Preliminary Comparison of Monte Carlo and 9-string IceCube Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sean Grullon w/ Gary Hill Maximum likelihood reconstruction of events using waveforms.
Advertisements

Anisotropy in Cosmic Ray Arrival Directions Using IceCube and IceTop Frank McNally ISCRA.
Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers Monte.
Cosmic Rays with the LEP detectors Charles Timmermans University of Nijmegen.
Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Design Study the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers construction.
Use of floating surface detector stations for the calibration of a deep-sea neutrino telescope G. Bourlis, N. A. B. Gizani, A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis,
TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
EHE Neutrino Search with the IceCube Aya Ishihara The University of Wisconsin - Madison for the EHE Verification working group.
The presence of the South Pole Air Shower Experiment (SPASE) on the surface provides a set of externally tagged muon bundles that can be measured by AMANDA.
Sean Grullon For the IceCube Collaboration Searching for High Energy Diffuse Astrophysical Neutrinos with IceCube TeV Particle Astrophysics 2009 Stanford.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
Sean Grullon Waveform-Based Reconstruction for EHE Cascades.
2006/6/211 IceCube EHE analysis Our findings and roadmap to analysis Shigeru Yoshida For the EHE working group.
2015/6/281 IceCube EHE analysis Present Status and Future Plan Shigeru Yoshida For the EHE working group.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
IceTop Tank Calibration Abstract This report outlines the preliminary method developed to calibrate IceTop tanks using through going single muon signals.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara for the IceCube collaboration Chiba University.
Apostolos Tsirigotis Simulation Studies of km3 Architectures KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting April 2007, Pylos, Greece The project is co-funded by the.
Estimation of Resolution and reduced Likelihood analysis - Kai Schatto University of Mainz IceCube Colaboration Meeting, Berlin 21. September 09.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.
Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics Newt,Paolo and Teresa.
1 Raghunath Ganugapati(Newt) && Paolo Desiati Event Topology Studies for detection of prompt muons in the down going muon flux IceCube Collaboration Meeting,March.
Online Reconstruction used in the Antares-Tarot alert system J ü rgen Brunner The online reconstruction concept Performance Neutrino doublets and high.
Determination of True Attenuation Lengths using SPASE-AMANDA Coincidence Data Tim Miller JHU/APL.
Standard Candle, Flasher, and Cascade Simulations in IceCube Michelangelo D’Agostino UC Berkeley PSU Analysis Meeting June 21-24, 2006.
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
IC59 Cascade Filter Comparison between the recos for (HLC+SLC) and (HLC only) pulses Part I Mariola Lesiak-Bzdak LBNL 1 Cascade Phone Call, Nov. 8, 2010.
EAS Time Structures with ARGO-YBJ experiment 1 - INFN-CNAF, Bologna, Italy 2 - Università del Salento and INFN Lecce, Italy A.K Calabrese Melcarne 1, G.Marsella.
Temporal and spatial structure of the Extensive Air Shower front with the ARGO- YBJ experiment 1 - INFN-CNAF, Bologna, Italy 2 - Università del Salento.
Active polarimeter simulation Suguru Shimizu Osaka University Sep. 1, 2007 JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan.
GPU Photon Transport Simulation Studies Mary Murphy Undergraduate, UW-Madison Dmitry Chirkin IceCube at UW-Madison Tareq AbuZayyad IceCube at UW-River.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Paolo Massarotti Charged Kaon Meeting 4 may 2006 Charged kaon lifetime P. Massarotti.
Comparison of reconstruction strategies in IceCube Lake Geneva, April 2007.
Muon Energy reconstruction in IceCube and neutrino flux measurement Dmitry Chirkin, University of Wisconsin at Madison, U.S.A., MANTS meeting, fall 2009.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara Chiba University.
First All-Sky Measurement of Muon Flux with IceCube IceCube REU Summer 2008 Kristin Rosenau Advisor: Teresa Montaruli.
IC-22 Point Source Analysis with Unbinned Maximum Likelihood C. Finley, J. Dumm, T. Montaruli 2008 May 2.
INFN-Pisa Collaboration Meeting, Roma – 12/10/2013 *
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
South Pole Ice model Dmitry Chirkin, UW, Madison.
Recent Results of Point Source Searches with the IceCube Neutrino Telescope Lake Louise Winter Institute 2009 Erik Strahler University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Newt Ganugapati and Teresa Montaruli
Neutrinos from BBfit J. Brunner.
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Performance of the AMANDA-II Detector
(2001) Data Filtering: UPDATE
Update on coincidences
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics
Freeze-In and Hole Ice Studies with Flashers
Erik Strahler UW-Madison 4/27/2008
IC22 Unbinned GRB Search Utrecht Collaboration Meeting
Online filtering Comparisons planned / going-on:
Karen Andeena, Katherine Rawlinsb, Chihwa Song*a
on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration
Comparisons of data/mc using down-going muons
Online filtering Comparisons planned / going-on:
Geometry and Timing Verification with Flashers
Atmospheric muons in ANTARES
Status report on CATA-01/POLA-01 coincidence measurements
Update on POLA-01 measurements in Catania
IC59+40 Point Source Analysis
IC59 muon Level3 investigations Mike Baker Muon call April 12, 2010
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Hellenic Open University
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Comparison of Monte Carlo and 9-string IceCube Data Jon Dumm, Paolo Desiati IceCube Collaboration Meeting Baton Rouge – April 2006 1

Comparisons Outline Lower level – the basics Trigger rates, Occupancy, Hit Doms (LC), and Hit Strings (LC) Higher level – the reconstructions line fit, direct walk, muon-llh, wf-llh Jon Dumm 2

Corsika Simulation 12 min. of Atmospheric Muons Production: Simulation V01-02-01 Reconstruction: IceRec V01-04-03 Hard Local Coincidence Nearest Neighbor DOM within ±800 ns (HLC NN DOM) Trigger-sim Majority Trigger - Events with >= 8 DOMs with LC in 2 µs Feature Extractor Jon Dumm 3

Experimental Data TestDAQ run 28696 from March 8th, 2006 Majority trigger ( >= 8 DOMs with LC in 2 µs) Trigger rate around 120 Hz Feature Extractor Reconstruction: V01-04-03 Jon Dumm 4

Trigger Rates MC trigger rate is about 4 times too high Issues with Real vs Test DAQ which have to be solved Jon Dumm 5

Occupancy Photonics layered table with bin sizes: 80 m in depth 60 deg in zenith angle Occupancy Black – Exp Red – MC DOM 1 at depth 1440 m DOM 60 at depth 2440 m Jon Dumm 6

Occupancy Jon Dumm 7

Number of Hit DOMs Black – Exp Red – MC (DOM + LC) Blue – MC (all DOMs) Is anything important being thrown away due to LC? Jon Dumm 8

Number of Hit Strings Black – Exp Red – MC (DOM + LC) Blue – MC (all DOMs) Jon Dumm 9

Reco Hits – (reconstructed by Feature Extractor ) Black – Exp Red – MC Agreement looks fine in this range... Jon Dumm 10

Reco Hits – (MC only) No Exp counterpart Jon Dumm 11

Higher Level Muon-llh Wf-llh uses Pandel likelihood function uses Feature Extractor Wf-llh uses photonics tables independent of Feature Extractor Jon Dumm 12

Angular Resolution (MC only) Black – muon-llh Red – wf-llh Angular Resolution (MC only) LF seed no cuts DW seed no cuts LF seed nstring>1 DW seed nstring>1 Space Angle Difference (deg) Jon Dumm 13

Angular Resolution (MC only) Quality cuts: Ldir >100; abs(smoothness)< 0.3 Black – wf-llh Magenta – muon-llh Courtesy of Sean Grullon Space Angle Difference (deg) Jon Dumm 14

Zenith Distribution – MC Truth theta (deg) Jon Dumm 15

Zenith Distribution – muon-llh Black – nstring >1 cut Red – no cuts Zenith Distribution – muon-llh LF Seed DW Seed MC -> LF Seed DW Seed Exp -> theta (deg) Jon Dumm 16

Zenith Distribution – wf-llh Black – nstring >1 cut Red – no cuts Zenith Distribution – wf-llh DW Seed LF Seed MC -> LF Seed DW Seed Exp -> theta (deg) Jon Dumm 17

Black – Exp Red – MC Azimuth Distribution Jon Dumm 18

Number of Direct Hits Black – Exp Red – MC ndir Jon Dumm 19

Outlook – lots more to look at! Basic checks before doing physics other quality parameters (Ldir, Smoothness) integrated charge of the waveform Trigger rate issues DCV2 Jon Dumm 20