PASER Ratings for TwinCATS Planning Area

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry
Advertisements

Road Maintenance & Planning AUDUBON PARK. ASPHALT FAILURE TYPES ALLIGATOR CRACKING – AS SEEN ON CARDINAL.
Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating Presentation City of Oberlin Public Works Department July 5, 2011.
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Developing Regional Solutions.
Rigid Pavement Concrete. Transverse Cracking Rigid Pavement Transverse Cracking Causes:  Slab longer than 15’ Slab Curl Curing.
City of Houston Street Surface Assessment Vehicle
Pavement Management Engineer
Wyoming County Paved Roads Management and Monitoring Khaled Ksaibati, Ph.D., P.E. STIC June, 2014.
City of Bloomfield Hills Asset Management Plan. Outline Overview plan Challenges and community input Recommendations for others.
Comparative Analysis of Emulsion and Hot Asphalt Cement Chip Seal Performance Douglas D. Gransberg, P.E., C.C.E. University of Oklahoma.
Pavement/Infrastructure Management Program Review April 6, 2009 Remington & Vernick Engineers.
TOPIC OF THE DAY Flexible Pavement Distresses/Failure Of Structure.
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
Bituminous Street Recertification Initiatives. Initiative Items n Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) n Longitudinal Joint Spec and other methods for longitudinal.
1 PAVEMENT DATA ITEMS. 2 Climate_Shapes (4 LTPP zones) Soil_Shapes Metadata Estimates Section level data HPMS Pavement Data Summary level data.
FDOT Aviation Pavement Inspection Training Module 2 – Pavement Fundamentals – Overview Florida Department of Transportation Statewide Pavement Management.
Pavement Management Keeping Good Roads Good, Making Poor Roads Better.
County of Orange Pavement Management System and Sustainable Treatment Program Clark Shen, Manager OC Construction Materials Lab Krishna Nadaraja, Senior.
Herriman City Engineering Department.  Herriman City has experienced tremendous growth over the last several years  Many new subdivisions and associated.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Preventive Maintenance
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
Development of GIS integrated Pavement Management System (PMS) for small cities. Golam Mohammad Moinuddin.
PCC Overlays of HMA Pavements
Bituminous Roads Deterioration
Pavement Distresses Flexible Pavement
Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. COUNTY AND LOCAL ROAD NEEDS 2012.
Pavement Failures, Construction And Maintenance
Performance & Distress of Flexible Pavement Serviceability/Performance Concept.
NETWORK LEVEL EXAMPLES OF PMS İNŞ.YÜK. MÜH. VEYSEL ARLI.
Pavement Preservation Preventive Maintenance
Influence of Pavement Condition on Project Selection
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1:
Micro-surfacing SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SemMaterials
LTPP Lessons Learned: Kansas SPS-2 July 17, 2013 Abilene, KS Gabe Cimini Database Manager, LTPP NRSC.
MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE WITH WARRANTY WORK. Warranty Program History Why Warranties ? Warranty Specifications Experience & Lessons Learned.
ODOT. Taking Care of What We Have. Asset Management, Life Cycle Analysis : A Three-Pronged Approach September 9th, 2015 Andrew Williams, Ohio DOT.
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1: Part 1: Pavement Preservation Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
S ALES T AX : P AVEMENT M ANAGEMENT P ROGRAM P RESENTATION TO THE A LACHUA C OUNTY B OARD OF C OUNTY C OMMISSIONERS A ND T HE C ITIZENS OF A LACHUA C OUNTY.
Ministry of Transportation Ministère des Transports Road Profiler User Group (RPUG) Stateline, Nevada September 28, 2011 Li Ningyuan Ministry of Transportation.
Automatic Pavement Cracking Distress Measurement System Bugao Xu and Yaxiong Huang University of Texas at Austin (512) December.
2003 Warranty Presentations Caltrans WARRANTED HMA PAVEMENTS PAVEMENTS.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
S ALES T AX : P AVEMENT M ANAGEMENT P ROGRAM P RESENTATION TO THE A LACHUA C OUNTY B OARD OF C OUNTY C OMMISSIONERS A ND T HE C ITIZENS OF A LACHUA C OUNTY.
Jeopardy Roads, Routes, and HighwaysYou Call It! Cause and EffectMiscellanousPotpourri Distress ID 101 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
Condition Surveys 2011/12 Results Andy Pickett Director Appia Infrastructure Solutions.
Region’s Core Services 202/17/2014 Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect Provide leadership, administrative support, procurement and budgetary and financial.
Protecting Your Pavement Investment Jeff Stokes. 4 R’s for Paving Success 1 Risk Management Identifying and minimizing your risk factors 2 Right Repair.
PROJECT SELECTION RIGHT TOOLS, RIGHT TIME, RIGHT PROJECT Presented by Joe Ririe, PE PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. September 9, 2015.
“Analysis of Pavement Condition along Ramon Magsaysay Boulevard by Pavement Distress Approach” Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Major in Transportation.
2012 Pavement Management Update June 12, 2012 BoCC Work Session.
CITY OF BELLEVILLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
A Data-Driven Strategy to Improve the Quality
Pavement Preservation Techniques Used in Virginia
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
Village of Woodridge 2011 Pavement Analysis
AN-Najah National University AN-Najah National University
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
Town of Clayton 2016 Pavement Condition Survey
Kent County Road Commission Partnering with 21 Townships serving over 235,000 residents and 1312 miles of Local Roads.
Pavement Maintenance II
HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE Failures in flexible pavement.
Pavement condition index calculation
CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE INFORMATION
Maintenance Rating Program Training
2014 Streets Resurfacing.
LONDON GROVE TOWNSHIP PUBLIC WORKS 2019 PAVEMENT CONDITION REPORT &
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Presentation transcript:

PASER Ratings for TwinCATS Planning Area Presented at the December TwinCATS Committee Meeting

A Brief Overview of How Roads are Rated Pavement A Surface Evaluation and Rating

10 & 9: Excellent No Maintenance required 10 is new construction or reconstruction less than a year old 9 is like new or any paving short of a full reconstruction

8: Very Good No longitudinal cracks except reflection of paving joints. Occasional transverse cracks, widely spaced (40’ or greater).

7: Good Very slight or no raveling, surface shows some traffic wear. Longitudinal cracks (open ¼”) due to reflection or paving joints. Transverse cracks (open ¼”) spaced 10 feet or more apart, little or slight crack raveling. No patching or very few patches in excellent condition.

6: Good Slight raveling (loss of lines) and traffic wear. Longitudinal cracks (open ¼” – ½”) due to reflection and paving joints. Transverse cracking (open ¼” to ½”) some spaced less than 10 feet. First sign of block cracking Slight to moderate flushing or polishing. Occasional patching in good condition.

5: Fair Moderate to severe ravelling (loss of fine and coarse aggregate). Longitudinal and transverse cracks (open ½”) show first signs of slight raveling and secondary cracks. First signs of longitudinal cracks near pavement edge. Block cracking up to 50% of surface. Extensive to severe flushing or polishing. Some patching or edge wedging in good condition.

4: Fair Severe surface raveling. Multiple longitudinal and transverse cracking with slight raveling. Longitudinal cracking in wheel path. Block cracking (over 50% of surface). Patching in fair condition. Slight rutting or distortions (½” deep or less).

3: Poor Closely spaced longitudinal and transverse cracks often showing raveling and crack erosion. Severe block cracking. Some alligator cracking (less than 25 % of surface). Patches in fair to poor condition. Moderate rutting or distortion (1” or 2” deep). Occasional potholes.

2: Very Poor Alligator cracking (over 25 % of surface). Severe distortions (over 2” deep). Extensive patching in poor condition. Potholes.

1: Failed Severe distress with extensive loss of surface integrity All images from City of Novi Surface Condition Report

TAMC Categories Category PASER Rating Maintenance Good 8-10 Routine Maintenance Fair 5-7 Capital Preventative Maintenance Poor 1-4 Structural Improvements

Treatment Options with Costs

Ratings By Year Vast majority of TwinCATS is rated in even years Lake Township & Bridgman are rated in odd Years Changes in the federal Aid network from year to year affect which roads are rated. For example the section in Lake Township rated in 2016 was not rated in previous years.

TwinCATS PASER Ratings 2015-2016 Miles Percent 1 0.0 0.0% 2 6.7 4.1% 3 28.8 17.6% 4 79.1 48.4% 5 24.1 14.7% 6 6.8 7 9.7 6.0% 8 4.0 2.5% 9 4.3 2.6% 10 Total 163.48 100%

Comparison to Trunkline Locally Controlled Federal Aid

City & Village versus Township Cities & Villages: 35 miles Townships: 130 miles