Faculty of Agriculture and Nutritional Science

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nordisk Avlsværdivurdering Joint Nordic Test Day Model: Evaluation Model M. Lidauer 1, J. Pedersen 2, J. Pösö 3, E. A. Mäntysaari 1, I. Strandén.
Advertisements

ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to derive factors to predict daily milk yield when milk is sampled once per d for cows milked three times (3x)
TEMPLATE DESIGN © John B. Cole 1,*, Kristen L. Parker Gaddis 2, Francesco Tiezzi 2, John S. Clay 3, and Christian Maltecca.
Factors affecting milk ELISA scores of cows tested for Johne’s disease H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, and T. M. Byrem 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
British Limousin Cattle Society Alison Glasgow. What’s been going on? Database development ~ Registrations & Perf. Recording Addition of Online Census.
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
CRITICAL POINTS IN THE FEEDING OF HIGH YIELDING DAIRY COWS Gergácz, Z., †Báder, E., Szűcs, E. University of West Hungary, Faculty of Agricultural and Food.
Extension of Bayesian procedures to integrate and to blend multiple external information into genetic evaluations J. Vandenplas 1,2, N. Gengler 1 1 University.
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
Principal Components Approach for Estimating Heritability of Mid-Infrared Spectrum in Bovine Milk H. Soyeurt 1,2,*, S. Tsuruta 3, I. Misztal 3 & N. Gengler.
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
John B. ColeKristen L. Parker Gaddis Animal Genomics and ImprovementDepartment of Animal Sciences LaboratoryUniversity of Florida Agricultural Research.
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) 2001 Variance of effects of lactation stage within herd by herd yield N. Gengler 1,2, B. Auvray *,1, and G.R. Wiggans 3 1.
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Selection for Disease Resistance Gert Pedersen Aamand Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation.
Dr BE Mostert Geneticist SA Stud Book The Genetics of Longevity… A Quantitative Perspective.
REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,
2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, Jan Wright, Chuanyu Sun, and Jana Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD National Association of Animal.
2008 ADSA-ASAS Joint Annual Meeting Indianapolis, July 7-11 Genetic Parameters of Saturated and Monounsaturated Fatty Acids Estimated by Test-Day Model.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Synchronization Effects on Parameters for Days Open M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and R. H. Miller* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Interbull Meeting – Dublin 2007 Genetic Parameters of Butter Hardness Estimated by Test-Day Model Hélène Soyeurt 1,2, F. Dehareng 3, C. Bertozzi 4 & N.
Bayesian integration of external information into the single step approach for genomically enhanced prediction of breeding values J. Vandenplas, I. Misztal,
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.
2003 P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluations.
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
J. B. Cole *, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.
2003 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
ADSA 2002 (RHM-P1) 2002 R.H. Miller, ,1 H.D. Norman, 1 and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Paul VanRaden 1, Mel Tooker 1, Mahinda Dematawewa 2, and Ron Pearson 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA 2 Virginia Polytechnic.
C.P. Van Tassell 1, * G.R. Wiggans 1, J.C. Philpot 1, and I. Misztal Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Lactation Number Effects on the Genetic Variability of the Stearoyl Coenzyme-A Desaturase 9 Activity Estimated by Test-Day Model V. M.-R. Arnould 1, N.
MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Genetic evaluations for birth weight:
John B. Cole Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD What direction should.
1 FIRST RESULTS OF THE AUSTRIAN EFFICIENT COW PROJECT Fuerst-Waltl Birgit, Steininger Franz, Fuerst Christian, Gruber Leonhard, Ledinek Maria, Zollitsch.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
EAAP Meeting, Stavanger Estimation of genomic breeding values for traits with high and low heritability in Brown Swiss bulls M. Kramer 1, F. Biscarini.
Partitioning of variance – Genetic models
Using a MQTL matrix to test for pleiotropic effects of Mendelian trait loci on quantitative traits. C. Scheper1. S. König1   1Institute of Animal Breeding.
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
Validation of €uro-Star Replacement Index.
Y. Masuda1, I. Misztal1, P. M. VanRaden2, and T. J. Lawlor3
Classifiers based on 3D-head acceleration data
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle
WP Leader: SRUC (Georgios Banos) INIA, AUTH, UNIVPM, CSIC, AHDB
Genome-wide Association Studies
S. Naderi1, R. R. Mota1, S. Vanderick1, N. Gengler1
Using recombination to maintain genetic diversity
Methods to compute reliabilities for genomic predictions of feed intake Paul VanRaden, Jana Hutchison, Bingjie Li, Erin Connor, and John Cole USDA, Agricultural.
Introducing CDCB Health Evaluations
S. Vanderick1,2, F.G. Colinet1, A. Mineur1, R.R Mota1,
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
Use of a threshold animal model to estimate calving ease and stillbirth (co)variance components for US Holsteins.
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Genetic Evaluation of Milking Speed for Brown Swiss Dairy Cattle
Hay Burners versus Hay Converters (a.k.a. Feed Efficiency)
Presentation transcript:

Faculty of Agriculture and Nutritional Science Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Institut für Tierzucht und Tierhaltung Breeding value estimation for feed intake in German HF cows using single-step genomic evaluation I. Harder1, E. Stamer2, W. Junge1 , G. Thaller1 1Institute for Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel 2TiDa Tier und Daten GmbH EAAP 2018 69th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science Dubrovnik, Croatia, 27th to 31st August 2018 Session 12, Abstract 29284, 27th August, iharder@tierzucht.uni-kiel.de

Introduction Economics Fertility Energy balance Milk yield Health Feed intake Economics Energy balance Milk yield Health Fertility 1

Introduction Economics Fertility Energy balance Milk yield Health Feed intake Economics Energy balance Milk yield Health Fertility Milk yield   Energy deficit Diseases Fertility problems by Strucken et al. 2015  Breeding for feed intake at the beginning of lactation 1

No. of SNPs after quality control Material and Methods Phenotypes HF Trait No. of Cows No. of Records Mean SD Feed intake (kg DM/d) 1,341 40,012 21.8 4.25 Milk yield (kg/d) 1,338 39,838 35.5 8.81 Energy balance (MJ NEL/d) 1,322 33,376 3.20 29.4 Criteria for data editing: Records: weekly averages Defined lactation stadium from 8 to 350 DIM Observations outside of ± 4 sd are excluded Pedigree information traced 4 generations back Genotypes HF Type of Chip No. of SNPs after quality control No. of Cows Phenotyped Illumina BovineSNP50K BeadChip 43,455 1,128  35  2

Material and Methods Model evaluation: parametric functions: Ali and Schaeffer (AS), Legendre Polynomials 2nd to 4th degree (LP2, LP3, LP4) evaluation criteria: AICC und BIC procedure: MIXED in SAS fixed effects: herd test week or herd group test week, parity (1, 2, 3 ≥4) AS function for lactation curve random effect: LP (3rd degree) for cow effect Estimation of variance components and breeding values: software packages: G-Matrix und DMU (Madsen et al. 2013) part 1: pedigree-based data part 2: single-step for combined data (pedigree and genomic) Final computation: software packages: SAS heritabilities genetic correlations reliabilities of breeding values 3

Results and Discussion Lactation curves modeled with Ali and Schaeffer function First parity Second parity 4

Results and Discussion Estimated heritabilities of feed intake across the first 350 DIM 5

Results and Discussion Estimated heritabilities of FI, MY and EB across the first 350 DIM 6

Genetic correlations for feed intake in course of lactation Results and Discussion Genetic correlations for feed intake in course of lactation FI DIM 10 40 70 100 130 160 190 220 250 280 310 0.85 0.60 0.93 0.44 0.83 0.97 0.34 0.74 0.92 0.98 0.28 0.65 0.24 0.56 0.73 0.84 0.22 0.49 0.76 0.87 0.95 0.99 0.21 0.46 0.61 1.00 0.20 0.47 0.64 0.75 0.96 0.18 0.51 0.69 0.80 0.94 340 0.14 0.54 0.90 7

Results and Discussion Reliabilities of breeding values for feed intake of cows 8

Summary Unique data set of feed intake measurments across lactation Fixed lactation curve: Ali and Schaeffer Random lactation curve: Legendre Polynomial (3rd degree) Heritabilities ranged between 0.17 and 0.49 (FI) and 0.19 and 0.33 (EB) along the trajectory Low genetic correlations between beginning and end of lactation Promising reliabilities of genomic breeding values for the trait feed intake Need to increase the number of phenotyped and genotyped animals to improve reliabilities of future breeding values 9

Outlook next steps long-term objective Including genotyped sires in the computation long-term objective Follow-up project: eMissionCow Genome based selection of cows with high feed intake at the beginning of lactation 10

Thank you for your attention! Schätzung des Futteraufnahmevermögens direkt aus dem Erbgut und Selektion von Milchrindern, die entsprechend ihres Bedarfes für die Milchleistung genügend Futter aufnehmen

Attachment Repeatability of FI, EB and MY for HF and SI 10