TALLER 6: Sostenibilidad de los sistemas de reciclaje con inclusión

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ontario Environment Network, Labour Caucus OVERVIEW OF EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY Jim Mahon Ontario Environment Network Detoxifying the Economy &
Advertisements

Refreshed Strategies to Address the Dimensions of Sustainability and Effective Delivery Biodiversity Land Degradation Climate Change Chemicals International.
Sustainable Approaches: Industrial Ecology and Pollution Prevention Chapter 21 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
Environmental law is what we do. TM 1191 Second Avenue Suite 2200 Seattle, WA ELECTRONIC WASTE RECYCLING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION.
Environmental Impacts of Single Use Plastic Bags  Consumed in extremely high volumes (>23 million per year in SM)  Produced from non-renewable resources.
EU Environmental policy priorities for the period till 2010 Based on the 6 th Environment Action Programme By Nikos Sakkas, LEI Crete, 2002.
CIRCULAR ECONOMY FOR PLASTICS INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE MARCH 2015 LOUIS LINDENBERG THE DUTCH CENTRE.
Sustainable transition of electronic products: WEEE and RoHS linking innovation to governance policies on electronic waste presentation at the workshop.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
Overview of Printing Industries Environmental Initiatives Presentation by Hagop Tchamkertenian Manager, Industry & Commercial Policy Printing Industries.
Nigel Marsh, Global Head of Environment, Rolls-Royce plc
Sustainability. Sustainability Defined Sustainability commonly refers to the characteristic of a process or state which can be maintained at a certain.
Sustainability Internal Drivers and Self-Assessment Dennis J. Stamm VP, Director Lean Enterprise Consulting February 22, 2010.
Sustainability Policy. Introduction 2 We understand that the decisions we make as a company have an impact on the ecological, social, cultural, and economic.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
 Homework #9 due  Quiz #4  After Break Homework #10 due Dec. 2 nd Exam #4 on Dec. 2 nd Last week of class – Group Presentations Group Papers – Dec.
Funding Discussion State of Vermont Solid Waste Management Districts and State Programs.
Defining the Role of Local Governments in Supporting EPR Policy April 14, 2011 Recycling Council of Ontario 1.
Rainer Kistler, Senior Advisor Environment, Health & Safety June Antigonish, Nova Scotia The Swiss Army Knife for Waste Management Zeroing In On.
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN ROMANIA “Achievements and Barriers” Dr.eng. Alexei Atudorei ISWA Board Member Representative of ISWA - RDN Southeast.
1 An Overview of EPR Jim Frey, CEO of Resource Recycling Systems What it Means for North Carolina, and What are Viable Alternatives NC SWANA Fall Conference.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
EPR webconference Tues 15 Feb 2011 Jane Bickerstaffe Director INCPEN.
The Eco-Innovation Action Plan Initiatives related to the EIP on Raw Materials Brussels, 19 April 2013 Paola Migliorini, DG ENV.E4-Eco-innovation.
More prosperity, new jobs: A practical business perspective on the Circular Economy Package by Dr. Katharina Reuter Director of Ecopreneur.eu Rotterdam,
The European WEEE Directive International Seminar on Electronic Waste World Bank – infoDev Eric MUGNIER, Executive director ERNST & YOUNG.
World Café 1) Why are the two sites we visited good experiences in terms of environmental impact / decent work perspective? 2) Are there areas for improvements.
Sustainable Development Goals and Public Procurement
Sustainability Internal Drivers and Self-Assessment Dennis J. Stamm
Sandra Méndez Fajardo, Ph.D., Colombia
ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBILITY
Managing Environmental Issues
PROGRESS WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WASTE BUREAU
Stimulating the processing of used materials:
Extended Producer Responsibility – origins and evolutions
Georges Kremlis DG Environment Head of Unit DG ENV.E.1
Extended Producer Responsibility
Is The Earth Flat and The Economy Circular?
CSIR BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Inclusive green economy in EU development cooperation
Circular Economy.
Impacts of new Legislation on waste statistics
Policy implications for proper WEEE management
Global Policies and Regulations for E-waste management
Advanced Management Control and Sustainable Development
Julian Polanco Sierra MA Development Studies student
Topic 8: Human Systems and Resource Use
The European Strategy for Circular Economy – Plastics Strategy and revised Waste Legislation Joanna Drake – Deputy Director-General DG ENV, European Commission.
3 billion more middle-class consumers will fuel future demand
Sustainable management of E-waste
Sustainability Internal Drivers and Self-Assessment Dennis J. Stamm
Cleaner production Assessment in Dairy Processing
SCP in the 7th Environmental Action Programme
Circular Economy -Public Consultation – Results
Port Sustainability and Future Generations
The Role of Bilateral Donors in supporting capacity-building in the area of ICT Open Consultations on Financing Mechanisms for Meeting the Challenges.
E-WASTE: A VALUABLE SOURCE OF RESOURCES
Advanced Management Control and Sustainable Development
Towards 2024: Taking Extended Producer Responsibility to the next level Monika Romenska Regulatory & Public Affairs Manager, EXPRA.
Sustainable buildings
ANALYSIS OF THE E-WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN THE CONTEXT OF CIRCULAR ECONOMY  ALBĂSTROIU IRINA, BUCUR MIHAELA AND NĂSTASE GABRIEL Abstract: Quantities.
Striving to achieve through international standards
INNOVATION DEALS: A NEW APPROACH TO REGULATION
Clarissa Morawski March 4, 2019
Recycling and Recovery of Plastic Packaging - An Industry Perspective - Financial opportunities & legislative barriers for the Circular Economy Brussels,
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SUPPLY
Deposit Return Schemes (DRS) across the UK
Closing the loop – An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy
Collaborative regulation in the digital economy
Presentation transcript:

TALLER 6: Sostenibilidad de los sistemas de reciclaje con inclusión Sostenibilidad de Esquemas de Reciclaje: la experiencia internacional

Can We Get to a Circular Economy? If recycling is the preferred public policy over waste disposal worldwide why is it more expensive to collect and recycle used products and packaging than the market value of the recovered commodities?

Waste or Resource Management? Waste management materials handling practices are more efficient Waste generators seldom charged the true economic, social and environmental costs Raw material extraction is subsidized and environmental and social costs externalized Poor economies of scale in recycling collection and processing Lack of competition in recycling systems

Closing the Financial Gaps Waste disposal surcharges to discourage waste generation and to raise funds to support recycling Charging “advance disposal fees” Voluntary and mandatory deposit – return systems Charging generators of waste for collection and treatment/providing recycling services at no charge Mandatory recycling laws Bans on the disposal of recyclable materials Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

What are the Goals of EPR? To give preference to recycling of used products over disposal To internalize to the producer (and indirectly the consumer) the cost to manage products and packaging at the end of their useful life. To provide an economic incentive to the producer – the key actor in the production /consumption chain with the greatest ability to re-design their products - to reduce environmental impacts by reducing resource consumption and waste disposal

EPR Goals (2) To promote behaviour changes among producers and consumers to achieve broader public policy goals such as: To favour reuse over single use products To eliminate toxic materials To ensure a level playing field for innovative companies making these changes To promote competition

Is EPR Working? Designed properly EPR drives large increases in recycling Requires producers to pay fees to sustain these financially There has been very little success in changing producers behaviour in the design of packaging: Continued substitution of plastics for glass and metals Multi-material pouches and laminates are the fastest growing components of packaging Making used packaging waste lighter, smaller, less valuable and more difficult to recycle Governments (and some leading companies) are introducing new policy incentives to drive more effort into reduction and reuse

A Key Question for LATAM Can public policies to protect the rights and needs of informal recyclers be legitimately and effectively integrated within EPR policies?

The IRR/IADB Study There are at least 400 different EPR programs operating in approximately 100 jurisdictions National and sub-national This study is focused on packaging 16 candidate jurisdictions assessed 9 selected for more intensive study Focus on well established international programs and leading LATAM countries To provide: Comparative analysis of the results achieved Case studies that could provide a helpful starting point for other LATAM markets considering similar approaches

LATAM Brazil - unique design to incentivise the inclusion of informal recyclers Ecuador - a government imposed fee on beverage containers not consistent with EPR principles Uruguay - based on a shared producer responsibility model which shares some aspects with European EPR programs

Mature European Austria, Belgium, France, Spain Each with over 20 years experience Operate under very different economic, institutional and cultural conditions than LATAM

ROW South Africa - a mix of informal and formal recycling system with voluntary EPR programs over which the government has implemented new legislation Turkey - has been implementing “European” style EPR approach over a dominant informal recycling system

Some Early Observations All countries have some form of informal recycling European EPR programs do not have explicit policies or regulations to protect or advance the interests of informal recyclers Driven by technology improvements & cost reduction There are tensions between policies to advance formal municipal recycling programs and the existing informal sectors in Turkey & South Africa LATAM is the leader in addressing the needs of informal recyclers as national recycling and EPR policies evolve