Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Advertisements

Harmonization of Parts 60 and 75
1 PM NAAQS: Update on Coarse Particle Monitoring and Research Efforts Lydia Wegman, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA Presentation at the.
Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
Exceptional Events Elements of an Effective Demonstration Darren Palmer US EPA Region 4.
AQS Concepts. In This Section We Will Talk About AQS Concepts 2 AQS Background History AQS as part of a monitoring program Types of Information in AQS.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
1 AQS Ambient Monitoring Topics AQS Conference August 20, 2008 David Lutz.
NAAQS UPDATE SIP Steering Committee January 13, 2011.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
EPA Update- Bob Judge Maine Air Quality Monitoring Committee April 18, ) NAAQS schedule 2) Budget 3) Technical Systems Audit.
NACAA FALL MEMBERSHIP MEETING - SEPTEMBER 21-23, Overview of NAAQS Monitoring Issues Lewis Weinstock NACAA Fall Meeting Boston, MA September 22,
Overview and Status of Lead NAAQS Review and Overview of Agency Technical Documents on Lead NAAQS Monitoring Issues Kevin Cavender and Joann Rice Presented.
1 Key Monitoring Issues Status of PM 2.5 monitoring methodologies Criteria for acceptance of monitors and sites Special considerations for comparing ambient.
Revisions to NAAQS –Data Handling and Interpretation NO 2 /SO 2 Update AQS Conference Colorado Springs June 2010 Rhonda Thompson US EPA, Office of Air.
Elfego Felix Air Quality Analysis Office EPA Region 9 1-Hour NO 2 Near Roadway Monitoring April 12, 2011.
Ozone Regulation under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
HD 2007 Rule Diesel Fuel Sulfur Testing and Sampling Methods and Requirements US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality November 20, 2002.
Timely Policy-Related Monitoring Issues 2013 NACAA Spring Meeting May 6-8, 2013 Richard A. “Chet” Wayland Air Quality Assessment Division U.S. EPA OAQPS.
CAMD PROGRAM UPDATE NACAA/EPA Ambient Air Monitoring Steering Committee Clean Air Markets Division, OAP June
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
Treatment of Natural Events WESTAR Planning Committee & WESTAR NEP Workgroup March 28, 2006.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Exceptional Events Meredith Kurpius US EPA Region 9.
NAAQS Altitude Effects Ozone Transport Commission Annual Meeting June 11, 2014 Baltimore, MD Will Ollison 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
Overview and Status of Lead NAAQS Review and Overview of Agency Technical Documents on Lead NAAQS Monitoring Issues Kevin Cavender and Joann Rice Presented.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Ozone Update Ben Wells U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Analysis Group February 11, 2014.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For AMTAC April 12, 2011 Kate Hoag – US EPA, Region 9.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Ambient Monitoring Update NACAA Fall Meeting Chet Wayland, AQAD Division Director Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 1 October 3-5, 2011 Cleveland,
WESTAR National Air Monitoring Steering Committee Update Spring Business Meeting 2010 Denver, CO Bruce Louks, Idaho DEQ.
Brad Miller Anna Kelley. National Ambient Air Quality Standard Update New Sulfur Dioxide Non-Attainment Area – Effective October 4, 2013 Ozone Secondary.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
PM Methods Update and Network Design Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis.
WHAT IS THE CHEROKEE NATION? Cherokee Nation Air Quality Data Management Concepts for Quality Data Collection Ryan Callison.
1 The Exceptional Events Rule (EER) Overview Tom Link EPA – OAQPS Geographic Strategies Group Westar Meeting, San Francisco, February 25, 2009.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Review of Federal Reference Method for Ozone: Nitric Oxide-Chemiluminescence Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory April.
1 National Monitoring Committee Report Bruce Louks WESTAR Fall Meeting Portland, OR September 28, 2010.
1 Černikovský, Krejčí, Volná (ETC/ACM): Air pollution by ozone in Europe during the summer 2012 & comparison with previous years 17th EIONET Workshop on.
Ozone and Lead Monitoring Issues Under Revised NAAQS Monitoring Steering Committee June 21-22, 2007 Washington, DC Phil Lorang, OAQPS.
Annual Air Monitoring Data Certification and Concurrence Process 1.
Optimization of O 3 Monitor NAAQS Compliance Networks OTC/MANE-VU Spring Meeting Hotel Palomar Philadelphia 117 South 17 th Street Philadelphia, PA
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
Department of Environmental Quality
Assessment of International Transport and Improved Ozone Air Quality
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Consideration of Final Rulemaking
OZONE Monitoring Network
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Department of Environmental Quality
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Designations for Indian Country
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
Implementing 8-Hour Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze Standards
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
TRTR Briefing September 2013
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
A New Tool for Evaluating Candidate PM FEM and PM2.5 ARM Monitors
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods Joann Rice Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards AAPCA December 15, 2014

Outline Proposed Changes to Ozone Monitoring Seasons Addition of a New Federal Reference Method (FRM) for Ozone Revisions to the Part 53 Performance Testing Requirements for Federal Equivalent Methods (FEMs)

Ozone Monitoring Seasons: Proposal Ozone monitoring is required during times of the year conducive to ozone formation Current season length varies from 4 months to year-round Last revisions were made in 1997 in response to the 0.08 ppm 8-hour NAAQS The current proposal includes changes to the ozone monitoring seasons based on recent data, 2010 – 2013 43 states had at least 1 exceedance day ≥0.060 ppm before or after their current season Proposing changes in 33 states with the addition of 1 or 2 months to the monitoring season for most states Also proposing to require year-round monitoring at 80 NCore stations NCore stations have a full suite of gaseous and particulate monitors and basic meteorology to support scientific studies NCore is currently operating year-round Implementation proposed for January 1, 2017

Ozone Monitoring Season: Data Analysis Ambient data retrieved for monitors operating year-round (2010 – 2013) A monitor was identified as year-round if it had at least 20 daily observations in all 12 months, for at least 1 year of the 4 year period Greater than 50% of the ozone monitors in the national network are operated year-round, either due to existing year-round ozone season requirements as listed in the CFR, because CASTNET sites operated by EPA or the NPS already run year-round, or on a discretionary basis by the states Evaluated occurrences of daily maximum 8-hour averages ≥ 0.060 ppm either before or after each state’s required ozone season Ensures monitoring under conditions that represent a potential for violations of existing (0.075) or proposed NAAQS (0.065 to 0.070) levels Ensures timely notification of potentially elevated levels through programs such as AirNow Consideration given to: Frequency of days ≥ 0.060 ppm threshold either before or after the current season Temporal pattern of exceedance days in out-of-season months Regional consistency

Ozone Monitoring Network ~1500 Monitors

Year-round Ozone Monitors (~800) Used in Ozone Season Analysis

362 Monitors ≥0.060 ppm Outside State’s Current Season

Ozone Seasons: Current Requirements 4-10 3-11 1-12 5-9 3-10 6-9 3-9 4/15- 10/15 4-9 NJ DE MD DC NH RI MA CT

Ozone Seasons: Proposed Changes 4-10 3-10 3-11 1-12 5-9 4-9 1-9 3-9 3- 10/15 NJ DE MD DC NH RI MA CT Proposed Season Change No Change

Ozone Seasons: Regional Consistency 4-10 3-10 3-11 1-12 5-9 4-9 1-9 3-9 3- 10/15 NJ DE MD DC NH RI MA CT Note split seasons In TX and LA

Ozone Monitoring Season Analysis: Memo to the Docket (Rice, 2014) Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699 www.regulations.gov Memo provides and overview of the analysis performed to support the proposed season changes and presents the findings Attachment A provides maps, number of monitors operated year-round, and number of days ≥0.060 ppm by state Attachment B provides distribution charts of days ≥0.060 ppm by state and month Attachment C provides the detailed information regarding the monitor AQS site IDs, exceedance day dates, and daily 8- hour maximum values ≥0.060 ppm by state

Ozone Monitoring Season Analysis (Example) Attachment A State-by-State Maps and Number of Days ≥0.060 ppm Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

Ozone Monitoring Season Analysis (Example) Attachment B Distribution Charts of Days ≥0.060 ppm by Month and State *Note: only those states not currently required to operate year- round are included Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699 Ozone Monitoring Season Analysis (Example) Attachment C Detailed Information Regarding AQS Site IDs, exceedance dates, and Daily 8-hour Maximum Values by State Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

Ozone Federal Reference Method Federal Reference Methods (FRMs) provide a definitive method for measuring concentrations of criteria pollutants for comparison to the NAAQS and a standard of comparison for approving federal equivalent methods (FEMs) The ozone FRM was initially promulgated in 1971 and is no longer available commercially nor being technically supported by instrument manufacturers A new FRM based on Nitric Oxide Chemiluminescence (NO-CL) is being proposed The new FRM will be added to existing Ethylene Chemiluminescence (ET-CL) FRM with same calibration procedure applied Impact on state monitoring networks is minimal as existing approved methods are adequate for continued operation

Ozone FRM: Research Comprehensive laboratory/field evaluations of candidate FRM completed (EPA/600-R14-432) and docketed CASAC’s Ambient Air Monitoring and Methods Subcommittee (AAMMS) peer review of proposed FRM occurred April 3, 2014 Draft CASAC letter supportive, but recommended additional data analysis be performed ORD completed additional data analysis and submitted the results to CASAC on May 5, 2014 CASAC teleconference on consensus letter June 12, 2014 CASAC final report July 28, 2014 (EPA-CASAC-14-007)

Revisions to the Part 53 Requirements Proposed changes in Tables B-1 and B-3 of Subpart B to make performance requirements consistent with current O3 analyzer performance Noise limit, LDL, maximum interference limits, maximum zero drift, span drift, precision Change to Figure B-5 to correct minor inconsistency in units (% URL to % Standard Deviation) for precision Change in performance requirements would not affect existing FRM/FEM designations Change in units for precision limits also proposed to be extended to methods for NO2 No change in limits just specifying precision as percentage instead of absolute concentration Propose to extend length of time for Administrator to take action on requests for modification of FRM/FEM from 30 to 90 days (40 CFR 53.14(c)) Propose to remove obsolete provision in 40 CFR 53.9(i) that manufacturers submit annual updates to Product Manufacturing Checklist for PM FRMs/FEMs