Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages (September 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transient Membrane Localization of SPV-1 Drives Cyclical Actomyosin Contractions in the C. elegans Spermatheca  Pei Yi Tan, Ronen Zaidel-Bar  Current.
Advertisements

María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
RhoD Inhibits RhoC-ROCK-Dependent Cell Contraction via PAK6
Colleen T. Skau, David R. Kovar  Current Biology 
Β1 Integrins with Individually Disrupted Cytoplasmic NPxY Motifs Are Embryonic Lethal but Partially Active in the Epidermis  Alexander Meves, Christopher.
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Janet H. Iwasa, R. Dyche Mullins  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
The UPEC Pore-Forming Toxin α-Hemolysin Triggers Proteolysis of Host Proteins to Disrupt Cell Adhesion, Inflammatory, and Survival Pathways  Bijaya K.
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Nimish Khanna, Yan Hu, Andrew S. Belmont  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages (December 2008)
by Silvia Mele, Stephen Devereux, Andrea G
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Control of Local Rho GTPase Crosstalk by Abr
Distinct Autophagosomal-Lysosomal Fusion Mechanism Revealed by Thapsigargin- Induced Autophagy Arrest  Ian G. Ganley, Pui-Mun Wong, Noor Gammoh, Xuejun.
Volume 24, Issue 22, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages e6 (January 2018)
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
Intracellular Trafficking of Interleukin-1 Receptor I Requires Tollip
The Formin FMNL3 Controls Early Apical Specification in Endothelial Cells by Regulating the Polarized Trafficking of Podocalyxin  Mark Richards, Clare.
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
EB1-Recruited Microtubule +TIP Complexes Coordinate Protrusion Dynamics during 3D Epithelial Remodeling  Sarah Gierke, Torsten Wittmann  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Volume 25, Issue 21, Pages (November 2015)
Malaria Sporozoites Traverse Host Cells within Transient Vacuoles
Lizhong Xu, Veronica Lubkov, Laura J. Taylor, Dafna Bar-Sagi 
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Kentaro Abe, Masatoshi Takeichi  Neuron 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
Myosin-IXA Regulates Collective Epithelial Cell Migration by Targeting RhoGAP Activity to Cell-Cell Junctions  Tatiana Omelchenko, Alan Hall  Current.
Amphiregulin Exosomes Increase Cancer Cell Invasion
Polarity Determinants Tea1p, Tea4p, and Pom1p Inhibit Division-Septum Assembly at Cell Ends in Fission Yeast  Yinyi Huang, Ting Gang Chew, Wanzhong Ge,
Sara K. Donnelly, Ina Weisswange, Markus Zettl, Michael Way 
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
ASPP2 Regulates Epithelial Cell Polarity through the PAR Complex
Kari Barlan, Wen Lu, Vladimir I. Gelfand  Current Biology 
STIL Microcephaly Mutations Interfere with APC/C-Mediated Degradation and Cause Centriole Amplification  Christian Arquint, Erich A. Nigg  Current Biology 
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Irina Chernyakov, Felipe Santiago-Tirado, Anthony Bretscher 
Takashi Hayashi, Gavin Rumbaugh, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron 
The Ran-GTP Gradient Spatially Regulates XCTK2 in the Spindle
Uma B. Karadge, Minja Gosto, Matthew L. Nicotra  Current Biology 
High-affinity binding to the hypervariable region of the β1 I-like domain controls signaling to fibronectin fibrillogenesis. High-affinity binding to the.
Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Promotes Invadopodia Activity
High-affinity mutants of β3 integrin fail to stimulate RhoA activity and fibronectin fibrillogenesis. High-affinity mutants of β3 integrin fail to stimulate.
Human Myo19 Is a Novel Myosin that Associates with Mitochondria
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
MT1-MMP-Dependent Invasion Is Regulated by TI-VAMP/VAMP7
Scott R. Frank, Jennifer H. Bell, Morten Frödin, Steen H. Hansen 
Maria Schmid, Andreas Jaedicke, Tung-Gia Du, Ralf-Peter Jansen 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Fig. 5 C9orf72 knockdown disrupts autophagy induction.
Nimish Khanna, Yan Hu, Andrew S. Belmont  Current Biology 
Dengue Virus-Induced Autophagy Regulates Lipid Metabolism
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages 1554-1563 (September 2012) Distinct Roles of Talin and Kindlin in Regulating Integrin α5β1 Function and Trafficking  Coert Margadant, Maaike Kreft, Dirk-Jan de Groot, Jim C. Norman, Arnoud Sonnenberg  Current Biology  Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages 1554-1563 (September 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.060 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Disruption of the MP- but Not the MD-NPxY in β1 Prevents α5β1-Induced Dissociation of Cell-Cell Contacts and Cell Scattering (A) Amino acid sequences of the cyto-tail of wild-type β1A and mutants. The MP- and MD-NPxY motifs are underlined. (B) Phase-contrast images of GE11, GEβ1, GEβ1Y783A, GEβ1Y795A, and GEβ1Y783/795A cells. Scale bar represents 40 μm. (C) ZO-1 (green), pan-cadherin (Cadh; red), and DAPI (blue). Scale bar represents 20 μm. (D) P(Y) (green), F-actin (red), and nuclei (blue). Scale bar represents 20 μm. (E–H) Confocal images of GEβ1 and GEβ1Y795A cells (n ≈ 30 cells) were analyzed to quantify cell area (E), the average number of FAs per cell (F), and the average FA size (G). The adhesive area was calculated as the ratio total FA area/cell area (H). Statistically significant differences are indicated by ∗∗p < 0.01 or ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. See also Figures S1 and S2 and Movie S1. Current Biology 2012 22, 1554-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.060) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Disruption of the MP- but Not the MD-NPxY in β1 Prevents α5β1-Induced FN Fibrillogenesis, Assembly of FBs, and Cell Migration (A) FN (green) and nuclei (blue) visualized by confocal microscopy. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (B) GFP-tensin-1 (green), P(Y) (red), and F-actin (blue) visualized by confocal microscopy. Scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Images from time-lapse series with overlaid migration tracks. See Movie S2. Scale bar represents 40 μm. (D) Individual migration tracks from ∼15 cells. (E) Velocity of cell migration (averages ± SEM from ∼250 cells, 3 independent experiments). Statistically significant differences are indicated by ∗∗p < 0.01 or ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. ns, not significant. See also Figures S3, S4A, and S4B, and Movie S3. Current Biology 2012 22, 1554-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.060) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Disruption of the MP-NPxY in β1 Prevents Dissociation of Cell-Cell Contacts and Cell Scattering Induced by HGF or TGF-β (A) Images of GEβ1, GEβ1Y783A, GEβ1Y795A, and GEβ1Y783/795A cells that were untreated (Ctrl) or stimulated for 48 hr with HGF (5 ng/ml) or TGF-β (2 ng/ml). Scale bar represents 100 μm. See Movie S4. (B) Cell scattering was quantified as the average number of neighboring cells per cell at 60 hr of stimulation with TGF-β (2 ng/ml) or HGF (5 ng/ml). Data represent the means ± SEM from ∼150 cells per condition. Statistically significant differences are indicated by ∗p < 0.05. ns, not significant. Current Biology 2012 22, 1554-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.060) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The MP-NPxY Motif Is Required for α5β1 Activation, whereas the MD-NPxY Motif Regulates α5β1 Surface Expression and Degradation in LE/Lysosomes (A) Quantification of β1 surface levels, the active β1/total β1 ratio, and relative FN binding (FN/β1), as determined by FACS. Data represent averages ± SEM of three independent experiments. (B) Live-cell confocal microscopy of eGFP-α5 (green; top) and mCherry-LAMP-1 (red; middle). The degree of colocalization is indicated. See Movie S5. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (C) Expression of β1 and TfnR in cells cultured for 8 hr in the absence or the presence of Bafilomycin A1 (100 nM). (D) Degradation of α5β1 (averages ± SEM of three independent experiments). Statistically significant differences with GEβ1 cells are indicated by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, or ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. ns, not significant. Current Biology 2012 22, 1554-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.060) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Disruption of the MP-NPxY Does Not Abolish Activation-Triggered α5β1 Routing to LE/Lysosomes but Prevents Cell Scattering (A) Integrin β1 (green), active β1 (9EG7; red), and F-actin (blue) in GEβ1Y795A and GEβ1Y783/795A cells. Scale bars represent 10 μm. (B) Top, amino acid sequences of the cyto-tail of human α5 and constitutively active α5 (CA-α5). Bottom, confocal images of eGFP-CA-α5 (green) and mCherry-LAMP-1 (red). The degree of colocalization is indicated. See Movie S6. Scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Cells were incubated overnight with TS2/16 or K-20, after which they were stained with an antibody against endogenous LAMP-1, followed by a FITC-conjugated antibody against TS2/16 or K-20 (green) and a TRITC-conjugated antibody to visualize LAMP-1 (red). F-actin, blue. Scale bar represents 10 μm. The degree of colocalization is indicated. (D) Effects of TS2/16 on α5β1-mediated cell adhesion to FN (averages ± SEM of three independent experiments). Statistically significant differences are indicated by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, or ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. ns, not significant. Current Biology 2012 22, 1554-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.060) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Both NPxY Motifs Promote α5β1 Internalization, and Integrity of the MD-NPxY Is Required for Recycling (A) Internalization of α5β1 in the presence of 0.6 mM primaquine (averages ± SEM of three independent experiments). (B) Degradation of internalized α5β1 (averages ± SEM of three independent experiments). (C) Recycling of internalized α5β1 (averages ± SEM of three independent experiments). See also Figure S5. Statistically significant differences with GEβ1 cells are indicated by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, or ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Current Biology 2012 22, 1554-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.060) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Depletion of β1 or Talin-1 Reverses Cell Scattering whereas Depletion of Kindlin-2 Triggers α5β1 Degradation in LE/Lysosomes (A) Western blots showing depletion of the indicated proteins in GEβ1 cells expressing shRNAs against β1, talin-1, or kindlin-2. (B) Phase-contrast images of GEβ1 and GEβ1 cells expressing shRNAs against β1, talin-1, or kindlin-2. Scale bar represents 30 μm. (C) Confocal images showing P(Y) (green), F-actin (red), and pan-cadherin (blue). Scale bar represents 20 μm. (D) Expression of β1 at the cell surface as determined by FACS. Graphs represent the averages ± SEM of three experiments. (E) FN binding was determined by FACS. Depicted is the FN/β1 ratio, averages ± SEM of three experiments. (F) Cell adhesion assay to 10 μg/ml FN. (G) Live-cell confocal microscopy of eGFP-α5 (green) and mCherry-LAMP-1 (red) in GEβ1 and GEβ1_shkind-2 cells. The degree of colocalization is indicated. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (H) Degradation of α5β1 (averages ± SEM of three experiments). Statistically significant differences are indicated by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. ns, not significant. Current Biology 2012 22, 1554-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.060) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions