September 2011 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Overview of the California Carbon Market Presented by: Randy Lack Founder & Chief Marketing Officer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demand Response in Ontario Paul Grod, CEO, Rodan Energy July 11, 2013.
Advertisements

Created in June 1999, the first business group devoted to pricing and trading GHG reductions HQ in Geneva, Offices in Brussels, Toronto, Washington, DC,
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
Carbon Dioxide Emissions Costs and Electricity Resource Planning New Mexico Public Regulation Commission Case No UT March 28, 2007 Presented.
Planning for a Low-Carbon Future at San Diego Gas & Electric Rob Anderson Director of Resource Planning San Diego Gas & Electric Western Resource Planners.
The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) California Council on Science and.
Opportunities and Challenges of Marketing FGD - Gypsum to Agriculture David Flack Marketing Director Ag Spectrum Company.
ICAO Symposium on Aviation and Climate Change, Destination Green, 14 – 16 May 2013 Destination Green The Carbon Pricing Mechanism in Australia Presented.
1 Meeting carbon budgets – 5th Progress Report to Parliament Committee on Climate Change, June If you want to tweet about this report.
AB32: CAs Global Warming Solutions Act of first ever statewide cap of GHG pollution -CA is 12 th largest source of GHG pollution in world -law designed.
1 mAn organized market that auctions firm energy contracts to acquire new energy mThe contract auction system has been very effective in promoting the.
Developing Offset Projects in a U.S. Pre-Compliance Market: Smart Investment or Unwise Policy Gamble Potential Carbon Markets & Utah Agriculture Utah.
The environmental and policy context for crowd-funding in the UK LSE Seminar on Crowd-Funding for Renewables 2 May 2013 Sam Fankhauser Grantham Research.
Association of Irritated Residents v. California Air Resources Board Summary and Status Update California Cap and Trade Workshop Climate Action Reserve.
S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S This may not necessarily represent the view of the Government CBA/Justice Annual.
OCTOBER 8, 2014 Bob Laurita INTERNAL MARKET MONITORING New Import Capacity Resource FCM Market Power Mitigation Order to Show Cause Compliance Filing.
Group Integrating CDM and PoA structures into a NAMA: Case-Studies by South Pole Group September 5 th 2014 Christian Dannecker Director Forestry and Land.
Corbin Devlin McLennan Ross LLP October 19, 2007 ALBERTA’S CLIMATE: A Comparison to Canada’s Approach to Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
Canada’s Offset System for Greenhouse Gases Dean Stinson O’Gorman New Brunswick Climate Change Hub meeting October 7, 2009.
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
Federal Cap-and-Trade Policy: Overview of Design Options Ray Hammarlund, KCC Energy Programs Division Director Presentation to Kansas Energy Council Greenhouse.
Carbon Offsets for Compliance Under AB32 Joel Levin Vice President of Business Development.
Carbon Offsets for Compliance Under AB32 Joel Levin Vice President of Business Development.
The Cap-and-trade program of the Western Climate Initiative ITU SYMPOSIUM ON ICTs THE ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE Montréal 29 May 2012 Robert Noël de.
Carbon Offsets for Compliance Under AB32 Joel Levin Vice President of Business Development.
Oregon Climate Change Regulatory Activities and Policy Initiatives Bill Drumheller -- Oregon Department of Energy University of Oregon School of Law Climate.
Energy Project Development A Discussion on State and Federal Incentives Presented By Dennis Plaster, General Manager.
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
1 California Carbon Markets update: An overview of the regulations, market and trading activity Presented by: David Nussbaum July 2011.
Carbon markets An international tool for cost-effective GHG mitigation.
Environmental Reform Climate Change Update VCEDA Annual Business Outlook Conference October 15, 2010 Sharon Rubalcava Alston + Bird.
Manitoba Hydro’s Emission Management Perspectives Bill Hamlin.
FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780.
© 2006 UNDP. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Proprietary and Confidential. Not For Distribution Without Prior Written Permission. State and Trends of the.
Carbon credits - origination to commercialisation© 2006 EcoSecurities Group plc CleanTech and Carbon in the Pacific Northwest Seattle, WA November 8, 2007.
Climate Change John Sherwell PPRP. Two major initiatives 1 – RGGI All NE states except PA Component of the HAA.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
Carbon Finance North America Workshop NYC Catherine A. Lee, Esq. Consultant to Maine DEP June 15, 2007 The Nation’s First GHG Cap and Trade Program
Federal Climate Change Legislation – Charlotte Chamber September 22, 2009 Mike Stroben Director, EHS Policy.
California Cap on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms Edie Chang California Air Resources Board September 2015 California.
March 2012 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY CA REC Market Update FOR.
Chuck Seidler California Air Resources Board September 2015.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
Partnership for Market Readiness Connecting Carbon Markets through Registries September 25, 2015 Jason Gray, Esq. California Air Resources Board 1.
Chicago Climate Exchange ®, Inc. © 2008 Murali Kanakasabai, Ph.D Vice President & Senior Economist Carbon Expo Cologne May, 2008.
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
Offsets as Common Currency: U.S. and Canadian Offset Programs World Resources Institute Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities for Establishing a North.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
California Air Resources Board June 28, 2012 Proposed Amendments to the Cap-and-Trade Regulation California Air Resources Board.
Cap-and-Trade Regulation Program Update September 20, 2012.
California Air Resources Board April 25, 2014 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CAP-AND-TRADE REGULATION California Air Resources Board 1.
California Public Utilities Commission CPUC Climate Change Activities Paul Clanon Executive Director August 28, 2007 Presentation to the Senate Energy,
California to Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia and Beyond? Can Subnational Arrangements Fill the Gap? Professor Sharon Mascher Faculty of Law, University.
Introduction to Domestic Emissions Trading Warren Bell Associate, IIISD Kyoto Mechanisms Seminar for the Manitoba Business Sector March 14, 2003.
Environmental Industries Sector Unit CDM Opportunities in South Korea Greg Dunne, Director, ICECAP Ltd. Seoul, 25 th September 2006 EISU Seminar Mission.
Overview of Western Climate Initiative WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2008.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATION FOR THE MANDATORY REPORTING OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS California Air Resources Board California Air Resources Board.
AB 32 Update December 6, Outline Cap and Trade Program 2013 Update to Scoping Plan Looking ahead to
California’s Cap-and-Trade Program Overview & Market Update.
Greenhouse Gas Initiatives: progress and perspective Sandra Meier Environmental Energy Alliance of New York.
Linkages Workshop November 14/ Outline Alberta context Regulatory framework Compliance options Carbon connections.
California Cap on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market- Based Compliance Mechanisms California Air Resources Board CDAWG November 2012 California Air Resources.
John Davis Mojave Desert and Mountain Recycling Authority.
McCarthy Tétrault APGQ – Conference 2016
Global, National and Provincial Climate Change Commitments
UK Climate Change Policy
Jeff Wennberg, Senior Consultant The Center for Climate Strategies
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
Canada’s Regulatory Framework for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Presentation transcript:

September 2011 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Overview of the California Carbon Market Presented by: Randy Lack Founder & Chief Marketing Officer

ELEMENT MARKETS INTRODUCTION - US Emissions House of the Year Business Units Greenhouse Gas (GHG) and Emissions Services Credit Marketing GHG Offset Projects Asset Management Credit Aggregation Credit Monetization Asset Management Credit Aggregation Credit Monetization Methane (Landfills, Coal Mines, Agriculture) Industrial Gases (N20 & ODS) Forestry Methane (Landfills, Coal Mines, Agriculture) Industrial Gases (N20 & ODS) Forestry Renewable Energy Group Credit Marketing Biogas Development Launched in 2005, Element Markets has become the largest integrated environmental credit marketing and project development company in North America Marketing Compliance Solutions Project Types Leading marketer of environmental commodities in the US with a focus on Emissions, GHG, and Renewable Energy Trading and is the largest account manager in CAR. Transacted over $700,000,000 in environmental credits since inception in 2005 Has retired over 500,000 tonnes of CAR offsets voluntarily for clients in the last 12 months EM is one of the largest developers of biogas projects in the US and owns the largest Anaerobic Digestion Project in North America that produce

Background In December 2010, the California Air Resources Board approved Californias proposed cap and trade regulations, a key part of the AB32 / The Global Warming Solution Act of 2006 In late June, CARB Chairwomen Mary Nichols announced that California would delay the compliance obligation for affected entities under AB32 for one year Beginning in 2013, the regulations will cover GHG emissions from electric generation facilities, industrial emitters, and fuel suppliers, and require them to reduce emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 The program will be implemented over 3 phases or compliance periods: (Phase I); (Phase II); (Phase III) Covered Entities Phase I ( ): Electric Generation Units, Industrial Stationary Sources (including Carbon Dioxide Suppliers) and Importers of Electricity from specified sources with emissions over 25,000 tpy, as measured in any single year from Also included is electricity from unspecified source – threshold is 0 MWhs Phase II and Phase III ( , ): Liquid fuel suppliers and suppliers of natural gas with emissions >25,000 tpy. Also included are importers of electricity – threshold is 0 (tons or MWhs) for all sources of electricity AB32 PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Effects of Reduced Emissions on an Entitys Compliance Obligation Entities are in the program until their emissions are below 25,000 tpy for an entire compliance period or if they shut down the facility If a facility triggers the threshold in any year, they must remain in the program until the end of the current compliance period at a minimum Note that entities can opt into the program and be eligible to receive free allocations; they can subsequently opt out after a compliance period Compliance Instruments Allowances issued by ARB Allowances / Offsets from programs linked to California (e.g. Western Climate Initiative states) Offset credits issued by ARB (including Early Action offsets) Sectoral-based Offset Credits AB32 PROGRAM OVERVIEW

AUCTION FORMAT AuctionAllowance Reserve FrequencyQuarterly Auction3 weeks after each quarterly auction Available for saleCurrent vintage and current vintage + 3 years million tons (from future vintages and through borrowing from future years) available at start of program FormatSingle-round, sealed-bid, uniform price format Fixed Price Sale - Tiers of Allowances, with minimum purchase price for each tier; Participants submit bids for purchase of allowances from each tier Who can participateAnyoneCovered Entities under AB32, possibly covered entities from linked programs Floor Price (2013) Min. price of $10 (constant $2009) ($10 for 2015 vintage) $40 (Tier I) $45 (Tier II) $50 (Tier III) Floor Prices (2014+) Increases every year by CPI+ 5% First Auctions – August 15, 2012 and November 14, 2012 For 2013 allowances

Based upon the current offset % allowed for compliance the estimated maximum amount of offsets used for each Phase is as follows: Phase I – 25.8 million Phase II million Phase III – 83.1 million To date, only 5.1 million tonnes of ARB eligible offset credits have been issued under the Climate Action Reserve Only 4.2 million tonnes of those credits have not been retired and are still available Offset supply right now is expected to be low compared to the maximum amount that can be used At least until additional protocols are approved by ARB OFFSETS

Early Offsets The program allows the use of offsets from the Climate Action Reserve (CAR) for certain projects types (remaining CRTs) Urban forestry – 0 tonnes Forestry – ~2 million tonnes Domestic ODS – ~1.9 million tonnes Livestock (Ag.) – ~292,000 tonnes Requirements Project State Date - prior to 1/1/2013 Project Location - United States Eligible Credits - 1/1/ /31/2014 In order to be exchanged for ARB credits, the projects that earned the offset credits must be re- verified or checked in some manner by an ARB-accredited verifier Process is still being defined, but does pose some risk on transference Other Potential Project Types (LFG, N2O, CMM, International ODS, etc.) If these projects were eventually accepted by ARB, they could allow older vintages For example N2O – could consider credits before they are required to capture under AB 32 (1/1/2012) OFFSETS – EARLY ACTION OFFSETS

Once the program starts, ARB will implement its General Offsets program Project Types – For right now, same 4 protocols are eligible with new protocols considered in 2012 Urban forestry, Forestry, Domestic ODS, Livestock Start Date Post December 31, 2006 Location Projects to be located in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eligible Offset Registries External registries can apply to be eligible ARB registries The registries can administer offset project registration, verification, etc Approval of an Offset Project Registry is valid for 10 years An approved Offset Project Registry must use the ARB-approved Compliance Offset Protocols OFFSETS – POST 2012 OFFSETS

California Carbon Allowances (CCA): AB32 Allowances for 2013 Delivery Auction floor price of $10 The program must be initiated and allowances trading for product to exist Historical lifetime range of CCAs has been $ $24.25/ CCA Currently valued at $18/ CCA California Carbon Offsets (CCO): AB32 Guaranteed Offsets for 2013 Delivery CCOs are offsets issued by CARB Falls under the 8% of allowable offset usage limit The program must be initiated and allowances trading for product to exist Currently valued at $12.00/ tonne AB32 CAR Approved Offsets: One of the four approved CAR offset protocols Offsets from one of the 4 CAR protocols that approved by CARB Falls under the 8% offset usage limit These offsets bear re-verification risk by CARB Currently valued at $10.50/ tonne PRODUCTS AND PRICING

Superior Court Case ARB is moving forward with accepting its updated CEQA analysis to fulfill the outcome of the court case In the meantime, a stay is in place allowing ARB staff to continue implementation Offsets ARB has stated that they plan to issue new protocols for adoption by early 2013 Expectation is 1-2 protocols to be adopted and it will be interesting to see which protocols are selected with the offset supply concerns that exist by compliance entities Linkage with Other Programs The potential effect of other programs linking with AB 32 is unknown Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia all hope to initiate compliance in 2013 as well Still uncertain if other states/provinces link with California, but could have large impacts on the market GOING FORWARD

The implementation of a state wide cap and trade program has the potential to have significant impacts on underlying commodities prices including natural gas and power Under AB32 will likely have a considerable effect on operating expenditures and business yields As the details of the program are still evolving it is important to be proactive and put into place internal and external controls to mitigate the affects of this program to your organization In Californias current economic state and increasing regulatory environment, it is important to work with a firm that will assist you indentifying compliance options, project investment opportunities, energy efficiency measures, and that understands the overall costs of the program in order to enhance value and optimize your portfolio CONCLUSION

ELEMENT MARKETS Randy Lack, Chief Marketing Officer Element Markets, LLC 3555 Timmons Lane, Suite 900 Houston, TX Office: Randy Lack, Chief Marketing Officer Element Markets, LLC 3555 Timmons Lane, Suite 900 Houston, TX Office: