Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Accreditation Climate Survey MC GAP May 1, Overview  Administered Fall 2012 via  Directly linked to the Accreditation Standards  Modeled.
The Program Review Process What is Instructional Program Review?
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
JAZAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING & ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
Convocation Opening Address College of Sequoias Welcome&Introductions.
MVC – Outcomes Assessment FLEX –Day February 8, 2013.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Cul de Sac? PROGRAM REDUCTION AND DISCONTINUANCE Julie Bruno, Sierra College Sidney.
Closing the Loop: SLOs, GE SLOs, Assessment, Curriculum, Program Review, Planning, and Budgeting Marcy Alancraig, Cabrillo College Janet Fulks, Bakersfield.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Accreditation Update August 24, 2016 Susan Mills, Accreditation Liaison Officer.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Contextualization in English and Reading: A Few Examples
Discipline/Department Improvement Process (DIP) and Program Improvement Process (PIP) at WCC Monday, November 19, 2012.
Santa Ana College School of Continuing Education
Lead-Off Batter: Applying New Accjc standards
Accreditation Self-Study
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
SLOs: What Are They? Information in this presentation comes from the Fundamentals of Assessment conference led by Dr. Amy Driscoll and sponsored by.
Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review
Program Review and Integrated Planning: A Conversation About Data
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Rebecca Jackson Iowa State University June 17, 2005
Preparing for the NWCCU 10-year Self-Study
Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here
Curriculum and Accreditation
October 9, 2015 Daniel Wanner, Los Angeles City College
Stephanie Curry, Reedley College Jarek Janio, Santa Ana College
Curriculum and Accreditation
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
AGC October 11, 2016 Sheila jones
Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation Module
Critical Conversations for Educational Program Development
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: Understanding Standard I WITH GUIDANCE ON I.B.3 AND I.B.6 Stephanie Droker, Vice.
Accreditation Standard 1: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: The College Mission & The 2015 Student Success Scorecard.
Accreditation and curriculum
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Program Review and Accreditation
Yuba Community College District Board of Trustees Meeting
Course Sequencing and Program Mapping 2018 Curriculum Institute Riverside, California Daniel Keller, Dean of Curriculum and Instructional Support Services,
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
SCHEV Strategic Plan Priorities
Assigning courses to disciplines
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Fall 2018 Overview from Curriculum Regional Meeting (11/17)
Completing your Program Review
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
Academic Affairs Cluster 28 May 2015
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Craig Rutan, Accreditation and Assessment Committee Chair
Fort Valley State University
Navigating the College Culture
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Presenters Lesley Agostino, Diablo Valley College
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Presentation transcript:

Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college Monday, October 8, 2018

Program Review To be effective, program review must be cyclical Picture of institutional success and needs for improvement Evidence-based overview of specific programs Faculty Driven

Purpose of the Program Review p. 8 Instructional, student service, and administrative activities sustain a vital, effective, and relevant role consistent with the program goals and the college mission Purpose of the Program Review p. 8 Instructional program curriculum, student support services, and administrative services are adequately aligned to produce the appropriate student learning outcomes expected by transfer institutions and employers What are the most effective ways to examine the program to determine its effectiveness? What does the program do to contribute to teaching and learning? How will changes to the program effect students?

Scope of the Program Review p. 10 Program Review must evaluate and improve instructional, student support and administrative services Based on data

an organized sequence of courses leading to a defined objective, a degree, a certificate, a diploma, a license, or transfer to another institution of higher education departments, such as Early Childhood Education, Counseling, etc. Defining a “Program” p. 12 student service pathways that end in a specific outcome disciplines, such as natural sciences, or even more broadly, as science

Defining the Mission of the Program p. 20 program’s mission will help to guide program review and justify the resource and staffing requests submitted. 01 college’s mission should align with the statewide community college mission and the program’s mission should align with the college’s locally defined mission. 02 refinement of the mission is an integral discussion as part of the process 03 Defining the Mission of the Program p. 20

Program Review Components p. 21 the committee participants and levels of authority must be clearly indicated Faculty-driven and based on locally determined data Program Review Components p. 21 alignment of program review, curriculum processes, budget processes, student equity analysis, mission review and educational planning, and accreditation planning Program review template may include: a description of the program an explanation of how the program meets its mission information on faculty, staff, and departmental resources curriculum (courses offered, enrollment and number of sections, student success—grades, program

Evidence-based Program Review p. 23 Qualitative data Program level data p. 27 Evidence-based Program Review p. 23 Quantitative data Learning Outcomes Assessment Data p. 26 Example: Enrollment Data and Analysis Success Data and Analysis Delivery Method Data and Analysis Demographic Data and Analysis

Links p. 31 Linking to curriculum review Linking to budget process Linking to planning Linking to accreditation Linking to student equity Linking to guided pathways

Program review evaluation p. 38 Groups involved: Academic Senate Program Review Committee Other committees Evaluation based on goals, purposes, and guidelines Program review evaluation p. 38 Evaluation embedded into the regularly scheduled program review process Evaluation linked to college culture

Customize this Template Template Editing Instructions and Feedback