DCOM-CORBA Comparison

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COM vs. CORBA.
Advertisements

Intro to COM What is it and how do I use it?. Objectives Teach the fundamentals of COM. Understand the reason for using it. Learn to make a simple in-process.
CS514: Intermediate Course in Operating Systems Professor Ken Birman Ben Atkin: TA Lecture 16 Oct. 19.
AP 01/01 Asynchronous Calls Standard COM+ model is completely synchronous –Emulates standard procedure calls –Problematic in distributed scenarios with.
1 Advanced Programming Topics - II Objectives:  Background  Remoting  Types of remoting  Marshalling  Farmatters  Channels.
A brief look at CORBA. What is CORBA Common Object Request Broker Architecture developed by OMG Combine benefits of OO and distributed computing Distributed.
Hadar Vorenshtein & Meital Levy Instructor yavgeni Rivkin.
Sockets  Defined as an “endpoint for communication.”  Concatenation of IP address + port.  Used for server-client communication.  Server waits for.
© Chinese University, CSE Dept. Distributed Systems / Distributed Systems Topic 4: RPCs vs. CORBA Dr. Michael R. Lyu Computer Science & Engineering.
DCOM Technology. What is DCOM? DCOM is just COM with a longer wire DCOM is just COM with a longer wire DCOM extends COM to support communication among.
DCOM Technology Şevket Duran Haşim Sak.
Copyright © 2003 ProsoftTraining. All rights reserved. Distributed Object Computing Using Java and CORBA.
CSIS0402 System Architecture Distributed Computing - Middleware Technology (2) K.P. Chow University of Hong Kong.
Understanding the CORBA Model. What is CORBA?  The Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) allows distributed applications to interoperate.
COM vs. CORBA Computer Science at Azusa Pacific University September 19, 2015 Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA 91702, Tel: (800) Department.
CS 390- Unix Programming Environment CS 390 Unix Programming Environment Topics to be covered: Distributed Computing Fundamentals.
Microsoft’s Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM) Jim Ries Updated 10/5/1999 A semi-technical overview.
COM/DCOM Implementation Basics of: Object creation and access Object Reuse Interface referencing.
DCOM-CORBA Comparison Operating Systems II Reference: P. Chung et al., DCOM and CORBA: side by side, step by step,and layer by layer, C++ Report.
COM and DCOM CS 562 February 27, Motivation Data Analyzer Resource Monitor int compute (…) { } int compute (…) { } Data Analyzer int compute (…)
CS 603 DCOM April 5, DCOM – What is it? Start with COM – Component Object Model –Language-independent object interface Add interprocess communication.
1 Distributed Systems Distributed Objects & Remote Invocation II (CORBA VS DCOM) Dr. Sunny Jeong. With Thanks to.
Information Management NTU Interprocess Communication and Middleware.
11 September 2008CIS 340 # 1 Topics To examine the variety of approaches to handle the middle- interaction (continued) 1.RPC-based systems 2.TP monitors.
Silberschatz, Galvin, and Gagne  1999 Applied Operating System Concepts Chapter 15: Distributed Communication Sockets Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Remote.
RMI Remote Method Invocation Distributed Object-based System and RPC Together 2-Jun-16.
Distributed Objects and Middleware. Sockets and Ports Source: G. Coulouris et al., Distributed Systems: Concepts and Design.
CS 501: Software Engineering Fall 1999 Lecture 12 System Architecture III Distributed Objects.
GAM666 – Introduction To Game Programming ● DirectX is implemented as a collection of COM objects ● To use a DirectX program, the user must have the correct.
Server-Side C++ Mapping Copyright © ZeroC, Inc. Ice Programming with C++ 6. Server-Side C++ Mapping.
COM / DCOM Xiaolan Lu Mingzhen Wang Dong Xie. Why COM / DCOM?  Challenges facing the software industry  Component software provides a solution  General.
Object Interaction: RMI and RPC 1. Overview 2 Distributed applications programming - distributed objects model - RMI, invocation semantics - RPC Products.
CORBA Antonio Vasquez, John Shelton, Nidia, Ruben.
Java Distributed Computing
Putting the Distributed into COM
Apartments and COM Threading Models
Prof. Leonardo Mostarda University of Camerino
Microsoft’s Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM)
Java Distributed Computing
Remote Method Invocation
What is RMI? Remote Method Invocation
Out-of-Process Components
COM: A Brief Introduction
Remote Method Invocation
COM: A Brief Introduction
Knowledge Byte In this section, you will learn about:
Programming Models for Distributed Application
CSE 451: Operating Systems Winter 2006 Module 20 Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Ed Lazowska Allen Center
Interpreter Style Examples
DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING
Lecture 4: RPC Remote Procedure Call Coulouris et al: Chapter 5
CSE 451: Operating Systems Autumn 2003 Lecture 16 RPC
CSE 451: Operating Systems Winter 2007 Module 20 Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Ed Lazowska Allen Center
Chapter 40 Remote Method Invocation
Lecture 4: RPC Remote Procedure Call CDK: Chapter 5
CSE 451: Operating Systems Winter 2004 Module 19 Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Ed Lazowska Allen Center
Remote method invocation (RMI)
CSE 451: Operating Systems Spring 2012 Module 22 Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Ed Lazowska Allen Center
CSE 451: Operating Systems Autumn 2009 Module 21 Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Ed Lazowska Allen Center
Chapter 46 Remote Method Invocation
Chapter 46 Remote Method Invocation
Out-of-Process Components
CORBA Programming B.Ramamurthy Chapter 3 5/2/2019.
CSE 451: Operating Systems Autumn 2010 Module 21 Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Ed Lazowska Allen Center
Java Remote Method Invocation
Middleware and ORB CS 314 Operating Systems
CSE 451: Operating Systems Winter 2003 Lecture 16 RPC
Lecture 7 ATL and Out-of-Process Components
Copyright 1999 B.Ramamurthy
CSE 451: Operating Systems Messaging and Remote Procedure Call (RPC)
Presentation transcript:

DCOM-CORBA Comparison Operating Systems II Reference: P. Chung et al., DCOM and CORBA: side by side, step by step,and layer by layer, C++ Report. http://www.research.att.com/~ymwang/papers/HTML/DCOMnCORBA/S.html

A COM object can have multiple interfaces each representing a different view of the object A COM client interacts with a COM object by obtaining a pointer to one of the object's interfaces and invoking methods through that pointer as if the object is in the client's address space DCOM vs CORBA

The client of a CORBA object acquires an object-reference and The core of CORBA is the Object Request Broker (ORB) that acts as the software bus over which objects interact with each other transparently The client of a CORBA object acquires an object-reference and uses it as a handle to make calls as if it is in the client's local address space. The ORB is responsible for facilitating the call DCOM vs CORBA

Both DCOM and CORBA provides client-server relations between objects The interface to a server is described using an IDL in both cases CORBA supports multiple inheritance at IDL level, DCOM does not DCOM however allows multiple interfaces to an object DCOM vs CORBA

Communication CORBA and DCOM uses RPC style of communication The client makes a call to the client stub (called proxy in DCOM) The stub marshals the parameters and sends it to the server At the server end, a server skeleton (called stub in DCOM) demarshals the message and makes the call DCOM vs CORBA

Sample application A Grid server maintains a two-dimensional grid of integers Two views to the grid: View One: Two methods: get and set to get and set grid point View Two: One method: reset to reset all grid points to a given value DCOM vs CORBA

The DCOM implementation uses two interfaces, one for each view Interfaces IGrid1 and IGrid2 The CORBA implementation uses multiple inheritance Interface grid1 supports get and set Interface grid2 supports reset Interface grid inherits from grid1 and grid2 DCOM vs CORBA

DCOM IDL Each interface and class has GUIDs // uuid and definition of IGrid1 [ object, uuid(3CFDB283-CCC5-11D0-BA0B-00A0C90DF8BC), helpstring("IGrid1 Interface"), pointer_default(unique) ] interface IGrid1 : IUnknown { import "unknwn.idl"; HRESULT get([in] SHORT n, [in] SHORT m, [out] LONG *value); HRESULT set([in] SHORT n, [in] SHORT m, [in] LONG value); }; // uuid and definition of IGrid2 [ object, uuid(3CFDB284-CCC5-11D0-BA0B-00A0C90DF8BC), helpstring("IGrid2 Interface"), interface IGrid2 : IUnknown { HRESULT reset([in] LONG value); Each interface and class has GUIDs DCOM vs CORBA

multiple views for Grid DCOM IDL (continued) // uuid and definition of type library [ uuid(3CFDB281-CCC5-11D0-BA0B-00A0C90DF8BC), version(1.0), helpstring("grid 1.0 Type Library) ] library GRIDLib { importlib("stdole32.tlb"); // uuid and definition of class [ uuid(3CFDB287-CCC5-11D0-BA0B-00A0C90DF8BC), helpstring("Grid Class") // multiple interfaces coclass CGrid { [default] interface IGrid1; interface IGrid2; }; multiple views for Grid DCOM vs CORBA

CORBA IDL interface grid1 { long get(in short n, in short m); void set(in short n, in short m, in long value); }; interface grid2 void reset(in long value); // multiple inheritance of interfaces interface grid: grid1, grid2 DCOM vs CORBA

DCOM server class definition (cgrid.h) #include "grid.h" // IDL-generated interface header file class CGrid : public IGrid1, public IGrid2 { public: // IUnknown STDMETHODIMP QueryInterface(REFIID riid, void** ppv); STDMETHODIMP_(ULONG) AddRef(void) { return InterlockedIncrement(&m_cRef); } STDMETHODIMP_(ULONG) Release(void) { if (InterlockedDecrement(&m_cRef) == 0) { delete this; return 0; } return 1; } // IGrid1 STDMETHODIMP get(IN SHORT n, IN SHORT m, OUT LONG *value); STDMETHODIMP set(IN SHORT n, IN SHORT m, IN LONG value); // IGrid2 STDMETHODIMP reset(IN LONG value); // create and destroy methods, and private declarations are not shown } DCOM vs CORBA

CORBA server class definition (grid_i.h) #include "grid.hh" // IDL-generated interface header file class grid_i : public gridBOAImpl { public: virtual CORBA::Long get(CORBA::Short n, CORBA::Short m, CORBA::Environment &env); virtual void set(CORBA::Short n, CORBA::Short m, CORBA::Long value, CORBA::Environment &env); virtual void reset(CORBA::Long value, grid_i(CORBA::Short h, CORBA::Short w); virtual ~grid_i(); private: CORBA::Long **m_a; CORBA::Short m_height, m_width; }; DCOM vs CORBA

DCOM Server Implementation #include "cgrid.h" STDMETHODIMP CGrid::QueryInterface(REFIID riid, void** ppv) { if (riid == IID_IUnknown || riid == IID_IGrid1) *ppv = (IGrid1*) this; else if (riid == IID_IGrid2) *ppv = (IGrid2*) this; else { *ppv = NULL; return E_NOINTERFACE; } AddRef(); return S_OK; } STDMETHODIMP CGrid::get(IN SHORT n, IN SHORT m, OUT LONG* value) { *value = m_a[n][m]; return S_OK; extern HANDLE hevtDone; CGrid::~CGrid () { for (int i=0; i < m_height; i++) delete[] m_a[i]; delete[] m_a; SetEvent(hevtDone); DCOM Server Implementation create, set, reset method implementations are not shown DCOM vs CORBA

CORBA Server Implementation #include "grid_i.h" CORBA::Long grid_i::get(CORBA::Short n, CORBA::Short m, CORBA::Environment &) { return m_a[n][m]; } void grid_i::set(CORBA::Short n, CORBA::Short m, CORBA::Long value, CORBA::Environment &) { m_a[n][m] = value; void grid_i::reset(CORBA::Long value, CORBA::Environment &) { short n, m; for (n = 0; n < m_height; n++) for (m = 0; m < m_width; m++) m_a[n][m]=value; return; // create and delete not shown DCOM vs CORBA

DCOM Server main program HANDLE hevtDone; void main() { // Event used to signal this main thread hevtDone = CreateEvent(NULL, FALSE, FALSE, NULL); hr = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_MULTITHREADED); CClassFactory* pcf = new CClassFactory; hr = CoRegisterClassObject(CLSID_CGrid, pcf, CLSCTX_SERVER, REGCLS_MULTIPLEUSE , &dwRegister); // Wait until the event is set by CGrid::~CGrid() WaitForSingleObject(hevtDone, INFINITE); CloseHandle(hevtDone); CoUninitialize(); } DCOM vs CORBA

CORBA Server main program int main() { // create a grid object using the implementation class grid_i grid_i ourGrid(100,100); try { // tell Orbix that we have completed the server's initialization: CORBA::Orbix.impl_is_ready("grid"); } catch (...) { cout << "Unexpected exception" << endl; exit(1); } DCOM vs CORBA

DCOM client program #include "grid.h" void main(int argc, char**argv) { IGrid1 *pIGrid1; IGrid2 *pIGrid2; LONG value; CoInitialize(NULL); // initialize COM CoCreateInstance(CLSID_CGrid, NULL, CLSCTX_SERVER, IID_IGrid1, (void**) &pIGrid1); pIGrid1->get(0, 0, &value); pIGrid1->QueryInterface(IID_IGrid2, (void**) &pIGrid2); pIGrid1->Release(); pIGrid2->reset(value+1); pIGrid2->Release(); CoUninitialize(); } DCOM vs CORBA

CORBA client program #include "grid.hh" void main (int argc, char **argv) { grid_var gridVar; CORBA::Long value; // bind to "grid" object; Orbix-specific gridVar = grid::_bind(":grid"); value = gridVar->get(0, 0); gridVar->reset(value+1); } DCOM vs CORBA

Registration In both CORBA and DCOM the servers need to be registered This establishes the mapping between the interface name and the path name (in CORBA), and the CLSID and the path name in DCOM DCOM uses registry (which is supported by the Window o/s) CORBA uses implementation repository DCOM vs CORBA

Observations DCOM: Client calls COM library's CoCreateInstance() with CLSID_Grid and IID_IGrid1 CORBA: Client calls client stub's bind DCOM: The client can get another interface (IID_IGrid2) of the same object using QueryInterface DCOM vs CORBA

DCOM Middle layer Upon receiving CoCreateInstance() call, COM library delegates the task to Service Control Manager (SCM) SCM tries to map CLSID_Grid to its server path name by consulting the registry If an instance does not exist, SCM creates an instance When the instance is created, COM creates an interface stub for IID_Grid1 interface Then SCM ferries the marshalled pointer back to the client side; COM on the client side creates a proxy for the interface and associates it the with the RPC channel to the stub COM library returns to the client an IID_IGrid1 pointer to the interface proxy pIGrid1 DCOM vs CORBA

CORBA middle layer Upon receiving bind() call, the client stub delegates the task to ORB ORB consults the implementation repository and activates the server Server instantiates all supported objects and creates an instance of the skeleton When the ORB ferries the object reference back to the client side, it creastes an instance of the proxy class and registers it in a proxy object table with its corresponding object reference Client stub returns to the client an object reference as gridVar DCOM vs CORBA