Far Detector Performance and Calibration

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

VETO Analysis Update Michael Wood University of Massachusetts, Amherst Outline Introduction and basics Reconstruction packages Efficiencies Simulation.

Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.

LI Gain Curves Peter Litchfield Calibration Workshop, 6 th September 2005  Beginning to understand the LI system  Beginning to understand the software.

Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?

30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.

Beamline Takashi Kobayashi 1 Global Analysis Meeting Nov. 29, 2007.

Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.

Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.

Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University June 2004.

Partially Contained Atmospheric Neutrino Analysis Andy Blake Cambridge University March 2004.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.

GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 Analyses of Muon Calibration Data Xin Chen.

FD Timing Calibration Status Guardians of the FD timing calibration: –John Chapman, graduation in ~3-6 months. –Andy Blake, renewal of contract (or redundancy!)

Far Detector Timing Calibration Andy Blake Cambridge University November 2004.

NuMI MINOS The MINOS Far Detector Cosmic Rays and their neutrinos are being collected now. How does this work, and of what use is this data? Alec Habig,

ECAL TIMING. 20/04/092 Ratios’ Method Basics Position of pulse maximum parameterized using the ratio of two consecutive samples, i.e., R = A(t)/A(t+1)

The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,

STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes, July2002 SVT Analysis/Status Update Jun Takahashi – University of Sao Paulo.

Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.

Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2

The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.

Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.

PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.

14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.

Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.

Outrigger Timing Calibration & Reconstruction Milagro – 11/17/03 Shoup – 1 Purpose: To incorporate outrigger hits in event angle fitting Additionally incorporated.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.

Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.

1 N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Operation and performance of the NESTOR test detector.

The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.

STAR Collaboration Meeting Rene Bellwied – Wayne State University July 2004 SVT Calibration and STI tracking status An update of work since the SVT review.

Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.

N. Saoulidou Fermilab 1 Status & Update of track reconstruction in the Near Detector N. Saoulidou, Fermilab

July 19, 2006VLCW-06 Vancouver1 Scint/MAPMT Muon Prototype Operation Robert Abrams Indiana University.

1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.

Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.

ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.

PMT Calibration R.Sawada 7/Jan/2007. Time calibration Method was talked at the previous meeting. The problems which was shown before were because I used.

The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.

Some feedbacks from DRS data analysis (very preliminary) F. Scuri - I.N.F.N Sezione di Pisa RD52 – Collaboration Meeting – Pavia, March 12, 2013 F. Scuri.

FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.

Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.

Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.

TOF Emittance Pion Emittance Measurement with the TOFs? Mark Rayner 11 December 2008.

NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.

A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.

EAS Time Measurements P.K.Mohanty (On behalf of the GRAPES-3 Collaboration) 5 th Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, 14 – 16 December 2010 at CRL, Ooty.

Measurement of the Muon Charge Ratio in Cosmic Ray Events with the CMS Experiment at the LHC S. Marcellini, INFN Bologna – Italy on behalf of the CMS collaboration.

Mark Dorman – UCL/RAL – Calibration Workshop Talk Update on ND Strip-to-Strip Calibration Work Mark Dorman Calibration Workshop Fermilab, September 7-9.

Monitoring and Commissioning the NOνA Far Detector M. Baird 1, J. Bian 2, J. Coelho 4, G. Davies 3, M. Messier 1, M. Muether 5, J. Musser 1 and D. Rocco.

Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.

E. W. Grashorn, for the MINOS Collaboration Observation of Shadowing in the Underground Muon Flux in MINOS This poster was supported directly by the U.S.

DOE review slide 1 MINOS Software and Data Analysis Peter Litchfield, U. of Minnesota DOE Review, 28 th August 2003  Progress on Offline Software  Detector.

Results with the RPC system of OPERA and perspectives

TPC status report Marian Ivanov.

J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting

Marian Ivanov TPC status report.

A PID based approach for antineutrino selection

The Status of the Data Analysis of the Beam Test at FZJ

Status of the TOF Detector

Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003

Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017

on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration

The time-of-flight reconstruction & calibration

NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University

BESIII EMC electronics

Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST

SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies

Run5 Analysis of RHIC-pC Polarimeter

Beam Tests data vs Matlab simulations

Presentation transcript:

Far Detector Performance and Calibration J. Musser Indiana University Minneapolis, July 2002

Summary roughly 200 ‘plane trigger’ runs available for analysis in March-July time period. A small number of cabling errors have been ‘fixed’ in the plex, reprocessing complete (at IU) Improvement in time resolution: ~ 5% velocity resolution now observed. Primary Data Analysis/Reconstruction Activities Calibration Constant Refinement/Stability Studies Demultiplexing Optimization Detector Aligmment Studies Up-going Muon Searches Contained Event Analyses The Future

Calibrations (1) Timing T0s: Independent determination by Lee, Musser, Rebel,Tardiff. Timewalk: Independent determination by Lee, Musser. Studies indicate that calibrations hold at better than 1 ns over the March-July time period. Calibration quality is sufficiently good at this time to consider batch data processing and production of DSTs.

T0 Calibration T0s vs Channel -15 ns < T0 < 15 ns Strip Meantime Timing Residual s= 2.5 ns L/R strip timing vs track position predicts 2.2 ns.

TimeWalk Calibration Pulse-height dependent tail on time residuals - correctable by time walk correction.

Time Walk Correction Mean Time Residual (ns) ADC T' = T - C1/(C2+ADC^1.2) ADC

T0 Stability T0 differences between two data sets separated by 2 months.

T0 Stability (2) Stability is better than 1 ns over this period. However, some statistically significant differences are seen.

Velocity Resolution/Stability Average 1/b RMS vs run, from March to the present. RMS is stable at 8% Average muon 1/b vs run, from March to the present. Average is stable to much better than 1%.

Calibrations (2) Pulse Height Strip Attenuation (mapper data) Inter-strip Normalization Using Muons Stopping Muons Inter-Detector Normalization

Muon Pulse Height Distribution Far Detector Data - Single End Blue: Raw Green: Clear Fiber Atten. Yellow: Strip Atten. Red: Path Length. Black: Inter-Strip Norm.

Inter-Strip Normalization # Events Used in Calibration vs Plane Inter-Strip Normalization Factor Distribution (23% strip-strip gain variations)

Inter-Strip Normalization Mean Resp. vs Plane Raw Mean Resp. vs Plane Corrected

Time Stability of Strip Response*PMT Gain Restricted to first 120 planes (those planes instrumented for entire period under consideration (March 15-July 1) Response is stable to better than 1%

Stopping Muon Calibration

Demuxing Optimization Optimization of ‘IU’ demuxer is ongoing, all pathological events sent to B. Rebel. UMN group is working on an alternative demuxer, based on ‘global’ event analysis (rather than event swimming, as in IU code) Status will be reported in this meeting.

Detector Alignment SM1 will be energized in the near future. This makes detector alignment studies very timely. There is now a group of people actively working on this. Results will be presented by Nelson, Lee, Boehnlein, Becker, and Viren at this meeting.

Alignment Using Muons (Post Nicolai) Work Presented in 6/02 by R. Lee Single Strip Tracking Uncertainty is ~ 2.3 mm.

Alignment (2) Residual vs Plane - Outlier Planes Identified (some associated with cabling errors)

Upgoing Muons Searches for upgoing muons being conducted by Rebel, Musser, Lee, and Tardiff. ~ 6 candidate events (in my analysis) Data from March to July 1 now processed.

Muon Velocity Distribution

Candidate Events

Horizontal Muon

Fully Contained Up-going Event

Contained Events Most of this work is being conducted by Roy in conjunction with veto shield study. Expect ~ 0.7 fully contained, reconstructed events in this data set.

Contained Event Candidate

Contained Event Candidate 2

Angular Distributions - Signal & Background

The Future The state of calibrations and reconstruction is consistent with moving towards batch processing of data, and generation of DSTs. Broader participation in reconstruction and analysis is highly desirable. The following steps will be taken to assist in this - thoughts on how we can do better are appreciated: Maintainance of a ‘needed task list’ on MINOS web site. Improve documentation for reconstruction software. Begin batch data processing, making DSTs available to general users.