GroEL–Substrate Interactions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GroEL and GroES By: Jim, Alan, John. Background Proteins fold spontaneously to their native states, based on information in their amino acid sequence.
Advertisements

Folding and flexibility. Outline What is protein folding ? How proteins fold in vivo ? What is protein flexibility ?
SBL 100 Dr. Tapan K. Chaudhuri (course co-ordinator)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
ATP-Bound States of GroEL Captured by Cryo-Electron Microscopy
Protein Folding: Importance of the Anfinsen Cage
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Electrostatic Fasteners Hold the T Cell Receptor-CD3 Complex Together
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Principle of protein folding in the cellular environment
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
The Crystal Structure of a GroEL/Peptide Complex
Antonio del Sol, Chung-Jung Tsai, Buyong Ma, Ruth Nussinov  Structure 
GroEL: More than Just a Folding Cage
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Deciphering NAD-Dependent Deacetylases
GroEL Mediates Protein Folding with a Two Successive Timer Mechanism
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Kåre L. Nielsen, Nicholas J. Cowan  Molecular Cell 
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages (April 1998)
Traffic Jam at the Bacterial Sec Translocase: Targeting the SecA Nanomotor by Small- Molecule Inhibitors  Kenneth Segers, Jozef Anné  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
A Model for How Ribosomal Release Factors Induce Peptidyl-tRNA Cleavage in Termination of Protein Synthesis  Stefan Trobro, Johan Åqvist  Molecular Cell 
GroEL Mediates Protein Folding with a Two Successive Timer Mechanism
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Crystal Structure of an Inactive Akt2 Kinase Domain
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages (October 2001)
Protein Turnover: A CHIP Programmed for Proteolysis
The Ribosome Emerges from a Black Box
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Molecular Mechanism of Protein Folding in the Cell
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Daniel Hoersch, Tanja Kortemme  Structure 
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Martin Klumpp, Wolfgang Baumeister, Lars-Oliver Essen  Cell 
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages R93-R104 (December 1997)
Crystal Structure of SRP19 in Complex with the S Domain of SRP RNA and Its Implication for the Assembly of the Signal Recognition Particle  Chris Oubridge,
Structural Basis for Specificity in the Poxvirus Topoisomerase
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages (February 1998)
AMPK and SNF1: Snuffing Out Stress
Gymnastics of Molecular Chaperones
GroEL–Substrate Interactions
Visualizing the ATPase Cycle in a Protein Disaggregating Machine: Structural Basis for Substrate Binding by ClpB  Sukyeong Lee, Jae-Mun Choi, Francis.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Sculpting the Proteome with AAA+ Proteases and Disassembly Machines
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2004)
Crystal Structure of Skp, a Prefoldin-like Chaperone that Protects Soluble and Membrane Proteins from Aggregation  Troy A Walton, Marcelo C Sousa  Molecular.
Molecular Recognition of Cargo by the COPII Complex
The Hsp70 and Hsp60 Chaperone Machines
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Presentation transcript:

GroEL–Substrate Interactions Joanna L Feltham, Lila M Gierasch  Cell  Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages 193-196 (January 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81557-3

Figure 1 The GroEL Tetradecamer, Represented Here in a Longitudinal Cut-Away View, Consists of Two Rings Stacked Back-to-Back, Each Containing Seven Subunits The apical, intermediate, and equatorial domains of each subunit are shown in yellow, green, and purple, respectively. GroEL-mediated folding in vitro involves each of the two rings of the GroEL tetradecamer alternately in consecutive steps represented in sequence on the uppermost ring: (1) hydrophobically mediated, high-affinity substrate (blue) binding to an empty ring, (2) binding of ATP and GroES, which releases substrate into the hydrophilic cavity of the cis complex (or Anfinsen cage), (3) ATP hydrolysis, which serves as a timing mechanism that potentiates release of GroES and substrate from the chaperonin, and (4) disassembly of the cis complex with concomitant ATP-driven assembly of a new cis complex on the opposing ring. Substrates that do not fold properly in a single round are released to solvent, but can rebind to GroEL for another try. There is intra-ring allostery, which favors saturation of one ring with ATP, and inter-ring negative allostery, which promotes the next step in the cycle in the opposing ring. Cell 2000 100, 193-196DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81557-3)

Figure 2 The Peptide-Binding Site of the GroEL Apical Domain (a) The SBP peptide (cyan)–apical domain (green) structure (Chen and Sigler 1999). (b) Residues of the GroEL apical domain that come within 4 Å of the β hairpin SBP peptide are highlighted in purple. (c) Sites of GroEL mutations that diminish binding to a denatured substrate (Fenton et al. 1994) are indicated in orange. (d) Sites in the apical domain where an attached fluorophore senses binding of denatured protein substrates (Tanaka and Fersht 1999) are illustrated in red, and residues that undergo NMR chemical shift changes when a helical peptide binds (Kobayashi et al. 1999) are highlighted in yellow. Coordinates kindly provided by the Sigler laboratory. Cell 2000 100, 193-196DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81557-3)