Regulatory Impact Assessment in Austria

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Role of National Parliaments
Advertisements

Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
Accountability in the EU Accounting for performance – How to account for policy and regulatory impact EU Accountability Conference 14 October 2014 Manfred.
Development of internal control: methodology and responsibility
The development and use of KNI’s in South Africa and the role of the Auditor-General in auditing KNI’s INTOSAI WG ON KNI - 6 TH MEETING APRIL 2013.
Public Procurement in Albania in the framework of recent reforms PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
Modernising government budget operations: Case studies from Europe Lewis Hawke World Bank The Exchange Abu Dhabi, UAE May 13-15, 2013.
9 July 2008Evaluation of audit of PIFC systems1 Workshop on audit/evaluation of Public Internal Financial Control Systems (PIFC) Jurrie Vos.
IEKA - Albanian Institute of Authorized Chartered Auditors Towards application of new standards on accounting and auditing – Albanian challenge on implementing.
PAD190 PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
/SCM-Network, Ljubljana Gerald Reindl SCM: Test Case for Outcome- Oriented Impact Assessment.
Ryve Prekorogja 13 June VET Vocational Education and Training.
Grosu-Axenti Diana Financial Inspection Director Financial Inspection vs External & Internal audit in Republic of Moldova.
FROM INSPECTION TO INTERNAL AUDIT - the Bulgarian experience - PEM–PAL workshop Chisinau June 2007 Ludmila Rangelova – Director CHU, MoF Stefan Belchev.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU THE COORDINATION OF THE DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS Claudia Lung.
‘ By Abdou Karim LO Minister of State for Reform and Technical Assistance AfCoP/MfDR Co-Chair.
Accountability for system-wide results and impact Valbona Kuko Director, Department of Strategy and Donor Coordination Government of Albania
GRB in Austria TOT on gender Responsive Budgeting, Sponsored by UN Women Russian Presidential Academy on the Economy and Public Administration Moscow,
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review 1 2 nd Global Round Table on PRTRs 25 November 2015 Andreas Grangler.
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TEMPLATE Svilena Simeonova, Director of Internal Control Directorate, Ministry of Finance, Bulgaria.
Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.
PROTECTING THE INTERESTS OF CONSUMERS OF FINANCIAL SERVICES Role of Supervisory Authorities Keynote Address to the FinCoNet Open Meeting 22 April 2016.
Gender Budgeting in Austria Gerhard STEGER Director General for Budget and Public Finances Ministry of Finance, Austria Vienna, June 2013.
FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF OSLO The principle of integration and its dilemmas Hans Chr. Bugge Professor of Environmental Law University of Oslo.
REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE CURRENT CHALLENGES IN BUDGET REFORM SOFIAMR. LYUBOMIR DATZOV 03 DECEMBER 2004DEPUTY MINISTER
Financial Management and Control in the Dutch Public Sector Prague, March 24, 2016 Manfred van Kesteren.
Kishinev 2016 MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN.
European Union support to the Ukraine Bratislava, 3 June 2016 Livia Vasakova, EC Representation in Slovakia.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 19 – Social Policy and Employment.
Reform of Polish public sector accounting Minsk, Belarus October 2016 Ranjan Ganguli, FM Consultant,
Introduction – The Austrian Federal Budget Reform Friederike Schwarzendorfer Budget Directorate Tallinn.
PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO AND SELECT COMMITTEE
Optimizing the Effectivenes of CAPA: Keeping an Eye on Audit Reports
Agency Performance: A New Agenda
GN-PBO Webinar Series: “Gender Budgeting and Impact Analysis”
PEMPAL IACOP PUBLIC INTERNAL CONTROL: MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF THE PUBLIC ENTITIES Presenter: Malapateng Teka; National Treasury| March 2016.
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Steering Policy and Steering Systems
PEMPAL, Moscow, October 2016 Natalia Pilets Deputy Head,
THE PATH TO EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM IN EU INTEGRATION PROCESSES
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
OF ALBANIAN GOVERNMENT TRANSACTIONS ACCOUNTING
The role of the Passport Indicators in Monitoring PFM Strategy
Austrian Budget Reform - Performance Budgeting
Simplification in ESI funds for
Best practice or Missing A Link? Gender budgeting in AUstria
Messages from the OECD’s Fiscal Network
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA
PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF GEORGIA
PEMPAL Internal Control Working Group– 45th IACOP Meeting
Third National Plan of Action, Ministry of Public Finance of Guatemala
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Performance Management and Impact Assessments
Special Features of the Swedish Government Sector
PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO AND SELECT COMMITTEE
Ministry of National Economy of The Republic of Kazakhstan
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Defence on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year.
Bulgaria – Capital Budgeting And Fiscal Institutions
A Framework for the Governance of Infrastructure - Getting Infrastructure Right - Jungmin Park, OECD Budgeting & Public Expenditures Division 2019 Annual.
Conclusions from the Review of REACH
Good practices for risk assessment and control activities
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Department of Correctional Services on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year Presenter: Solly Jiyana.
Portfolio Committee on Communications
Presentation transcript:

Regulatory Impact Assessment in Austria Dr. Andreas Fraydenegg Directorate General for Budget and Public Finance Department for General Issues, Coordination and Law PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) undesired impact desired impact cost outcome PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

Scope of RIA mandatory for all new laws, ordinances, international agreements – national and EU legislation big projects (e.g. procurement, building projects), depending on financial impact done within the administration responsible only significant impacts are assessed in detail internal evaluation within 5 years PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

The seven steps to RIA Problem analysis Outcome statement Output statement Impact assessment Planning of internal evaluation Detailed Documentation Internal evaluation PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

Impact dimensions defined by law Financial (budgetary) impact Impact on the overall economy Impact on enterprises Environmental impact Impact in the field of consumer protection policy Impact on administrative costs for citizens and enterprises Social impact Impact on children and young people Impact regarding equality of women and men PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

The MoF‘s central objective The MoF (especially the DG for Budget and Public Finance) is committed to providing value for money and initiating public sector reforms The Austrian Constitution sets down the guiding principles for public finance (Art. 51): efficiency, transparency, outcome orientation, gender equality and a true and fair view on the state of the public finances RIA is a key instrument for achieving these goals PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

RIA and fiscal discipline The RIA process forces the administration to ex-ante clearly assess financial consequences of the respective issue Starting point for a change in focus – from input to outcome and efficiency Also: to assess consequences for the diverse impact dimensions The practical application of RIA is supported by a standardized IT-tool provided by the MoF PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

Scope of RIA (financial) Costs and benefits to federal/regional/local government Costs and benefits to social security providers Direct costs and benefits only Only costs and benefits that can be measured financially Not included: Public enterprises, self-governing bodies outside the federal budget Time scope: next four years (based on the scope of the medium-term-financial framework) Long-term-costs and benefits (where applicable) PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

The MoF‘s role in RIA Every RIA statement has to be sent to the MoF for quality assurance and budgetary agreement Impact Dimensions most relevant for the MoF: Impact on public budgets (federal/regional/local level, Social Security) Impact on bureaucracy costs for citizens and businesses (how much time is needed to comply with a new regulation) PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

Assessment of RIA Are there consequences for public budgets? Have they been fully and correctly assessed? Are calculations and models comprehensible, verifiable and consistent? From where‘s the data? Does the RIA contradict evidence and/or past experience regarding the relevant topic? How and where will expenses be covered (in which detail budget?) What about savings? PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

RIA and bureaucracy costs New regulation often creates a substantial regulatory burden for citizens and/or businesses Measures the time needed for complying with regulation („information requirements“) Time needed is converted into financial costs using average hourly wages Not measured here: direct costs to businesses or citizens (e.g. administrative fees) Objective: creating transparency and raise awareness PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

RIA and Deregulation Law on the Principles of Deregulation (takes effect on July 1st, 2017) One in, one out Sunset legislation No „gold plating“ where applicable We point to these principles in our assessment of the RIA statement – especially when referring to bureaucracy costs PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

Our Experience – Lessons learned The quality of RIA statements varies Trend: RIA statements have greatly improved since 2013 2016: The Court of Auditors regarded the quality of the RIA (assesment of financial impact) as „good“ or „very good“ in 74% of all cases – up from 61% in 2015 MoF assessment of RIA statements leads to improvements across the board Impact dimension „bureaucracy costs“ is sometimes neglected by other ministries Impact of RIA on public policy debate is still rather low PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

Challenges and next steps Improving the quality of RIA Further enhancing the use of RIA for purposes of „good government“ and „better regulation“ Strengthening the role of RIA in public policy debates Optimizing the legal framework and scope for RIA (e.g. to include public enterprises) Development of a new IT-Tool (web-based) PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018

Thank you for your attention. Dr. Andreas Fraydenegg Directorate General for Budget and Public Finance Department for General Issues, Coordination and Law Himmelpfortgasse 9 1010 Vienna +43/1/51433-502029 andreas.fraydenegg@bmf.gv.at PEMPAL Workshop, Vienna, March 13th, 2018