19 - Full time faculty completed the survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Successful strategies for improving outcomes through quality assessment and evaluation of programs Leadership Conference Winston Salem, NC June
Advertisements

WCDGS 2013 – Victoria, BC Learning Outcomes and Assessment Learning Outcome - A learning outcome is an area of knowledge, practical skill, area of professional.
Service Learning through Community Inquiry: A Campus-Community Partnership Robin Ringstad Valerie Leyva John Garcia Kelvin Jasek-Rysdahl California State.
NWIC Shared Governance Survey January Number of Reponses to the Survey The primary groups surveyed were administrators on the NWIC Leadership Team,
Welcome.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
NWIC Teaching and Learning Environment Survey Results 38 faculty completed the survey Survey taken June 10-July 1, administrators completed the.
“Technology is Changing Higher Education…” Develop scalable institutional models Need for instructional support staff that are skilled beyond technology.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Student Development – Part I Student Development Division Meeting SUNY Oneonta May 9, 2008.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Social work specialists get the following knowledge: - psychology, pedagogics, philosophy, law; - information about modern political, social, and economic.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Does Your Academic Program Make a Difference? Knowing What Your Students Learned Rosslyn M. Smith (moderator) Katherine A. Austin Valerie Osland Paton.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.
A Critical Friend: Peer Review of Teaching at AUS Daniel Kirk Daniel Kirk: Oct 2007.
The Association of Spiritual Care professional of Quebec Current situation 2016.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Full-time Respondents
Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program
The Power of Supplemental Instruction (SI)
Generational Differences in the Workforce
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Going Beyond Course Design: Implementing Online Delivery Standards
The Role of Students in the QA System in Kazakhstan: IAAR Experience
Finding/Creating Meaning in SLO Assessment
Institutional Student Learning Outcome Assessment Report Fall 2015 Assessment Cycle
Learning Resource Center
COE Assessment The “Then” and “Now”.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
The IAGD Mission is to improve
Graduate Student Professional Development
HERE Seminar “Universities and social engagement”
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
Curriculum and Accreditation
BEST PRACTICES IN LIBRARY INSTRUCTION FORUM November 7, 2007
Curriculum and Accreditation
Enhancing the Teaching and Learning Process
Los Angeles Mission College
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Conclusion & Implications
Team members and Institution(s)
recommendations for new teachers
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
Project Goals and Institutional Goals
AACRAO Update.
Institute for English Language Education
AVID College Completion Project
Bring the GWP to Your School
FSSE-G RESULTS Faculty Survey of Student Engagement for Graduate Student Instructors.
The International Indigenous RPL Collective:
Accreditation and curriculum
Adjunct, newbies, and non-tenure track faculty – oh my!
Statewide InD Coordinators/ December 2017
Liberal Education & America’s Promise (LEAP) Workshop
Survey Results to Date 9/2010
Effective Classroom Atmosphere
The Heart of Student Success
Career Pathway ENTRY ADVANCED MANAGER
Survey Results to Date 9/2010
New Prospect Elementary School
The Adjunct Faculty Certification Institute
2013 NSSE Results.
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Field monitoring Project (number and title)
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
QM Regional Conference Diana Zilberman, Ph.D. March 2018
The Washburn University Diversity Climate Survey Results
Evaluating Staff Development Initiatives
Presentation transcript:

19 - Full time faculty completed the survey NWIC Teaching and Learning Environment Survey Results 2009 – 2011 COMPARISONS 2009 19 - Full time faculty completed the survey (19 - part time faculty completed the survey) 11 - administrators completed the survey 2011 28 - Full time and prorata faculty completed the survey 16 - administrators completed the survey

Number of years at NWIC (2011 data only) FACULTY <1 year =6 (21.4%) 1-5 years = 7 (25%) 5-10 years = 8 (28.6%) >10 years = 7 (25%) ADMINISTRATORS <1 year = 0 (0%) 1-5 years = 4 (25%) 5-10 years = 5 (31.3%) >10 years = 7 (43.8%)

participated in academic program development since Sept. 2007 Faculty 2009 (FT only) Yes – 14 = 74% No – 5 = 26% 2011 (FT & PR) Yes – 14 = 50% No – 14 = 50% Administrators 2009 Yes – 4 = 36% No – 7 = 64% 2011 Yes – 11 = 69% No – 5 = 31%

ADMINISTRATORS FACULTY To what extent does the faculty believe that NWIC has established a teaching and learning philosophy? ADMINISTRATORS FACULTY 2009 Mean = 3.0 2011 Mean = 3.5 2009 Mean = 3.4 2011 Mean = 3.5 Note that all mean valurs on this and subsequent slides ignore “0” (I’m not sure) responses.

FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS To what extent does the faculty believe that NWIC faculty and administration have a shared teaching and learning philosophy? FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS 2009 Mean = 2.7 2011 Mean = 3.1 2009 Mean = 2.4 2011 Mean = 3.3

FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS To what extent does the administration believe that NWIC faculty and administration have a shared teaching and learning philosophy? FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS 2009 Mean = N/A (question not asked of faculty in 2009) 2011 Mean = 3.1 2009 Mean = 2.9 2011 Mean = 3.5

FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS To what extent does the faculty see a connection between the implementation of the assessment plan and improving teaching and learning at NWIC? FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS 2009 Mean = 3.6 2011 Mean = 3.5 2009 Mean = 3.4 2011 Mean = 3.3

FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS To what extent does the faculty have access to the cultural knowledge and tools necessary to teach at NWIC? FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS 2009 Mean = 2.7 2011 Mean = 2.9 2009 Mean = 3.6 2011 Mean = 3.1

FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS To what extent does the faculty have access to the general teaching and learning knowledge and tools necessary to teach at NWIC? FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS 2009 Mean = 4.0 2011 Mean = 3.5 2009 Mean = 3.7 2011 Mean = 4.0

FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS To what extent does the faculty at NWIC believe that it is involved in teaching and learning decisions? FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS 2009 Mean = 2.9 2011 Mean = 3.6 2009 Mean = 3.4 2011 Mean = 3.6

FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS To what extent do you feel confident in your skills in creating and implementing course assessments? FACULTY ADMINISTRATORS 2009 Mean = 3.9 2011 Mean = 4.0 2009 Mean = 3.2 2011 Mean = 3.1

How much do you believe that each of the following factors influence faculty when developing course content? 2011 – FACULTY 2009 - FACULTY improvement of student academic success affirmation of students' tribal identity inclusion of content that interests students inclusion of content that interests the instructor inclusion of content that relates tribal examples to academic content

How much do you believe that each of the following factors influence faculty when developing course content? 2009 – ADMINISTRATORS 2011 – ADMINISTRATORS improvement of student academic success affirmation of students' tribal identity inclusion of content that interests students inclusion of content that interests the instructor inclusion of content that relates tribal examples to academic content

How much do you believe that each of the following factors influence faculty when deciding what content to teach and what methods to use in teaching courses at NWIC? 2009 - FACULTY 2011 - FACULTY prior academic knowledge knowledge about NWIC student interests and how they learn academic standards comparable to those used at non-tribal higher education institutions Program outcomes developed at NWIC how well they address the NWIC institutional mission

2009 - ADMINISTRATORS 2011 - ADMINISTRATORS How much do you believe that each of the following factors influence faculty when deciding what content to teach and what methods to use in teaching courses at NWIC? 2009 - ADMINISTRATORS 2011 - ADMINISTRATORS prior academic knowledge knowledge about NWIC student interests and how they learn academic standards comparable to those used at non-tribal higher education institutions Program outcomes developed at NWIC how well they address the NWIC institutional mission

To what extent do you believe that each of the following factors influence faculty in finding out about and determining what native content to teach in courses? 2009 - FACULTY 2011 - FACULTY asking native students asking native faculty or staff asking community members attending professional meetings that contain native content reading literature with native content

2009 - ADMINISTRATORS 2011 - ADMINISTRATORS To what extent do you believe that each of the following factors influence faculty in finding out about and determining what native content to teach in courses? 2009 - ADMINISTRATORS 2011 - ADMINISTRATORS asking native students asking native faculty or staff asking community members attending professional meetings that contain native content reading literature with native content

How much influence do you believe that each of the following items would have on improving teaching and learning at NWIC? 2009 - FACULTY 2011 - FACULTY working with teaching and learning initiatives at other higher education institutions development of a faculty learning community, which could include regularly scheduled faculty dialogues creation of a physical teaching and learning center working with native education specialists development of bibliographies of useful teaching and learning tools and information

How much influence do you believe that each of the following items would have on improving teaching and learning at NWIC? 2009 - ADMINISTRATORS 2011 - ADMINISTRATORS working with teaching and learning initiatives at other higher education institutions development of a faculty learning community, which could include regularly scheduled faculty dialogues creation of a physical teaching and learning center working with native education specialists development of bibliographies of useful teaching and learning tools and information