WEIGHTING OF FACTORS and Sub-Factors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 To facilitate the implementation of employment equity and the communication to employees of matters relating to employment equity and diversity.
Advertisements

JOB ANALYSIS AND HUMAN RESOURCE PLANNING
EPA RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PROCESS Thursday March 8, 2007 Ann Penn Equal Opportunity/ADA Officer.
SAISD Office for Professional Learning Advisory Board March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy 623 S. Pecos.
Building Internally Consistent Compensation Systems
SUPERVISING STUDENT EMPLOYEES August 13, 2002 Office of Human Resources Office of the General Counsel.
The NHS KSF Learning Programme Days One & Two [Sessions 1- 6] The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework.
MGMT Overview of Job Evaluation Job Evaluation Overview Background –There is a Need for a Systematic Approach to develop company pay structures.
Job Analysis. I. Nature of Job Analysis Work activities and behaviors Interactions with others Performance standards Machines and equipment used Working.
Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Verena Schmidt, ACTRAV: TRIPARTITE DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND SOCIAL POLICY « These slides are partly based on.
Page 1 Management excellence. Page 2 Section 4 Performance Management Process.
1 EMPLOYEE PREFERENCE ANALYSIS: USING CONJOINT ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT LABOR NEGOTIATIONS AND COMPENSATION PLAN DESIGN.
Framework Agreement – Associate Tutors. Background on framework agreement Benefits of framework Job evaluation Associate Tutor grades Moving to the new.
BSBPMG405A Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Unit Guide C ertificate IV in Project Management
Certificate IV in Project Management Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
BSBPMG405A Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Unit Guide C ertificate IV in Project Management
Agenda for Change General Awareness Session Job Evaluation.
Lecture 11: Compensation. Strategic Issues and Compensation  Why do dome employers pay more than other employers?  Why are different jobs within the.
"Women in decision-making and collective bargaining in trade unions- 20 years experience of independent Latvia“. "From Membership to Leadership: Advancing.
Prentice Hall, Inc. © A Human Resource Management Approach STRATEGIC COMPENSATION Prepared by David Oakes Chapter 7 Building Internally Consistent.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
Briefing for employees A Guide to the National Job Evaluation Scheme.
+ Chapter 6 Part 1: Building Internally Consistent Compensation Systems MGT 4543 ~ Compensation Management.
CJA 324 Week 5 Learning Team Ethical Scrapbook Part II To purchase this material click
New Employee Orientation
Wage and Salary Management
Group evaluation There is need to assess the degree to which a group is achieving or has achieved its set goals. The process of assessing this constitutes.
Routes to Internal Equity
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
HRM 498 ASSIST Experience Tradition/hrm498assist.com
Equality and Human Rights Exchange Network
Job Analysis And Job Description.
NEGOTIATION SEVENTH EDITION
Administering Salaries of
Cost Allocation Webinar
Internship orientation: Research module basics
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
Succession Planning and Management
Exeter Model of ITE Induction for ITE Coordinators,
Action Request (Advice) Registry
The Gender Perspective
Club Chair Workshop
The Departmental Performance Review (PR)
What is Collective Bargaining?
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
Learning Objectives TOPIC: Topic 2: Human Resources
EXCEL BOOKS 14-1 JOB EVALUATION.
In-range progression, In-Class progression and Reclassification
The constructive dialogue
16 SUPERVISION and LABOR Supervision Today! 7th Edition
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Streamline, Simplify, Organize, Automate
RECRUITING Staff and Student
The Gender Perspective
Information on projects
Welcome. Samantha Dellamarta Director DelRoy Consulting.
Hands-On: FSA Assessments For Foreign Schools
Chapter 15: Government at Work: The Bureaucracy Section 1
2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Performance Management and Appraisal
Session 1: The report on CIS-members´ views on the experience in the implementation of the economic aspects of the WFD.
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Agenda • Introductions • Project Objectives • Project Steps
Leuven Policy implementation.
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
Compensation 101 A Primer for HR Professionals
LABOUR LAW TRADE UNION.
Presentation transcript:

WEIGHTING OF FACTORS and Sub-Factors Pay Equity Bureau WEIGHTING OF FACTORS and Sub-Factors

Weighting What is weighting? Weighting represents the value or importance given to each of the factors and subsequently sub-factors. The value or importance depends on the organizations’ goals, objectives and mission. Today we are going to provide you with an overview of the Joint Job Evaluation Project undertaken by CUPE 1252 and the Employer. We will present the material in 6 parts Part I Introduction Part II Job Evaluation Part III Roles and Responsibilities Part IV Collecting Job Information Part V Data Collection Process Part VI What’s Next Document 6.15

Considerations There is no universal “weighting” Should reflect the value of the organization Should not discriminate against women or men

How is it determined? Determine what is valued by the organization Discuss and agree on principles Should groups of similar factors have equal weights? Should the weighting of each factor be of sufficient size to be meaningful? (so that all individual factors add value) Before starting the session, we would like to welcome the members of The Joint Steering Committee and Advisors: Names and titles (people to introduce themselves) The Data Collection Teams: List handed out The Joint Job Evaluation Committee: - Names and titles Document 6.15

Guidelines As a general rule, no sub-factor should be weighted at less than 5% or more than 15% The total of the weights assigned to each factor equals 100% (=1000 points) The total of the weight assigned to each sub-factor equals the weight assigned to the factor Before starting the session, we would like to welcome the members of The Joint Steering Committee and Advisors: Names and titles (people to introduce themselves) The Data Collection Teams: List handed out The Joint Job Evaluation Committee: - Names and titles Document 6.15

Factors The four key factors used to measure the value of the work are: skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions. For instance: Qualifications Responsibilities Required Effort Working Conditions A joint job evaluation project has been contemplated by the union and the Government of New Brunswick for some years now. In the last round of bargaining, agreement was reached to proceed with the project. Today we want to explain an overview of this project. Document 6.15

Sub-Factors In order to conduct an exhaustive, balanced analysis, the four factors are broken down into 10 sub-factors, which will allow you to consider all of the important aspects of the work carried out What is the goal of the joint job evaluation project? To develop a logical, well-defined job evaluation system. To jointly review all jobs. To address the internal relativities among the jobs within the CUPE 1252 contract. The results of the study will be reported to the negotiating teams. Document 6.15

Qualification The sub-factors for the Qualification factor are: Education Experience Dexterity and Coordination

Responsibility The sub-factors for the Responsibility factor are: Accountability/Decision Making Communication/Interpersonal Relations Supervision

Required Effort The sub-factors for the Required Effort factor are: Intellectual Effort Concentration and Sensory Attention Physical Effort

Working Conditions The sub-factor for the Working Conditions factor is: Inconveniences and inherent risks

Determining Weights of Factors Weighting Qualifications 20% to 35% Responsibilities 25% to 30% Effort Required 20% to 40% Working Conditions 5% to 15%

Determining Weights of Sub-factors Weighting Education 10% to 15% Experience 6% to 12% Dexterity and Coordination 4% to 8% Accountability/Decision Making 9% to 10% Communication/Interpersonal Relations Supervision 7% to 10% Intellectual Effort 8% to 14% Concentration and Sensory Attention 6% to 13% Physical Effort Inconveniences and inherent risks 5% to 15% Job Evaluation is a systematic procedure used for determining the relative value of jobs within an organization (internal relativity). - In other words it compares jobs to each other in order to determine a relative ranking order within the organization. It consists of factors and subfactors against which all jobs are rated/evaluated. Reminder – As a general rule, no sub-factor should be less than 5% or more than 15% Document 6.15

Arithmetic Progression Formula Once you have determined the weights for each sub-factor, you will be able to determine the value for each level within the sub-factor by using the following arithmetic progression formula: Level X Max. # of points of sub-factor = Points Total # of Levels It is not: -The individual’s performance is not a factor that is assessed during the job evaluation process. -The salaries will be negotiated between the Employer and the Union during the collective bargaining process. -Job Evaluation is not an exact science; it is a technique. Document 6.15

An example It has been determined that the Education sub-factor has been weighted at 14% (140 points). The level required for this job has been determined to be 1 and there are 7 levels within the sub-factor. Level X Max. # of points in sub-factor = Points Total # of Levels Job Evaluation consists of Factors and Subfactors. Factors Skill Responsibility Effort Working Conditions The Job Evaluation System has been designed to measure the value of jobs within CUPE Local 1252 hospital sector. 1 X 140 = 20 Points 7 Document 6.15

Converting ratings into total points The point value of each level will be used to determine the total point value of each job. To ensure objectivity, compare all the rating decisions made to previous rating decisions of similar and/or related positions. Further reassessment may be required if some jobs seem out of place. The Data Collection Team members will provide information sessions for Employees and Managers during a two-week period (March 20th to March 31st). The Joint Data Collection Teams are responsible to distribute and track the JAQ’s for their RHA. You will be available to assist employees and managers to answer questions about the process and questionnaire. After the JAQ’s are completed by Employees and Managers, they will track and forward the completed questionnaires to the JJEC via HR. The JAQ’s will then need to be sent by courier to Sharon Hamilton, Office of Human Resources (we will give them the mailing address). Document 6.15