Army Corps permitting of shellfish culture, harvest and restoration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Aquatic Programs Administered by the WV Division of Natural Resources Dan Cincotta WVDNR P. O. Box 67 Elkins, WV
Advertisements

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Restoration and Regulation Discussion Joseph P. DaVia US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore Chief, Maryland.
Coal Mining Activities Mark A. Taylor Huntington District Corps of Engineers.
401 Water Quality Certification South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.
Department of Army Permitting Process: Dredging
BUILDING STRONG ® Mitigation in a Modern World or 33 CFR 332 and You Presented by Jayson M Hudson To the Texas Association of Environmental Professionals.
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
Coastal Communities and Marine Resources David Whitaker Department of Natural Resources.
Utah Watershed Coordinating Council Conservation Planning Workshop Navigating the Corps’ Permitting Process July 20, 2011 Jason Gipson Chief, Utah/Nevada.
US Army Corps of Engineers One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program.
Tessa Getchis Connecticut Sea Grant University of Connecticut Groton, Connecticut Do All Roads Really Lead to Rome?
Army Corps permitting of shellfish culture, harvest and restoration Bill Dewey, Taylor Shellfish Company Shelton, Washington
Clean Water Act Section 404: An O&G Perspective Andrew D. Smith SWCA Environmental Consultants.
Environmental Consultants BMI Environmental Services, LLC AN OVERVIEW OF THE WETLANDS REGULATORY PROCESS AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPOSED OCEAN SPRINGS HIGH.
“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Legislation.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Coordinating U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Permits with Species Conservation Plans November 16,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Regulatory Program Glen Justis Chief, Policy & Administration Regulatory Division Alaska District 2010 Building.
The National Aquaculture Policy and The State Shellfish Initiative Perry Lund Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program 17 November 2011.
Tessa Getchis Connecticut Sea Grant University of Connecticut Groton, Connecticut Do All Roads Really Lead to Rome?
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act 404(b)(1) Guidelines Field Exercise
Kitsap County Shoreline Master Program Update Task Force Work Group Meeting August 16, 2011.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans020-1 Unit 20 Regulation of Wetlands Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Section 10, Rivers and Harbors Acts of 1890 and 1899.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers REGULATORY PROGRAM WILMINGTON DISTRICT March 13, 2008.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Karl Morgan JUNE 2013 Karl Morgan JUNE 2013.
Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
Exploring Environmental Sustainability through AQUACULTURE Dr. Julia Rankin Morandi The Science Collaborative, Inc.
Fish and Wildlife : Regulatory Framework and Challenges Cherise M. Oram STOEL RIVES LLP Hydrovision 2008 Ocean/Tidal/Stream Power Track 7D “Environmental.
Overview of the 401 WQC Process. Main Topics Relationship between Clean Water Act Sections 404 and 401 State permitting processes Specifics of Kentucky’s.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
Salton Sea Species Conservation Habitat Scoping Meetings July 7 and 8, 2010.
MARYLAND BLUE CRABS By: Burk Hill. DETAILS ABOUT CRABS Crabs serve as predator and prey in the Chesapeake bay ecosystem Can grow up to 9.1 inches Crabs.
Impacts of Mining, Mining Regulations & Mine Reclamation.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mobile District Nationwide Permit Overview Cindy House-Pearson Chief, Inland.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Lisa Mangione Regulatory Division Los Angeles District January 14, 2016 USACE Regulatory Program Emergency.
Sustaining Aquatic Biodiversity. Questions for Today  What are the major threats to aquatic biodiversity (HIPPCO)?  How can we protect and sustain marine.
Department of Army Permitting Process: Dredging
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Barriers and Challenges to Developing Renewable Energy Projects
Coal Mining Activities
THE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Continuing Authorities Program
VP1 W Largest vernal pools are visible from this historic 1938 aerial (pre-oil operation)
Overview of the Reissuance of 401 Water Quality General Certifications
Coal Mining Activities
Construction Management & Inspection
May 7, 2018 Milton Boyd, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers*
Galveston Bay Bottom Ecosystem System Features
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Environmental Law Fall 2018
Waters of the U.S. Updates and Changes
More Agencies and Regulations
Pipeline Planning and Construction: Environmental Considerations
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Proposed Mitigation Rule Amendment Rulemaking Pre-Proposal State and Local Government Outreach June 20, 2019.
BOSTON HARBOR DEEP DRAFT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming
Eric Ellis Habitat Restoration Senior Program Specialist
Environmental Law Fall 2019
Presentation transcript:

Army Corps permitting of shellfish culture, harvest and restoration Bill Dewey, Taylor Shellfish Company Shelton, Washington www.taylorshellfish.com

Historic Industry Farming oysters since the 1830’s Late 1800’s: San Francisco gold-rush created huge demand for oysters

Army Corps of Engineers permitting USACE authority Rivers & Harbors Act Section 10 Structures and work that interfere with navigation Clean Water Act Section 404 Discharge of dredged or fill material (pollutants)

Army Corps of Engineers permitting Historically shellfish industry has obtained Section 10/404 permits for docks, piling, floating structures and dredging (channeling) of streams as they cross tideflats through shellfish beds

Nationwide Permits Programmatic permits for activities that cause only minimal adverse environmental effects when performed separately, and cause only minimal cumulative adverse effect on the aquatic environment

Nationwide Permit 4 (NWP 4) Fish and Wildlife Harvesting, Enhancement, and Attraction Devices and Activities

Evolution of NWP4 1977 §322.4(d) Marine life harvesting devices such as pound nets, crab traps, eel pots, lobster traps, provided there is no interference with navigation

Evolution of NWP4 1982 added “duck blinds, clam and oyster digging” after lobster traps 1986 no changes

Evolution of NWP4 1991 “This nationwide permit authorizes shellfish seeding provided this activity does not occur in wetlands or vegetated shallows.” First assertion of CWA authority for shellfish seeding

Evolution of NWP4 1996 This nationwide permit authorizes shellfish seeding provided this activity does not occur in wetlands or sites that support submerged aquatic vegetation (including sites where submerged aquatic vegetation is documented to exist, but may not be present in a given year.). This nationwide permit does not authorize…or the use of covered oyster trays or clam racks.” “SAV”

Problem: SAV and shellfish happen

Problem: SAV and shellfish happen

Problem: SAV and shellfish happen

Problem: SAV and shellfish happen

Nationwide Permit 4 (NWP 4) Bulk of west coast industry predates NWP4 Unaware that harvesting and seeding had come to be permitted activity under NWP4 or more recently specifically not Until recently no complaints about practices, no enforcement by ACOE, no reason to know otherwise

Rude awakening Coast Seafoods, Humboldt Bay, California required to get individual permit Process, consultation, studies, conditions, operational changes cost company ~ $1 million Two new Washington State shellfish farms required to get heavily conditioned individual permits

Consultation triggered Corps permit = federal nexus Consultation required under ESA if threatened or endangered species in area. Consultation required for impact to Essential Fish Habitat under Sustainable Fisheries Act Conditions imposed on permits

Corps responds to industry alarm National review of consistency of regulating shellfish culture practices Jurisdictional review of authority under CWA section 404 and RHA section 10 Commitment to efficient permitting through NWP and/or Regional General Permits

New NWP D – shellfish aquaculture Published in federal register 9/26/06 for public comment (by November 27th) Intended to permit existing commercial shellfish culture activities in the U.S.

Pre-construction notification (PCN) Project area is > 25 acres > than 10 acres of the “project area” is occupied by (SAV) The permittee intends to relocate existing operations into portions of the project area not previously used for aquaculture activities Dredge harvesting is conducted in areas inhabited by SAV

New NWP D – shellfish aquaculture New commercial shellfish aquaculture activities or the “substantial modification” of existing commercial shellfish culture activities not covered by NWP D but can be covered by Regional General Permit (RGP) or Individual Permit (IP).

Changing species on a facility NWP D does not authorize switching to a new species that has not previously been cultivated by the existing commercial shellfish culture (activity or) facility New species will require permitting under an RGP or IP

Regional conditions NWP D as well as other NWPs can be conditioned by individual Districts Proposed conditions announced through District Public Notice (PN) process

Regional General Permits (RGPs) Corps is developing Regional General Permits for activities that fall outside of NWP D Beginning with West Coast then plan to work their way around country

Individual Permits Individual permits will be required where activities fall out of both NWP and RGP

Seed Seed includes immature individual shellfish attached to a shell or shell fragment and shellfish shells and shell fragments placed into waters for capturing larvae

NWP 4 changes previously addressed shellfish harvest and seeding activities continues to cover “clam and oyster digging”. removing the old text authorizing shellfish seeding, since that activity would be authorized by proposed NWP D (if the activity is an existing commercial shellfish aquaculture operation) or NWP 27 (if it is conducted for restoration)

NWP 27 Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Establishment, and Enhancement Activities adding shellfish seeding to the list of examples of authorized activities, since shellfish seeding is used to restore oyster populations replacing ‘‘values’’ with ‘‘services’’ because ecosystem services provide more objective measures of the importance of aquatic resource functions to human populations

NWP 27 requiring permittees to submit copies of: Binding wetland enhancement, restoration, or establishment agreements; NRCS documentation for voluntary wetland restoration, enhancement, or establishment actions; or Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) permits 30 days prior to commencing activities

Double Standard? Little scrutiny or regulation when shellfish culture done with tax dollars to improve water quality and provide habitat Tremendous scrutiny and regulation when same shellfish cultured for food and profit. Crops are providing same ecological services at no cost to tax payers!

Restoration gone awry!