Consensus Statement: Chromosomal Microarray Is a First-Tier Clinical Diagnostic Test for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities or Congenital Anomalies 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Variability in interpreting and reporting copy number changes detected by array-based techology in clinical laboratories K.D. Tsuchiya 1, L.G. Shaffer.
Advertisements

Department of Human Genetics
Recurrent Reciprocal Genomic Rearrangements of 17q12 Are Associated with Renal Disease, Diabetes, and Epilepsy  Heather C. Mefford, Séverine Clauin, Andrew.
Christopher J. Klein, MD, Tatiana M. Foroud, PhD 
A Genome-Wide High-Resolution Array-CGH Analysis of Cutaneous Melanoma and Comparison of Array-CGH to FISH in Diagnostic Evaluation  Lu Wang, Mamta Rao,
Whole-Genome Scanning by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization as a Clinical Tool for Risk Assessment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia  Shelly R. Gunn,
Christopher J. Klein, MD, Tatiana M. Foroud, PhD 
Helen V. Firth, Shola M. Richards, A
Microarray-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Using Sex-Matched Reference DNA Provides Greater Sensitivity for Detection of Sex Chromosome Imbalances.
Highly heterogeneous genomic landscape of uterine leiomyomas by whole exome sequencing and genome-wide arrays  Svetlana A. Yatsenko, M.D., Priya Mittal,
Recurrent CNVs Disrupt Three Candidate Genes in Schizophrenia Patients
Refinement and Discovery of New Hotspots of Copy-Number Variation Associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder  Santhosh Girirajan, Megan Y. Dennis, Carl.
Resolving the Breakpoints of the 17q21
Genomic Sequencing Procedure Microcosting Analysis and Health Economic Cost- Impact Analysis  Linda M. Sabatini, Charles Mathews, Devon Ptak, Shivang Doshi,
Diagnostic Genome Profiling in Mental Retardation
Michael H. Duyzend, Xander Nuttle, Bradley P
Transmission Disequilibrium of Small CNVs in Simplex Autism
Copy Number Variation Sequencing for Comprehensive Diagnosis of Chromosome Disease Syndromes  Desheng Liang, Ying Peng, Weigang Lv, Linbei Deng, Yanghui.
Whole-Genome Scanning by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization as a Clinical Tool for Risk Assessment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia  Shelly R. Gunn,
Addition of H19 ‘Loss of Methylation Testing’ for Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS) Increases the Diagnostic Yield  Jochen K. Lennerz, Robert J. Timmerman,
Contribution of Global Rare Copy-Number Variants to the Risk of Sporadic Congenital Heart Disease  Rachel Soemedi, Ian J. Wilson, Jamie Bentham, Rebecca.
Rare Deletions at the Neurexin 3 Locus in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Jennifer Kerkhof, Laila C
High-Resolution Mapping of Genotype-Phenotype Relationships in Cri du Chat Syndrome Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization  Xiaoxiao Zhang, Antoine.
Yu Jiang, Glen A. Satten, Yujun Han, Michael P. Epstein, Erin L
Rare Deletions at the Neurexin 3 Locus in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Autosomal-Dominant Microtia Linked to Five Tandem Copies of a Copy-Number- Variable Region at Chromosome 4p16  Irina Balikova, Kevin Martens, Cindy Melotte,
Daniel Moreno-De-Luca, Jennifer G. Mulle, Erin B. Kaminsky, Stephan J
Molecular Cytogenetic Evidence for a Common Breakpoint in the Largest Inverted Duplications of Chromosome 15  A.E. Wandstrat, J. Leana-Cox, L. Jenkins,
A Genome-Wide High-Resolution Array-CGH Analysis of Cutaneous Melanoma and Comparison of Array-CGH to FISH in Diagnostic Evaluation  Lu Wang, Mamta Rao,
A Systematic Comparison of Traditional and Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Genes in More Than 1000 Patients  Stephen.
Figure 2 Flowchart for investigation and diagnosis of Beckwith– Wiedemann syndrome Figure 2 | Flowchart for investigation and diagnosis of Beckwith– Wiedemann.
Microdeletions of 3q29 Confer High Risk for Schizophrenia
Kristina Allen-Brady, Peggy A. Norton, James M
Molecular Inversion Probe Array for the Genetic Evaluation of Stillbirth Using Formalin- Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue  Leslie R. Rowe, Harshwardhan.
Mechanism, Prevalence, and More Severe Neuropathy Phenotype of the Charcot- Marie-Tooth Type 1A Triplication  Pengfei Liu, Violet Gelowani, Feng Zhang,
Secondary Variants in Individuals Undergoing Exome Sequencing: Screening of 572 Individuals Identifies High-Penetrance Mutations in Cancer-Susceptibility.
Survival of Male Patients with Incontinentia Pigmenti Carrying a Lethal Mutation Can Be Explained by Somatic Mosaicism or Klinefelter Syndrome    The.
Bassem A. Bejjani, Lisa G. Shaffer 
Recurrent Reciprocal Genomic Rearrangements of 17q12 Are Associated with Renal Disease, Diabetes, and Epilepsy  Heather C. Mefford, Séverine Clauin, Andrew.
Value for Money? Array Genomic Hybridization for Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Causes of Intellectual Disability  Dean A. Regier, Jan M. Friedman, Carlo.
Volume 376, Issue 9750, Pages (October 2010)
Validation and Implementation of Targeted Capture and Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutation, Copy Number Variation, and Gene Rearrangement.
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Detects Chromosomal Abnormalities in Hematological Cancers That Are Not Detected by Conventional Cytogenetics 
A Novel Method for Creating Artificial Mutant Samples for Performance Evaluation and Quality Control in Clinical Molecular Genetics  Michael Jarvis, Ramaswamy.
Genomic Technologies and the New Era of Genomic Medicine
Disruption of Contactin 4 (CNTN4) Results in Developmental Delay and Other Features of 3p Deletion Syndrome  Thomas Fernandez, Thomas Morgan, Nicole Davis,
High-Throughput Analysis of Subtelomeric Chromosome Rearrangements by Use of Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization  Joris A. Veltman, Eric F.P.M.
Structural Variation of Chromosomes in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Limited Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Subchromosomal Abnormalities  Kitty K. Lo, Evangelia Karampetsou, Christopher Boustred,
Contribution of SHANK3 Mutations to Autism Spectrum Disorder
Large Clinically Consequential Imbalances Detected at the Breakpoints of Apparently Balanced and Inherited Chromosome Rearrangements  Sarah T. South,
Ryan McDaniell, Daniel M. Warthen, Pedro A
J. M. Friedman, Ágnes Baross, Allen D
Mechanisms for Nonrecurrent Genomic Rearrangements Associated with CMT1A or HNPP: Rare CNVs as a Cause for Missing Heritability  Feng Zhang, Pavel Seeman,
Molecular Analysis of a Deletion Hotspot in the NRXN1 Region Reveals the Involvement of Short Inverted Repeats in Deletion CNVs  Xiaoli Chen, Yiping Shen,
3q29 Microdeletion Syndrome: Clinical and Molecular Characterization of a New Syndrome  Lionel Willatt, James Cox, John Barber, Elisabet Dachs Cabanas,
The Variant inv(2)(p11.2q13) Is a Genuinely Recurrent Rearrangement but Displays Some Breakpoint Heterogeneity  Ina Fickelscher, Thomas Liehr, Kathryn.
Highly heterogeneous genomic landscape of uterine leiomyomas by whole exome sequencing and genome-wide arrays  Svetlana A. Yatsenko, M.D., Priya Mittal,
Molecular cytogenetic analysis by genomic hybridization to determine the cause of recurrent miscarriage  Aurore Perrin, Ph.D., Bruno Delobel, M.D., Joris.
Mutations in CHEK2 Associated with Prostate Cancer Risk
SHANK1 Deletions in Males with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Exon Array CGH: Detection of Copy-Number Changes at the Resolution of Individual Exons in the Human Genome  Pawandeep Dhami, Alison J. Coffey, Stephen.
Harrison Brand, Ryan L. Collins, Carrie Hanscom, Jill A
Anupama Srinivasan, Diana W. Bianchi, Hui Huang, Amy J
Familial Mental Retardation Syndrome ATR-16 Due to an Inherited Cryptic Subtelomeric Translocation, t(3;16)(q29;p13.3)  Elke Holinski-Feder, Edwin Reyniers,
Addition of H19 ‘Loss of Methylation Testing’ for Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS) Increases the Diagnostic Yield  Jochen K. Lennerz, Robert J. Timmerman,
Familial Isolated Clubfoot Is Associated with Recurrent Chromosome 17q23.1q23.2 Microduplications Containing TBX4  David M. Alvarado, Hyuliya Aferol,
Development of a Novel Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for Carrier Screening in Old Order Amish and Mennonite Populations of Pennsylvania  Erin L. Crowgey,
High-Resolution Identification of Chromosomal Abnormalities Using Oligonucleotide Arrays Containing 116,204 SNPs  Howard R. Slater, Dione K. Bailey, Hua.
Presentation transcript:

Consensus Statement: Chromosomal Microarray Is a First-Tier Clinical Diagnostic Test for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities or Congenital Anomalies  David T. Miller, Margaret P. Adam, Swaroop Aradhya, Leslie G. Biesecker, Arthur R. Brothman, Nigel P. Carter, Deanna M. Church, John A. Crolla, Evan E. Eichler, Charles J. Epstein, W. Andrew Faucett, Lars Feuk, Jan M. Friedman, Ada Hamosh, Laird Jackson, Erin B. Kaminsky, Klaas Kok, Ian D. Krantz, Robert M. Kuhn, Charles Lee, James M. Ostell, Carla Rosenberg, Stephen W. Scherer, Nancy B. Spinner, Dimitri J. Stavropoulos, James H. Tepperberg, Erik C. Thorland, Joris R. Vermeesch, Darrel J. Waggoner, Michael S. Watson, Christa Lese Martin, David H. Ledbetter  The American Journal of Human Genetics  Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages 749-764 (May 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006 Copyright © 2010 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Examples of Genomic Imbalances Detected by a CMA but Not by G-Banded Karyotyping (A) A 10.9 Mb deletion, including more than 60 genes. The deletion includes the Williams-Beuren syndrome region at chromosome region 7q11 but extends beyond the typical breakpoints for this syndrome. The arrow is pointing to the deleted chromosome that was observed by retrospective analysis of G-banded slides. (B) A 7.2 Mb duplication on the long arm of chromosome 11. Again, the arrow is pointing to the chromosome that has the duplication shown by the darker G-positive band. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2010 86, 749-764DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006) Copyright © 2010 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Evolution of a Constitutional CMA Design (A) Early versions of array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) platforms used for constitutional cytogenetic testing targeted the subtelomeric and pericentromeric regions and defined microdeletion and microduplication syndromes.61,62 (B) Later, more extensive coverage was added at the subtelomeric and pericentromeric regions and included additional probes outside the targeted regions; this is so-called “backbone” coverage. (C) Higher-density backbone coverage or high-density genome-wide arrays provide essentially whole-genome coverage, yielding even higher detection rates.47 The American Journal of Human Genetics 2010 86, 749-764DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006) Copyright © 2010 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Algorithm for CMA Testing in Patients with Unexplained DD, MR, MCA, and ASD This algorithm assumes that the patient does not present with features of a recognizable syndrome or metabolic disorder or that tests have been negative for a suspected disorder. The first-tier test is a chromosomal copy-number array or CMA. If no copy-number changes are identified, or if only known CNVs that are known to be benign are identified, this testing is considered “normal” (left side of figure), and further clinical evaluation is warranted to determine whether other testing should be pursued on the basis of the clinical presentation. If a CNV is detected within a known, clinically relevant region or gene, or if the CNV is in the genomic backbone and meets recommended size and gene content guidelines, then the result is considered a pathogenic CNV and “abnormal” (right side of figure). For these cases, follow-up analyses include confirmation studies and determination of the mechanism of imbalance in the proband and parental analysis to determine recurrence risk. All other results are considered VOUS until parental analysis is performed to aid in the final clinical interpretation. After the parental analyses of “abnormal” and “VOUS” results, final results may be classified into three major categories: familial variant, abnormal with a low recurrence risk (RR), or abnormal with an increased RR. In addition, the final interpretation may remain VOUS in some instances, even after parental testing. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2010 86, 749-764DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006) Copyright © 2010 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions