Ling-Jyh Chen, Mario Gerla Computer Science Department, UCLA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TCP Probe: A TCP with Built-in Path Capacity Estimation Anders Persson, Cesar Marcondes, Ling-Jyh Chen, Li Lao, M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla Computer Science.
Advertisements

Improving TCP over Wireless by Selectively Protecting Packet Transmissions Carla F. Chiasserini Michele Garetto Michela Meo Dipartimento di Elettronica.
Logically Centralized Control Class 2. Types of Networks ISP Networks – Entity only owns the switches – Throughput: 100GB-10TB – Heterogeneous devices:
IPv4 to IPv6 Migration strategies. What is IPv4  Second revision in development of internet protocol  First version to be widely implied.  Connection.
Dynamic Tunnel Management Protocol for IPv4 Traversal of IPv6 Mobile Network Jaehoon Jeong Protocol Engineering Center, ETRI
Supercharging PlanetLab : a high performance, Multi-Application, Overlay Network Platform Written by Jon Turner and 11 fellows. Presented by Benjamin Chervet.
William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition Chapter 13 Congestion in Data Networks.
IPv6 Multihoming Support in the Mobile Internet Presented by Paul Swenson CMSC 681, Fall 2007 Article by M. Bagnulo et. al. and published in the October.
End-to-end Asymmetric Link Capacity Estimation Ling-Jyh Chen, Tony Sun, Guang Yang, M.Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla Dept. of Computer Science, University of.
Host Mobility Using an Internet Indirection Infrastructure by Shelley Zhuang, Kevin Lai, Ion Stoica, Randy Katz, Scott Shenker presented by Essi Vehmersalo.
Adaptive Video Streaming in Vertical Handoff: A Case Study Ling-Jyh Chen, Guang Yang, Tony Sun, M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla Computer Science Department,
1 Spring Semester 2007, Dept. of Computer Science, Technion Internet Networking recitation #8 Explicit Congestion Notification (RFC 3168) Limited Transmit.
AdHoc Probe: Path Capacity Probing in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Ling-Jyh Chen, Tony Sun, Guang Yang, M.Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla Computer Science Department,
Reliable Transport Layers in Wireless Networks Mark Perillo Electrical and Computer Engineering.
S-MIP:A Seamless Handoff Architecture for Mobile IP Robert Hsieh Zhe Guang Zhou Aruna Seneviratne School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications.
Network Layer (Part IV). Overview A router is a type of internetworking device that passes data packets between networks based on Layer 3 addresses. A.
An Agile Vertical Handoff Scheme for Heterogeneous Networks Hsung-Pin Chang Department of Computer Science National Chung Hsing University Taichung, Taiwan,
End-to-end QoE Optimization Through Overlay Network Deployment Bart De Vleeschauwer, Filip De Turck, Bart Dhoedt and Piet Demeester Ghent University -
Parmesh Ramanathan University of Wisconsin, Madison Mobility Management in GENI WiMAX.
A Mobile-IP Based Mobility System for Wireless Metropolitan Area Networks Chung-Kuo Chang; Parallel Processing, ICPP 2005 Workshops. International.
Seamless Handover in Terrestrial Radio Access Networks: A Case Study 第 5 組 彭瑱瑞 李政穎 陳冠男 郝晉杰.
A Smart Decision Model for Vertical Handoff Ling-Jyh Chen *, Tony Sun *, Benny Chen *, Venkatesh Rajendran †, Mario Gerla * * Department of Computer Science,
Fast Handoff for Seamless wireless mesh Networks Yair Amir, Clauiu Danilov, Michael Hilsdale Mobisys’ Jeon, Seung-woo.
Efficient Mobility Management for Vertical Handoff between WWAN and WLAN IEEE Communications Magazine November 2003.
Real-time Flow Management 2 BOF: Remote Packet Capture Extensions Jürgen Quittek NEC Europe Ltd, Heidelberg, Germany Georg Carle GMD.
Reconsidering Internet Mobility Alex C. Snoeren, Hari Balakrishnan, M. Frans Kaashoek MIT Laboratory for Computer Science.
Performance Validation of Mobile IP Wireless Networks Presented by Syed Shahzad Ali Advisor Dr. Ravi Pendse.
Network Sniffer Anuj Shah Advisor: Dr. Chung-E Wang Department of Computer Science.
Improving TCP Performance over Wireless Networks
for SDN-based flow handover in wireless environments Daniel Corujo Carlos Guimarães Rui L. Aguiar
Internet Traffic Engineering Motivation: –The Fish problem, congested links. –Two properties of IP routing Destination based Local optimization TE: optimizing.
USHA: A Practical Vertical Handoff Solution Ling-Jyh Chen, Tony Sun, Mario Gerla Computer Science Department, UCLA.
Access Link Capacity Monitoring with TFRC Probe Ling-Jyh Chen, Tony Sun, Dan Xu, M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla Computer Science Department, University of.
P2MP LSP for IPTV 이동 무선 네트워크 연구실 홍 석 준
RCP (Receiver Centric Transport Protocol)
CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (SY0-401)
An Architecture for Wireless LAN/WAN Integration
Minimizing latency of critical traffic through SDN
Internet Networking recitation #9
Point-to-Point Network Switching
Approaches towards congestion control
Computer Data Communications
ISO/OSI Model and Collision Domain
Rohit Kapoor, Ling-Jyh Chen, M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla
Multipath QUIC: Design and Evaluation
Wei-Cheng Xiao1, Ling-Jyh Chen2, Shih-Hsuan Tang1, Cheng-Fu Chou1
2002 IPv6 技術巡迴研討會 IPv6 Mobility
CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (SY0-401)
Congestion Control, Internet transport protocols: udp
* Essential Network Security Book Slides.
i-Path : Network Transparency Project
EE 122: Quality of Service and Resource Allocation
IT351: Mobile & Wireless Computing
Congestion Control (from Chapter 05)
Application Layer Mobility Management Scheme for Wireless Internet
Internet Networking recitation #10
Congestion Control (from Chapter 05)
CapProbe Ling-Jyh Chen, M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla
Distributed Systems CS
Tony Sun, Guang Yang, Ling-Jyh Chen, M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla
QShine 2005, Orlando, Florida
Muhammad Niswar Graduate School of Information Science
Congestion Control (from Chapter 05)
Transport Layer: Congestion Control
An Empirical Evaluation of Wide-Area Internet Bottlenecks
The Transport Layer Chapter 6.
Congestion Control (from Chapter 05)
Congestion Control (from Chapter 05)
Wireless and TCP: Performance Issues
Distributed Systems CS
Presentation transcript:

Ling-Jyh Chen, Mario Gerla Computer Science Department, UCLA Vertical Handoff Ling-Jyh Chen, Mario Gerla Computer Science Department, UCLA

Handoff Illustration Horizontal Handoff Vertical Handoff Occurs when the user switches between different network access points of the same kind. Vertical Handoff Involves two different network interfaces which usually represent different technologies.

Seamless Handoff Defined as a handoff scheme that maintains the connectivity of all applications on the mobile device when the handoff occurs. Aims to provide continuous end-to-end data service in the face of any link outages or handoff events. Design Goal: low latency Minimal packet loss

The “ideal” solution – Mobile IP The mobile users need a “practical” solution NOW! Pros Cons Mobile IP is standardized. The deployment cost is high. Mobile IP solutions provide Internet servers the ability to track the mobility. Mobile IP solutions need to negotiate with Internet routers to relay/redirect the data flows. Thus, the handoff latency is higher. An ideal solution for mobile scenarios. Real deployment is still rare.

Universal Seamless Handoff Architecture (USHA) A “simple” and “practical” handoff solution. NAT server NAT Server All packets are encapsulated and transmitted using UDP Applications are bound to the tunnel and transparent to the handoff.

Detecting handoff events and performing service adaptation Transcoding according to available bandwidth and MH properties Smart Decision: decide the “best” time and target interface to handoff

Smart Decision Model With USHA, mobile hosts are able to select any network interface for its connection at any time. However, still need a model that knows which interface to use based on various factors such as Link Capacity, Available Bandwidth Loss Rate, Delay Power Consumption Cost Solution: Smart Decision Model

Smart Decision Model HCC—Handoff Control Center Provides connection between network interfaces and the upper layer applications. Composed of DM (Device Monitor) SM (System Monitor) SD (Smart Decision) HE (Handoff Executor)

Service Agility Vertical handoff usually results in a dramatic change in the path capacity. “Fast Rate Adaptation” forces TCP/TFRC to enter Slow Start when detecting a handoff from LOW to HIGH “Agility” is triggered by Explicit handoff notification Implicit handoff notification

Service Agility – TFRC Probe TFRC Probe with “fast rate adaptation” Vertical handoff from 1xRTT to 802.11b

Service Agility – TCP Probe TCP Probe with “fast rate adaptation” Vertical handoff from 10Mbps to 100Mbps Unit: bps

Summary We proposed a practical vertical handoff solution, called USHA. We proposed a Smart Decision Model to determine the “best” time and target interface to perform vertical handoff. We evaluated Service Agility in vertical handoff scenarios.