Springboro Community City School District Todd Petrey, Superintendent Jamie Miles, 8 th Grade Science Teacher SEA Vice-President.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.

Advertisements

Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.

Ohio Resident Educator Program: Focusing on Years 3 and 4.

Kara Hanges, Martha Slamer, Maribeth Pennekamp, Debbie Dye, Rhonda Parker, and Kim Davidson.

Student Learning Objectives -SLOs Student Growth Measures and OTES

Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System

SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.

Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan

IH PTO General Meeting Sept. 25, 2013 Check out our new website Look for us on Facebook too!

Waiver Day May 15, Today’s presentation would not be possible without the hard work of the Evaluation Committee and Mad River staff. ◦ Cristi Fields.

PIONEER CONTACT Amy Wagoner If you have any questions.

BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.

Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training

Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.

Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS

TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….

Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.

Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.

Teacher Practice in  In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature unanimously passed the TEACHNJ Act, which mandates implementation of a new teacher.

Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.

Student Growth Measures Category “B” Teachers VENDOR (STAR)

Student Growth Measures Category “A” Teachers Value Added.

OTES & OPES DEADLINES/REQUIREMENTS/CHANGES

Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.

OCM BOCES Day 6 Principal Evaluator Training. 2 Nine Components.

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.

Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation

Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES PART 1: AN OVERVIEW LEADING CHANGE 2014 VIRGINIA STODOLA & SUSAN POOLE EFFECTIVE TEACHERS AND LEADERS UNIT.

Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.

Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.

Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.

ELECTRONIC TEACHER AND PRINCIPAL EVALUATION SYSTEM eTPES Principal Session: Building Set-Up.

Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.

Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data The SLO Process – Part 3 Setting the SLO Achievement.

Observations Pre observation (optional) Observations (minimum of 2 thirty minute) Post observation Rubric

Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.

STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES Condensed from ODE Teacher Training.

Creating a Climate of Professionalism Fenton Avenue Charter School Evaluation Process.

E VALUATION C HANGES SB290 R EQUIREMENTS January 17, 2013.

Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.

Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.

Horizonte Instruction and Training Center Salt Lake City School District School Community Council Meeting November 14, 2012.

OVERVIEW OF SB 290 CHANGES IN LICENSED STAFF EVALUATION WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.

Berkshire Local School District Strategic Plan Update Fourth Update, 10/14/09.

From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.

2012 – 2013 School Year. OTES West Branch Local Schools.

What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

Assessing Intended Learning Outcomes. What We Have Done.

OTES AND TESTING AND BEARS… OH MY!!! WHAT IS HAPPENI NG?

Worthington Teacher Evaluation System Dr. Trent Bowers.

Garrett Elementary Accountability Report Kids are our Business! October 14,

Why set Student Growth Objectives (SGOs)?  Currently the Aldine Growth Model used to measure student growth can only be applied to teachers in content.

Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.

Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated Professional Practices, Measures of Student Learning/ Outcomes- Calculating Scores & Translating SLOs/SOOs.

PA-ETEP Overview for Teachers. Table of Contents  Registration Registration  Portal Navigation Portal Navigation  Notifications Notifications.

Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.

EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS

MSBSD Educator Evaluation

Introduction to Teacher Evaluation

Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan

Introduction to Teacher Evaluation

LITERACY IN HISTORY/SOCIAL STUDIES, SCIENCE, AND TECHNICAL SUBJECTS

Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated

Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Curriculum Selection Process

Presentation transcript:

Springboro Community City School District Todd Petrey, Superintendent Jamie Miles, 8 th Grade Science Teacher SEA Vice-President

Meeting Purpose Establishing a Laser-like Focus - Pulling the plan together Feedback Comment Cards: Include name, school, grade level, and subject Submit to you principal We want your feedback

OTES Timeline Currently piloting across the district for the school year Continually revising and aligning the evaluation system to meet the needs of our staff (using staff feedback) and based on new information provided by the state. Training videos during staff meetings Spring 2013(SLOs): Develop student growth measures with principals Implementation school year

OTES Focus Based on the OTES Model which is aligned with the Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession. Individual student growth: differentiation Coaching model Individualized teacher rating system based on specific data selected by the teacher 50% teacher performance and 50% student growth measures

Special Area Teachers Art, Music, PE Intervention Specialists Media Specialists, Speech Therapists, and Counselors Must instruct students at least 50% of the time to be evaluated using the student growth measures More information TBA

1 Teacher Performance

Composed of: Two formal observations (a minimum of 30 minutes each) Informal walkthroughs Uses rubrics aligned with the Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession Teacher holistic performance rating Ratings: 1 (Ineffective), 2(Developing), 3 (Proficient), or 4 (Accomplished)

Student Growth Measures All teachers must have a minimum of three student growth measures (some are State selected) Teachers can choose up to five student growth measures Teachers are divided into three categories:

Student Growth Measures and Teacher Type 2

Student Growth Measures Teachers can choose the percentage each student growth measure is worth The percentages must add up to 50%. Building value-added data is set at 10% of the total score. Teacher value-added date (if required) is set at a minimum of 10% of the total score. The other 30% is to be set by the individual teacher. Student growth measure summative score Above, expected, below

Identifying Teacher Rating Teacher performance rating + Student growth measure rating = Teacher Rating (ineffective, developing, proficient, accomplished)

3

Fill out your card. Include: name, building, grade level, subject Give to your principal Responses to questions will be sent through .