Volume 100, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Voltage-Dependent Hydration and Conduction Properties of the Hydrophobic Pore of the Mechanosensitive Channel of Small Conductance  Steven A. Spronk,
Analysis and Evaluation of Channel Models: Simulations of Alamethicin
A Protein Dynamics Study of Photosystem II: The Effects of Protein Conformation on Reaction Center Function  Sergej Vasil’ev, Doug Bruce  Biophysical.
The Protonation State of the Glu-71/Asp-80 Residues in the KcsA Potassium Channel: A First-Principles QM/MM Molecular Dynamics Study  Denis Bucher, Leonardo.
Pedro R. Magalhães, Miguel Machuqueiro, António M. Baptista 
Vishwanath Jogini, Benoît Roux  Biophysical Journal 
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Urs Zimmerli, Petros Koumoutsakos  Biophysical Journal 
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Composition Fluctuations in Lipid Bilayers
Sonya M. Hanson, Simon Newstead, Kenton J. Swartz, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Prediction of Thylakoid Lipid Binding Sites on Photosystem II
Volume 113, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Experimental and Computational Studies Investigating Trehalose Protection of HepG2 Cells from Palmitate-Induced Toxicity  Sukit Leekumjorn, Yifei Wu,
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Exterior Site Occupancy Infers Chloride-Induced Proton Gating in a Prokaryotic Homolog of the ClC Chloride Channel  David L. Bostick, Max L. Berkowitz 
Analysis and Evaluation of Channel Models: Simulations of Alamethicin
Volume 98, Issue 8, Pages (April 2010)
Fiber-Dependent and -Independent Toxicity of Islet Amyloid Polypeptide
Yuno Lee, Philip A. Pincus, Changbong Hyeon  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Calcium Enhances Binding of Aβ Monomer to DMPC Lipid Bilayer
Alexander J. Sodt, Richard W. Pastor  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 102, Issue 9, Pages (May 2012)
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Molecular View of Hexagonal Phase Formation in Phospholipid Membranes
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Sundeep S. Deol, Peter J. Bond, Carmen Domene, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Grischa R. Meyer, Justin Gullingsrud, Klaus Schulten, Boris Martinac 
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Chetan Poojari, Dequan Xiao, Victor S. Batista, Birgit Strodel 
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Insight into Early-Stage Unfolding of GPI-Anchored Human Prion Protein
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
M. Müller, K. Katsov, M. Schick  Biophysical Journal 
Ion-Induced Defect Permeation of Lipid Membranes
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Philip J. Robinson, Teresa J.T. Pinheiro  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Rotary Motor F0 under External Electric Fields across the Membrane  Yang-Shan Lin, Jung-Hsin Lin, Chien-Cheng Chang 
Nevra Ozer, Celia A. Schiffer, Turkan Haliloglu  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrophilic Pores in Lipid Bilayers
Alternative Mechanisms for the Interaction of the Cell-Penetrating Peptides Penetratin and the TAT Peptide with Lipid Bilayers  Semen Yesylevskyy, Siewert-Jan.
Mikyung Han, Yuan Mei, Htet Khant, Steven J. Ludtke 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Anisotropic Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Peptides
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Ralf Blossey, Fabrizio Cleri 
Chze Ling Wee, David Gavaghan, Mark S.P. Sansom  Biophysical Journal 
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Molecular Structure of Membrane Tethers
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages (October 2009)
Membrane Perturbation Induced by Interfacially Adsorbed Peptides
Geert van den Bogaart, Jacek T. Mika, Victor Krasnikov, Bert Poolman 
Ultraslow Water-Mediated Transmembrane Interactions Regulate the Activation of A2A Adenosine Receptor  Yoonji Lee, Songmi Kim, Sun Choi, Changbong Hyeon 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
The NorM MATE Transporter from N
Presentation transcript:

Volume 100, Issue 10, Pages 2422-2431 (May 2011) The Molecular Basis for Antimicrobial Activity of Pore-Forming Cyclic Peptides  Anna D. Cirac, Gemma Moiset, Jacek T. Mika, Armagan Koçer, Pedro Salvador, Bert Poolman, Siewert J. Marrink, Durba Sengupta  Biophysical Journal  Volume 100, Issue 10, Pages 2422-2431 (May 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.057 Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The cyclic peptides cause large fluctuations in the membrane upon binding and can form a disordered toroidal pore. (A) Time course of the simulation 9Ca. At 0 ns, all peptides were placed close to the bilayer and they bound within 5 ns. The first perturbation of the inner leaflet was seen at 16 ns, when some lipids were pulled into the bilayer due to the action of the cyclic peptide. The highest perturbation was at 109 ns and involved three peptides, one of which adopts a transmembrane orientation. The inner leaflet relaxed at 115 ns. (B) The snapshot of the transition state (A, 109 ns) was taken as the starting structure (0 ns). An increase of the number of water molecules inserting into the bilayer was followed by the opening of a water channel (1–2 ns) and insertion of lipid headgroups further inside to form a toroidal-shaped pore (10–25 ns). A stable toroidal-shaped pore was seen at 65 ns. The lipid headgroups are depicted in large spheres. The peptide backbone is shown as thick sticks, lipid tails as thin sticks, and water molecules as small spheres. In the online figure, the cyclic peptide, BPC194, is always depicted in pink. To clarify the bridging of the two leaflets in the transition state, the lysine residues and the glutamine residue are shown only for the peptide in a transmembrane orientation. (C) Current traces recorded after the addition of BPC194 peptide to DOPG membranes. (D) I/V curves plotted from seven independent current trace recordings of BPC194. Biophysical Journal 2011 100, 2422-2431DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.057) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The linear peptides do not induce fluctuations in the membrane. (A) Time course of the simulation L9a. Initially (0 ns), all linear peptides were placed close to the outer leaflet. Within 10 ns, all peptides bound and remained at the membrane interface. No large perturbations were seen along the simulation (25–140 ns). The headgroups of DPPG are depicted as large spheres, the peptide backbone as thick sticks, and lipid tails as thin sticks. In the online figure, the linear peptide, BPC193, is depicted in purple (B) Current traces recorded after the addition of BPC193 peptide to DOPG membranes. Biophysical Journal 2011 100, 2422-2431DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.057) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Secondary structure related to the distance at the rim of the pore and its function. (A) DSSP plot of the secondary structure of all peptides for simulation C9, taking the transition state as the 0-ns time point. (B) Top view of the pore showing the positions of the nine peptides. Region 1 peptides are those involved in the pore (within the inner concentric circle). The peptides that remain at the rim of the pore (region 2) are delimited by the outer concentric circle. The peptides furthest from the pore (region 3) are outside the circles. The peptides that remain at the rim of the pore (region 2) are delimited by the red dashed line. The peptides furthest from the pore (region 3) are outside the circles. (C) Parallel arrangement of lysine residues in the β-structure (D) An example of the aligned lysine residues stabilizing the lipid curvature in the porated state (side-view of the pore). (E) The average distance between lysine residues K1-K8 and K2- K7 (plotted as a sum) for peptides in regions 1, 2, and 3. The timescale to the left of the gray line refers to simulation 9Ca (before transition state formation 0–109 ns). The time frame to the right is an average for all simulations (C1–C10) where a pore was formed with the starting time 0-ns being the putative transition state. Biophysical Journal 2011 100, 2422-2431DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.057) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The linear peptides cause large perturbations from the in silico modified transition state. Time course of a transient pore formed by a linear peptide (simulation L7). The time point 0-ns corresponds to the transition state taken from the simulation with the cyclic peptide. After 10–30 ns, large perturbations were seen and a few water molecules crossed the bilayer. Please note that in most simulations, the bilayer relaxes and such large perturbations are not seen. Biophysical Journal 2011 100, 2422-2431DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.057) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mechanism of action of peptides studied by DCFBA. (A and B) DCFBA population histograms of BPC194 and BPC193, respectively. Numbers in the subpanels refer to P/L ratios. The y axis corresponds to the number of liposomes, and the x axis to the arbitrary marker concentration inside the liposomes. (Right panels) Confocal images of vesicles probed in the experiments shown in panels A and B, indicated by Greek symbols (α-δ). (Leftmost panels) Membrane probe, DiD. (Rightmost panels) Internal marker probe, GSH-AF488. The scale bar is 20 μm. (C and D) Average DiD population (circles, solid line) and relative GSH population (squares, dotted line) for the cyclic and the linear peptide, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2011 100, 2422-2431DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.057) Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions