Nominal Group Technique Heather Hatch Quality Management, Winter 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Support Services Department- Leadership Teams Alignment: Setting and Communicating Direction.
Advertisements

Behavioral Interviewing 101
JOB INTERVIEW FLASH CARDS Work-Based Learning Virtual Campus.
THE NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE
BRAINSTORMING BURÇİN AKI WHAT IS BRAINSTORMING? Brainstorming is a group activity technique.It is designed to generate lots of ideas for solution.
Nominal Group Technique (NGT) With Multivoting Paula Mower WISD Director Assessment and Organizational Development February 2012.
Creative Thinking.

Nominal Group Technique Designed to promote group participation in the decision making process Everyone as a voice. Used by Small Groups to Reach consensus.
0 Solving Problems in Groups ©2008, University of Vermont and PACER Center Solving Problems in Groups PCL Module 9.
Affinity Diagrams.
Communicating for Results 9e 9 Key Ideas Defining small group Characteristics of successful problem-solving teams Group formats Small-Group Communication.
Internship Programs A University Perspective By Dr. Lisa Stephenson The George Washington University Elliott School of International Affairs.
Experiential Learning Cycle
DECISION-MAKING STRATEGIES FACULTY TEAMS THAT REACH CONSENSUS.
Group Techniques John A. Cagle California State University, Fresno.
Organizational Behaviour Individual and Social Behaviour
HSA 171 CAR. 1436/5/19  TYPES OF DECISIONS  TECHNIQUES FOR IMPROVING GROUP DM  FACTORS INFLUENCING GROUP DM  Constrains on Decision Making 3.
Decision Making Ch. 7 Management A Practical Introduction
6-1 Copyright  2009 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Managerial Problem Solving by Wood Slides prepared by Robert Wood, Julie Cogin and Jens Beckmann.
Chapter 5 Determining System Requirements
Chapter 11 Requirements Workshops
Copyright c 2006 Oxford University Press 1 Chapter 7 Solving Problems and Making Decisions Problem solving is the communication that analyzes the problem.
NIATx opportunities for tomorrow Over 13,000 substance abuse treatment providers nationwide. Going to the Tool Chest A Tool for Facilitators A Valuable.
11 Welcome to the Facilitation Skills Practice Workshop!
Delmar Learning Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company Nursing Leadership & Management Patricia Kelly-Heidenthal
Facilitator Training Program. Day One Agenda – Day One Welcome Getting Started Activity Course Objectives Overview of Facilitation Skills Facilitation.
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Technology Education Logic and Problem Solving Advanced Computer Programming.
Qualitative Research Methodologies Keys to Exploratory Research.
CQI (TQM) Tools and Time Management. CQI or TQM?? u CQI – Continuous Quality Improvement or u TQM – Total Quality Management Technically, there are some.
 The model consists of 6 steps: Step 1: Define the problem or opportunity. Step 2: Set objectives & criteria. Step 3: Generate alternatives. Step 4:
Focus groups ScWk 242 – Session 4 Slides.
Year 11 Physical Education Social Responsibility in Physical Activity.
Team Leadership AGED Thought for the day… “Strength lies in differences, not in similarities.” ~ Steven Covey.
Why Teams?. Teams Outperform individuals acting alone or in groups Outperform individuals acting alone or in groups Often necessary to lead deep and lasting.
METHODOLOGIES – PART 3 Focus groups, nominal group process, Delphi technique.
Teamwork Goal 4.01: Demonstrate characteristics of effective leadership.
© ABSL Power Solutions 2007 © STM Quality Limited STM Quality Limited Brainstorming TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT Brainstorming.
Creativity.  Creativity and Innovation  Creativity Model- Decision Making  Creative Process – Phases  Team structures for Creativity and Decision.
Quality Tools. Decision Tree When to use it Use it when making important or complex decisions, to identify the course of action that will give the best.
Lecture : 5 Problem Identification And Problem solving.
Chapter 14 Creating High Performance Teams
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-1.
Overcoming Barriers for your Change Initiatives.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Making Decisions The purpose of this module is to develop participants’ facilitation and training skills to enable them to enhance.
Communicating for Results Seventh Edition Cheryl Hamilton, Ph.D.
Welcome to Take your Meetings from Good to GREAT!
Facilitate Group Learning
Interactive Learning PHCL 482 Seminar 2. Interactive Teaching Involves facilitator and learners Encourage and expect learners to participate Use questions.
Reduce Waiting & No-Shows  Increase Admissions & Continuation Reduce Waiting & No-Shows  Increase Admissions & Continuation Nominal Group.
Strategic Planning Building Connections: Community Leadership Program Improving Lives. Improving Texas.
Problem Solving Skills
Ashley James & Tom Flammini October 8, 2013
GROUP DECISION MAKING ADVANTAGES BROAD REPRESENTATION TAPS EXPERTISE MORE IDEAS GENERATED EVALUATION OF OPTIONS COORDINATION HIGH ACCEPTANCE DISADVANTAGES.
Focus groups. What are Focus Groups?  A focus group is basically a way to reach out to potential users for feedback and comment.
Future Prediction Methodologies using expert groups
Facilitated by Kelly Bailey, Durham College Prepared by Ruth Rodgers, Durham College Based on the work of Ingrid Bens (Facilitation at a Glance)
Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 1 Nominal Group Technique (NGT) Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in the early 1970s Useful to define.
Nominal Group Process (NGP) A well researched technique (Delbecq et al., 1986) that is effective in facilitating a group to come to the best combined judgements.
Leadership in Management Chapter 8 Introduction to Business.
Presented by The Solutions Group Decision Making Tools.
Team Contracts We can work together! Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved. 1.
Using Nominal Group Technique for Data Gathering, Prioritizing, and Decision Making Session 562 American Evaluation Association Conference 2012 October.
PROBLEM SOLVING. Definition The act of defining a problem; determining the cause of the problem; identifying, prioritizing and selecting alternatives.
Management & Planning Tools
PROBLEM SOLVING June 2010 CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC.
Objectives 1. A fundamental understanding of the term decision
Communicating For Results
Nominal Group Technique
Conducting a meeting فرح جبر نعمة مشايخ.
Presentation transcript:

Nominal Group Technique Heather Hatch Quality Management, Winter 2010

Contents: Basics of Nominal Group Technique (NGT) Advantages and Disadvantages When to use NGT Steps of NGT Example of NGT in practice Try it yourself Summary

What is NGT? Method of brainstorming, making decisions, or organizing ideas in a group setting

What is NGT? Basic process: –Team members silently write down ideas –Ideas are shared and discussed –Team members vote

Why use NGT? Helps eliminate biases and peer-pressure Encourages participation from all team members All opinions are heard and weighted equally

What inhibits people? They dont want conflict. They dont want to be criticized.

Advantages Disadvantages More unique ideas More participation Members have greater sense of contribution Time-efficient Better decisions Productive Addresses only one problem at a time Mechanical Requires preparation Hard to combine ideas at the end for even better output

Best to use NGT when… Some members are very vocal. People work better in silence. Some members are reluctant to participate. There is concern that enough ideas will be generated. Some participants are new to the team. The issue is controversial and the discussion could become heated.

Stages Introduction Idea Sharing Idea Generation Discussion Voting/Ranking Preparation

A team is assembled to include participants from varying areas. Materials needed: –Pen and paper for each member –Flip chart –Markers –Tape –Sticky notes (optional)

Introduction A facilitator introduces themselves, explains the NGT process. The key problem or question is presented, explaining the purpose of the meeting. Telling team members about problem sooner allows them to come prepared.

Introduction Role of Facilitator: A facilitator is chosen from among group members. Their responsibilities include: –Helping group avoid conflict –Encouraging participation –Keeping time –Facilitating rounds –Recording ideas

Idea Generation Individuals silently and independently write down as many ideas as possible during pre-determined time period. (usually 10 minutes)

Idea Sharing There are various approaches to idea sharing, but the same principles apply: Everyone has equal chance to share their ideas All ideas shared are recorded on flip chart, except repeat ideas There is no discussion during this stage

Idea Sharing Anonymous approach: facilitator collects idea cards and records ideas on flipchart, eliminating duplicates Non-anonymous approach: ideas are shared one at a time in a circular direction. Members can pass at any point.

Idea Sharing This round ends when –All members have passed on sharing their ideas –Time limit is reached (usually minutes)

Discussion Now ideas are disussed. Members can ask for details or clarification. The purpose is clarification not changing peoples opinions. Ideas are not eliminated. Ideas can be re-worded. c c

Discussion Facilitator tries to keep all members involved, continue the flow of discussion, and not get caught on any point for too long. This phase typically lasts minutes.

Discussion If there are many ideas (over 40), there can be an elimination stage before voting. Members can choose to eliminate their own ideas, or combine ideas together. Alternatively, idea elimination can require approval by all members.

Voting/Ranking Voting or ranking determines the NGTs output. Facilitator should number the ideas to make voting easier. Members either vote anonymously, with the facilitator totaling points, or they can publicly write their votes on the flipchart.

Voting/Ranking Voting method 1: Members can vote for ideas based on a chart like the following: Points for each idea are totaled after all members vote. Number of ideasNumber of votesValue of votes Less than 2041, 2, 3, , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Over 3581, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Voting/Ranking Voting method 2: Members rank all ideas, with the highest number as the most favored idea. Points are totaled after all members rank ideas. The idea with the most points wins.

Voting/Ranking If the top 5 ideas are all within several points of each other, a second round of votes will best determine the real winner. Repeat the voting stage using only the top 5 ideas.

Visibility Throughout the process, all charts should remain visible. Tape them to the walls around the room.

Example of NGT The faculty at X-University is concerned that the students are not getting internships and jobs. A team is created involving faculty, students, and recruiters. The goal is to identify the cause of this problem. After this NGT process, the faculty will create an action plan based on the outcome.

Example of NGT Statement of Problem: Why arent students getting internships and job offers?

Example of NGT Individual idea generation: Not enough recruiters come. Their resumes are weak. Students are unwilling to relocate. Students are unprepared. No internships prevents them from getting jobs later on. The career fair is not productive. Everyone wants to stay in- state. The job market is slow. Poor interview skills. Theyre not networking.

Example of NGT Idea Sharing:

Example of NGT Discussion: What do you mean by poor interview skills? Does that include lack of training? Is the career fair not productive because there are too many people or too few? Can we re-word that to say, There arent job opportunities through the career fair? Should we combine unwillin gness to relocate with students wanting to stay in- state?

Example of NGT Voting/ranking: Idea #Rank Unwilling to re-locate 2. Poor interview skills 3. Weak resumes 4. Career fair doesnt offer very many job opportunities 5. Students arent networking. 6. Not enough recruiters. 7. Bad job market 1. Unwilling to re-locate 2. Poor interview skills 3. Weak resumes 4. Career fair doesnt offer very many job opportunities 5. Students arent networking. 6. Not enough recruiters. 7. Bad job market Idea #Rank = = = = = = =17 List of ideas Individual rankings Combined points

Practice Identify a problem within your own organization you want to solve using NGT, or use the following example: What are the consequences of children watching violent television shows and playing violent video games? Choose a facilitator and follow the NGT steps to arrive at your answer.

Stages Introduction Idea Sharing Idea Generation Discussion Voting/Ranking Preparation

Definition: In summary: NGT allows groups to reach optimal solutions by generating ideas privately, sharing ideas, discussing, and voting. It eliminates biases and group- think. Members can participate equally with less intimidation. Try using NGT for your organizations future questions and challenges.

For more information on NGT: Handbook of Techniques for Formative Evaluation by George and Cowan The Nominal Group Technique: A useful consensus methodology in physiotherapy research by Potter, Gordon and Hamer Focus Groups: Theory and Practise by Stewart and Shamdasani

Sources creation-tools/overview/nominal-group.html htm _98.htm