40 ms for 24 Mbps Control Rate (RTS 28 ms vs. 52; CTS 28 ms v. 44) Sean Coffey, Realtek

(C) September 2015 Microseconds Subtract 40 ms for 24 Mbps Control Rate (RTS 28 ms vs. 52; CTS 28 ms v. 44) Sean Coffey, Realtek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1115r0 January 2016 References [1] IEEE doc. 11/15-1114r1, “Airtime Analysis of EDCA”, S. Coffey, D.Z. Liu (Realtek), September 2015 Sean Coffey, Realtek Sean Coffey, Realtek