Toshiro Oda, Keiichi Namba, Yuichiro Maéda  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule
Advertisements

Structural Changes of Cross-Bridges on Transition from Isometric to Shortening State in Frog Skeletal Muscle  Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Katsuaki Inoue 
Fatma Briki, Jean Doucet, Catherine Etchebest  Biophysical Journal 
Structural Transition of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Preceded by Deprotonation of Schiff Base: Microsecond Time-Resolved X-Ray Diffraction Study of Purple Membrane 
Induced Fit and the Entropy of Structural Adaptation in the Complexation of CAP and λ- Repressor with Cognate DNA Sequences  Surjit B. Dixit, David Q.
Hydroxide and Proton Migration in Aquaporins
Monitoring the Structural Behavior of Troponin and Myoplasmic Free Ca2+ Concentration during Twitch of Frog Skeletal Muscle  Tatsuhito Matsuo, Hiroyuki.
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Vishwanath Jogini, Benoît Roux  Biophysical Journal 
Hydration Force in the Atomic Force Microscope: A Computational Study
Mechanism of the Lamellar/Inverse Hexagonal Phase Transition Examined by High Resolution X-Ray Diffraction  Michael Rappolt, Andrea Hickel, Frank Bringezu,
Ann M. Edwards, J. Kent Blasie, John C. Bean  Biophysical Journal 
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Transconformations of the SERCA1 Ca-ATPase: A Normal Mode Study
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Rubén Díaz-Avalos, Donald L.D. Caspar  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
The Influence of Amino Acid Protonation States on Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Bacterial Porin OmpF  Sameer Varma, See-Wing Chiu, Eric Jakobsson 
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Shiori Toba, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Shinji Kamimura, Kazuhiro Oiwa 
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Ion Counting from Explicit-Solvent Simulations and 3D-RISM
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Multiple Conformations of F-actin
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Low-Resolution Structures of Proteins in Solution Retrieved from X-Ray Scattering with a Genetic Algorithm  P. Chacón, F. Morán, J.F. Díaz, E. Pantos,
Histone Octamer Helical Tubes Suggest that an Internucleosomal Four-Helix Bundle Stabilizes the Chromatin Fiber  Timothy D. Frouws, Hugh-G. Patterton,
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Analysis of the Stability of Hemoglobin S Double Strands
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2018)
Tests of Continuum Theories as Models of Ion Channels. I
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Intrinsic Bending and Structural Rearrangement of Tubulin Dimer: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Coarse-Grained Analysis  Yeshitila Gebremichael, Jhih-Wei.
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Absence of Ion-Binding Affinity in the Putatively Inactivated Low-[K+] Structure of the KcsA Potassium Channel  Céline Boiteux, Simon Bernèche  Structure 
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Refined structures of the active Ser83→Cys and impaired Ser46→Asp histidine- containing phosphocarrier proteins  Der-Ing Liao, Osnat Herzberg  Structure 
Open-State Models of a Potassium Channel
Water Molecules and Hydrogen-Bonded Networks in Bacteriorhodopsin—Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Ground State and the M-Intermediate  Sergei Grudinin,
The 4 Å X-Ray Structure of a Tubulin:Stathmin-like Domain Complex
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Small Angle X-Ray Scattering Studies and Modeling of Eudistylia vancouverii Chlorocruorin and Macrobdella decora Hemoglobin  Angelika Krebs, Helmut Durchschlag,
The Selectivity of K+ Ion Channels: Testing the Hypotheses
Coupling of S4 Helix Translocation and S6 Gating Analyzed by Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of Mutated Kv Channels  Manami Nishizawa, Kazuhisa Nishizawa 
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Erika J Mancini, Felix de Haas, Stephen D Fuller  Structure 
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Computed Pore Potentials of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor
Volume 91, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Analysis of the Stability of Hemoglobin S Double Strands
Chze Ling Wee, David Gavaghan, Mark S.P. Sansom  Biophysical Journal 
Jun’ichi Wakayama, Takumi Tamura, Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto 
Alexander Spaar, Christian Münster, Tim Salditt  Biophysical Journal 
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Demian Riccardi, Qiang Cui, George N. Phillips  Biophysical Journal 
Evidence of Cholesterol Accumulated in High Curvature Regions: Implication to the Curvature Elastic Energy for Lipid Mixtures  Wangchen Wang, Lin Yang,
Presentation transcript:

Position and Orientation of Phalloidin in F-Actin Determined by X-Ray Fiber Diffraction Analysis  Toshiro Oda, Keiichi Namba, Yuichiro Maéda  Biophysical Journal  Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 2727-2736 (April 2005) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.047753 Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Processed diffraction patterns from F-actin sols on the central section of the reciprocal space. The left and right halves show the patterns in the presence and absence of phalloidin, respectively. The diffraction patterns were recorded on imaging plates with a size of 30 cm×30cm at SPring-8 BL40B2, and were read out with a raster interval of 100μm. The exposure times were 120s for F-actin and 150s for the phalloidin F-actin complex. The specimen-detector distance was 396.12mm. The edge of these patterns corresponds to 8Å resolution. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2727-2736DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.047753) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Layer-line amplitude distributions. Solid and dotted lines represent profiles from F-actin and the phalloidin F-actin complex, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2727-2736DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.047753) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Patterson maps and correlation function used to determine the position and orientation of phalloidin. (a) Difference-Patterson map between F-actin and phalloidin-F-actin; (b) calculated Patterson map from a phalloidin model located at r=9.5Å in the helical lattice of F-actin. These two maps were normalized and the height at the origin was set to 1000. The maps were contoured only at levels between 10 and 110 at an interval of 10. Some of the high contour levels were omitted near the meridian for clarity. (c) Correlation between the difference-Patterson map (Fig. 3 a) and the calculated Patterson map (Fig. 3 b). A series of Patterson maps was calculated as the phalloidin molecule was rotated at its mass center with intervals of 20° at a given radius. For each orientation and radial position, the correlation was calculated for three peak areas, within a radial range from 0 to 39Å and an axial range of 21Å, each centered at 27, 82, and 138Å along the axial direction. (d) Cross-Patterson map in radial projection between structural factors with experimental phases and with the conventional model phases. The experimental phases were deduced from the radial position and orientation of bound phalloidin determined in c. The model phase was calculated from the model of Holmes et al. (1990). The map shows spatial correlations of F-actin with the experimental phases against the one with the model phases. The map density was normalized at the origin to be 1000. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2727-2736DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.047753) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The determined phalloidin position in F-actin. The refined position and orientation of bound phalloidin are shown as electron densities in three subunits of the Lorenz F-actin model (stereo view). The electron densities of phalloidin molecule were derived from the coordinates by truncating the Fourier transform at a resolution of 8Å, as used in the analysis. The residues 73, 177, 179, 196–200, and 285–287 are shown in ball-and-stick representation. Note that the results were almost independent of the F-actin model phases used: the model of Holmes et al. (blue), the model of Lorenz et al. (green), the model based on the tight crystal structure (magenta), and the model of Tirion et al. (cyan). The tight crystal-structure was made by placing the tight conformation G-actin (Schutt et al., 1993) on the actin helix. In this diagram, the electron densities for phalloidin are slightly asymmetric, indicating the low resolution shape of phalloidin placed in the most plausible orientations. Atomic models of phalloidin were not shown here because details of interaction between F-actin and phalloidin are beyond the resolution of the present analysis (see text for discussion on the plausible orientation of phalloidin). This figure was made with Bobscript (Esnouf, 1997). Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2727-2736DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.047753) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison of observed layer-line amplitudes from phalloidin F-actin complex (solid line) with those calculated from a model (dotted line). The calculated amplitudes were obtained from the structure factors of F-actin with observed amplitudes and model phases and the structure factor of phalloidin calculated in its most plausible position and orientation. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2727-2736DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.047753) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Difference- and cross-Patterson maps to determine the position and orientation of rhodamine. (a) Cylindrically averaged difference-Patterson map between phalloidin-F-actin and phalloidin-rhodamine-F-actin. Peak positions (■) were those expected from a rhodamine model located at r=17Å in the helical lattice of F-actin. The map was normalized to have the height at the origin 1000. Some of the high contour levels were omitted near the meridian for clarity. (b) Cross-Patterson map in radial projection between phalloidin-F-actin structural factors with experimental phases and with the conventional model phases. The experimental phases were deduced from the position of bound rhodamine. The model phase was calculated using the F-actin model of Lorenz et al. (1993) and the model of bound phalloidin determined in this study (Fig. 4). The map was normalized at the origin to be 1000. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2727-2736DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.047753) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Electron densities corresponding to phalloidin (blue) and rhodamine (red) determined in the rhodamine phalloidin F-actin complex. The density of rhodamine was calculated in a similar way to that described in Fig. 4, by using the Lorenz F-actin model and the model of bound phalloidin determined in this study. Similar results were obtained by using the other phase sets. The differences of amplitudes between the rhodamine phalloidin F-actin complex and the phalloidin F-actin complex were smaller than those used for the determination of phalloidin position. By adding a mass corresponding to rhodamine, the crystallographic R-factor decreased from 4.9% to 4.1%. The R-merge was 2.9% (n=2) and 3.5% (n=7) for the phalloidin F-actin complex and rhodamine phalloidin F-actin complex, respectively. This figure was made with Bobscript (Esnouf, 1997). Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2727-2736DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.047753) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 The best candidate for the position and orientation of bound phalloidin. This solution satisfies the three restricting conditions: stereochemical interactions; diffraction data; and stereochemical knowledge about F-actin and phalloidin interactions. See the main text for details. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2727-2736DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.047753) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions