Program Review Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
UMR’s Accreditation Self-Study. The Value of Accreditation  Institutional Reputation  Standard of Quality  Vehicle for Self Improvement  Transferability.
All-Campus Meeting of Faculty & Staff Monday, August 19, 2013 G. Michael Pratt, Ph.D Associate Provost, Miami University Dean, College of Professional.
Creating a Continuous Improvement Program: A Balanced Scorecard Approach A Presentation AACSB Continuous Improvement Conference September 15, 2003 Presented.
IBHE Program Review A Very Brief Presentation To the CGS/Graduate Coordinators’ Joint Conference September 7, 2004 Dr. Mary Herrington-Perry, Assistant.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Cyclical Program Review John Shepherd Vice-Provost and Associate Vice-President (Academic) Office of Quality Assurance.
Tennessee Promise Forward Mini- Grant Competition Tennessee Higher Education Commission Informational Webinar.
Institutional Assessment Day: Program-Level Alumni Survey Data August 19, 2014 Pat Hulsebosch Associate Provost – Office of Academic Quality Rosanne Bangura.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
TIME LINE FOR PROGRAM REVIEWS. BASIC MAP OF PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESSES.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
The College of Education and Professional Studies Phase II Planning Committee November 19, 2015 Faculty Senate.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
University of Cincinnati Program Review (E-Review)
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Academic Program Review
MSJC Accreditation Classified Professional Day – March 22,2017
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Master Academic Planning
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola October 2010
Master Academic Planning
Reporting the Course level RWR Assessment data
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Cyclical Program Review
Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Proposal Development
ACCJC 18-Month Follow-up Report
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Developing a Business Plan for your Agricultural Operation
Annual Reporting UWF.edu/ASPIRE Cynthia Catellier
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Technology Committee Report to the Budget Committee & College Planning Council March 7, 2012.
Time Line for Program Reviews
Sam Houston State University
Extend an Existing Degree, Certificate, Minor, or Option Program:
Master Academic Planning
Office of the University Provost & the Graduate College Present:
University of Akron Academic Program Review
Academic Program Review Comprehensive Report
Completing your Program Review
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
Sam Houston State University
Program Review Guidelines & Processes at SUNY New Paltz
Time Line for Program Reviews
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Fort Valley State University
Cyclical Program Review
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Presentation transcript:

Program Review Workshop Key topics for a successful review. April 18, 2018

Timeline of the Self-Study April – Trend data for the most recent five year period has been placed in a Blackboard Shell. August – Enrollment trend data for the most recently concluded year is added to Blackboard Shell. September 30 – Deadline for additional data requests January 15 – Draft of Self-Study due to the Dean(s) February 1 – Deans meet with Chairs to discuss revisions/clarifications March 1 – Final Self-Study Report due to the Dean(s), VPAA, and Director of Assessment.

Components of the Self-Study Report Executive Summary of Comprehensive Plan Overview and Vision Assessment Analysis and Action Plan for Future Appendices Student Data Faculty Data Resources

Overview and Vision Brief Overview Program vision, mission and objectives Relationship to the university mission, vision and strategic plan Overview of the program Undergraduate, Graduate, minors, and concentrations Internal demand of the program/department Recommendations and actions from the previous Program Review Departmental/program initiatives and significant changes since last review

Assessment Program Inputs Program Processes, Undergraduate and Graduate Program Outcomes, Undergraduate and Graduate Student

Analysis and Action Plan for the Future (Self Identified) Comparative strengths and distinctiveness, and areas of improvement across all program levels Opportunities to extend existing strengths and resources in place or needed Weaknesses found during the self-study Opportunities for addressing weaknesses Positioning of program to address future direction of the discipline in the next review timeline Action Plan for implementation for next Program Review Key objectives and strategies or actions to achieve each objective Timeline, with milestones and measurable outcomes to determine progress and measure success Method of achieving objectives Resources necessary to achieve the plan

External Evaluator Timeline and Selection February 1 – Department Chair forwards the names, addresses and CV for potential external evaluators to the Dean. February – Dean and Director of Assessment meet to choose an evaluator and notifies the Department Chair March – The Office of Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) completes the contract process and forwards the completed Self-Study Report to the external evaluator. April – The External Evaluator completes an on-site visit Before setting the site visit – make sure all parties are available! May – The External Evaluator submits a report to the IRP office. The IRP office will forward to VPAA, Dean(s), and Department Chair.

Action Plan Timeline September – the VPAA, Dean(s), Director of Assessment and the Department Chair meet to discuss Evaluator’s report. September-December – the Program/Department work on an Action Plan that encompasses the next five years. December – Action Plan due to the Dean(s), VPAA, and Director of Assessment. A copy is sent to the library for archival purposes. Final submission to library should have the final Self-Study Report, the Evaluator’s Report and the Action Plan.

Action Plan components For each implementation item, describe the following: Specific area where improvement is needed, Evidence supporting the recommended change(s), The specific person(s) responsible for implementing the change(s), The proposed timeline for implementing the change(s), The resources needed to successfully implement the change(s) (e.g. personnel, financial, facilities, equipment, etc.) and The plan to assess the change(s) after implementation.

Action Plan Table Format Specific area where improvement is needed Evidence to support the recommended change Person(s) responsible for implementing the change Timeline for implementation Resources needed Assessment Plan Item#1   Item #2 Etc.

Dean’s Support and Expectations in the Self-Study and Program Review Process Review of draft utilizing the rubric (January) Meeting with the Department Chair (February) Selects the Evaluator in consultation with the Director of Assessment (February) Meets with the Evaluator during on-site visit Meets with Chair, VPAA, and Director of Assessment after reviewing Evaluator’s report (September) Reviews the Action Report submitted by the Chair (December)

Office of Institutional Research and Planning Support Today’s workshop Blackboard created for each program Trend data loaded Will provide additional data as requested by September 30 Director of Assessment will load Graduating Student Survey data and Alumni Survey data to Blackboard during the summer OIRP handles contract and sending of report

Thank you for coming! Questions?