Wastewater Facilities Upgrade Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPRINGETTSBURY TOWNSHIP.
Advertisements

JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX AND UNION COUNTIES Virtual Plant Tour.
NEW YORK WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOCIATION WINTER MEETING – FEBRUARY 10, 2003 MAXIMIZING CSO CAPTURE THROUGH WET WEATHER OPERATIONS.
Welcome to American #2 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Located in Exmoor National Park, with nearby bathing beach 3800 population equivalent (summer) 1900 m 3 /d flow to full treatment Sewage feed started 12th.
Treatment of Slaughterhouse Wastewater
Nutrient Issues at the Blue Plains WWTP February 2004.
Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works
w-fn005 1 Ocean Outfall Legislation Compliance City of Hollywood Department of Public Utilities LARGE USER MEETING October 2, 2008.
An-Najah National University Civil Engineering Department
FE Review for Environmental Engineering Problems, problems, problems Presented by L.R. Chevalier, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
The Town of Discovery Bay Community Services District Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan NOVEMBER 9, 2011.
Phosphorus Removal at Sand Creek Water Reuse Facility by Duane “Bear” Steib and Kathy Bill/City of Aurora Steve Polson/CH2M HILL by Duane “Bear” Steib.
INTRODUCTION TO THE TREATMENT OF TANNERY EFFLUENTS
TEXAS COMMISSION on ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PROPOSED STUCTURE FOR CHAPTER 217 < Subchapter A Administrative Provisions < Subchapter B Design Bases < Subchapter.
Energy Efficient Design Low Cost State Loan Low-Impact Construction Novato Sanitary District Wastewater Facilities Upgrade Presenter: Beverly James, Manager-Engineer.
1 CE 548 Analysis and Selection of Wastewater Flowrates and Constituent Loading.
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Preliminary Seventh Power Plan Energy Efficiency Estimates October 14, 2014 West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant, Seattle.
Presentation Overview
Wastewater Treatment & Collection System Improvements.
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Preliminary Seventh Power Plan Energy Efficiency Estimates November 18, 2014 West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant, Seattle.
ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR (RBC) PROCESS
Municipal Wastewater Efficiency Improvements Potential Savings for the 6 th Power Plan September 30, 2008 Regional Technical Forum South Treatment Plant.
Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Retrofit for Ammonia and Nitrate Removal
Pennsylvania Water Environment Federation PennTEC Annual Technical Conference June 4, 2013 Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion.
Effective Use Of Peracetic Acid to Reduce Effluent Disinfection Byproduct in Water Resource Recovery Facilities Isaiah Shapiro, EIT Dimitri Katehis PhD,
Increasing Energy Efficiency at the Allegan WWTP MWEA/AWWA Joint Annual Conference August 19, 2010.
Phosphorus Removal in a Membrane Reactor System— A Demonstration Study Wayne Lorenz, P.E. and Matthew J. Gavin Wright Water Engineers, Inc. and Newell.
Cortez Sanitation DistrictSeptember 2002 Arber Cortez UV Disinfection Steven M. Ravel, P.E. Travis E. Meyer, P.E. Richard P. Arber Associates.
Biological Aerated Filtration (BAF) at the Denver Water Recycling Plant 2006 Water Reuse Workshop Golden, CO Russell Plakke, Denver Water.
2008 Facility Plan Update May Purpose  Comprehensive Plan through 2033 –Builds on Past Work –Adjust for Changing Conditions  Identify Capacity,
Status update presentation #1 for the Cayucos Sustainable Water Project Status update presentation #1 for the Cayucos Sustainable Water Project November.
City of Tallahassee Wastewater Treatment System Hydrogeology Workshop – 2005 May 12 – 13, 2005.
Construction OF AMMONIA REMOVAL UPGRADES FOR FIRST BROAD RIVER WWTP
November 17, 2015NC AWWA-WEA Annual Conference Planning for the Future --- MSD’s Facility Plan Update Peter Weed and Hunter Carson, MSD Mary Knosby, HDR.
Energy Efficiency Opportunities at Wastewater Treatment Facilities UW – Madison Class November 3, 2010 Focus on Energy Joseph Cantwell, P.E.
Good at the First Drop: Start-up of the Western Wake Regional WRF Meets Summer Permit Limits 95 TH Annual Conference | November 2015 | Raleigh Convention.
NYWEA ENERGY SPECIALTY CONFERENCE November 20, 2014 Towards Net-Zero Energy in Wastewater Treatment Demonstration of ClearCove’s Enhanced Primary Treatment.
APC-MB05 IS ADVANCED IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS APC Wastewater Treatment System.
Public Information Meeting Wastewater Treatment January 26, 2016.
COMPARISON OF MBBR AND Suspended growth BNR Performance at the HRWTF
CITY OF ARCATA -WATER AND WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: RATE SETTING.
Energy Efficiency and Competitiveness with Advanced Wastewater Treatment How a wastewater treatment plant can be more efficient and achieve better results?
Town of Taos / Taos Valley Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility MBR Upgrade Emerging Technologies 2012 Infrastructure Finance Conference Kari Edenfield,
Phase II and Compost Facility Upgrade Projects February 16, 2012.
CTC 450 Review WW Collection Systems Types of pipes Installation.
2011 WCW Conference. Fort McMurray James Sacker, Director Environmental Hugh Crawford, Wastewater Supervisor Plant Operations staff Alberta Environment.
Town of Enfield : Upgrading the Water Pollution Control Facility & Collection System Jay Sheehan, PE Michael Burns, PE.
WATER MANAGEMENT.
Welcome to American-Bath Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Background Slide #1 5/27/2004 CITY OF GALT public works Wastewater Background May 2004.
CTC 450 Review WW Sludge Processes.
National University Of Kaohsiung Taiwan
Update on PI Modeling and Nitrogen Removal at Blue Plains
Modified Ludzack-Ettinger Wastewater Plant
How Do Wastewater Facilities Address Contaminants in Water
Flow Equalization Jae K. (Jim) Park Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison.
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Victor Valley Water Reclamation Authority Biogas to Energy Project with Omnivore™ Digester Demonstration May 30th, 2013.
CTC 450 Review Preliminary & Primary Treatment Measure flow Screen
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Pollution Control in the City of Windsor Wastewater & CSO Management 2013 Status & Update The 7th Biennial Meeting of the Lake Erie Millennium Network.
Big Sky Wastewater Facility Plan Update
City of Janesville Wastewater Facility Plan Amendment Public Hearing
________________________________________________________________
Capital Improvement Plan April 9, 2018 Status Update
The Project Overview and Status Report
Is the Bay Area Ready for Potable Reuse?
Advanced Wastewater Treatment
Presentation transcript:

Wastewater Facilities Upgrade Project Novato Sanitary District Wastewater Facilities Upgrade Project Water and Environment

Background 2005 Novato Sanitary District had two treatment plants Novato Plant: 3.6 million gallons/day Ignacio Plant: 1.6 million gallons/day Peak wet weather flows = 7 times average flow All treatment components over 20 years old Majority of components are 30 to 50 years old Some facilities have been reused three times Plant had reliability issues Additional flow and load was forecasted More stringent regulations were coming

Novato treatment plant

Novato Treatment Plant 3.6 million gallons/day

Ignacio treatment plant

Ignacio Treatment Plant 1.6 million gallons/day

Existing Plants Had Difficulty Meeting Previous NPDES Limits and … No. of Violations

…Regulatory Requirements Were Getting Stricter New “zero spill” tolerance requirement Zero exceedance of effluent limitations Mandatory fines for each exceedance (SB709) District under mandatory time schedule for upgrades (March 2008-2010) Reduction in discharge limits for mercury, cyanide and others Ignacio must meet full secondary treatment EPA and RWQCB were ambiguous but worrisome regarding ‘blending’

Permit Conditions Vary Based on Discharge Location Season Permit Condition Operational Mode Reclamation - Summer June thru August BOD5 40 mg/L Carbonaceous Bay Discharge – Spring and Fall May, Sept, Oct BOD5 15 mg/L TSS 10 mg/L NH3 6 mg-N/L Nitrification Bay Discharge - Winter November thru April BOD5 30mg/L TSS 30 mg/L Note that these are average monthly values.

Condition Assessment Conducted on All Plant Components

Many Plant Areas Were Not Reusable

Several Alternatives Were Considered Replace both treatment plants Consolidate treatment at one plant Novato site Ignacio site Type of treatment process Oxidation ditch Activated Sludge (MLE) MBR Consolidation at Novato with Activated Sludge recommended Lowest cost Highest reliability Lowest environmental impact

New Consolidated Treatment Plant Ignacio Transfer PS and Equalization Basins

Construction Cost Summary of Total Project Item Construction Estimate $ million* Construction Bid $million Novato Treatment Plant 75 67 Ignacio PS + FM 12 11 Total 87 78 *Escalated to mid pt of construction

Flow Path, New Treatment Plant From Collection System Ignacio PS To Reclamation or Outfall

New Consolidated Plant Aeration 4 X 115,000 cu ft basins Anoxic zones Primary Clarifiers 2 X 100 ft diameter, covered tanks Headworks 2 X Aquaguard Screens, 15 mm opening 2 X Vortex grit chambers Influent PS 6 X 9.4 MGD Submersible Pumps Secondary Clarifiers 2 X 125 ft diameter UV Disinfection 3 Channels

Innovative Aeration Design Avoids Flow Equalization and Blending Summer conditions require only carbonaceous removal Designed to avoid nitrification to save energy Winter conditions: Permit requires nitrification for Bay discharge Peak wet weather flows up to 7 times average Design of dual mode aeration avoids need to equalize peak flows Conventional MLE operation up to 18 MGD Transition to contact stabilization 18 to 47 MGD

Nitrification Mode Winter Flow < 18 MGD Primary Effluent ZONE F AERATED ZONE E AERATED Aeration Basin 3 ZONE A ZONE B ZONE C ZONE D AERATED RAS Aeration Basin 4

Contact Stabilization Mode: Winter Flow at > 18 MGD ZONE F AERATED ZONE E AERATED Primary Effluent ZONE A ZONE B ZONE C ZONE D AERATED RAS

Cost Saving Measures Totaled $17 million Item Savings, $ millions Innovative method to treat peak wet weather flows 3.0 Postponement of third secondary clarifier 4.1 Reuse of existing emergency generators 1.5 Reuse of existing diesel pumps at effluent pump station 1.0 Deletion of parallel force main 2.4 State Revolving Fund low interest loan 5.5* *Present worth of interest savings

Annual Energy Savings Came From Many Sources Design Element Net Annual Savings, kWh Net Annual Power Savings, $ Utility Water Discharge Pressure 30,400 $3,950 Plant Elevation 30,800 $4,000 Submerged Weirs at Peak Flows 38,450 $5,000 Premium Efficiency Motors 83,000 $10,800 Aeration Basin Depth 85,750 $11,150 Energy Efficient Blowers 310,000 $40,250 NSD Annual Total Savings 528,000 $76,000 Present Worth of Savings, 30 yrs, 5% $1,200,000 Typical Annual Energy for AS Plant** 3,394,500 $441,285 at 1,200 kwh/MG and $0.13 electrical cost

Plant is in Start-up, and Performing Well Parameter Units Average Monthly Nov - Apr May, Sept, Oct Typical Performance of New Plant BOD5 mg/l 30 15 5 to 10 TSS 10 3 to 6 Ammonia 6 <1 Oil and Grease Mg/l 5 < 5 Enterococcus Per 100 ml 35 < 10 to 15 Fecal Coliform MPN 140 4 to 8

Thank you