Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in New Mexico March 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05 Fall & Winter Sessions) FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
Vouchers in Milwaukee: What Have We Learned From the Nation’s Oldest and Largest Program? Deven Carlson University of Oklahoma.
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Massachusetts March 2015.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Texas March 2015.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
July 18, 2011 Oakland Boys and Men of Color Project Data Profile of Latino Males in Oakland Unified School District Prepared by: Urban Strategies Council.
Keys to Closing the Gap in Florida: Accountability, Technical Assistance, and Targeted Resources Presentation to the National Governors’ Association John.
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Wisconsin March 2015.
Florida Department of Education Jeanine Blomberg, Commissioner External Factors Review: GRADE 3 FCAT READING 2005, 2006, 2007 Jay Pfeiffer, Deputy Commissioner.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Arizona March 2015.
1 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Results Student Growth Tracked Over Time: 2006 – 2009 Grade-by-grade testing began in The tests and data.
TACOMA PUBLIC SCHOOLS- RESEACH AND EVALUATION Webinar for Tacoma Principals May 7, 2014 (Thank you to the State Board of Education for some of the slides.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
 Educator Effectiveness System  Comparative Measures  Resource for Professional Development.
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Ohio March Notice This presentation contains interactive graphics which should be viewed in the context of a powerpoint.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Florida Charter Schools:
The Excellence Gap.
Student Homelessness in NYC
PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in CALIFORNIA March 2015
Urban Charter Schools in California March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Minnesota March 2015
What’s Driving Chicago’s Educational Progress?
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in FLORIDA March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Florida March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in ILLINOIS March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Colorado March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in New York March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Impact in Washington DC March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Michigan March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in NEVADA March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in NEW JERSEY March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in PENNSYLVANIA March 2015
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in TENNESSEE March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Georgia March 2015
Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Pennsylvania March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in DC March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in NEW MEXICO March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in Wisconsin March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in NEW YORK March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Missouri March 2015
Student Mobility and Achievement Growth In State Assessment Mohamed Dirir Connecticut Department of Education Paper presented at National Conference.
Texas State Accountability
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in MINNESOTA March 2015
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in LOUISIANA March 2015
Central City Elementary School
Chronic Absence in Oregon
AYP and Report Card.
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Urban Charter Schools Demographics in ARIZONA March 2015
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
Chapter 4 Science, Mathematics, and Computer Science Courses
Chapter 4 Science, Mathematics, and Computer Science Courses
Presentation transcript:

Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in New Mexico March 2015

Notice This presentation contains interactive graphics which should be viewed in the context of a powerpoint presentation. Viewing presentation as static slides will cause some data to be hidden from the viewer and may cause labels to appear with the wrong graph.

Impact Research Questions This impact study answers the following questions: How does the academic progress of charter school students compare to their traditional public school (TPS) counterparts in New Mexico? We examine: Total average academic growth for all charter students relative to TPS Average academic growth for charter school students for separate time periods Charter school student growth by elementary / middle / high school grade levels Charter school student growth by prior year academic achievement Charter school student growth by the major student subgroups Charter school student growth by the number of years student continuously attended charter schools For the group of charter schools in Albuquerque, how do they perform compared to their peer schools in the same community?

A Quick Word About Methods Charter school students may be different than a typical student in TPS, so care is needed in testing their learning gains. We use a “Virtual Twin” approach to match each charter school’s students to TPS students who look just like them drawn from the TPS schools that have lost students to the charter school. A Technical Appendix provides a full explanation of our research methodology.

A Quick Word About Methods Unlike other recent CREDO studies, this study does not include a conversion of effect sizes to days of learning. As the days of learning computation is based on the national NAEP scores, it would not be appropriate to apply it to the limited regional samples which almost certainly DO NOT progress at the same rate as the national population.

Understanding the Slides Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Urban Region– There are two growth values for reading. The left is for TPS students and the right for Charter students There are also two growth values for math. As before, the left is for TPS students and the right for Charter students These are the marginal effects of charter enrollment. The left is for reading and the right for math. This graph looks at the difference between the charter and TPS growth values. 0.03 – 0.08 - 0.05 -0.01 – 0.05 - 0.06 Average TPS Growth Average TPS Growth To compute the difference, we take the Charter growth value minus the TPS growth value for each subject.

Albuquerque Results

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth Average TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL STUDENTS by Growth Period Average TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL STUDENTS by Gradespan Average Elementary TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL STUDENTS by Years of Charter School Enrollment Average TPS Growth This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after 2006-2007.

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Asian TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Native American TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Black TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Hispanic TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth Average TPS in Poverty Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL BLACK STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White, Non-Poverty TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White Non-Poverty TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average Non-ELL TPS Growth Average ELL TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL STUDENTS with SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average Non-SPED TPS Growth Average SPED TPS Growth

Student-Level Results Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Albuquerque – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Non-Retained TPS Growth Average Retained TPS Growth