Glycemic control for macrovascular disease in type II diabetes: Evidence and insights from recent trials  Sanjay Rajagopalan  Journal of Indian College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
Advertisements

Aggressive Hyperglycemia Management. Significant hospital hyperglycemia requires close follow-up Previously diagnosed diabetes and elevated A1C Without.
Foos et al, EASD, Lisbon, 13 September 2011 Comparison of ACCORD trial outcomes with outcomes estimated from modelled and meta- analysis studies Volker.
UKPDS Paper 36 Slides © University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit UKPDS slides are copyright and remain the property of the University of Oxford Diabetes.
UKPDS Paper 35 Slides © University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit
Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004.
Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines Targets for Glycemic Control Chapter 8 S. Ali Imran, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, Stuart Ross.
Diabetic Microvascular Disease: The Role of Glycemic Control and the Impact on Public Health Robert E. Ratner, MD MedStar Research Institute Georgetown.
ACCORD - Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes to Prevent Vascular Disease VADT - Veterans Administration Diabetes.
Blood glucose: is lower better for diabetic patients?
Session II: Glycemic control, when the lower is not the better Strict glycemic control and cardiovascular diseases Stefano Genovese Diabetologia e Malattie.
VBWG HPS. Lancet. 2003;361: Gæde P et al. N Engl J Med. 2003;348: Recent statin trials: Reduction in primary outcome in patients with diabetes.
PPAR  activation Clinical evidence. Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR  activation and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large.
Lower the better; the case for glucose Professor Taner DAMCI Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa Medical School, TURKEY.
The ADVANCE trial: update and new results Jean-François Gautier Saint Louis Hospital, Paris 12 th Meeting of the Mediterranean Group for the Study of Diabetes.
Glycemic Control: When the Lower is Not the “Better”?
Study Design Scirica BM, Bhatt DL Braunwald et al, Sexagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med
Lancet 373: , 2009 Baseline Characteristics of Participants and Study Design of Clinical Trials to Compare Intensive glucose- lowering versus.
UKHDS (UKPDS): UK Hypertension in Diabetes Study Purpose To determine whether tight control of blood pressure (aiming for BP
Background There are 12 different types of medications to lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is widely agreed upon that metformin.
Impact of Diabetes on Cardiovascular Risk C.Richard Conti M.D. MACC Oct 16,2004 GWICC Beijing, PRC.
Therapy of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: UPDATE Glycemic Goals in the Care of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes ADA and AACE Guidelines: Room For Improvement.
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015
An initiative of South Asian Federation of Endocrine Societies (SAFES)
Part 3. Diabetes Report Card: HbA 1c Levels in the United States Hoerger TJ, et al. Diabetes Care. 2008;31: Patients (%) HbA 1c (%)
Diabetes and the Kidney Richard Kingston Department of Renal Medicine Kent and Canterbury Hospital.
Summary of “A randomized trial of standard versus intensive blood-pressure control” The SPRINT Research Group, NEJM, DOI: /NEJMoa Downloaded.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Diabetes type 2 Landmark Outcomes Trials
The ALERT Trial.
ACCORD Design and Baseline Characteristics
Volume 352, Issue 9131, Pages (September 1998)
Reducing Adverse Outcomes after ACS in Patients with Diabetes Goals
Recent Breakthroughs in Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials in T2DM
Disclosure Consultations and Honoraria Grant Support
2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol treatment guidelines
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
AIM-HIGH Niacin Plus Statin to Prevent Vascular Events
Diabetes and Risk of CV Outcomes
Macrovascular Complications Microvascular Complications
New Insights on PPAR Agonists For Cardiovascular Disease
Clinical Advances in Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk
366 میلیون نفر در جهان مبتلا به دیابت هستند.
Early Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cardiovascular Disease
Incidence of CV Events in Subjects With T2D vs the Nondiabetic CAD Population
Impacting CV Risk With Diabetes Medications
Impacting CV Risk With Diabetes Medications
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Management of hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease
Growing Diabetes Pandemic Worldwide
CV Risk Management in T2DM: What Did We Learn from ADA 2016?
Alan Gradman  Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 
Journal of Indian College of Cardiology
Epidemiology of hypertension in India: Insights from PURE
Incidence of CV Events in Subjects With T2D vs the Nondiabetic CAD Population
Eric Peterson  Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 
T2DM, CV Risk, and Modulating Risk With Glucose-Lowering Strategies
Hypertension management in high risk type II diabetes with CKD: Insights from recent trials with a focus on albuminuria. A case based discussion  Matthew.
Panelists. Cardiovascular Risk Modulation in Diabetes: Emerging Pathways and Insights.
Pharmacotherapy for Diabetic Coronary Disease:
Need for better diabetes treatment for improved renal outcome
Journal of Indian College of Cardiology
2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol treatment guidelines
Potential mechanisms whereby statins may reduce the risk of stroke
ARISE Trial Aggressive Reduction of Inflammation Stops Events
New frontiers in Diabetes management
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
Presentation transcript:

Glycemic control for macrovascular disease in type II diabetes: Evidence and insights from recent trials  Sanjay Rajagopalan  Journal of Indian College of Cardiology  Volume 5, Pages S83-S94 (March 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006 Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Survival data from 820,900 individuals in 97 prospective studies. Source: Seshasai SR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(9):829–841 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Trends in age-standardized rates of diabetes-related complications in U.S adults. Source: Gregg EW et al. NEJM. April 17, 2014; 370; 1514–1523 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Annual event rate due to coronary heart disease and MI observed in various diabetes trials. Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Comparison of the BARI 2D and the SYNTAX trials, in terms of CV events. Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Blood glucose levels and vascular risk in diabetes – Best Evidence. (Diabetes Related End-Points: Sudden death, death from hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia, fatal or non-fatal MI, angina, heart failure, stroke, renal failure, amputation [of at least one digit], vitreous hemorrhage, retinal photocoagulation, blindness in one eye, or cataract extraction). Source: UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Lancet. 1998; 352(9131):837–853 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Blood glucose and vascular risk in diabetes best evidence: 2000. Source: Stratton IM, et al. BMJ. 2000; 321(7258):405–412 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 7 Benefit and risks of blood glucose control coexist: Evidence from UKPDS. The risks of diabetes complications significantly reduced for every 1% reduction of HbA1c. 1: Glycemia trials in perspective. 2: Glycemic targets set by various trials. Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 8 Impact of intensive therapy for diabetes: Legacy and vintage effects for CV events. Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 9 Hypoglycemia in the landmark trials. Source: Turnbull FM, et al. Diabetologia. 2009;52(11):2288–2298 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 10 Incident vascular outcomes and death among patients who had severe hypoglycemia in ADVANCE. Source: Zoungas N,et al. Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 7; 363(15):1410–8 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 11 10 year follow-up of UKPDS. Source: Holman R et al. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:1577–89 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 12 Effect of duration of diabetes (“vintage”) and other pre-specified sub-groups on major cardiovascular events. Source: Turnbull FM, et al. Diabetologia. 2009; 52(11):2288–2298 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 13 Heart disease prevention with improved glycemic control: Start early and continue long-term. Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 14 Steno-2: Effects of multifactorial intervention on CV outcomes. Source: Gaede P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(6):580–591 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 15 Effect of early intensive therapy on outcomes detected by screening. Source: Griffin SJ, et al. Lancet. 2011;378(9786):156–167 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 16 Summary of pharmacological incretin action on different target tissues. Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 17 Macrovascular outcome trials. Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 18 SAVOR-TIMI primary outcome measure. Source: Scirica BM, et al.N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1317–6 and AHA Scientific Session, 2013 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 19 1: SAVOR-TIMI: Individual Endpoints of Secondary Composite End-Point: Expanded MACE. 2: SAVOR-TIMI: Risk of hospitalization for HF according to baseline NT-proBNP. Source: Scirica BM, et al.N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1317–6 and AHA Scientific Session, 2013 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S83-S94DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.006) Copyright © 2015 Terms and Conditions