Packet loss Measurement Model draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Framework for Management and Control of Optical Interfaces supporting G draft-kunze-g management-control-framework-00 Ruediger Kunze Manuel.
Advertisements

ITU-T Workshop on IP/Optical Chitose, 9-11 July 2002 Session Network Performance N eal Seitz, Chair SG 13/WP 4 IP Performance Specifications: Progress.
Tuning the Behavior of IGMP and MLD for Routers in Mobile and Wireless Networks draftietfmultimobigmpmldtuning-01 Hitoshi Asaeda Hui Liu Qin Wu 81 st IETF,
LIME OAM Model Design Team (DT) Discussion Qin WU (Design Team member) Gregory Mirsky (Design Team member) Tom Taylor (Design Team member) Deepak Kumar.
MPLS-TP OAM Analysis draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-00.txt
63rd IETF Paris August 2005 Requirements for Multicast Support in Virtual Private LAN Services draft-kamite-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-reqts-00.txt Yuji Kamite (NTT.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
66th IETF Montreal July 2006 Requirements for delivering MPLS services Over L3VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-01.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI, Editor.
MPLS-TP - 78th IETF1 MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-cp- framework-02.txt Contributors: Loa Andersson Lou Berger Luyuan Fang Nabil.
SACM Information Model. Current Status First WG draft posted 10/24 Many open issues remain Several comments / suggestions sent to WG for review Today.
Framework for Black Link Management and Control draft-kunze-black-link-management-framework-00 Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom March th IETF Prague1.
Proposal for new Working Group Item: Core Router Software Accelerated Life Testing (draft-poretsky-routersalt-term-00.txt) Authors: Scott Poretsky, Avici.
Diagnostic test for MPLS transport profile draft-flh-mpls-tp-oam-diagnostic-test-01 IETF78, Maastricht, 25th-30th, July, 2010 Feng Huang ( Alcatel Lucent)
MPLS-TP - 77th IETF1 MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework draft-abfb-mpls-tp-control-plane- framework-02.txt Contributors: Loa Andersson Lou Berger Luyuan Fang.
July 28, 2010IETF 78 – Maastricht, Netherlands1 IP Multicast Performance Monitoring: update on IPPM experience Vero Zheng Alberto Tempia Bonda.
Sub-IP Layer Protection Mechanism Performance Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-04.txt draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth-03.txt BMWG, IETF-72.
1 draft-fang-mpls-tp-oam-toolset-01.txt Luyuan Dan Nabil
1 Security Framework for MPLS-TP draft-mpls-tp-security-framework-01.txt Editors: Luyuan Fang Ben Niven-Jenkins
Standardization activities on IPTV in CCSA CCSA DOCUMENT #:GSC13-PLEN-25 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:CCSA AGENDA ITEM:Plenary; 6.6
1 Comments on OGSA platform document draft-2 03/06/2003 Andreas Savva, Ph.D. Hiro Kishimoto, Ph.D. Fujitsu GGF7 OGSA-WG.
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST Study of Performance Standards, kick off (Task 1.1.1) Robert Stoy DFN EGEE.
November 10, 2010IETF 79 – Beijing, China A method for IP multicast performance monitoring draft-cociglio-mboned-multicast-pm-01 Alessandro Capello Luca.
1 IETF-70 draft-akhter-bmwg-mpls-meth MPLS Benchmarking Methodology draft-akhter-bmwg-mpls-meth-03 IETF 70 Aamer Akhter / Rajiv Asati /
82 nd Taipei Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Huawei.
IETF85 A framework for Point-to-Multipoint MPLS-TP draft-hmk-mpls-tp-p2mp-oam-framework-01.txt Yoshinori Koike Masatoshi Namiki Takafumi Hamano.
Flow OAM Requirements Janardhanan Pathangi Balaji Venkat Venkataswami DELL Richard Groves – Microsoft Peter Hoose – Facebook
Communicating Prefix Cost to Mobile Nodes (draft-mccann-dmm-prefixcost-01) IETF 93 Prague.
Draft-mpls-tp-OAM-maintnance-points-00
Rakesh Kumar Juniper networks Anil Lohiya Juniper networks
IPv6 based NGN and after (Use of NGNv6) March 31 – April 2, 2008
Tal Mizrahi Marvell IETF Meeting 78, July 2010
LIME Base YANG Model Work Update draft-tissa-lime-yang-oam-model draft-wang-lime-yang-pm Deepak Kumar Qin WU IETF93 Prage,Czech.
IPv6 Site Renumbering Gap Analysis draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-04
Alan Clark Claire Bi Qin Wu Glen Zorn
OmniRAN Introduction and Way Forward
Current Situation of F.MID and H.MID in ITU-T SG16
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-04
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone
High Intelligent Network (Smart Pipe)
Multi-layer OAM for SFC Networks draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam-09
IP Performance Specifications - Progress and Next Steps
draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-04
Brief Introduction to IEEE P802.1CF
and LMAP liaison Document Number: IEEE R0
Migration-Issues-xx Where it’s been and might be going
CHAPTER 8 Network Management
Authors Mach Chen Andrew G. Malis
draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-00
Ali C. Begen, Yiqun Cai and Heidi Ou {abegen, ycai,
SUPA Policy-based Management Framework (SUPA: Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions) draft-ietf-supa-policy-based-management-framework-01 Will Liu, John.
Greg Mirsky Erik Nordmark Nagendra Kumar Deepak Kumar Mach Chen
Framework for DWDM interface Management and Control
Toward a Network Telemetry Framework draft-song-ntf-02
Rakesh Kumar Juniper networks Anil Lohiya Juniper networks
Framework for DWDM interface Management and Control
DetNet Information Model Consideration
ICCP extension for the MSP application
Deepak Kumar Zitao Wang Qin Wu Reshad Rahman Srihari Raghavan
NGN 2004 Project status on July 25
and LMAP liaison Document Number: IEEE R0
LIME CO Model Update draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-07
Consideration of IPv6 Encapsulation for Path Services draft-li-6man-ipv6-sfc-ifit-00 Zhenbin Li, Shuping Peng.
DMTF Alliance Partner Technical Symposium
Qin Wu Zhen Cao Yang Shi Baohong He
draft-dharinigert-ccamp-dwdm-if-lmp-07
János Farkas, Balázs Varga, Rodney Cummings, Jiang Yuanlong
Enhanced Alternate Marking Method
DetNet Data Plane Solutions draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-ip-02  draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-mpls-02  Bala’zs Varga, Jouni Korhonen, Janos Farkas, Lou Berger,
Draft-lee-teas-actn-vpn-poi-00 Applicability of ACTN to VPN with the Integration of Packet and Optical Networks Young Lee - Qin.
draft-ggalimbe-ccamp-flex-if-lmp-07
Presentation transcript:

Packet loss Measurement Model draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 By G. Fioccola(giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it) Praveen A (Praveen.ananthasankaran@Nokia.com) Bharat G (gbharat@juniper.net) Sudhin Jacob(sjacob@juniper.net) Qin Wu (bill.wu@huawei.com) draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 IETF 99 July Prague 2017 draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-00

draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 IETF 99 July Prague 2017 Overview Objective: Define fine granularity performance measurement between end points based on SLA COS based Loss Measurement Color Based Loss Measurement COS and Color based Loss Measurement …. Focus on measurement model instead of protocol design Model is agnostic to overlay and underlay. This model can be used for Active and Passive measurements. Motivation: measuring the network performance and assessing network quality to meet user expectation is very challenging. PM related telemetry become important for better troubleshooting and fault localization. Especially information related network element and interface in the path involved with the session ITU-T SG12 Q16 has initiated a new work on “Framework for Intelligent Network Analytics and Diagnostics ” Performance data is one of data source for network analytics iOAM work discussed recently focuses on carrying OAM and telemetry data but the measurement PM related telemetry data is not covered. draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 IETF 99 July Prague 2017

Document Status Update The latest version v-03 is submitted with the following changes: 1       Address the relationship with MEF work 2       Expand the scope to cover delay measurement and delay variation measurement. 3       Add more details to section 4. 4       Update definitions in the section 2. 5       Change the title to performance measurement model. draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 IETF 99 July Prague 2017

draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 IETF 99 July Prague 2017 Measurement Models Complete Data measurement in one direction. Color based Data measurement. COS based Data measurement. COS and Color Based Measurement. Active and Passive Measurement. Provision for Real Time analytics. Small mile stone towards Self Driving networks draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 IETF 99 July Prague 2017

Use Case for Packet loss Measurement Model Both P2P and MP2MP are covered. For instance in a P2P scenario: CUSA P2P Service CUS A Router A Router B Service Bandwidth (SLA) Voice Service 40% strict Service A 30% Service B 20% Service C 10% draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 IETF 99 July Prague 2017

draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 IETF 99 July Prague 2017 Next Steps Draft Must be reviewed. Comments anticipated. draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 IETF 99 July Prague 2017

draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 IETF 99 July Prague 2017 Thank you draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-03 IETF 99 July Prague 2017