+ Relationship Management Theory By: Tori, Sarah & Katie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1 The Evolution of Evaluation What Gets Measured is What Counts.
Advertisements

Welcome to Volunteer Management
MAPP Process & Outcome Evaluation
Stage One: Registrant Mentor, (N.M.C., 2006).
Evaluation on a Shoestring Participatory Techniques for the Evaluator with Minimal Funding.
What is an M and E Plan?. Organizing the Work of M and E An M and E System -- the 12 components as a whole – Sets out broad vision at national level An.
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
A Healthy Workplace Canadian HW Criteria & Implementation John Perry (
Orienting Public Spending towards Achieving Results - Performance and Performance Management: A Conceptual Overview Joel Turkewitz World Bank.
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
CUPA-HR Strong – together!
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Chapter I Introduction: The Nature of Leadership Matakuliah: A Kepemimpinan Tahun: 2008 / 2009.
Clinical Supervision Foundations Module Six Performance Evaluation.
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training Assessing Need, Theory of Change, and Logic Model.
Introduction: The Nature of Leadership
Getting Connected: The Inaugural Seminar of the Laboratory for Applied Network Research Valentina Kuskova May 20, 2014 NRU HSE International Laboratory.
 Definition of Public Relations  1. ‘Public Relations are the management through communication of perceptions and strategic relations between an organisation.
Chapter 1: An Overview of Marketing
Building Effective Partnerships – the Foundation of Service- Learning and Engagement Barbara A. Holland, Ph.D. October 30, 2009 University of Akron Service-Learning.
Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).
Certified Business Process Professional (CBPP®) Exam Overview
ACHE Competency Assessment Model
Introduction: The Nature of Leadership
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
Business Leadership: Management Fundamentals
1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training
Reconciling institutional theory with organizational theories How neoinstitutionalism resolves five paradoxes? Ms.Chanatip Dansirisanti ( 陳美清 ) MA2N0204.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Commitment plus INVESTORS IN PEOPLE In association with Business Link Surrey & Surrey County Council The Investors in People Standard New Version – New.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International Center for Leadership in Education SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning Part II Organizational Perspectives Chapter 5 Contemporary Organizational Theories and Management Systems.
Risk Communications for Disaster Response in an increasingly Wired World What communicators need to know and do Christine Clark Lafleur “ Establishing.
Evaluation framework: Promoting health through strengthening community action Lori Baugh Littlejohns & Neale Smith David Thompson Health Region, Red Deer,
Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
EEX 3257 COOPERATIVE LEARNING. BENEFITS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING Academic Benefits Increased achievement and increased retention of knowledge Improved.
Physical Education Standards Toolkit (4 hours) OCISS Instructional Services Branch.
Member Development and Support Tools and Resources for Building Strong Programs.
Understanding Groups & Teams Ch 15. Understanding Groups Group Two or more interacting and interdependent individuals who come together to achieve particular.
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
The P Process Strategic Design
Measurement of Public Relations Effects James E. Grunig Professor Emeritus Department of Communication University of Maryland.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
BPMM3063 Industrial Marketing GROUP 3: Customer Loyalty.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
LDR/531 – WEEK 2. WDWLLW? DISC Assessment Leadership Personality.
Using results frameworks to shift the focus of evaluation to a strategic level Emerging research on the principles underpinning results frameworks Kate.
PRESENTATION AT THE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITIES QUALITY FRAMEWORK Professor Sarah Moore, Chair, National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning.
B121 Chapter 11 Marketing. It is concerned with exchange relationships. Transactional marketing – oriented towards single purchase Relationship Marketing.
Social Marketing Social Marketing’s Distinguishing Features Case Studies: Food Thermometer Education Evaluating a Social Marketing Intervention: Cardiff.
Leadership in Groups and Teams Chapter 7. “When building a team, I always search first for people who love to win. If I can’t find any of those, I look.
1 CHAPTER FOUR Negotiation: Strategy and Planning.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Chapter 10 Learning and Development in a Knowledge Setting
Session: Instructional methods; How to prepare practical exercise/case study 24 th January 2013 Dr. Eliona Kulluri Bimbashi (University of Tirana)
true potential An Introduction to the Middle Manager Programme’s CMI Qualifications.
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 40 The Nurse Leader in.
Introduction: The Nature of Leadership
Leadership Traits & Evolution of Leadership Theories
Introduction to Program Evaluation
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Interprofessional Education (IPE)
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Presentation transcript:

+ Relationship Management Theory By: Tori, Sarah & Katie

+ Agenda Brief explanation of the emergence of this theory Definition and content involving RMT How RMT contributes to the practice and management of public relations A study that exemplifies the theory Discussion of recent PR campaign Interactive activity

+ Four pivotal developments spurred the emergence of the relational perspective (1) Recognition of the central role of relationships in the study and practice of public relations (2) Re-conceptualizing public relations as a management function

+ Four pivotal developments spurred the emergence of the relational perspective (3) Emergence of measurement strategies, relationship components and types of organization- public relationships and linkage of organization-public relationships to public attitudes, perceptions, knowledge and behavior (4) The construction of models that accommodate relationship antecedents, process, and consequences of organization-public relationships

+ Relationship Management Effectively managing organizational relationships around common interests and shared goals, over time, results in mutual understanding and benefit for interacting organizations and publics

+ Important focus on…. Placed the notion that the appropriate domain of PR is relationships Building mutual benefit Evaluates PR in terms of outcomes instead of outputs Creating a framework for scholars and practitioners

+ Organizational Relationships: Are transactional and dynamic: they change over time Goal oriented Have antecedents and consequences Can be analyzed in terms of relationship quality, maintenance strategies, relationship type and those involved in the relationship Driven by the perceived needs and wants of interacting organizations and publics The continuation of an organization-public relation depends on whether those needs and expectations are met Described as: personal, professional and community

+ Evaluative Relationship Indicators Control mutuality Trust Satisfaction Commitment Exchange relationship Communal relationship

+ How does this theory relate to PR? Represents a fundamental change in the function and direction of PR Focus moves from focus of communication to relationships Movement away from traditional impact measures and toward evaluation of PR initiatives Strategic planning = central in decision-making process Bigger picture versus small details when assessing problems Empowers the PR function Begins to answer those long-standing questions concerning the value of public relations to an organization

+ What does this theory mean for you? Proficiency in messaging AND strategic planning & evaluation Understanding of management principles (for those who aspire to higher- level management positions) Students must be prepared to develop and manage organization-public relationships in addition to proficiency in traditional communication skills

+ Relationship building as a retention strategy (Related Study) Shift of enrollment Strategies to building mutually beneficial relationships Results: overall satisfaction was strongly related and university–student relationship attitudes were substantially related to the criterion What the results mean for PR

+ Practitioners cannot expect to build lasting relationships by adopting a one size fits all orientation when communicating with key public members (Brunig, 2000)

+ Aspen Heights = Relationship Management Example

+ Activity Organizational involvement in and support of the community in which it operates can engender loyalty toward an organization among key publics when that involvement/support is known by key publics [and] what emerges is a process in which organizations must: (1) Focus on the relationships with their key publics (2) Communicate involvement of those activities/programs that build the relationship to members of their key publics (Botan, )

+ Conclusion Using communication as a tool to build mutually beneficial relationships between organization and key publics The focus of PR should be the management of relationships not individual communication strategies PR should not involve a one-size-fits-all approach Evaluation based on relational and behavioral outcomes (bigger picture) vs. communication outputs

+ Sources Beckett, K. (2012). Harrisonburgs first gated community for students moves in. The Breeze. Retrieved from 11e2-9fcd-001a4bcf6878.html Botan, C. H. & Hazleton, V. (2006). Public Relations Theory II. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bruning, S.D. (2000). Examining the role that personal, professional, and community relationships play in respondant relationship recognition and intended behavior. Communication Quarterly, 48(4), Stephen D, B. (n.d). Relationship building as a retention strategy: linking relationship attitudes and satisfaction evaluations to behavioral outcomes. Public Relations Review, doi: /S (02)