HEW Study Group Documentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1100r0 September 2013 Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 HEW SG Progress Review Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE hew Submission Sep 2013 Slide 1 PAR and 5C: Comments and some draft text based on n Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0543r0 Submission May 2015 TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide.
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0070r0 Jan 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Joint MAC/PHY Evaluation Methodology Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0757r0 Submission July 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0800r3 SubmissionHemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Study Group Documentation Date: Authors: July 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.
Doc.: IEEE /0386r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Discussions on MCS selection for SLS calibration Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek March.
Doc.: IEEE /1054 Sept 2013 SubmissionYonggang Fang, ZTETX HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1366r3 Submission November 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition Date: 2013-xx-11Authors:
Dense apartment building use case for HEW
On the feasibility of 1Gbps for various MAC/PHY architectures
Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Aug 2013 May 2013
VHTL6 task group work plan proposal (VHTL < 6 GHz)
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
TG ax DSC Summary Date: Authors: July 2015 April 2013
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Requirements Discussion
HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions
Verifying 11ax’s PAR by UL MU-MIMO
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
On High Efficiency WLAN (HEW) TG PAR Scope
Home Network Simulation Scenario with OBSS
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Potential TGbb task group documents
PAD SG Closing Report Date: Authors: September 2012
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
802.11ax Timeline Scenarios Date: Authors: May 2014
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Discovery of ESS services
VHTL6 Throughput Metric Thoughts
ISD SG Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2012 May 2012
ISD SG Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2012 March 2012
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
VHT in Below 6 GHz Frequency Bands
VHT in Below 6 GHz Frequency Bands
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices
Dense apartment building use case for HEW
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Efficient Frequency Spectrum Utilization
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Introductory TGah Proposal
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
VHT - SG Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
VHT SG March 2008 Closing Report
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Distributed MU-MIMO and HARQ Support for EHT
Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Aug 2013 May 2013
TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use
LC MAC submission – follow up
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
LC MAC submission – follow up
Presentation transcript:

HEW Study Group Documentation November 2011 doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/1507r1 July 2013 HEW Study Group Documentation Date: 2013-07-15 Authors: Hemanth Sampath, Qualcomm Stephen McCann, RIM

November 2011 doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/1507r1 July 2013 Abstract This presentation provides our view on the Study Group documentation that could help define PAR and enhance TG spec development. Hemanth Sampath, Qualcomm Stephen McCann, RIM

Background: 11ac PAR and Documentation July 2013 11ac PAR focused on optimizing link throughput in an isolated BSS. PAR: “A maximum multi-station (STA) throughput (measured at the MAC data service access point), of at least 1 Gbps and a maximum single link throughput (measured at the MAC data service access point), of at least 500 Mbps.” Techniques & potential gains over 11n were understood even during SG phase. MIMO, 80 MHz BW, MU-MIMO etc. 11ac 5C feasibility demonstration was relatively easy. The following documents were not needed until TG phase. Channel model document Simulation scenario document Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology document Hemanth Sampath, Qualcomm

HEW PAR and Documentation July 2013 HEW study group formed in March 2013 has a focus on improving efficiency & area throughputs in indoor and outdoor environments, dense networks, moderate to heavy user loaded APs, and presence of interfering sources. HEW SG is faced with a different set of challenges compared to VHT SG. Don’t understand what metrics to use in PAR. Don’t understand how to assess feasibility. Don’t know how to quantify gains over 11ac. Hence, HEW SG may need some additional “guiding” documents to help form PAR metrics and scope. These documents can be leveraged by TG, to create the appropriate TG documents, and help accelerate overall spec development process. Hemanth Sampath, Qualcomm

Proposed Document Creation in SG July 2013 Proposed Document Creation in SG Revised Usage Model Document incorporating WFA feedback. To have clear understanding of key categories and priorities for HEW. Simulation Scenario document and Channel Model document. Identify a minimum set of representative simulation scenarios (e.g.: residential, enterprise and/or outdoor metro). Identify initial set of associated parameters and metrics. Should be representative of the Usage Models. Evaluation Methodology document. Identify initial guidelines to evaluate gains of technology proposals. Includes channel models, metrics and MAC/PHY simulation details. Note: Above SG Documents can be developed in parallel. Hemanth Sampath, Qualcomm

Benefits of Early SG Documentation July 2013 Benefits of Early SG Documentation Help form PAR metrics and scope. Establishes well-defined scenarios and test methodology to evaluate potential gains and feasibility. Needed anyway in TG to reproduce/verify results or show gains. Avoids scenarios where proposals use “concocted simulations” to show gains. Accelerate TG process. Why wait until TG launch to start developing these documents ? Early documentation avoids lengthy “process” debates in TG phase. Hemanth Sampath, Qualcomm

July 2013 Strawpoll Do you agree with the proposal to develop the following SG documents ? Simulation scenario document Channel model document Evaluation methodology document These SG documents can be leveraged by TG, to create the appropriate TG documents. Yes - No - Abstain - Hemanth Sampath, Qualcomm