UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructor Teaching Impact. University Writing Program 150 sections of required writing courses per semester, taught by Instructors and GTAs 33 Instructors–
Advertisements

THE DIVERGENT BUT COMPLEMENTARY PATHS OF COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM REVIEW AND STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT A Case Study Presentation At the 2004 AAHE.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Summer Institute, May16,  Peer review process that evaluates educational programs and services for quality.  Transferability of credit hours.
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Strategic Planning: Theme 1 – Develop and Inspire Creative Thinkers and Leaders and Life-long Success Lever 1.1 : Require all undergraduate students to.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
College of Business California State University, Monterey Bay February 28, 2014 College of Business Committee Structure: Preparing for AACSB.
August 15th 2007 Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes by Kirby Hayes.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report January 2009 WASC Accreditation.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
Course Substitutions & Course Waivers Proposed New Policy AGC 1 st Presentation September 08, 2015 Patti Trepkowski and Diane Patrick.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
Maximum Student Credit Hour Load per Semester POLICY 8.22.
Understanding Assessment Projects. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate the requirements.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
A University-Wide Approach to Inclusion: A Model Bridging Teaching, Learning and Accessibility.
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Finding balance between academic requirements and accommodations
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Update – January 2016
Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment
Academic Affairs Update Monday, October 17, 2016
SUNY Applied Learning Resolution.
Curriculum and Accreditation
Curriculum and Accreditation
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
HLC
HLC/Strategic Planning Update Professional Development and Assessment Day August 15, 2017.
Proposed Policy on Undergraduate Certificates
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Donna Kragt: HLC Liaison April 11, 2017
Charge from Provost The UMKC General Education Program 2.0 Task Force is charged with the review and re-design of the University’s General Education Program.
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Student Activities Centralized Training
Accreditation and curriculum
HLC Update: Progress and Preparation for the Visit
General Education Redesign Task Force
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Ohio Guaranteed pathways and ODHE General education forum updates WSU Faculty Senate September 10, 2018 Carl Brun ext 2155.
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Shazna Buksh, School of Social Sciences
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Reaccreditation and Illinois
Task Force Orientation
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Fort Valley State University
Assessment at Northeastern University
Cyclical Program Review
Core Concepts of the Standards 2019
CSUN Re-Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016

Context – Finalizing work on campus strategic plan – Student Success – retention, graduation and student learning/achievement    Previous work on General Education at UMKC – http://www.umkc.edu/provost/gen-ed/default.asp

Prior to university revision of general education program – MDHE/CBHE Matrix - http://www.umkc.edu/provost/committees/general-education-advisory-task-force/matrix.asp

Campus committees working on General Education revision at UMKC – General Education Advisory Task Force General Education Oversight Committee General Education Implementation Committee General Education Curriculum Committee Faculty Senate Approval and all campus Faculty vote on General Education Student Learning Outcomes Faculty Senate Approval of General Education Curricular Model

CAMPUS GENERAL EDUCATION WORK IMPACTED BY – American Association for Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) – http://www.aacu.org/leap Higher Learning Commission – HLC (institutional accrediting body) - Criteria for Accreditation Assumed Practices UMKC HLC Accreditation Review

HLC Criteria for Accreditation- CRRT.B.10.010 (2013) http://download.hlcommission.org/policy/CRRT.B.10.010.pdf Criterion 3 – Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Core Component 3.A.2, 3.B.1, 3.B.2, 3.B.4 Core Component 4.A.1, 4.B, 4.B.1, 4.B.3, 4.B.4, 4.C

HLC Assumed Practices (Effective September, 2017) B. Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support h. The institution maintains a minimum requirement for general education for all of its undergraduate programs whether through a traditional practice of distributed curricula (15 semester credits for AAS degrees, 24 for AS or AA degrees, and 30 for bachelor’s degrees) or through integrated, embedded, interdisciplinary, or other accepted models that demonstrate a minimum requirement equivalent to the distributed model. Any variation is explained and justified.

UMKC HLC Accreditation review – http://www. umkc UMKC HLC Accreditation review – http://www.umkc.edu/Accreditation/documents/HLC_2009 _FinalReport.pdf Assurance section – pg. 13 – “ … improve innovation and relevance of the general education program content that is supported by clear learning outcomes. Therefore, it is advisable for the university to actively engage in discussion and revision of the general education curriculum to ensure its relevance to skills needed to function in contemporary society.”

Accreditation review cont. Assurance section – pg. 19 – “Focus Visit on Assessment during Spring 2013. A Focused visit is required following the development and implementation of an effective assessment plan which will provide useful data to guide and evaluate learning outcomes. The Team recommends that the visit occur in May-June of 2013 and will ensure that an effective assessment process is in place and used. During the last comprehensive re-accreditation (1999), assessment of student learning procedures were found rudimentary and ineffective in informing classroom and curricular improvements. Ten years later these problems persist.”

Accreditation review cont. Assurance section – pg. 21 - “Focus visit team members visit should reveal 1.) a university wide assessment plan linked to the completion of the three phases found in the UMKC Assessment Plan including a timeline for implementation; 2.) General Education learning outcomes clearly stated and documented at the University and academic-unit levels; 3.) Documentation of student learning activities and their application to classroom, program, graduate studies, and professional fields should be available for examination; 4.) Integration of Student Assessment with Program evaluation activities with illustrations of application to improve learning; 5.) Collaboration between academic units to ascertain student learning linked to student matriculation in program stages. This should include the connections between IR, Assessment, and Academic Affairs review; 6.) centralization of assessment activities through the Institutional Assessment office.”

Accreditation review cont. Advancement section – pg. 9 & 10 – “6. Review and revision of the university general education program requirements and the development of an associated assessment plan; …”

Missouri Department of Higher Education (MDHE) – Statewide Transfer Articulation agreement http://dhe.mo.gov/files/policies/credittransfer.pdf “42 Hour Block” transfer