VALUE Trial design: Hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk were randomized to valsartan (n = 7,649) vs. amlodipine (n = 7,596). Results (p =

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K Fox, W Remme, C Daly, M Bertrand, R Ferrari, M Simoons On behalf of the EUROPA investigators. The diabetic sub study of.
Advertisements

Effects of amlodipine plus telmisartan or amlodipine plus amiloride regimen on blood pressure control in hypertensive patients: preliminary report of Chinese.
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
VBWG IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study.
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT study overview Double-blind, randomized trial to determine whether.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
לדיובן הגנה כלייתית מוכחת בחולי סכרת מסוג 2, (היפרטנסיבים ונורמוטנסיבים) עם מיקרואלבומינוריה לדיובן הגנה כלייתית מוכחת בחולי סכרת מסוג 2, (היפרטנסיבים.
The effect of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on renal function in patients with chronic heart failure: an analysis from SHIFT Systolic Heart failure.
Review of an article Not all Angiotension-Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are Equal: Focus on Ramipril and Perindopril DiNicolantonio J, Lavie C, O’Keefe.
7/27/2006 Outcomes in Hypertensive Black and Nonblack Patients Treated with Chlorthalidone, Amlodipine, and Lisinopril* * Wright JT, Dunn JK, Cutler JA.
ASCOT and Steno-2: Aggressive risk reduction benefits two different patient populations *Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI or stroke, revascularization,
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
Relationship of background ACEI dose to benefits of candesartan in the CHARM-Added trial.
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
New 2011 SHIFT quality of life substudy Quality of life ( QoL) in heart failure: where do we stand? Therapies that have survival benefits either have a.
European trial on reduction of cardiac events with perindopril in stable coronary artery disease Presented at European Society of Cardiology 2003 EUROPA.
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
Long-term prognostic value of white coat hypertension: an insight from diagnostic use of both ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements Reference:
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control The SPRINT Research Group* November 9, /NEJMoa R2 이성곤 /pf. 우종신.
Results from ASCOT-BPLA: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial–Blood Pressure Lowering Arm VBWG.
The AURORA Trial Source: Holdaas H, Holme I, Schmieder RE, et al. Rosuvastatin in diabetic hemodialysis patient. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(7):1335–1341.
Prognostic Value of B-Type Natriuretic Peptides in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease The PEACE trial Omland T, et al. JACC 2007;50:
Summary of “A randomized trial of standard versus intensive blood-pressure control” The SPRINT Research Group, NEJM, DOI: /NEJMoa Downloaded.
Reducing Adverse Outcomes after ACS in Patients with Diabetes Goals
PRAGUE-18 Trial design: Patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI were randomized to prasugrel (n = 634) versus ticagrelor (n = 596). Results (p = 0.94)
CORAL Trial design: Patients with renal artery stenosis and hypertension or chronic kidney disease were randomized to renal artery stenting (n = 467) vs.
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
United States Preventive Services Task Force: Recommendations for ABPM
Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial Investigators
Effect of Obesity on In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating AMI Obesity is paradoxically associated with favorable mortality.
Avoiding Cardiovascular events through COMbination therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH): Design Randomized, double-blind.
BENEFIT Trial design: Patients with positive serologic tests for T. Cruzi and cardiomyopathy were randomized to benznidazole 300 mg daily for days.
Select Topics in Cardiovascular Medicine
DANISH Trial design: Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were randomized to ICD implantation (n = 556) versus usual care (n = 560). Results (p = 0.28)
EUCLID Trial design: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were randomized to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (n = 6,930) vs. clopidogrel 75 mg.
AARDVARK Trial design: Patients with small abdominal aortic aneuryms (AAAs) were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either perindopril 10 mg once daily,
Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial The effect of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on renal function in patients.
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
MARFAN SARTAN Trial design: Marfan patients were randomized to losartan (n = 153) vs. placebo (n = 150). The dose of losartan was 50 mg for those
Losartan vs. Atenolol in Marfan Syndrome
Median total new lesion volume
OptiLink HF Trial design: Patients with heart failure who underwent implantation of an ICD were randomized to telemonitoring (n = 505) vs. usual care (n.
Compare-Acute Trial design: STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were randomized to fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization (n.
PARADIGM-HF Trial design: Participants with NYHA class II-IV and LVEF ≤40% were randomized to LCZ mg twice daily (n = 4,187) vs. enalapril 10 mg.
PRECISION Trial design: Patients with arthritis and increased cardiovascular risk were randomized to celecoxib 100 mg twice daily (n = 8,072) vs. ibuprofen.
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
SIGNIFY Trial design: Participants with stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure and resting heart rate >70 bpm were randomized to.
FAMOUS-NSTEMI Trial design: Participants with NSTEMI were randomized to an FFR-guided strategy (n = 176) vs. a coronary angiography-guided strategy (n.
ASCOT-BPLA: Primary and secondary end points
BASKET-PROVE II Trial design: Subjects with stable or unstable coronary artery disease undergoing stent implantation were randomized to a biodegradable-polymer.
FOURIER Trial design: Patients with established cardiovascular disease on statin therapy were randomized to evolocumab 140 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks.
(p = 0.32 for noninferiority)
(p for noninferiority < 0.001)
CHAMPION Trial design: Patients with recent hospitalization for heart failure were implanted with a pulmonary artery pressure monitor and randomized so.
A decade after the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial: Weaving firm clinical recommendations from lessons learned  Robert E.
Post-Heart Failure Mortality
ITALIC Trial design: Patients with Xience V (everolimus-eluting stent) PCI were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive 6 or 24 months of dual antiplatelet.
DENERHTN Trial design: Patients with resistant hypertension were randomized to renal denervation plus standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment.
SOLID-TIMI 52 Trial design: Participants within 30 days of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were randomized to darapladib 160 mg daily (n = 6,504) versus.
MOMENTUM 3 Trial design: Patients with advanced heart failure were randomized to a centrifugal-flow pump (n = 152) vs. an axial-flow pump (n = 142). Results.
IVUS-XPL Trial design: Patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary lesions were randomized to IVUS-guided PCI (n = 700) vs. angiography-guided.
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
MATRIX: Radial vs. Femoral
MOOD-HF Trial design: Patients with chronic systolic heart failure and comorbid depression were randomized to escitalopram (n = 185) vs. placebo (n = 187).
ASCOT: randomised trial showing a decrease in cardiovascular mortality in patients treated with amlodipine/perindopril compared with atenolol/thiazide.
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
CIRCUS Trial design: Patients with anterior STEMI were randomized to IV cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg (n = 475) vs. placebo (n = 495) immediately before coronary.
Presentation transcript:

VALUE Trial design: Hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk were randomized to valsartan (n = 7,649) vs. amlodipine (n = 7,596). Results (p = 0.49) Sudden cardiac death, fatal MI, death during or after PCI or CABG, death due to HF, and death associated with recent MI on autopsy, HF requiring hospitalization, nonfatal MI, or emergency procedures to prevent MI: 10.6% of the valsartan group vs. 10.4% of the amlodipine group (p = 0.49) BP reduction: 17.3 mm Hg with amlodipine vs. 15.2 mm Hg with valsartan (p < 0.0001) 10.6 10.4 % Conclusions Among hypertensive patients at high CV risk, valsartan was not associated with a reduction in cardiac morbidity and mortality compared with amlodipine Lack of benefit for valsartan may be due to greater BP reduction in the amlodipine-based regimen Valsartan Amlodipine Mancia G, et al. Eur Heart J 2015;Nov 20:[Epub]