What role do individual differences play in the way L2 learners respond to corrective feedback? Rod Ellis University of Auckland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hello I'll tackle this question from an ecological perspective. First, I'll (very broadly) describe an ecological perspective/approach: relationships between.
Advertisements

Oral Production and Error Correction Amongst Arab Learners of English
Interactional corrective feedback in L1 & L2 learning Krakow 2006 Mina Drever, consultant, Training and Development Agency for schools, London.
Does Teacher Feedback Make a Difference in Second Language Learning?
Corrective Feedback – pronunciation errors How effective it is in learning L2 oral communication Nguyễn Thị Tố Hạnh.
Oral Corrective Feedback in Language Pedagogy and SLA
Oral Feedback in Classroom SLA
Presented by Sarah Waters and Kate Lunde. To study corrective feedback as an analytic teaching strategy. To determine which types of corrective feedback.
Masatoshi Sato Universidad Andrés Bello TBLT, November 19, 2011
THEORY OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Gradual Release of Responsibility & Feedback
Model Of Explicit Instruction
Hartono, S.S., M.Pd. COLASULA
How Languages Are Learned 4th edition
Chapter 4 Key Concepts.
Error Analysis Abdul Saeed. Definitions Error Corder (1967) states error as a breach of code. Norrish (1983) defines error as “a systematic deviation.
Assessment and error correction. Reasons for assessment  a teacher is accountable for children’s progress to the children themselves, to the parents,
Affecting Learners Positively. The teacher provides the correct form, clearly indicating that what the student had said is incorrect I go to the store.
Takehiro Iizuka.  CF has significant and durable effects on target language development (Lyster & Saito, 2010) What type of CF benefits L2 acquisition??
Sharonda Walker Texas Woman’s University. Acquisition-Learning Monitor Natural Order Input Affective Filter.
Motivating Students Abigail Bruhlmann English Language Fellow June 2014.
Fundamentals of Instructor Training. Course Purpose n Introduce you to the history, structure and activities of the American Red Cross n Prepare you to.
Using Tasks in Language Teaching
LANGUAGE RESEARCH IN SERVICE TO THE NATION Rapid Rise Tailored Treatment (R2T2): Fast Tracking the “Fast Tracks” Presented by: Richard D. Brecht CASL Executive.
Explaining second language learning
Oral Corrective Feedback: Teachers’ Concerns Vs. Researchers’ Orientation Sajjad Sepehrinia Mostafa Mehdizadeh Kashan Language Academy 05/02/1393.
“On the Teaching and Learning of Grammar: Challenging the Myths” By Diane Larsen-Freeman.
Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms Roy Lyster & Leila Ranta 1997.
Cognitive, Social and Psychological Dimensions of Corrective Feedback Rod Ellis University of Auckland.
Chapter 5 Key Concepts. Audiolingual Method Based on behaviorist principles, this method attempted to develop good language habits through repetitive.
Tony Lynch University of Edinburgh. Feedback in SLA (Lyster & Ranta 1997)  Explicit correction  Recast  Clarification request  Metalinguistic feedback.
Presenter: Chen, Yu-Chu Advisor: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: 2008 Nov.3 Corrective Feedback in the Chatroom: An experimental study Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006).
Author: Younghee Sheen Reporter: NA1C0003洪志隆
GRAMMAR CORRECTION Penny Ur Various issues 1.Does it help? 2.What different kinds of correction are there? And which is the most effective? 3.What.
The Power of Feedback Hattie & Timperley (2007) from Review of Educational Research, 77(1)
Audio Diaries for improved spoken proficiency Anthony Schmidt University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar: An SLA Perspective Rod Ellis.
ERROR CORRECTION. How to respond calm calm consistent consistent brief brief and respectful and respectful.
Lecture 3: Finding Balance in the Treatment of Grammar Dr. Douglas Fleming Faculty of Education.
Corrective Feedback EJ 414 By Chris Gunn. Today’s Goals (1) Begin discussing corrective feedback. (2) Look at explicit error correction. (3) Do two role-plays:
Mai Hong Ngoc Pham Thi Mai Duyen Can Tho, 8/2013 PREFERENCES TOWARDS ORAL ERROR CORRECTION OF NON-ENGLISH-MAJORED STUDENTS AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY.
SLA Effects of Recasts as Implicit Knowledge Young-ah Do Fall, College English Education.
Workshop Dora Morales By Fiona Ross Colegio Ignacio Zaragoza Saltillo, Coah. Learning From our Mistakes Effective Error Correction.
The Linguistic Environment (Ch. 4)
1 ACCURACY AND CORRECTING MISTAKES Penny Ur 2006.
Input, Interaction, and Output Input: (in language learning) language which a learner hears or receives and from which he or she can learn. Enhanced input:
Oral Corrective Feedback in Second Language Classrooms
How Languages Are Learned
Immersion and Inquiry in the High School World Language Classroom Today we are going to speak another language … it may be one you are not familiar with.
Teaching methodology, Fall, 2015 Teaching Grammar form vs. forms structure.
CISELT TRAINING ERRORS AND MISTAKES CTLI 27 JUNE 2015.
EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT SECOND LANGUAGE TRAINING Morgan-Short et al.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Error Correction Techniques
Theories of Language Acquisition
Second Language Acquisition & English Teaching
Corrective feedback L2 in the classroom
ELT for a Day 2017: Current Trends Saturday 20th May 2017
Theories of Language Acquisition
Teresa R. Bell Brigham Young University SWCOLT 2017
Oral Corrective Feedback during ELL Academic Conversations
Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center
Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Error Correction Techniques
Giving explicit feedback on spoken errors - the more the better
شرح مفردات مفاهيم التربية الإسلامية الصف العاشر ج1
Investigating the Empirical Links between Learner Uptake and Language Acquisition through Task-Based Interaction Wenchi Haung 2019/1/16.
Teacher Feedback Anna Martinović University of Zadar
Cognitive, Social and Psychological Dimensions of Corrective Feedback
How to correct student errors
Implications for Methodology
PASSWORD: workshopsfeb2019
Presentation transcript:

What role do individual differences play in the way L2 learners respond to corrective feedback? Rod Ellis University of Auckland

What is corrective feedback? Corrective feedback takes the form of responses to learner utterances containing an error. The responses can consist of (1) an indication that an error has been committed, or (2) provision of the correct target language form or (3) metalinguistic information about the nature of the error, or any combination of these. Corrective feedback takes the form of responses to learner utterances containing an error. The responses can consist of (1) an indication that an error has been committed, or (2) provision of the correct target language form or (3) metalinguistic information about the nature of the error, or any combination of these.

Lyster and Rantas (1997) taxonomy Lyster & Ranta (1997) distinguish the following types of corrective feedback occurring in French immersion classrooms in Canada: Explicit correction – this refers to the explicit provision of the correct form together with an explicit indication that what the learner said was incorrect. Recasts – a reformulation of all or part of a learners utterance, minus the error. Clarification requests – an indication that the learners utterance has been misunderstood (e.g. pardon?) Metalinguistic feedback – comments, information or questions related to the well-formedness of the learners utterance without explicitly providing the correct form. Elicitation – an attempt to directly elicit the correct form from the learner (e.g. prompts involving partial repetition of the learners utterance with a blank for the learner to complete). Repetition – repetition of the learners utterance with or without highlighting the error.

Uptake Uptake refers to the learners utterance that imemdiately follows the teachers feedback and that constitutes a reaction in some way to the teachers intention to draw to some aspect of the learners initial utterance. Uptake can take the form of needs repair (unsuccessful) or repair (successful). Successful uptake is indicative of noticing. However, uptake cannot be viewed as a measure of acquisition. Uptake refers to the learners utterance that imemdiately follows the teachers feedback and that constitutes a reaction in some way to the teachers intention to draw to some aspect of the learners initial utterance. Uptake can take the form of needs repair (unsuccessful) or repair (successful). Successful uptake is indicative of noticing. However, uptake cannot be viewed as a measure of acquisition.

Key Issues (1) What role does corrective feedback play in L2 acquiisition? What role does corrective feedback play in L2 acquiisition? Negative evidence - this arises when the feedback signals that the learners utterance contains an error Negative evidence - this arises when the feedback signals that the learners utterance contains an error Positive evidence - this arises when the feedback shows the learner what the correct form of his/her error is. Positive evidence - this arises when the feedback shows the learner what the correct form of his/her error is.

Key Issues (2) What type of corrective feedback works best for language acquisition? What type of corrective feedback works best for language acquisition? Implicit feedback Implicit feedback Explicit feedback Explicit feedback

Key Issues (3) What role do individual differences play in the effect that corrective feedback What role do individual differences play in the effect that corrective feedback has on acquisition? has on acquisition? Cognitive factors (e.g. language aptitude/ working memory) Cognitive factors (e.g. language aptitude/ working memory) Affective factors (e.g. motivation/ anxiety/ personality) Affective factors (e.g. motivation/ anxiety/ personality)