The Use of Systemic Treatment in the Maintenance of Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review Swati Kulkarni, MD, Emily T. Vella, PhD, Nadia Coakley, MLIS, Susanna Cheng, MD, Richard Gregg, MD, Yee C. Ung, MD, Peter M. Ellis, M.B.B.S., PhD Journal of Thoracic Oncology Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages 989-1002 (July 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.007 Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Overall survival for pemetrexed versus no pemetrexed for systemic maintenance in non–small cell lung cancer. Red squares represent the effect estimate and weight for each study. Black diamonds represent the overall effect estimate. SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2016 11, 989-1002DOI: (10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.007) Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Progression-free survival for pemetrexed versus no pemetrexed for systemic maintenance in non–small cell lung cancer. Red squares represent the effect estimate and weight for each study. Black diamonds represent the overall effect estimate. SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2016 11, 989-1002DOI: (10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.007) Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Overall survival for pemetrexed versus no pemetrexed for systemic maintenance in nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer. Red squares represent the effect estimate and weight for each study. Black diamonds represent the overall effect estimate. SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2016 11, 989-1002DOI: (10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.007) Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 Progression-free survival for pemetrexed versus no pemetrexed for systemic maintenance in nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer. Red squares represent the effect estimate and weight for each study. Black diamonds represent the overall effect estimate. SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2016 11, 989-1002DOI: (10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.007) Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Terms and Conditions
Figure 5 Overall survival for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) versus no EGFR for systemic maintenance in non–small cell lung cancer. Red squares represent the effect estimate and weight for each study. Black diamonds represent the overall effect estimate. SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2016 11, 989-1002DOI: (10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.007) Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Terms and Conditions
Figure 6 Progression-free survival for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) versus no EGFR for systemic maintenance in non–small cell lung cancer. Red squares represent the effect estimate and weight for each study. Black diamonds represent the overall effect estimate. SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2016 11, 989-1002DOI: (10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.007) Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Terms and Conditions
Figure 7 Overall survival and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status. Red squares represent the effect estimate and weight for each study. Black diamonds represent the overall effect estimate. SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2016 11, 989-1002DOI: (10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.007) Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Terms and Conditions
Figure 8 Progression-free survival and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status. Red squares represent the effect estimate and weight for each study. Black diamonds represent the overall effect estimate. SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2016 11, 989-1002DOI: (10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.007) Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Terms and Conditions