Jeong Mi Park, MD, Limin Yang, MD, PhD, Archana Laroia, MD, Edmund A

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breast Neoplasm In this section we will be discussing breast neoplasm.
Advertisements

Breast Imaging Made Brief and Simple
Normal Ultrasound Protocol Breast
In The Nam of God.
Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University
 Determining the Nature of a Breast Abnormality  It is a procedure that may be used to determine whether a lump is a cyst (sac containing fluid) or a.
MedPix Medical Image Database COW - Case of the Week Case Contributor: Russell A. Patterson Affiliation: Uniformed Services University.
The Breast Clinic Index case Year 2 Michaelmas term.
Introduction to Breast Imaging BREAST RAD LAB Directions: Please answer all the questions prior to interactive conference. 1.
Introduction to Clinical Radiology: The Breast
How will you approach the 35-year old, with a 2x2x2cm, firm, mobile, well-circumscribed non-tender mass on her R breast?
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Learning Cue Phrase Patterns from Radiology Reports Using a Genetic Algorithm Robert M. Patton, Ph.D.
Erwin Hernandez Seng Thai Phou Trang Pham Shane Manalang Y Dinh.
BREAST CANCER: Half a million women later… Amy Miglani M.D September 3, 2004.
MAMMOGRAM COLLAGE OF MEDICINE /RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT.
Figure 1: a 32-year-old woman presented with RT breast mass, MRI showed false positive diagnosis of cancer. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI, axial subtraction.
Case D Karmi Margaret G. Marcial. How will you approach the 35-year old, with a 2 x 2 x 2cm, firm, mobile, well-circumscribed non-tender mass on her R.
Application of the breast imaging reporting and data system final assessment system in sonography of palpable breast lesions and reconsideration of the.
BREAST IMAGING.
European Journal of Radiology
Invasive Lobular Cancer of the Breast: A Pictorial Essay of Imaging Findings on Mammography, Sonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging  Sarah L. Savaridas,
Breast Case 1 Jane McNicholas Consultant Oncoplastic Breast Surgeon
Ultrasonographic criteria for fine needle aspiration of nonpalpable thyroid nodules 1– 2cm in diameter  Ji Yang Kim, Soo Young Kim, Ki Ra Yang  European.
Diagnosis and Management of Benign, Atypical, and Indeterminate Breast Lesions Detected on Core Needle Biopsy  Lonzetta Neal, MD, Nicole P. Sandhu, MD,
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (July 2015)
Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy for breast mass: Preoperative predictors of invasive breast cancer  Ah Young.
Contrast-enhanced Dedicated Breast CT: Initial Clinical Experience
Example 7: (A,B) Diagnostic mammogram in 63-year-old woman who presented with a palpable mass in the left breast. CC and MLO views of the left breast shows.
Fig. 1. A 60-year-old woman with a palpable lump in right breast
Challenge in Breast imaging: volumetric analysis of tumor/breast ratio
Fig. 1. Screening breast MR images of 31-year-old woman with personal history of contralateral breast cancer.Breast MRI was reported as negative finding.
SON 2147 Sonography of the Breast
Example 4: (A,B) Standard CC and MLO views of the right breast in this screening mammogram for a 60-year-old woman who never had any prior mammograms.
Fig. 2. Screening breast MR images of 46-year-old woman with personal history of contralateral breast cancer.Breast MRI was reported as multiple benign.
Assessing the Impact of Incidental Findings in a Lung Cancer Screening Study by Using Low-dose Computed Tomography  Michael J. Kucharczyk, Ravi J. Menezes,
Occurrence and Positive Predictive Value of Additional Nonmass Findings for Risk Stratification of Breast Microcalcifications in Mammography  Marga B.
Is Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With “Possible Invasion” More Predictive of Invasive Carcinoma Than Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?  Tal Arazi-Kleinman, MD,
Variable Appearances of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Calcifications on Digital Mammography, Synthesized Mammography, and Tomosynthesis: A Pictorial Essay 
Diagnosis and Management of Benign, Atypical, and Indeterminate Breast Lesions Detected on Core Needle Biopsy  Lonzetta Neal, MD, Nicole P. Sandhu, MD,
Pathologic Upgrade Rates of High-Risk Breast Lesions on Digital Two-Dimensional vs Tomosynthesis Mammography  Leslie R. Lamb, MD, MSc, Manisha Bahl, MD,
Beyond Mammography: New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Screening
Imaging Approaches and Findings in the Reconstructed Breast: A Pictorial Essay  Anabel M. Scaranelo, MD, PhD, Bridgette Lord, RN, NP, MN, Riham Eiada,
Mammography and Breast Localization for the Interventionalist
Current Status of Breast Ultrasound
Scott J. Adams, MD, Rajan Rakheja, MD, Rhonda Bryce, MD, Paul S
Inflammatory Pseudotumours in the Abdomen and Pelvis: A Pictorial Essay  Tony Sedlic, MD, Elena P. Scali, MD, Wai-Kit Lee, MD, Sadhna Verma, MD, Silvia.
Imaging of Fibroepithelial Lesions: A Pictorial Essay
Benign Lesions That Mimic Thyroid Malignancy on Ultrasound
The Lung Reporting and Data System (LU-RADS): A Proposal for Computed Tomography Screening  Daria Manos, MD, Jean M. Seely, MD, Jana Taylor, MD, Joy Borgaonkar,
Priscilla J. Slanetz, MD, MPH, FACR, Shieh-Pei Wu, MD, Jeffrey B
Mammography and Breast Localization for the Interventionalist
Pathologic Upgrade Rates of High-Risk Breast Lesions on Digital Two-Dimensional vs Tomosynthesis Mammography  Leslie R. Lamb, MD, MSc, Manisha Bahl, MD,
Assessing the Impact of Incidental Findings in a Lung Cancer Screening Study by Using Low-dose Computed Tomography  Michael J. Kucharczyk, Ravi J. Menezes,
Pancreatic and Extrapancreatic Features in Autoimmune Pancreatitis
Dose-Length Product to Effective Dose Conversion Factors for Common Computed Tomography Examinations Based on Canadian Clinical Experience  Idris A. Elbakri,
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Breast Biopsies: Tips and Tricks
Avoiding Pitfalls in Mammographic Interpretation
Low-Grade Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Breast: Imaging and Histopathologic Characteristics of This Rare Disease  Elena P. Scali, MD, Rola H. Ali, MD,
Jeong Mi Park, MD, Limin Yang, MD, PhD, Archana Laroia, MD, Edmund A
Neety Panu, MD, FRCPC, Elizabeth Morris, MD 
Priscilla J. Slanetz, MD, MPH, FACR, Shieh-Pei Wu, MD, Jeffrey B
The Value of “Liver Windows” Settings in the Detection of Small Renal Cell Carcinomas on Unenhanced Computed Tomography  Kamal Sahi, MD, Stuart Jackson,
Comparison of inter- and intra-observer variability of breast density assessments using the fourth and fifth editions of Breast Imaging Reporting and.
Pancreatic Tuberculosis: Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography
Sensitivity of a Direct Computer-aided Detection System in Full-field Digital Mammography for Detection of Microcalcifications Not Associated with Mass.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: An Initial Experience in a Community Hospital  Paul Friedman, DO, Sean Enis, MD, Jeremy.
Diabetic Mastopathy Masquerading as Breast Cancer
Andreas Rimner, MD, Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, MD 
Pancreatic Tuberculosis: Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography
Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University
Presentation transcript:

Missed and/or Misinterpreted Lesions in Breast Ultrasound: Reasons and Solutions  Jeong Mi Park, MD, Limin Yang, MD, PhD, Archana Laroia, MD, Edmund A. Franken, MD, Laurie L. Fajardo, MD, MBA  Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal  Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 41-49 (February 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.002 Copyright © 2011 Canadian Association of Radiologists Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A 50-year-old woman. Screening mammogram. Outside craniocaudal (A) and mediolateral oblique (B) mammogram, showing a small suspicious lesion in the upper inner right breast (circle). (C and D) Focused transverse (C) and longitudinal (D) ultrasound (US) of upper inner right breast, showing a corresponding small isoechoic lesion (box). This lesion would have been easily missed on US if there were no mammographic correlation. Biopsy revealed invasive ductal carcinoma. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2011 62, 41-49DOI: (10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.002) Copyright © 2011 Canadian Association of Radiologists Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A 71-year-old woman with left nipple discharge. She had a right mastectomy in 1989. Her mother and cousin also had breast cancer. (A) Screening mammography, showing that a small focal asymmetry was identified on the left mammogram, lower left breast on mediolateral oblique (MLO) view (circle). Initially, a corresponding lesion was not identified on a craniocaudal (CC) view (not shown). (B) Mediolateral view confirms that the lesion is in the lower left breast (circle). Longitudinal (C) and transverse (D) ultrasound (US) of left lower breast finds a 5-mm suspicious mass at 7 o’clock, 2 cm from the nipple (circle). (E) CC spot compression view of the left medial breast identified a corresponding focal asymmetry (circle). US-guided core biopsy of the lesion, showed invasive ductal carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ. Postbiopsy CC and MLO mammograms (not shown) confirm the location of the lesion. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2011 62, 41-49DOI: (10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.002) Copyright © 2011 Canadian Association of Radiologists Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A 66-year-old woman with an abnormality on a screening mammography. Craniocaudal (CC) (A) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) (B) views of a screening mammogram, showing that a small focal asymmetry was identified in the right upper outer quadrant (circle). (C) Transverse ultrasound (US) of right upper outer quadrant finds a cyst at 10 o’clock. A decision was made to biopsy this area because of the suspicious mammographic finding. On the date of biopsy, repeated longitudinal (D) and transverse (E) US finds an ill-defined heterogeneous echoic lesion at 10 o’clock on the right breast, 7 cm from the nipple (arrows), slightly lateral to the previously seen cyst. US-guided core biopsy of this lesion, showed invasive lobular carcinoma. Postbiopsy CC and MLO mammograms (not shown) confirmed the location of the lesion. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2011 62, 41-49DOI: (10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.002) Copyright © 2011 Canadian Association of Radiologists Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 This circumscribed oval isodense mass (circle) is well seen on a mammogram (A) but difficult to recognize on ultrasound (US) because of its complete isoechogenicity (B and C, arrows). Real-time movement of the ultrasound transducer, shows the abrupt transition between this mass and the surrounding normal tissue. Minimal mass effect is also identified around the mass. US-guided core biopsy of this lesion, showed fibroadenoma. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2011 62, 41-49DOI: (10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.002) Copyright © 2011 Canadian Association of Radiologists Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A 53-year-old woman with a screening mammogram that was interpreted as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 2. The patient feels mass in her upper inner right breast a week later. Transverse (A) and longitudinal (B) ultrasound of the palpable mass, showing a heterogeneous echoic mass (box) in a background of heterogeneous parenchyma and numerous benign cystic and solid lesions. Retrospective review of craniocaudal (C) and mediolateral oblique (D) views of the screening mammogram identified the mass (circle). Biopsy result was invasive ductal carcinoma. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2011 62, 41-49DOI: (10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.002) Copyright © 2011 Canadian Association of Radiologists Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 A 44-year-old woman. Screening mammography. A focal asymmetry is seen on the mediolateral oblique view, which changes the shape on spot compression view (A) and is not correlated with any finding on the craniocaudal spot compression view (B). However, this was interpreted as a suspicious finding. (C) Transverse ultrasound (US) of the upper outer right breast, showing “suspicious” mass with posterior shadowing. Biopsy was recommended. A possible mass was palpated in the same area at the clinic and palpation-guided fine needle aspiration was performed, which showed benign breast and adipose tissue. (D) The patient returned for an US-guided biopsy. Repeated US with proper compression, showing only normal breast parenchyma. No significant change or abnormality was found on a follow-up US examination. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2011 62, 41-49DOI: (10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.002) Copyright © 2011 Canadian Association of Radiologists Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 A 57-year-old woman had a 3-cm circumscribed mass in the upper outer right breast on an outside mammogram. (A) Initial ultrasound (US) was interpreted as negative. How could a 3-cm mass be missed? On retrospective analysis, the anterior wall of the lesion was misinterpreted as chest wall (arrows) in this longitudinal US image. (B) On repeated US, the anechoic mass was seen at the bottom of the field (arrows). The cystic mass was completely aspirated by a needle and confirmed on a postaspiration mammogram (not shown). Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2011 62, 41-49DOI: (10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.002) Copyright © 2011 Canadian Association of Radiologists Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 A 78-year-old woman with a history of bilateral lumpectomy and radiation therapy had a yearly screening mammogram. Craniocaudal (CC) view (A) of the right breast identified a new focal asymmetry (circle), however, the lesion was not identified on the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view (B). (C) Transverse ultrasound (US) of the subareolar area, showing postoperative changes at 12 o’clock only. Six months later, the lesion is well seen on both CC (D) and MLO (E) views, and the location is lower outer quadrant (circles). Repeated transverse (F) and longitudinal (G) US of the lower outer quadrant, showing a suspicious lesion (circle). Biopsy revealed recurrent invasive ductal carcinoma. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2011 62, 41-49DOI: (10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.002) Copyright © 2011 Canadian Association of Radiologists Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 (A) There are 3 lesions in this right breast. If one measures the distance from the nipple for each lesion on this right craniocaudal (CC) mammogram, then the white lesion is the closest and the plaid-patterned lesion is the farthest. However, all 3 lesions are located at the same distance from the nipple on ultrasound (US) (solid arrow on US image). Only the depth of the lesions differs from one another on US. (B) On this right CC mammogram, both lesions are at the same distance from the nipple, but the white lesion is far lateral from the nipple on US, whereas the plaid-patterned lesion is located in subareolar area. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2011 62, 41-49DOI: (10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.002) Copyright © 2011 Canadian Association of Radiologists Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 A 54-year-old woman with a history of leukopenia and splenectomy. (A) A computed tomography (CT), showing a round mass in the left breast that is interpreted as having slightly increased in size since the previous examination. Mammogram (not shown) does not find corresponding abnormality because of the very posterolateral location. (B) Longitudinal ultrasound (US) of left lower outer breast, showing a circumscribed anechoic mass with posterior shadowing and without Doppler flow. Short-term follow-up was recommended because of its growing nature on CT. (C) The patient returned in 3 months. Transverse US of the mass, showing significant growth of the mass, with irregularity. Biopsy result was invasive ductal carcinoma. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2011 62, 41-49DOI: (10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.002) Copyright © 2011 Canadian Association of Radiologists Terms and Conditions