WEBSITE EVALUATION Using C.A.R.S

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Publish or Pear-ish Moving through research in the 21 st century Michael DavisMillard West Photo from:

Advertisements

Evaluating Internet Research Sources Dennis LeForce ENG2A Kingman High School (Source: Robert Harris June 15, 2007)

Reading Comprehension Standard 2.8 Evaluate the credibility of an author’s argument or defense of a claim by critiquing the relationship between generalizations.

Instructor: Bess A. Rose What examples of logic models have you found since the last class? Where did you find them?

Personal Project M5 2010/11 Introduction Peter Dunoon Personal Project/MYP Coordinator.

Cars Checklist Is your source credible? Credibility Accuracy Reasonableness Support.

Components of Rhetoric – Aristotle’s Triangle Speaker MessageAudience.

CARS Checklist Credibility – trustworthy Accuracy – up-to-date, factual, exact Reasonableness – fair, balanced, objective, reasoned Support – valid.

Internet Research Skills Prof. Dwyer IS112 Fall 2004.

IS112 – Class 01 Computer Organization and Programming Professor Catherine Dwyer.

IS112 Internet Research Skills Evaluating Internet Research Internet has quickly become primary medium for.

מידע באינטרנט: סיווג, איתור והערכה ניתן למצוא באינטרנט מידע מהסוגים הבאים : מידע כללי: מילונים ואנציקלופדיות כתובות דואר אלקטרוני וכתובות דואר רגילות מספרי.

EVALUATING INTERNET RESEARCH SOURCES GIVE CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE! HARRIS, ROBERT. "EVALUATING INTERNET RESEARCH SOURCES." EVALUATING INTERNET RESEARCH.

Evaluating Online Sources Clayton Hunter Michael Mitchell Adam Sheppard Nicole White.

Website Evaluation Using the internet for research.

LIBRARIES, DATABASES AND THE INTERNET. Why do we need Libraries? Credible Organized Selected In Depth Info.

Finding Reliable Sources. Credible in providing the information necessary for your topic Fair Objective Lacks biases/motives Quality control Identify.

Internet Research Evaluation AOS 272.  Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie 

Website Evaluation Using the internet for research.

Elisad Webpages Marianne van der Heijden november 2000.

Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library

CIL Training for the Trainers: Plan your search and search strategy - SABINET Marieta Buys 10 July 2007.

Plan your search and search strategy - CSA Marieta Buys 24 Jan 2008.

MVHS Research Projects Choosing Reputable Sources.

Library, Campus, and Internet Resources HS 1 Understanding Your Health.

Evaluating Internet Resources Why Evaluate? Identifying the Information Need Search Engines & Web Pages Evaluating Sources CARS Checklist Worksheet.

Three Pillars of Persuasion Establishing Rhetorical Techniques.

Web Sources How to evaluat ? Nowadays, web technologies grant fast access to a tremendous variety of sources, but they cannot help you decide by themselves.

C.A.R.S. AND THE INTERNET. Why is it important to evaluate websites? No rules about what can be posted on the Internet No quality standards for websites.

Evaluating Sources Using the CARS Checklist

EVALUATING ONLINE SOURCES. GOAL Identify criteria to evaluate websites. Evaluate websites to determine their usefulness for research & your own personal.

Introduction to Website Evaluation Patricia Heeter EME6415.

Internet Sources: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Evaluating Websites.

Today we’re going to talk about resources that you definitely know how to find… Websites.

History Fair Help. Evaluating Websites Is it Credible?

Myth Busting Distinguish between factual statements and inferences. Evaluate scientifically related claims against available evidence. Reject pseudoscience.

Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.

Evaluating Web Sources By Kathy West English II Research.

CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico

Using the Internet Welcome to the Library!. Research skills Week 7 Internet Just because you found it on the Internet, doesn’t mean it’s true.

Determining Reliable Websites For Research 4 Factors to Consider CARS:  Credibility: Can we believe the site?  Accuracy: Can we consider the information.

The CRAAP Way to Evaluate Credibility AP Capstone Research Mr. Linton.

A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5 TH EDITION Chapter 4 Ethical Public Speaking.

Identifying Reliable Websites

Evaluating Internet Research Sources

Evaluating Sources.

CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico

Determining Reliable Websites For Research

Title: ___________________________________________________

Using Credible Internet Sources

Evaluating Sources.

Credibility Accuracy Reasonableness Support

Introduction to Rhetoric

Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library

Plagiarism Your worst enemy in school.

Chapter 3: The Research Process

A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 4

Web Evaluation The C. R. A. A. P. Test.

Safe and Effective Web searchING

Evaluating Information

Credibility of Sources

Evaluating Websites Using CRAAP 

Lesson One Date: January 14th, 2019 Learning Targets:

ABC’s of Research.

When evaluating sources use the following methodology: OPVL

Use the CRAAP Test to Evaluate Information

Evaluating Internet Resources

Evaluating Websites The CRAAP Test: Don’t Surf the Net Without It! CRAAP Test: Meriam Library  California State University, Chico.

Presentation transcript:

WEBSITE EVALUATION Using C.A.R.S

C Credibility trustworthy source, author’s credentials, evidence of quality control, known or respected authority, organizational support. Goal: an authoritative source, a source that supplies some good evidence that allows you to trust it.

A Accuracy up to date, factual, detailed, exact, comprehensive, audience and purpose reflect intentions of completeness and accuracy. Goal: a source that is correct today (not yesterday), a source that gives the whole truth.

R Reasonableness fair, balanced, objective, reasoned, no conflict of interest, absence of fallacies or slanted tone. Goal: a source that engages the subject thoughtfully and reasonably, concerned with the truth.

S Support listed sources, contact information, available corroboration, claims supported, documentation supplied. Goal: a source that provides convincing evidence for the claims made, a source you can triangulate (find at least two other sources that support it).