Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
Advertisements

What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
1 Module 1: Building a Legal Foundation for Good Water Governance.
TMDLs and the NACD TMDL Task Force TMDLs NACD TMDL Task Force TMDL Draft Policy Trading and TMDLs.
Pollutant Trading Discussion 22 July Why Allow Trading? §To make point sources pay §To lure nonpoint sources into doing pollution control so we.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
ECOSYSTEM MARKETS What exactly are we talking about in the Yakima River basin!?
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.
Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.
Tom Singleton Associate VP, Director, Integrated Water Resources an Atkins company Linking TMDLs & Environmental Restoration.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Rule 62-40, F.A.C. – What is it? The Water Resource Implementation Rule (State Water Policy). Required by Sec , F.S. Goals, objectives and guidance.
Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading: Nonpoint Source Offset Options Kurt Stephenson Dept of Ag & Applied Economics Virginia Tech
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan North Bay Watershed Association Meeting November 3, 2006 Working together to enhance sustainable water.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Credit Trading Program
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
ISAT 422: Environmental Management Pollution Prevention n Reduction or elimination of the creation of pollution.
California Water Plan Old and New Steve Macaulay, Executive Director.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
City Officials Role in Water Quality
Partners in Conservation
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy - NLRS
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Florida and Reclaimed Water
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Chesapeake Bay Program
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Water Quality Credit Trading
Current VA Ag Initiatives
Markets and Regulation: Alternative or Complements?
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
Joint Army-EPA Mitigation Rule
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Manure Management Implementation by US Farmers
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework #IowaLeague18 Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework Dustin Miller, Attorney, Nyemaster Goode P.C. Handouts and presentations are available through the event app and at www.iowaleague.org.

Water Quality Numeric Nutrient Criteria Clean Water Act Point Source Total Maximum Daily Loading Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Total Phosphorus Total Suspended Solids Water Quality National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Watershed Environmental Protection Agency Water Quality Standards Publically Owned Treatment Works Total Nitrogen Hydrologic Unit Code Nonpoint Source Turbidity Iowa Department of Natural Resources

Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy Focused on Nitrogen and Phosphorus to the Mississippi River Final Draft Released in January 2013 Total Reduction Goal: 45% for Non-Point Source (NPS) and Point Source (PS) Integrated Strategy Non-Point Source: Science Assessment for NPS agricultural producers with voluntary implementation of conservation practices Point Source: Technology Assessment for major wastewater treatment facilities Estimated Cost NPS: Initial Investment Costs range from $1.2 to $4 billion PS: Capital and operation costs over 20 years of approximately $1.5 billion Water Quality Trading Included in Final Draft and Annual Updates

Water Quality Trading 2003 EPA Water Quality Trading Policy Allows a Point Source to Purchase "Credits" to Reduce Pollutants More Cost Effective Than with Technology at the Plant Previously Solely Compliance Driven with Numeric Nutrient Criteria or TMDL Too Restrictive and Limited Success Updated Language in the INRS in 2016 to reflect efforts of the Iowa League of Cities

Iowa League of Cities’ Efforts 2014 USDA NRCS Conservation Innovation Grant 2015 USDA NRCS Conservation Innovation Grant Technical Advisory Committee Storm Lake and Dubuque Pilot Trades Early Adoption Letter Housing of NRE

Iowa Nutrient Reduction Exchange (NRE) Utilize Motivations Environmental benefits, flood mitigation, source water protection, economic development, habitat development, nutrient reduction, increased production Data Points Watershed, permit number, project name, funding source, practice type, install data, term of practice (years), type of credits generated (N, P, sediment, etc.), credit calculation method, verifying entity, monitoring, pollutant reductions, ancillary benefits Track Multi-Benefit Investments Provide Incentives for Investment Improved ratios, environmental excellence, longer term schedules, etc.

NRE Incentives If/when the point source is subjected to water quality-based nutrient limits in its NPDES permit, DNR will provide compliance flexibility to the extent allowed by law (e.g., net-addition, longer-term compliance schedule if demonstrated to be necessary; a 1 to 1 trade ratio for projects with quantified performance developed pre-compliance; preferred access to credits if more demand than supply). The verified reductions may be applied by the point source as an offset against its new or expanded loading (i.e., in a growth scenario). DNR will provide official recognition through some kind of “environmental excellence” program, along with any discretionary incentives that DNR is legally authorized to provide (e.g., reduced agency inspections, streamlined permit processing, reduced monitoring, reduced paperwork). If/when the point source demonstrates that additional technology-based reductions are not feasible, DNR will provide an option allowing the point source to achieve equivalent reductions through the NRE. In situations where other sources join together in a watershed plan, then the affected point sources will be eligible for a “bubble” or watershed permit that enables them to trade between themselves and other sources for compliance with watershed-wide nutrient reduction goals. If the State adopts a formal water quality incentive program in the future with a different baseline, then DNR will waive the programmatic baseline for up to two NPDES permit cycles in connection with voluntary projects that are initiated and maintained before the formal program is adopted. SRF applications for Sponsored Projects may receive priority scoring if they anticipate registering projects into the NRE.

NRE Next Steps Process Incentives Database NRE placement NPDES permit integration (DNR) and practice application submittals (ISU and DNR) Incentives Evaluation of regulatory authority and potential for use Database USACE RIBITS Iowa Pilot – ensuring an easy to use electronic application submittal process NRE placement Evaluation of NRE placement in rule or policy Nutrient Load Reduction Model Evaluation and implementation of a specific model or models for load reduction estimates. Streambank Stabilization

Questions? Dustin Miller Attorney at Nyemaster Goode P.C. dmiller@nyemaster.com (515)883-0925 Robert Palmer General Counsel & Director of Government Affairs robertpalmer@iowaleague.org (515)720-4148