Evaluating the Impact of WHO Publications

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The new Sulzer website Internet Core Team | July 2012.
Advertisements

Investing in the future Michael Bright Senior Science Manager RESEARCH METHODS PROGRAMME.
The complex evaluation framework. 2 Simple projects, complicated programs and complex development interventions Complicated programs Simple projects blue.
Audit Commission Hertfordshire Housing Conference Housing Inspectorate Developments in inspection and assessment Roy Irwin Chief Inspector of Housing.
Montse Moharra; Antoni Parada on behalf of WP8 of the EUnetHTA project Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research EUnetHTA HANDBOOK ON.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
CerOrganic European Conference – Athens, 6/12/2011 Giannis Stoitsis, Alexios Dimitropoulos Agro-Know Technologies.
LEADER -The acronym ‘LEADER' derives from the French words "Liaison Entre Actions de Développement de l'Économique Rurale“ which means, ‘Links between.
DISTILLATE An introduction Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January 2008 Professor Tony May ITS, University.
Dissemination Strategies November 19, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
Introduction to the User’s Guide for Evaluating Learning Outcomes from Citizen Science Tina Phillips, Cornell Lab of Ornithology Marion Ferguson, Cornell.
1 “Adaptation to the consequences of Climate Change: Progress achieved and capacity building needed” Budapest, November 19-20, 2007 Strategic Environmental.
Strategic Environmental Assessment and environmental issues in programme evaluation Ivana Capozza Italian Evaluation Units Open Days Roma, July 5, 2006.
Assessing higher education learning outcomes globally Professor Hamish Coates
Session 3C: Monitoring and Evaluation of C/DRR: Tools and Strategies
WHO–ITU National eHealth Strategy Toolkit An effective approach to national Strategy Development and Implementation Clayton Hamilton WHO Regional Office.
Improving the Quality of Vocational Education and Training in Turkey Şennur Çetin Head of the VETDG Social Partners and Projects Group 12 DECEMBER 2013.
Assessment on the implementation of the Mediterranean Strategy for Sustainable Development Dr Nicola Cantore Overseas Development Institute,
Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.
UNITED NATIONS Population Unit ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Road Maps for Mainstreaming Ageing  Fiona Willis-Núñez.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
Identify a Health Problem Qualitative Quantitative Develop Program -theory -objectives -format -content Determine Evaluation -design -sampling -measures.
Roma Inclusion pilot project: Information and awareness raising DG REGIO conference “Monitoring and Evaluation of Roma projects and policies” 30 November.
M&E TRAINING MODULES Indicators.
The P Process Eight Key Questions 1. What is the communication problem? 2. What do we need to do? 3. What materials/interventions do we need to develop?
Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: Insight into internal stakeholder learnings Beth Ferguson AES Conference Sydney 2 September 2011.
IKM4DRR INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT for DRR SUPPORTING RISK-INFORMED DECISION MAKING.
Informing solutions together JIPS in Colombia October 2012 Scoping mission 12/10/2012 Natalia Baal William Chemaly
The process of building a national eHealth strategy for Ukraine “ How do we get to where we want to be?” Clayton Hamilton Unit leader, eHealth and Innovation,
Introduction to Group Work. Learning Objectives The goal of the group project is to provide workshop participants with an opportunity to further develop.
Find International Driving Document Translator Online
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
© International Training Centre of the ILO International Training Centre of the ILO Turin, Italy.
Ricardo Furman Senior Evaluation Officer- Geneva Daniel Chachu M&E Officer - Accra EIA Evaluation and Impact Assessment Section International Programme.
THE SOUND OF SILENCE: AN EVALUATION OF CDC’S PODCAST INITIATIVE Quynh-Chau, M., Myers, Bradford A. (2013). The Sound of Silence: an evaluation of CDC's.
Project monitoring and evaluation
Access to Information, Participation in Decision-Making and Justice in the OECS: some thoughts Peter A. Murray OECS Secretariat.
A Framework for Evaluating Knowledge Transfer and Exchange (KTE) in Public Health Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association.
Evaluation of Priority Gender Equality
The past, present and future of skills?
Monitoring & Evaluation Processes A A walkthrough of the whole process

April 21 Francesca Recanatini, WBI
First 5 LA Phase III Website Strategic Plan
MSM and Access to Free Water-based Lubricants:
Descriptive Analysis of Performance-Based Financing Education Project in Burundi Victoria Ryan World Bank Group May 16, 2017.
Tobacco control.
Laura E. Pechta, PhD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
UN Support to SDG implementation in Seychelles.
Policy and Budget Monitoring and Evaluation
Measuring dissemination policies
منهج الإطار المنطقي وإطار الرصد والتقييم وإطار النتائج
What it does OS Step Leads to Focus PRE-PLANNING VISION SCOPE TARGETS
Using a public-facing qub blog for assessment
Country group work on integrating climate into CSP cycle
The Monitoring of the implementation of the IPoA
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Project Management Training
Altmetrics: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Headed Next?
COUNTRIES NATIONALITIES LANGUAGES.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
ESF EVALUATION PARTNERSHIP
Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluation –Towards UNEG Guidance Update title Presentation by UNEG HR/GE Task Force.
Monitoring SDGs: the perspective of NSOs SDG Implementation in China
CARE INTERNATIONAL MEL COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE QUALITY OF EVALUATIONS & brief “what’s new” on the global MEL agenda November 27, 2018.
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Risk Management NDS Forum June 23rd 2010.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating the Impact of WHO Publications HIFA Evaluating Impact Working Group Teleconference - 03 October 2017

Context & Scope Context Scope Release of the Evaluation of the Impact of WHO Publications in 2016 External/neutral evaluation Six recommendations Scope Publications either in print or electronic media Produced between 2005 and 2014 Including publications in the six WHO official languages (Arab, Chinese, English, French, Russian, Spanish)

Recommendations Recommendations Develop a publication strategy Clearly identify information needs and target audiences Develop a more proactive dissemination strategy Better integrate quality assurance throughout the publication process Develop/implement M&E framework on reach, uptake and impact Publication strategies should include translation plans

Specific Actions Recommendation 5 Establish a monitoring system to track dissemination, uptake and reach of WHO publications. Create a monitoring approach to track readership, possibly using web analytics. Consider end-of-publication surveys on webpages to track use and usefulness Integrate the assessment of the impact of WHO publications as a cross-cutting component into future WHO programme evaluations.

Opportunity Working with HIFA Is true impact - in terms of health outcomes - measurable and feasible? How to monitor dissemination and uptake? How to measure impact? What indicators? Quantitative (uptake) vs. qualitative (impact) measures? A sustainable and recurring process?