Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
DSP online algorithms for the ATLAS TileCal Read Out Drivers Cristobal Cuenca Almenar IFIC (University of Valencia-CSIC)
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
October-November 2003China - ALICE meeting1 PHOS in ALICE A PHOton Spectrometer with unique capabilities for the detection/identification of photons and.
03/27/'07T. ISGC20071 Computing GRID for ALICE in Japan Hiroshima University Takuma Horaguchi for the ALICE Collaboration
DE/dx measurement with Phobos Si-pad detectors - very first impressions (H.P Oct )
Leo Greiner TC_Int1 Sensor and Readout Status of the PIXEL Detector.
Technical Part Laura Sartori. - System Overview - Hardware Configuration : description of the main tasks - L2 Decision CPU: algorithm timing analysis.
Summary of PHOS Internal Notes (part I) Rafael Diaz Valdes 10/25/20151.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
The ALICE Forward Multiplicity Detector Kristján Gulbrandsen Niels Bohr Institute for the ALICE Collaboration.
EMCal in ALICE Norbert Novitzky 1. Outline How Electro-Magnetic Calorimeters works ? Physics motivation – What can we measure with Emcal ? – Advantages.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
01/04/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
New L2cal hardware and CPU timing Laura Sartori. - System overview - Hardware Configuration: a set of Pulsar boards receives, preprocess and merges the.
Non-photonic electron production in p+p collisions at √s=200 GeV Xiaozhi Bai for the STAR collaboration Central China Normal University University of Illinois.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
May 10-14, 2010CALOR2010, Beijing, China 1 Readout electronics of the ALICE photon spectrometer Zhongbao Yin *, Lijiao Liu, Hans Muller, Dieter Rohrich,
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
D.Peressounko for the ALICE collaboration Hard Probes 2010, October 10-15, Eilat, Israel.
29/05/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
Introduction of my work AYAKO HIEI (AYA) Hiroshima Univ 2008/5/30 me.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Multi-lepton and general searches at HERA Andrea Parenti (DESY-Hamburg) on behalf of H1 and ZEUS collaborations - DIS Outline: ● Multi-electron.
The ALICE Electromagnetic Calorimeter
DAQ ACQUISITION FOR THE dE/dX DETECTOR
Progress of GEM R&D in Lanzhou Univerity
Di-electron elliptic flow in
Use of FPGA for dataflow Filippo Costa ALICE O2 CERN
“Performance test of a lead glass
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
ALICE – First paper.
PADME L0 Trigger Processor
Status of the Front-End Electronics and DCS for PHOS and TPC
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
The h double helicity asymmetry and cross section
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
CLAS12 MesonEx trigger studies
STAR Geometry and Detectors
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
Quarkonium production in ALICE
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
BESIII EMC electronics
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Missing Energy and Tau-Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
11th Pisa meeting on advanced detectors
Quarkonium production in p-p and A-A collisions: ALICE status report
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Implementation of DHLT Monitoring Tool for ALICE
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Electron PID & trigger using EMCal
Presentation transcript:

Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger LIJIAO LIU Email:Lijiao.Liu@ift.uib.no University of Bergen and Huazhong Normal University for the ALICE collaboration May, 2010

Outline Introduction (ALICE and PHOS) PHOS readout and trigger system Firmware and performance of the PHOS trigger Conclusion and outlook

ALICE experiment PHOS detector Heavy-ion collisions Study the properties of Quark Gluon Plasma PHOS detector Electromagnetic Calorimeter with high resolution Measuring electromagnetic showers with matrix of PbWO4 crystals Contribution to the generation of L0 and L1 triggers

ALICE hardware trigger Three level trigger : L0, L1, L2 Purpose: Select the event of interest and reduce the overall dataflow Latency : L0 (1.2 μs), L1 (6.5 μs), L2 (88μs) PHOS Trigger Requirement L0 minimum bias trigger for pp collisions high-pt trigger for pp and PbPb collisions arrival at CTP in 800 ns L1 - provides information on neutral particles produced in Pb-Pb collisions Cluster reconstruction -> energy Identify three energy ranges: L1Low, L1Middle, L1High Total transverse energy trigger Isolated photon trigger (to distinguish direct photon from decay photon) L1 must be ready in 6.1 μs.

PHOS readout and trigger system Front End Card (FEC) ALICE TPC Read Out (ALTRO) Trigger region unit (TRU) Trigger OR (TOR) Central Trigger Processor (CTP) Local Trigger Unit (LTU) Readout Control Unit (RCU) Data acquisition (DAQ) L1 accept (L1a) L1 rejection (L1r) ALTRO : mixed analogue-digital custom integrated. circuit dedicated to the digitisation and processing detector signals. Add real Altro data and Fake altro data flow here

The trigger electronics TOR TOR: 40 RJ45 input links for 40 TRUs Virtex4 FPGA Hosts DCS-board for remote configuration and re-programming L0 is ORed in firmware DCS TRU: 112 analogue inputs -> 12 bit ADCs FPGA -> process raw trigger data and prepare L0 decision 40 bit readout bus – communication with RCU remote configuration and re-programming by DCS-board on RCU TRU 3 modules have been installed Each module has 8 TRUs Only 1 TOR for PHOS

( 91 parallel calculations in FPGA )‏ L0 trigger algorithm Serial digital signal L0 to CTP Sliding window Miss pedestal substraction 4x4 (=2x2 Analog-OR)‏ 28 x PWO => N = 14 TRU (PHOS)‏ 16 x PWO => M= 8 N-1 x M-1 = 91 combinations ( 91 parallel calculations in FPGA )‏

L0 latency (test-bench results) <800ns

Commissioning results Noise of the trigger channels ALICE work in progress 1 ADC count  30 MeV

Commissioning results Triggering on cosmic rays – e.m. shower ALICE work in progress trigger channel matrix

Commissioning results Triggering on cosmic rays – muons (MIPs) Trigger: PHOS with relatively low trigger threshold ( 180 MeV) Readout: PHOS and TPC Trigger purity: (events with muon tracks in TPC) / (number of PHOS triggers) Preliminary result: Purity  23 % keep in mind: MIP signal ( 210 MeV) is just above trigger threshold To do: Noisy channels not yet excluded Global threshold so far, set individual threshold ALICE work in progress

Commissioning results Triggering on cosmic rays – muons (MIPs) Trigger: PHOS with low trigger threshold Readout: PHOS Energy distribution of PHOS clusters (mainly single crystal clusters): Preliminary result: MIP peak at around 210 MeV (PHOS is not yet fully calibrated) ALICE work in progress

Commissioning results Triggering on pp collisions Trigger latency – within specifications ALICE work in progress

Commissioning results Performance of PHOS – pp collisions ALICE min. bias trigger – energy channels Invariant mass distributions for different transverse momentum bins: clear pi0 signal ALICE work in progress

Commissioning results Trigger efficiency and fake trigger rate – pp collisions Data set: 155k events Full trigger information (trigger channels) has been recorded in addition to energy channels energy channel matrix trigger channel matrix signal no signal fake trigger inefficiency analysis ongoing

L1 firmware in TOR Basic L1 (L1Low, L1Middle, L1High) Receive the 4X4 sum from TRU (3 μs for data transfer) Find the cluster with the highest energy Issue L1 decision Total energy trigger Et Isolated photon Construct list of clusters Decision of isolated photon

Conclusion and outlook PHOS performs according to specs so far (more details in Zhongbao’s and Renzhuo’s talk) PHOS L0: timing fulfills 800 ns requirement performance study ongoing expected to take part in physics runs in the near future PHOS L1: basic L1 trigger firmware works in the lab behavioural simulation for finding the isolated photon works, we are now implementing the algorithm in HW (in the FPGA) Thanks for your attention!