Quantifying Producer Error in the Unsupervised Classification of Reservoirs Skye Swoboda-Colberg1, Chris Sheets2, Dr. Ramesh Sivanpillai3 1. Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 of 50 Optimization of Artificial Neural Networks in Remote Sensing Data Analysis Tiegeng Ren Dept. of Natural Resource Science in URI (401)
Advertisements

With support from: NSF DUE in partnership with: George McLeod Prepared by: Geospatial Technician Education Through Virginia’s Community Colleges.
Predicting and mapping biomass using remote sensing and GIS techniques; a case of sugarcane in Mumias Kenya Odhiambo J.O, Wayumba G, Inima A, Omuto C.T,
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
The Use of Remote Sensing in Habitat Management for Wildlife Helen Holdsworth EES 5053 University of Texas at San Antonio December 2,
Spatial Statistics in Ecology: Case Studies Lecture Five.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Geography Tools For Geographers. Geography Tools Database - A collection of information that can be analyzed and are often used with other tools to answer.
VALIDATION OF REMOTE SENSING CLASSIFICATIONS: a case of Balans classification Markus Törmä.
Use of Remote Sensing in Forestry Applications Murat Tunç Murat Tunç
1 Subject Database Management Information System & Applications of Remote sensing and GIS “Introduction to Image Interpretation” Topic: Dated: 21/10/14.
Essential Standard 8.E.1.4 Conclude that the good health of humans requires: • Monitoring of the hydrosphere • Water quality standards • Methods of water.
An Overview of Remote Sensing and Image Processing by Miles Logsdon with thanks to Robin Weeks and Frank Westerlund.
Published in Remote Sensing of the Environment in May 2008.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
Methods of Validating Maps of Deforestation and Selective Logging Carlos Souza Jr. Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia—Imazon.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
TARGETED LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION by: Shraddha R. Asati Guided by: Prof. P R.Pardhi.
A Forest Fragmentation Index to Quantify the Rate of Forest Change James D. Hurd, Emily H. Wilson, Daniel L. Civco Center for Land Use Education and Research.
Introduction to Remote Sensing. Outline What is remote sensing? The electromagnetic spectrum (EMS) The four resolutions Image Classification Incorporation.
Learning Objectives Nature of Light Color & Spectroscopy ALTA Spectrophotometer Spectral Signature of Substances Interpretation of Satellite Images.
Seto, K.C., Woodcock, C.E., Song, C. Huang, X., Lu, J. and Kaufmann, R.K. (2002). Monitoring Land-Use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Multispectral Remote Sensing of Benthic Environments Christopher Moses, Ph.D. Jacobs Technology.
Remotely Sensed Data EMP 580 Fall 2015 Dr. Jim Graham Materials from Sara Hanna.
Data Sources Sources, integration, quality, error, uncertainty.
Chapter 5 Remote Sensing Crop Science 6 Fall 2004 October 22, 2004.
May 4 th (4:00pm) Multiple choice (50 points) Short answer (50 points)
Estimating Water Optical Properties, Water Depth and Bottom Albedo Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Coastal Habitat Mapping S. C. Liew #, P.
 Introduction to Remote Sensing Example Applications and Principles  Exploring Images with MultiSpec User Interface and Band Combinations  Questions…
Landsat unsupervised classification Zhuosen Wang 1.
Land Use / Land Cover Change in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area Lori Krider & Melinda Kernik
Accuracy of Land Cover Products Why is it important and what does it all mean Note: The figures and tables in this presentation were derived from work.
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
By: Katie Blake and Paul Walters.  To analyze land cover changes in the Twin Cities Metro Area from 1984 to 2005 Image difference and Thematic Change.
Application of spatial autocorrelation analysis in determining optimal classification method and detecting land cover change from remotely sensed data.
Development of a Small Remotely Piloted Vehicle for the Collection of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index Readings Dr. Randy R. Price, Goutam Nistala.
Observing Laramie Basin Grassland Phenology Using MODIS Josh Reynolds with PROPOSED RESEARCH PROJECT Acknowledgments Steven Prager, Dept. of Geography.
Object-oriented Land Cover Classification in an Urbanizing Watershed Erik Nordman, Lindi Quackenbush, and Lee Herrington SUNY College of Environmental.
REMOTE SENSING DATA Markus Törmä Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Helsinki University of Technology
Estimating intra-annual changes in the surface area of Sand Mesa Reservoir #1 using multi-temporal Landsat images Cody A. Booth 1 with Ramesh Sivanpillai.
Karley R. Shepperson 1 with Dr. Ramesh Sivanpillai 2 1. Departments of Renewable Resources; 2. Department of Botany.
Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas Sarah Belcher & Grant Cooper December 8, 2014.
Intra-Urban Land Cover Classification in High Spatial Resolution Images using Object-Oriented Analysis: trends and challenges Carolina Moutinho Duque de.
Christopher Steinhoff Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming Ramesh Sivanpillai Department of Botany, University of Wyoming Mapping Changes.
Effect of Sun Incidence Angle on Classifying Water Bodies in Landsat Images Ina R. Goodman, Dr. Ramesh Sivanpillai Department of Botany WyomingView.
Kate E. Richardson 1 with Ramesh Sivanpillai 2 1.Department of Ecosystem Science and Management 2.Department of Botany University of Wyoming.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Introduction to Remote Sensing of the Environment Bot/Geog 4111/5111
Gofamodimo Mashame*,a, Felicia Akinyemia
Quantifying Analyst Bias in Mapping Flooded Areas from Landsat Images
Jakobshavn Isbrae Glacial Retreat
Mapping Variations in Crop Growth Using Satellite Data
Using vegetation indices (NDVI) to study vegetation
THEMATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SPATIAL DATA
Mapping wheat growth in dryland fields in SE Wyoming using Landsat images Matthew Thoman.
STUDY ON THE PHENOLOGY OF ASPEN
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
Monitoring Surface Area Change in Iowa's Water Bodies
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
Matthew J. Thoman1 and Kaitlyn McCollum1 with Ramesh Sivanpillai2
with Ramesh Sivanpillai2 and Alexandre Latchininsky3
EMP 580 Fall 2015 Dr. Jim Graham Materials from Sara Hanna
By Blake Balzan1, with Ramesh Sivanpillai PhD2
Image Information Extraction
Bailey Terry1 & Benjamin Beaman2 with Ramesh Sivanpillai3
SA8922: Remote Sensing and Spatial data
Chapter 1 Lesson 1.
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Presentation transcript:

Quantifying Producer Error in the Unsupervised Classification of Reservoirs Skye Swoboda-Colberg1, Chris Sheets2, Dr. Ramesh Sivanpillai3 1. Department of Geography, 2. Earth System Science, 3. Department of Botany

What is Remote Sensing? Remote Sensing can be defined as the collection of information about an object without being in direct contact with that object. Information is often collected from sensors mounted on satellites or airplanes.

How Remote Sensing is used to solve Real-World Problems or Opportunities Process data to produce Images. Process Images to produce Maps. Use maps to make decisions about the world. Different land covers reflect different wavelengths of light. Remote Sensing can be used to identify land cover types.

Classification A number of factors can influence the accuracy of the classification of remotely sensed images. Analyst bias is one of the factors that could influence the classification.

Objective Quantify the producer error while classifying images. Four producers independently generated maps from same images. For six WY reservoirs in five different years. These maps were compared between producers to determine the amount of agreement or disagreement for an image in a given year.

Materials and Methods 4 Map Producers 6 Reservoirs Images from 5 Years Images were collected by the Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper Images are made available at http://landsat.usgs.gov

Study Area Anchor Reservoir Buffalo Bill Reservoir Bull Lake Gray Reef Reservoir Keyhole Reservoir Pilot Butte Reservoir

Data Analysis Classify each image into 50 clusters using the ISODATA unsupervised classification technique. Attribute each cluster as water or non-water. Each image was attributed by 4 map producers. Each map producer was not aware of the other producers working with the same image. This was a blind-study. Calculate the total area of water for each image. Compare the reservoir’s area between different map producers.

Data Analysis: Attribute Each Class Water (Blue) Edge (Green) Non-water (Beige) Calculate the total area of water.

Process for Comparing Map Producer Results

Results: Highest Agreement Levels of Agreement between 4 map producers in the Classification of Buffalo Bill Reservoir in year A (BBA) Blue pixels: All 4 map producers agreed. Pink pixels: Half the map producers agreed. Yellow pixels: One map producer classified as water. Average Water Area: 7674 Hectares

Results: Lowest agreement Average water area: 15 Hectares Results: Lowest agreement Levels of Agreement between 4 Map Producers in the Classification of Anchor Reservoir (ARA) Blue pixels: All 4 map producers agreed. Cyan pixels: ¾ of the map producers agreed. Pink pixels: Half the map producers agreed. Yellow pixels: One map producer classified as water.

Discussion: Sources of Error Reservoir Depth (Shallowness) Wet Sand or Soil Classification of Edges Floating Vegetation Map Producer Expertise

Discussion: Sources of Agreement Number of Clusters used in the classification of a reservoir (Fewer are better) Reservoir Size and shape Map Producer Expertise

Conclusions Unsupervised Classification can be applied in many, but not all, circumstances and is dependent on the condition of that reservoir in a given year. Smaller reservoirs with less standing water tend to be more difficult to accurately classify than larger ones. Floating vegetation can significantly decrease the accuracy of Reservoir Classification.

Acknowledgements

Questions?