French Seagrass indicator - Atlantic and Channel CW & TW

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ecological Evaluation Index (EEI) A biotic index for the implementation of WFD in rocky coastal and sedimentary transitional Mediterranean waters by Sotiris.
Advertisements

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Integration of different metrics to a whole water body classification for all.
Ecological Evaluation Index (EEI) A biotic index for the implementation of WFD by Sotiris Orfanidis (February 2008)
1 Water Framework Directive (WFD) of the European Union © Acri-st, all rights reserved – 2014 Satellite-derived data for the Water Framework Directive.
EU MEDIterranean Acoustic Survey on Small Pelagics “MEDIAS”
SFCC Walkover Habitat Survey Training Course July 2015.
Anne Lyche Solheim, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway Workshop on ”In situ trialing for ecological and chemical studies in support of.
October 31 st, 2007 – “BLACK SEA CELEBRATION DAY” - CONSTANTA.
Methods Benthic communities classification in the Inner Puck Bay Urszula Janas, Halina Rzemykowska, Institute of Oceanography, University of Gdańsk.
Integrating biodiversity measurements, assessments and policy responses in an ecosystem capital accounting framework. J-L Weber, R. Spyropoulou, A.T. Peterson.
Snejana Moncheva1, Laura Boicenko 2 1Institute of Oceanology-BAS, Parvi Mai str., No 40, P.O.Box 152, Bulgaria 2NIMRD “Grigore Antipa”, Mamaia bul., No.
Intercalibration in transitional waters (TW) Phase 2: Milestone 5 Reports (M5R) Presented by Nikolaos Zampoukas Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Water Bodies in Europe: Integrated Systems to assess Ecological Status and Recovery Funded under FP7, Theme 6: Environment (including Climate Change) Contract.
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Technologies & methodologiesfor operational systems ENEA, CNR, DMI, Ifremer Annual Meeting – Athens 2008.
Methods Compliance Checking Which methods can be included in the final intercalibration results?
Working Group A ECOSTAT Intercalibration Progress Coast GIGs JRC, Ispra, Italy, March 2005 Dave Jowett, Environment Agency (England and Wales), Coast.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands1 Diederik van der Molen Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management CIS workshop.
Baltic Sea GIG. Description of types that have been intercalibrated Type Salinity psu ExposureDepthIce daysOther Characteristics CW B Shelteredshallow.
WISER Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Third phase of deWELopment project Scope of the work Warsaw, 1st Feb
How do we work… Samuli Korpinen, Finnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Centre HELCOM BalticBOOST WS on Physical loss and damage to the seafloor.
Annick DONNAY STARESO, FRANCE
Deltares, Delft, Netherland
First data on biomass and abundance of two eelgrass
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
NE ATLANTIC GEOGRAPHICAL INTERCALIBRATION GROUP (NEA GIG)
ECOSTAT, Bristol Hotel, Brussels,
REFCOND EU Water Framework Directive project funded by the European Commission DG Environment Included in the EU Water Directors “Common Strategy on.
Intercalibration Results 2006
Intercalibration in transitional waters (TW) Phase 2: Milestone 4 Reports (M4R) Presented by Nikolaos Zampoukas Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
CW-TW Intercalibration results
ECOSTAT WG 2A, JRC - Ispra (I), 7-8 July 2004
Progress on Intercalibration COAST GIGs
Satellite-derived data for the Water Framework Directive (WFD) of the European Union Abstract : The application of the Water Framework Directive (WFD)
SoE Guidance – Biological reporting sheets
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
COAST Lisbon February Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom.
Intercalibration of Opportunistic Algae Blooms
Intercalibration : a “WFD compliant” boundary comparing procedure
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
NE Atlantic GIG ECOSTAT April 2013 Summary of NE ATLANTIC GIG Workshop held in Lisbon (24th-25th January 2013) The Next Phase.
COAST Lisboa Feb Methods Discussion
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT State of play in the intercalibration exercise Water Directors Meeting, November 2005.
CW-TW IC Work progress Fuensanta Salas Herrero, CW-TW IC Coordinator
Contact persons: - F. Bruchon- Seine Normandy Water Agency
CLASSIFICATION TOOLS FOR BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE FAUNA IN COASTAL WATERS
Saltmarsh Intercalibration CW
ECOSTAT, JRC April 2007 MEDiterranean RIVers GIG Report
Intercalibration Angiosperms Mediterranean
Typology and classification of coastal waters in Estonia
EU Water Framework Directive
Water Directors meeting Spa, 2-3 December 2010
Water Framework Directive
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
NEA-GIG: Intercalibration Validation Meeting (Ispra, March 2012)
Guidelines to translate the intercalibration results into the national classification systems and to derive reference conditions Presented by Wouter.
Use of WFD methods in MSFD initial assessment, GES definition and target setting Preliminary results of in-depth analysis focusing on eutrophication.
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2010
EEA European Topic Centre on Water
Angel Borja Coordinator of the Group
EU Water Framework Directive
CW BQE MACROINVERTEBRATES
Indicators reviewed for the SEBI2010
Presentation transcript:

French Seagrass indicator - Atlantic and Channel CW & TW NEA GIG Scientific team Isabelle Auby, Ifremer Arcachon Hélène Oger-Jeanneret, Ifremer Nantes Pierre-Guy Sauriau, CNRS, LIENSs Christian Hily, CNRS, LEMAR Laurent Barillé, University of Nantes

Index General information Description of the method Necessary information Reference conditions Indicators description How to apply the index

1. General information Acronym: SBQ CW & TW Method name: Seagrass Bed Quality Original name: Qualité des herbiers de zostères dans les masses d’eau côtières et de transition WISER ID: 351 GIG: NE Atlantic Category: Coastal and Transitional Water Bodies BQE: Angiosperms (Seagrass) Country: France Scientific literature : Foden J., Brazier D.P. (2007). Angiosperms (seagrass) within the EU water framework directive : A UK perspective. Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, (2007) 181–195

2. Description of the method 3 metrics have been selected to build the French indicator for angiosperms (seagrass bed quality) in the Atlantic/Channel CW & TW : Taxonomic composition : Changes in the number of species over time (« only » 2 species are considered : Zostera noltii and Zostera marina) Spatial extension of seagrass bed : state of the current extension compared to the largest known historical extension (after the 1930’s epidemic that decimated Zostera marina). Density of seagrass bed (abundance, biomass or % cover) : state of the current density from the highest known historical density Z. noltii (intertidal) Z. marina (intertidal & subtidal)

3. Necesary information : spatial extension of seagrass beds In all cases, mapping of seagrass beds is carried out when their development is maximal aboveground (late summer). Frequency chosen for these measurements : once every 6 years (duration of a management plan). Methods for mapping of intertidal seagrass beds : 2 situations Small seagrass beds (until a few km2) : mapping is carried out using field observation (with a GPS tracking), which are directly integrated into a GIS. Major seagrass beds : mapping is carried out from satellite imagery or aerial orthophotographies, and in all cases completed by field validation (especially in WB with macroalgae and/or Spartina islands) Methods for subtidal seagrass beds When water transparency allows it : mapping is carried out from aerial photography Otherwise: indirect methods are used (optical methods using video cameras or acoustic methods using side-scan sonar and/or single-beam sonar)

3. Necesary information : spatial extension of seagrass beds Field observation with GPS tracking : small intertidal seagrass beds & field validation for major intertidal seagrass beds Aerial photography : major intertidal seagrass beds and subtidal seagrass beds (Z. marina) when water transparency allows it

3. Necesary information : stational approach In all cases, sampling is carried out when development of Zostera is maximal aboveground (late summer). Frequency for these measurements is once every 3 years. For intertidal Z. noltii, seagrass coverage is visually determined (% of area covered with seagrasses on a 100 m* 100 m area/station). Then, sampling is carried out with 9 cores/replicates per station Total sampled area : 63,62 cm² for Z. noltii 0,08 m² for Z. marina On each sample : shoot density and biomass (aboveground and below ground) are determined. © PG Sauriau

4. Reference conditions Seagrass (Zostera) beds on French coasts (Channel & Atlantic) differ in terms of extension, density/biomass and number of seagrass species present in the considered water body. These parameters depend on a combination of geographical, edaphic, bathymetric and hydrodynamic factors, that are specific for each water body. For this reason, reference conditions are defined for seagrass beds of each water body : they correspond to the highest known values during the period for which historical informations are available. They are determined on the basis of historical data when they exist, otherwise by expert judgment. These choices require the collation and analysis of all available historical information on seagrass beds of water bodies. When such information is unavailable, expert judgment or modeling (work on progress) is used.

5. Indicators description Composition metric (Zostera noltii & Zostera marina) Status High Good Moderate Poor/Bad Composition Species emerged or no loss of any species Loss of 1 species : Zostera marina Loss of 1 species : Zostera noltii Loss of 2 species EQR 1 0,7 0,5 Density metric and Extension metric Etat High Good Moderate Poor Bad Density (loss) Extension (loss) 0-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-50% > 50% EQR 1-0,8 0,78-0,6 0,59-0,5 0,49-0,3 0,295-0 Class limits were derived from the first intercalibration exercise (2004-2006) and adapted from French expert judgment

6. How to apply the index The average of the three EQR obtained for each of the three metrics (composition, spatial extent and density) is calculated. Then the ecological status is assigned as follows : Ecological status EQR High 0,8–1,0 Good 0,6–0,79 Moderate 0,4–0,59 Poor 0,2–0,39 Bad 0,0–0,19