2013-2014 * Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon 2012-2013 data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Advertisements

August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Student Futures Project Policy Luncheon Austin, TX December 17, 2013.
State of Education Brad Neuenswander, Interim Commissioner
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/18/2008 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
2013 College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All.
Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
State Assessment Results October 2014 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Dawn Moore Director of Curriculum and Instruction The Warren Hills Regional.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Brock’s Gap Intermediate School Hoover City Schools Testing- Spring 2014 Results / Analysis- Fall 2014.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Northwestern Consolidated School District of Shelby County Office of the Superintendent 4920 W. 600 N. Fairland, IN “State of the Corporation” 2013.
2009 Closing the Expectation Gap Fourth Annual 50-State Progress Report on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.
College and Career Preparation 1 College and Career Preparation Lodi Unified School District September 2, 2008 Prepared by the Assessment,
Release of PARCC Student Results. By the end of this presentation, parents will be able to: Identify components of the PARCC English.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC S CHOOLS DATA PRESENTATION P ART I October 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION DECEMBER 8, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE River Edge School District December 16, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ESSEX FELLS SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 16, 2016.
ISAT AND MAP ASSESSMENTS THORP SCHOLASTIC ACADEMY SESSION 2: 2/27/2013.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE POMPTON LAKES PUBLIC SCHOOLS JANUARY 5, 2016.
Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
What is the Advanced Placement Program? The Advanced Placement Program are courses taught at local high schools, which allow students to participate in.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS DECEMBER 16, 2015.
GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT “HARTFORD MAGAZINE RECOGNIZED GMHS AS THE SIXTH RANKING HIGH SCHOOL IN HARTFORD COUNTY.” 2011 High School Testing.
Boyertown Area School District Data Summary
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
Spring 2015 Verona PARCC Results: Year One Wednesday, March 16 7:00-8:00 p.m. VHS Learning Commons.
GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT 2009 High School Testing Report.
PARCC Parent’s Night Information Session Tuesday, March 29, 2016 Connie Francis Auditorium Mr. Russell Pagano, Principal Mr. Joseph Lepo, Assistant Principal.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Advanced Placement & PARCC Results
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
PARCC Results: Year One LINCOLN SCHOOL GARWOOD NJ DECEMBER 15, 2015
Paulsboro School District
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Ridgefield Public Schools data presentation Part I
Ridgefield Public Schools data presentation Part II
Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Release of PARCC Student Results
Advanced Placement & PARCC Results
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review Plan Year 1/2
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
The Importance of David Brearley School Counseling Department
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Two District’s Best-Practices in Supporting Secondary LTELs
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Paulsboro School District
Presentation transcript:

* Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon data.

What are School Performance Reports? The reports take the place of the former School Report Cards, which were introduced in 1995 to provide a snapshot of student academic achievement and other important information about a schools environment, per-pupil costs, and attendance.

Key features of the new report include: Measuring college and career readiness as well as looking at how students fare once they graduate from high school. Emphasizing growth by tracking both individual student progress from grade to grade and school- wide achievement in meeting target goals. Comparing peer schools from across the state with similar profiles. Whats new about the report?

The measures… LevelAcademic Perform- ance is based on: College and career readiness is based on: Student Growth is based on: Elementary NJASK Administered grades 3-5 AttendanceNJASK Middle NJASK Administered grades 6-8 Attendance and # enrolled in Algebra I in 8 th grade NJASK High HSPA Administered in grade 11 Participation in SAT, ACT, or PSAT, and AP enrollment in English, math, social studies, and science Rate at which students graduate on time, and dropout rate

What are Peer Schools? Schools are clustered in groups of 30 based on: Grade configurations Percent of students eligible for free and reduced lunch Percent of students that are limited English proficient Percent of students that are in Special Education Under this new system, schools are clustered according to more precise demographic information, unlike under the former system, the District Factor Group (DFG), which was based primarily on average income in the community. The comparison… Schools are ranked state-wide and in relation to peer schools

At the state-wide level, PHS scored either high or very high in all three categoriesacademic achievement, college & career readiness and graduation rate and post-secondary readiness. At the peer group level PHS scored high for graduation rate & post-secondary readiness. How does PHS measure up?

Based upon measures of the school's proficiency rate on both the Language Arts Literacy and Math sections of the HSPA. PHS scored high statewide. In comparison to its peer group, PHS scored very high. Language Arts = 96% proficient (of which 62% were advanced proficient) Math = 96% proficient (of which 66% were advanced proficient)

Determined by: AP participation and scores in: English, Math, Social Studies, and Science. SAT or PSAT results. The AP course list from the state is limited to these 4 subject areas. Although all AP courses offered at PHS (18 AP courses total!) are listed on the report card, not all of these courses are considered when the state determines College & Career Readiness.

Graduation measures the rate at which students who begin high school four years earlier graduate within four years. Post-Secondary is based upon the number of graduates who attend an institute for higher education. PHS Graduation Rate = 94.8% Thats nearly 28% higher than the statewide average and nearly 20% higher than the statewide target! Some PHS graduates attend post-secondary institutions abroad However, the state only considers graduates attending American institutions and does not take into account students who attend colleges outside of the U.S.

Also included is a measure of the rate at which students drop out of school. PHS Dropout Rate = 0.1%

HSPA Math: Advanced Proficient remained 66% Partially Proficient decreased by 4% (from 8% in to 4% in ) HSPA LAL: Advanced Proficient increased by 8% (from 54% in to 62% in ) Partially Proficient decreased by 1% (from 4% in to 3% in ) Participation in PSAT, ACT, and SAT increased School-wide graduation rate has increased PHS Improvement Over Time

At the state-wide level, JW scored either high or very high in all three categoriesacademic achievement, college & career readiness and graduation rate and post-secondary readiness. At the peer group level, JW scored very high in student growth performance. How does JWMS measure up?

of 8 th Graders took Algebra I earned a C or higher JWMS Performance Over Time 91%100% NJASK Math: Advanced Proficient = 70% (a 6% increase) Partially Proficient = 7% (a 3% decrease) NJASK LAL: Advanced Proficient = 44% (a 4% increase) Partially Proficient = 6% (a 4% decrease)

At the elementary school level, the single determining factor of whether or not a child is on track for College & Career Readiness is attendance. There are many reasons why this single factor does not accurately indicate how well prepared a given student is for college and career. One that is especially true for the diverse body of students in Princeton Public Schools is that many of the student body miss school days for international travel. no single assessment can tell educators all they need to know to make well-informed instructional decisions –US Department of Education, Using Student Achievement Data to Support Instructional Decision Making, 2009 How do Elementary Schools Measure Up?

Beginning School Year , PARCC will replace NJASK* and HSPA As a result of this change in state testing, current (and past) performance data may not prove helpful in determining district success We look forward to providing you with an analysis of our PARCC data when the results are in. Whats next? * With one exception: Students will still take the science portion of the NJASK.

Higher order skills Curiosity, creativity, critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration across cultures NOTE: These are much more difficult to measure than standard skills (e.g., reading comprehension, information recall) Health and wellness of students and faculty High-quality nutrition Fitness Perseverance in the face of challenge Compassion for others Balance PPS is currently exploring these questions related to physical and emotional health: What is the current state of the health and wellness of the students and faculty? What can we do to shore up existing wellness efforts? What new wellness programs should we offer? What matters most?