Washington Laboratories (301) 417-0220 web: www.wll.com7560 Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD 20879 William H. Graff, American TCB Updates for Test Reporting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Washington Laboratories (301) web: Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD RF Exposure and Modular Equipment Considerations.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /064r0 Submission March 2000 Mårten Mattsson, EricssonSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Sg-whitespace-09/0019r0 Submission January 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Impact of FCC R&O on IEEE 802 Date: Authors: Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission July 2009 Ari Ahtiainen, NokiaSlide 1 A Cooperation Mechanism for Coexistence between Secondary User Networks on.
Doc.: IEEE /0165r1 SubmissionPäivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Implementation aspects of a coexistence system Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE Submission July 2007 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 Overview of FCC ET FNPRM ISM Band Spectrum.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
ITU-T Technical Session on EMF
Paolo Gemma, Senior Expert, Huawei
How To Review a TCB Application
How to Set Up, Secure and Manage A Network
Doc.: IEEE /1495r /0059r0 Submission Sep 2006 Denis Kuwahara, BoeingSlide 1 RR-TAG Liaison Report IEEE Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0008r0 & /0199r0 Submission January 2007 Rich Kennedy, OakTree WirelessSlide 1 RR-TAG Liaison Report Jan07 IEEE
Washington Laboratories (301) web: Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD Cellphones and Licensed Radio Reports.
ACB Module Assessment and Integration FCC and IC Michael Derby ACB Europe7 April
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
5/9/2015TCB Council1 TCB Sharing of FCC KDBs Michael Derby TCB Council Chairman 9 th April 2014.
American Certification Body - Your Online Resource for Regulatory Training 1588 ENERGYSTAR®
5/10/2015TCB Council1 Navigating the FCC Online Resrouces Presented by: Chris Harvey Tim Dwyer Anne Liang.
Recent FCC Activity William Hurst Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division October 2010.
Washington Laboratories (301) web: Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD How to Create a Part 15C Report.
1 ® Intel Labs ® Slide No. *Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners Module Approval Explained 04/18/02 Jeffrey Schiffer.
1 White Space requirements Gabor Bajko IETF 82 Taipei I-D: draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-01.
Wireless Networking 102.
Certification & Engineering Bureau CB notification Inquiries & Issues Nicolas DesMarais Certification Officer Agent d’Homologation TCB Workshop – February.
Doc.: IEEE /0916r0 Submission September 2005 Slide 1 Adjacent channel interference and its impact on the Mesh MAC Date: Authors: Notice:
Joint Industry Canada/RABC Stakeholder Discussion - Ottawa, ON
Ken Dorsey KA8OAD. What is EchoLink? The simple answer is EchoLink software uses VoIP technology to link ham radio stations together around the world.
Technician License Course Chapter 9 Lesson Module 21 Radio Frequency Exposure.
January 2005 Abbie Mathew, NewLANS Slide 1 IEEE /054r0 Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Submission.
Washington Laboratories (301) web: Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD How to List a Test Site.
Implementing Wireless and WLAN Chapter 19 powered by DJ 1.
Washington Laboratories (301) web: Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD Desert William H. Graff President and Director of Engineering,
Doc.: IEEE /1119r0 Submission November 2005 Alistair Buttar, MotorolaSlide 1 Support for Emergency Calls Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-02/011r0 Submission March 2002 Jim Lansford, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 Simultaneous Transmission: Some comments from FCC Jim Lansford.
Radiation Safety Plan Recommended by OSHA Elements of Plan  Site Specific Issues  Personnel Training  Safety Procedures  Definition of Controlled and.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission Title: Link Budget for m Date Submitted: 5 March 2012.
MASNET GroupXiuzhen ChengFeb 8, 2006 Terms and Concepts Behind Wireless Communications.
Doc.: IEEE /0152r0 Submission May 2008 Gerald Chouinard, CRCSlide 1 Incumbent database query IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 1 Proposal for Higher Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0398r0 Submission March 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: CWPAN Response to IEEE China MM-Wave (CMMW) Study Group.
Doc.: IEEE /1171r0 SubmissionRich Kennedy, MediaTek Summary of FCC Administrative Changes Proposed in NPRM FCC Date: Authors:
Forced firmware lockdown? Christian
Doc.: IEEE /1501r0 Submission September 2006 C. Wright, Azimuth SystemsSlide 1 Multipath Testing in a Conducted Environment Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0192r0 Submission September 2006 Edgar Reihl, Shure IncorporatedSlide 1 Shure Comments to TG1 IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0132r1 Submission March 2006 Dr. Michael D. Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 1 Traceable OTA Performance Testing Presentation Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE /0015r0 Submission Month YearJanuary 2005 Bryan Wells, DENSO, LA LabsSlide 1 Proposed MAC Enhancements Report Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0408r0 Submission May 2005 John Klein, SymbolSlide 1 TPC Comments Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It.
November 2005doc.: IEEE /1079r0 Stuart GoldenNovember Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a.
17/03/2016 Summary of FCC’s RF Exposure Proceeding Presented By: Bill Belt, TIA 1GSC-9, Seoul SOURCE:TIA TITLE:Summary of FCC’s RF Exposure Proceeding.
November 2005doc.: IEEE /1079r1 Stuart GoldenNovember Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a.
14 March 2002Overview of TCB ProgramSlide 1 Overview of FCC Telecommunication Certification Body Program.
Laboratory equipment Dr. W. Huisman Cairo, November 21th 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 1 STA receiver performance indication Notice: This document has been prepared.
ACB ISED Canada Radio Certification
Instructor Materials Chapter 6 Building a Home Network
Three types of wireless technology
Wireless Technology.
Zebra’s Official Website:
Waveform Generator Update– September ‘06
MHz FCC Action Date: Authors: March 2005
Submission Title: Link Budget for m
FCC Regulations and Multi-band Operation
Addressing Inconsistent Results in Open Over the Air Testing
Integrating Bluetooth Technology into Mobile Products
TGT Definitions Ad Hoc Report
Submission Title: [Regulatory Update]
What type of radiation are VHF and UHF radio signals?
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks
Waveform Generator Update– September ‘06
Presentation transcript:

Washington Laboratories (301) web: Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD William H. Graff, American TCB Updates for Test Reporting

GSM Duty Factor Test Report and supporting documentation should clearly support GPRS capabilities of the device. Please include information regarding both the GPRS classes (e.g. class 10 and class A). Test with maximum power for both body-worn and head positions as applicable. Currently the FCC has been asking on most GSM applications to verify if the GPRS capability will work while the device is transmitting in voice mode.

CDMA 2000 / W-CDMA The FCC has requested all TCBs to consult with them before any attempt to approve CDMA 2000 is attempted. FCC is considering whether or not to consider CDMA 2000 a new technology and therefore subject to approval exclusively by the Commission

Layards Devices with Neck worn lanyards or that are intended to be next to the body should be tested with 0 gap and body tissue liquid. Both Front and Back should be tested. An eyelet on the device does not necessitate use of neck lanyards. Instructions to the user should clearly support the correct uses.

Layards An eyelet on the device does not necessitate use of neck lanyards. Instructions to the user should clearly support the correct uses and accessories provided. If the manufacturer provides a neck lanyard with the device (in the box), or suggests to the user that this device is intended for lanyards, then it should be tested with 0cm gap.

Tablet Devices Tablet device screen sizes range 8-14 and weights range 2-8 lbs.

Tablet Type Devices Smaller devices may qualify for handheld- only operations, but filing must include strong justification for such – contact TCB or FCC for guidance if needed. Generally unless a strong justification can be made, portable may be assumed.

Tablet Type Devices Consumer tablet PCs are expected to have lap- held use positions per [IDB RFx 7) d) ii)]*. * - Excert from Mobile and Portable Device RF Exposure Equipment Authorization Procedures Released March 18, 2004 which states: For undefined or unclear device usage positions, where existing or standardized test procedures are not applicable, SAR should be evaluated according to the normal operating configurations which are intended for the device.

SAR Test Documentation Important test setup details affecting SAR should be provided in SAR Test Documentation: Belt clip and air gap thickness.

SAR Test Documentation PCMCIA card distance to phantom for laptop and PDA testing. P1528 device reference lines for held to ear testing.

USB Style Dongles Direct-connected USB (without integral cable) differs from most PCMCIA in that port alignment may be horizontal (H), vertical (V), and 180 degrees H or V, with respect to a notebook computer host

USB Style Dongles Grantee is responsible for SAR compliance in all such intended use positions. 1-host SAR testing is accepted for many Part 15 and some licensed-service USB-dongle transmitters. 3-host SAR test results have been filed for some licensed-service devices IDB/KDB Mar04 webpost RFx Procedures 7)b), 7)c) are applicable

WLAN Devices The FCC has spent considerable amount of time reviewing these devices and experimenting with many aspects of the SAR testing. The FCC has been seriously thinking about proposing many changes to the SAR procedures used for testing for these types of devices. Remember that these are proposals, are subject to change, and may or may not be implemented.

WLAN Devices Proposed Changes Include the following. Note that these are proposed changes and should not be considered final until formally released by the FCC: 1.Default channels use for test may be different than simply Low, Mid and High and will depend on power measurements of channels near the Low and High channels. This is due to the variance of bandedge channels seed in some devices where the bandedge channels have reduced power. Proposed FutureGuidelines Only

WLAN Devices 2.) Certain modulations may be considered required for default testing, but others may still need to be required depending on certain set power levels. For example, g is only required to be tested if the average power is 0.25 dB > than the b power for the same channel Proposed FutureGuidelines Only

WLAN Devices 3.) Higher data rates usually have lower average output. Higher data rates should be tested only when the average output is 0.25 dB > that at the lowest data rate for the default a-b/g mode test channels Proposed FutureGuidelines Only

WLAN Devices 4.) Turbo modes (proprietary modes) typically operate at higher data rates requiring higher order modulations & lower average power. Turbo, half & quarter rate channels should be tested at the lowest data rate used in each proprietary mode when the average output is greater than that on the closest default a-b/g mode channels. Proposed FutureGuidelines Only

WLAN Devices 5.) Switched Diversity Issue. The SAR of each antenna should be measured independently on the highest output channel in each a-b/g mode. Other channels should be tested only when the SAR vary by > 25% for the two antennas on highest output channel or > 1.2 W/kg. Proposed FutureGuidelines Only

WLAN Devices 6.) MIMO Type Devices. FCC is developing Procedures. These are likely to involve simultaneous TX conditions and Proposed FutureGuidelines Only

5 GHz SAR The FCC has expressed that review of SAR for devices in the 3 – 6 GHz range will hopefully be released to TCBs soon. However exact dates have not been released.

PCMCIA Cards For PCMCIA Cards with antennas external to the host device, the FCC is considering possible changes to their current testing requirements. 1) The 3 host policy that is typically required in certain situations may change for depending on certain acceptable margins to ensure compliance for variations among typical laptops. Proposed FutureGuidelines Only

PCMCIA Cards 2) The FCC is also considering test methods with use an extender card instead of a typical laptop computers and compare these measurements to those made in a typical host. Proposed FutureGuidelines Only

Proposed Changes The FCC also expects that any new procedures required for SAR measurements will likely also have a transition period associated with them. This is subject to be determined depending on the future release of information from the FCC.

FCC/TCB Training Bulletins HAC for cellphones is mandatory on for 25% of a carriers product line HAC test procedure already exists. TCBs are able to review HAC soon.

FCC/TCB Training Bulletins 5GHz SAR not yet released to TCBs. Notice will come in the form of a R&O Training material is in preperation

FCC/TCB Training bulletins SAR testing for WiFi products is being further refined. More emphasis on test software used inside WiFi transmitter and defining its characteristics. FCC will require more documentation of software, especially on/off transmitter timing characteristics.

FCC/TCB Training Bulletins No agreement yet on DFS testing for a. Testing with NTIA / FCC on proposed new procedure has been scheduled for November. FCC hopes to get revised DFS Test Procedure to TCBs before end of year.

FCC/TCB Training Bulletins Field Programmability to add DFS to existing a radios prohibited unless radio is Certified as a SDR. Factory programmability allowed using the Class II change procedure.

FCC/TCB Training Bulletins DFS products must go to FCC SDR products must go to FCC ***A DFS testing exclusion exists for client equipment which is under the control of a Certified access point. ***Ad-Hoc mode for clients prohibited

FCC/TCB Training Bulletins FCC has provided further guidance on MIMO and steered array antennas. Specific guidance is offered from FCC on Pout measurements, RF Exposure calculations, radiated Restricted Band measurements.

FCC/TCB Training Bulletins FCC will now allow Class II changes for RF category Portable to Mobile to be handled by TCBs.

FCC/TCB Training Bulletins GPS repeaters are not permitted in USA. GPS spectrum is carefully protected. No Part 15 Intentional Radiators are permitted. Reference: See

Questions?